What's new

"Productive for Pakistan’s cricketers to stay focused on the task at hand" : Fazeer Mohammed

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
"Productive for Pakistan’s cricketers to stay focused on the task at hand" : Fazeer Mohammed

Writing in his exclusive blog for PakPassion.net, Fazeer Mohammed offers some good advice to Pakistan cricketers as they begin their much awaited Test series against Australia.


Pakistan-test-Yasir-Shah.jpg


It wasn’t supposed to be like this.

Australia and Pakistan get their three-Test series underway with both sides’ very recent records pointing in the wrong direction.

A comprehensive victory in the final match of the rubber against South Africa under lights in Adelaide could not mask the general inadequacy of Steve Smith’s team after heavy losses in the first two fixtures gave the Proteas their third consecutive series triumph in a part of the world where it is generally considered extremely difficult for visiting sides to prevail.

That series defeat was preceded by an even more distressing performance in Sri Lanka, where the hosts thrashed Australia in all three Tests in a manner that has become commonplace for the Baggy Greens in Asia. It was bad enough to be hammered away from home, but to follow that up with another series loss in familiar surroundings merely confirms that this Australian side cannot be categorised as a world-beating one.

Unfortunately for Pakistan, they are following a similar downward trajectory since clinching the series against the West Indies in the United Arab Emirates at the end of October, and it will require a tremendous effort by the team, especially the leadership provided by captain Misbah ul Haq and coach Mickey Arthur, to turn the ship around at a venue where the visitors have been winless in four previous attempts, although the last of those encounters was 17 years ago.

It is difficult to avoid the belief that much of the Pakistanis’ predicament heading into the three-match contest is of their own making.

During the West Indies’ visit to the UAE, almost from the opening T20 International in Dubai on September 23, there seemed to be an unhealthy preoccupation with the Australian assignment at the end of the year, as if the intervening fixtures against the Caribbean squad and then in New Zealand were mere preliminaries to the great ambition of winning a Test series in Australia for the first time.

Of course the players and technical staff will dismiss any notion that they were taking their eyes off the ball, although the evidence from the third Test in Sharjah onwards appears to tell a very different story.

As well as the West Indies played to earn their first Test win over Pakistan away from home for 26 years, a combination of careless shots, dropped catches and a distinguishable lack of intensity contributed to their demise. It is difficult to imagine the top-order batting looking so vulnerable to the short-pitched bowling of medium-pacer and captain Jason Holder during the first two Tests when the series was very much alive.

Then in New Zealand, where as we were often reminded Pakistan had not lost a Test series for 31 years, they were soundly and comprehensively whipped, the loss of nine wickets in a single session in Hamilton to complete the Black Caps’ 2-0 sweep emphasising just how ill-prepared the team was for that contest, technically and temperamentally.

Such is the congested nature of the international cricket calendar that there is no longer the benefit of two or three first-class matches leading into a Test series away from home, which would be enormously beneficial for teams making a massive transformation in terms of playing conditions from one series to another. So to go into the first Test in Christchurch without any real match practice after the lone warm-up fixture was ruined by rain spelt trouble for Pakistan, and so it proved.

Even the most accomplished cricketers need a bit of time to adapt to unfamiliar circumstances and to see the top-order batting almost clueless to the moving ball in seamer-friendly conditions was hardly surprising.

Has there been enough time and more importantly, enough preparation to put that nightmarish experience across the Tasman Sea behind them and be fully focused on coping with the Australians and the pink ball under the lights of The Gabba? Anyone can say anything, but it is by their performances on the field that the players will provide the definitive response.

One thing is almost guaranteed – there will be no shortage of intensity, either in the form of the actual cricket or the verbal exchanges in between deliveries from both sides. Yet that is where Pakistan can seize a decisive upper hand or capitulate under a barrage of bouncers and backchat.

As much as it is tempting to give the Aussies some of their own medicine and perpetuate this nonsense about “mental disintegration,” it would be far more beneficial and productive for Pakistan’s cricketers to stay focused on the task at hand. That is going to be tough enough without having to come up with an equally sharp or sarcastic response to something uttered by the opposition.

Verbal exchanges are petty distractions from a far more important objective.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excellent advice from Fazeer!

But good news is that even Australia are in a similar boat to Pakistan. Obviously the home advantage does matter but Pakistan really need to focus and forget about hype
 
Looking forward to the series. Hopefully we win this one, Dil Dil Pakistan.
 
After a long time, I am over excited about a test series of Pakistan. Eagerly waiting for this series to start.
 
Well being focused is one thing, having the skills to deliver another.
 
http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/92474/fazeer-mohammed-sorry-pakistan-safety

Sorry, Pakistan, it’s safety first

I SUPPOSE it’s appropriate, with the English FA Cup coming to town on Wednesday, to use a football analogy in referencing how sporting hyperbole is just so much nonsense in the real world and why the West Indies Cricket Board would be justified in rejecting an invitation for the reigning World Twenty20 holders to play two matches in Pakistan in March.

For long-suffering Liverpool supporters like myself – it’s now 27 years since they were last crowned league champions of England – Bill Shankly is a revered personality for his transformation of the club in the mid-1960s into an almost invincible juggernaut that dominated the domestic and European game for more than two decades.

Apart from his success as a football manager (meaning coach in every other part of the world), Shankly is also remembered for some famous quotes, like this one: “Some people think football is a matter of life and death. . . I can assure them it is much more serious than that.”

Of course, such attention-grabbing statements are really intended to stir emotions. No one should ever take them seriously, especially when you consider what the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) was asking its Caribbean counterparts to sanction as part of an apparent reciprocal arrangement, with the Pakistanis playing a couple of T20 Internationals against the West Indies in the United States before coming to the region for three One-Day Internationals and three Tests in April and May.

Fearful

While there may be a legitimate argument for other International Cricket Council (ICC) full member nations spending more time appreciating the peculiarities and complexities of the security situation in Pakistan, the simple fact of the matter is that the country remains vulnerable to elements who use murderous violence to destabilise the nation, ensuring as well that those from outside who are looking on, even with a sympathetic eye, will remain fearful for their safety should they be required to visit the sub-continental nation for any reason.

Yes, it is now almost eight years since the Sri Lankan team was attacked by armed militants in Lahore while on an official tour. However that singular event, in which six police officers and two civilians were killed, seven Sri Lankan players were injured and Pakistani umpire Ahsan Raza survived two bullets to the chest, banished for the foreseeable future the notion that extremists would never dare to attack international cricketers for fear of a nationwide backlash in that cricket-crazy country.

And while the security-conscious alienation ended for a fortnight in May, 2015 when Zimbabwe played three ODIs and two T20s to significant audiences of enthusiastic fans in Lahore – the same city of the attack on the Sri Lankans – Pakistan’s cricket authorities have found it to be a virtual “Mission Impossible,” so far, to persuade more prominent nations to tour there.

Solidarity

From the Pakistani perspective, this will obviously be seen as an unforgiving perspective by other ICC members, with counterparts like the West Indies expected to show the lead and offer a significant degree of solidarity in helping to bring full-fledged international cricket back to that part of the world on a regular basis.

At the end of the day, though, for all of the history of camaraderie and presumed solidarity in the face of the traditional official dominance of England and its predominantly white cricketing outposts of Australia, New Zealand and (before the end of Apartheid) South Africa, there is really only one issue for the WICB to consider: Are they satisfied beyond any reasonable doubt that their players would be safe in Pakistan?

If the answer is “no,” whether that conclusion is based on independent security assessments or information sourced directly by them, then it would be highly irresponsible for the administrators to sanction such a trip.

Even if the continuing extremist attacks in Pakistan, as isolated as they may appear, can be compartmentalised as incidents from which visiting cricketers can be confidently protected and insulated, what about the perception that if it happened once it could happen again?

While all evidence can be presented related to security details and other supporting systems, is it fair to expect cricketers to function in such an environment, assuming any would be willing to go in the first place?

For argument’s sake, let’s say that the WICB and West Indian cricketers should be willing to step out of their Caribbean cocoon and expose the supposed hypocrisy of the ICC’s power-brokers in their continued alienation of Pakistan as a venue, is it a risk worth taking?

Yes, it’s a risk just stepping out the front yard in some parts of our region. But that is everyday life, which merely emphasises that cricket, for all of its presumed importance, is nothing more than a pastime and a triviality not worth risking life or limb, however remote the prospect.
 
Back
Top