What's new

PTI a Terrorist Party or a Political Party

emranabbas

ODI Debutant
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Runs
11,920
What we saw on 9 May was not peaceful protest, PTI supporters attacked military installations, burned state property, and created chaos across Pakistan.

Now fast forward to today PTI supporters abroad are openly threatening Pakistan with violence, including bomb-style threats and calls for harm to state institutions.

Peaceful protest is a democratic right. Threats, attacks, and intimidation are not politics they are terror tactics.



@Major
 
Pakistan urges UK action over violent threat made against Field Marshal at PTI Bradford event

LONDON: Pakistan has formally asked the UK authorities to investigate a PTI activist inciting violence against Chief of Defence Forces (CDF) Field Marshal Asim Munir, including threats suggesting he should be killed in a car blast, outside Bradford Consulate during a protest two days ago called by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI).

The video was uploaded by "UKPTIOFFICIAL" account, in which a woman speaker can be heard making a car bomb violence threat against Field Marshal Munir, similar to the plane blast that took the life of General Zia ul Haq nearly three decades ago.


The Pakistan government has handed over the video and its transcript to the UK authorities — in Islamabad and London — expressing "grave concern regarding a serious and unprecedented misuse of British territory for activities that amount to incitement to terrorism, violence, and internal destabilisation of a sovereign state".



The letter points out that, "The official social media account of PTI UK has circulated video material in which individuals, while physically present in the United Kingdom, are openly calling for the assassination of Field Marshal Munir. This content is neither rhetorical nor political. It constitutes explicit incitement to murder and the glorification of violence against the senior military leadership of a UN Member State".

"Equally alarming is that this messaging is deliberately amplified to audiences inside Pakistan, with the clear intent of provoking unrest, street violence, and confrontation with state institutions. PTI-linked platforms operating from the UK have repeatedly issued calls encouraging disorder, agitation, and violent mobilisation within Pakistan— effectively seeking to instigate internal violence from abroad while remaining beyond domestic accountability.



"Such conduct violates international and domestic legal obligations, including but not limited to: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373, which obliges states to prevent and suppress incitement, recruitment, and support for terrorist and violent acts, including cross-border incitement; the UK Terrorism Act 2006, particularly provisions criminalising encouragement, glorification, and indirect incitement to terrorism and violence; and established principles of state responsibility, which prohibit the use of one state’s territory to incite violence, threaten stability, or undermine the constitutional order of another".



The letter states that Pakistan has, over the years, raised concerns regarding the repeated use of UK territory by individuals and groups engaged in militancy, separatism, and violent agitation against Pakistan.

"While such matters have strained bilateral confidence in the past, the present incident represents a qualitative escalation: the open call for assassination combined with sustained incitement to violence and unrest inside Pakistan. Freedom of expression does not include the freedom to incite murder or civil violence. Political activism does not extend to conspiracy or encouragement of bloodshed. Political asylum does not confer immunity to promote terrorism or destabilisation abroad."

The letter formally expects the UK government to: immediately identify, investigate, and prosecute individuals involved in issuing and amplifying calls for assassination and violence; investigate PTI UK and affiliated platforms for their role in inciting violence, hatred, and mass unrest inside Pakistan; take decisive legal and administrative measures, including prohibition where warranted, to prevent PTI from operating in the UK as a vehicle for incitement and destabilisation; ensure that UK territory is not used to inspire violence, disorder, or terrorism within Pakistan.

"This matter constitutes a serious test of the United Kingdom’s commitment to counter-terrorism obligations, international law, and responsible state conduct. Silence or inaction will not be interpreted as neutrality; it will be understood as tolerance, with serious consequences for trust and cooperation. Pakistan values its relationship with the United Kingdom and expects this issue to be addressed with urgency, clarity, and adherence to the rule of law," the letter adds.

 
Pakistan urges UK action over violent threat made against Field Marshal at PTI Bradford event

LONDON: Pakistan has formally asked the UK authorities to investigate a PTI activist inciting violence against Chief of Defence Forces (CDF) Field Marshal Asim Munir, including threats suggesting he should be killed in a car blast, outside Bradford Consulate during a protest two days ago called by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI).

The video was uploaded by "UKPTIOFFICIAL" account, in which a woman speaker can be heard making a car bomb violence threat against Field Marshal Munir, similar to the plane blast that took the life of General Zia ul Haq nearly three decades ago.


The Pakistan government has handed over the video and its transcript to the UK authorities — in Islamabad and London — expressing "grave concern regarding a serious and unprecedented misuse of British territory for activities that amount to incitement to terrorism, violence, and internal destabilisation of a sovereign state".



The letter points out that, "The official social media account of PTI UK has circulated video material in which individuals, while physically present in the United Kingdom, are openly calling for the assassination of Field Marshal Munir. This content is neither rhetorical nor political. It constitutes explicit incitement to murder and the glorification of violence against the senior military leadership of a UN Member State".

"Equally alarming is that this messaging is deliberately amplified to audiences inside Pakistan, with the clear intent of provoking unrest, street violence, and confrontation with state institutions. PTI-linked platforms operating from the UK have repeatedly issued calls encouraging disorder, agitation, and violent mobilisation within Pakistan— effectively seeking to instigate internal violence from abroad while remaining beyond domestic accountability.



"Such conduct violates international and domestic legal obligations, including but not limited to: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373, which obliges states to prevent and suppress incitement, recruitment, and support for terrorist and violent acts, including cross-border incitement; the UK Terrorism Act 2006, particularly provisions criminalising encouragement, glorification, and indirect incitement to terrorism and violence; and established principles of state responsibility, which prohibit the use of one state’s territory to incite violence, threaten stability, or undermine the constitutional order of another".



The letter states that Pakistan has, over the years, raised concerns regarding the repeated use of UK territory by individuals and groups engaged in militancy, separatism, and violent agitation against Pakistan.

"While such matters have strained bilateral confidence in the past, the present incident represents a qualitative escalation: the open call for assassination combined with sustained incitement to violence and unrest inside Pakistan. Freedom of expression does not include the freedom to incite murder or civil violence. Political activism does not extend to conspiracy or encouragement of bloodshed. Political asylum does not confer immunity to promote terrorism or destabilisation abroad."

The letter formally expects the UK government to: immediately identify, investigate, and prosecute individuals involved in issuing and amplifying calls for assassination and violence; investigate PTI UK and affiliated platforms for their role in inciting violence, hatred, and mass unrest inside Pakistan; take decisive legal and administrative measures, including prohibition where warranted, to prevent PTI from operating in the UK as a vehicle for incitement and destabilisation; ensure that UK territory is not used to inspire violence, disorder, or terrorism within Pakistan.

"This matter constitutes a serious test of the United Kingdom’s commitment to counter-terrorism obligations, international law, and responsible state conduct. Silence or inaction will not be interpreted as neutrality; it will be understood as tolerance, with serious consequences for trust and cooperation. Pakistan values its relationship with the United Kingdom and expects this issue to be addressed with urgency, clarity, and adherence to the rule of law," the letter adds.

London protest: government to take action against individuals, not PTI​


The federal government would not move against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf UK as an organisation but would pursue legal action against specific individuals involved in incitement and threats, if necessary, under UK law, according to the minister of state for interior.

“We will not go after PTI [Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf] UK, but we will target the individuals involved,” Talal Chaudhry told The Express Tribune here, clarifying the government’s position while responding to questions about possible legal steps in the United Kingdom.

The controversy arose after the now-deleted clip, uploaded from PTI UK’s verified account, showed a woman addressing protesters outside the Pakistani consulate in Bradford and referring to the army chief in the context of a possible car bomb attack, language the government says crossed the line from political criticism into a suggestion of violence.

The Pakistani government formally raised the matter with British authorities.

The move followed Islamabad’s decision to summon Acting British High Commissioner Matt Cannell on Friday, where the Foreign Office handed over a demarche condemning what it described as “incitement to violence” from UK soil.

Pakistan urged London to investigate the incident and initiate legal action under British law.

Talal said that Pakistan had already received a response from UK authorities, who conveyed that if any actionable matter existed, relevant material should be provided and it would be dealt with in accordance with UK law.

He reiterated that the issue was not related to freedom of expression or political disagreement. “This is not about expanded freedom of speech, nor is it a political consultation. Threats against the army chief do not fall under freedom of expression,” he said, adding that there was no concept of absolute or unchecked freedom anywhere in the world.

Referring to international law, he said the 2006 Anti-Terrorism Act and UN guidelines clearly prohibit the use of a sovereign country’s soil for terrorism or for inciting violent activities against another state. Such actions, he added, were also covered under the UN Charter.

The minister further pointed to PTI’s past record, including the events of May 9, stating that there was a documented history of incitement and violence linked to the party.

He warned that if the UK authorities failed to take action, Pakistan would pursue legal remedies within the UK system. “This is not a trivial matter. It is a criminal issue that cannot be resolved through condemnation alone and requires strict legal action,” Talal stressed.

Meanwhile, in a statement on X, PTI UK confirmed it had deleted the video, describing the woman’s comments as “metaphorical remarks” about the army chief.
While the party said it did not believe the individual had directly called for violence, it said the content was removed “in an abundance of caution to prevent potential misunderstanding”.

Pakistani officials say the video and its transcript have been shared with British authorities, alongside a formal complaint accusing the speaker and those who amplified the footage of incitement to terrorism and destabilisation.

PTI UK stressed it does not endorse unlawful behaviour and urged supporters to exercise restraint in public speech. The Bradford protest was part of a series of overseas demonstrations organised by PTI supporters in solidarity with jailed party founder Imran Khan, featuring slogans critical of Pakistan’s establishment.

Information Secretary PTI Sheikh Waqas Akram also clarified the party’s position. In an X statement, he said, “Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf clarifies that the speech delivered by a woman during a protest in the United Kingdom has no association whatsoever with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. The individual in question does not hold any official position within the party. The views expressed do not reflect PTI’s stance, values, or political philosophy. PTI fundamentally and unequivocally opposes violence, incitement, hate speech, and the use of offensive language.”

While the original video has been removed, screenshots and reposted clips continue to circulate online and have been cited by Pakistani authorities in correspondence with London.

The episode adds to already strained ties between PTI and the establishment. It also reflects Islamabad’s broader effort to curb overseas-based critics targeting state institutions, even as Britain weighs how far diaspora political speech is protected before it triggers criminal scrutiny under counterterrorism laws.

 
I've spent time with pTi UK and PMLN UK.

It's just uncles with nothing to do and some crazy aunties who think they are politically active.

It suits the Pakistani parties because when they come over they get free meals and chauffeured around and the UK uncle and aunties get some selfies and Facebook likes in return.

These foreign parties branches are completely useless and probably should be banned by the UK.
 
I've spent time with pTi UK and PMLN UK.

It's just uncles with nothing to do and some crazy aunties who think they are politically active.

It suits the Pakistani parties because when they come over they get free meals and chauffeured around and the UK uncle and aunties get some selfies and Facebook likes in return.

These foreign parties branches are completely useless and probably should be banned by the UK.

I don’t agree with any protests in the UK l whether it’s a PML-N protest or a PTI protest, it makes zero difference here in uk .

If these people genuinely want to do something, they should go to Pakistan and do it there. Here, it’s just for cameras, TikTok views, and grabbing a bit of fame.

it’s only a handful of people these protests barely even reach 100 attendees.

But threatening to bomb places is on a completely different level, especially when we Muslims already get labelled as terrorists in the UK just make is look bad.
 
Back
Top