What's new

Rafael Nadal defeated Kevin Anderson in straight sets to win the US Open [his 16th Grand Slam title]

Muhammad10

T20I Debutant
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Runs
6,284
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Andy Murray has announced he has withdrawn from the U.S. Open due to a hip injury</p>— Sky News Newsdesk (@SkyNewsBreak) <a href="https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/901523097915973634">August 26, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
No Murray, Djokovic or Wawrinka. I guess it won't be a very competitive tournament.
 
US Open 2017: Maria Sharapova stuns Simona Halep on Grand Slam return

Maria Sharapova made a dramatic return to Grand Slam action by knocking out world number two Simona Halep at the US Open.

The Russian won 6-4 4-6 6-3 in front of a sell-out night session crowd of almost 24,000 people in New York.

Sharapova, 30, was playing her first Grand Slam match since serving a 15-month doping suspension.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2006 champion and former world number one needed a wildcard to enter the main draw as she is ranked 146th.

When her name was drawn alongside Halep's in the first round it set up a contest that felt more like a Grand Slam decider than opener.

Over the course of two hours and 44 minutes, Sharapova's greater pace off the racquet outstripped Halep's speed of foot, with 60 winners proving decisive despite 64 errors.

"You never know what you're going to feel until you win that match point, but everything you go through is worth it for this moment," said Sharapova, who now has a 7-0 record against Romania's Halep.

"You sometimes wonder why you put in all the work, and this is exactly why."

Sharapova goes on to face Hungary's Timea Babos, the world number 59, in round two on Wednesday.

New York gives Sharapova warm welcome

Sharapova returned from her ban in April but has struggled with thigh and forearm injuries, playing just once since May, and was also refused a wildcard by the French Open.

The United States Tennis Association took a different view, handing the Russian a place in the main draw in New York, and she took full advantage.

John McEnroe had been among those wondering whether the Flushing Meadows crowd would react badly to the 2006 champion, but she was given a warm reception as she stepped on court.

It was Sharapova's first appearance at a Grand Slam since she lost to Serena Williams in the 2016 Australian Open quarter-finals - and she relished returning to the big stage.

"It's prime-time, baby - I love it," she joked afterwards. "I embrace every moment of it and I love it."

Halep has three times been on the brink of the number one ranking this year, and was match-tight after playing 12 times on North American hard courts over the last month, but in the end she was overpowered by Sharapova.

The five-time Grand Slam champion edged ahead in a gripping first four games that lasted 27 minutes, and a blizzard of winners brought her the first set.

The same fierce hitting seemed like carrying Sharapova all the way at 4-1 up in the second, but Halep recovered with five straight games to level.

With the error-count growing, it appeared Sharapova was running out of gas, but after a six-minute bathroom break she returned rejuvenated for the decider.

Once again she raced ahead, building another 4-1 lead, and this time she would not be pegged back.

Halep had saved a remarkable 17 of 22 break points but could only find the net when given a chance to get back on terms, and Sharapova edged home in a dramatic closing game, dropping to her knees in celebration.

"Behind all these crystals and little black dresses this girl has a lot of grit and she is not going anywhere," added Sharapova.

Halep said Sharapova was "very strong" and had "hit everything".

"Some balls were really good and I couldn't even touch them," the Romanian said.

"I'm sad, of course, losing this match, but I think I gave everything I had. She was better.

"It was a tough one for the first round, for sure. But this is the draw. I cannot say anything else."

There were smiles and tears as Sharapova celebrated a spectacular win on her first Grand Slam appearance for 19 months.

The 2006 champion's lack of match practice looked as if it would cost her when she let slip a 6-4 4-1 advantage, but she maintained the aggression in the deciding set and her nerve steadied.

Sharapova was able to dictate the course of the match against the world number two: whatever the rights and wrongs of her being awarded a wildcard by the USTA, this was a magnificent effort and an exceptional match.

http://m.bbc.com/sport/tennis/41078599
 
Fourth-seeded Alexander Zverev crashed out of the United States Open on Wednesday night, losing, 3-6, 7-5, 7-6 (1), 7-6 (4), in the second round to his fellow 20-year-old Borna Coric.

With the late withdrawal of second-seeded Andy Murray, Zverev was the highest seed in his half of the draw, and he had a golden opportunity to make a deep run at a Grand Slam tournament for the first time.

But he still has not made it past the second round at the United States Open. And his best result at a Grand Slam event is reaching the fourth round at Wimbledon this year.

“It’s upsetting because the draw is pretty open in the bottom part,” Zverev said. “I felt like I should have been the favored there. You know, I just played a very, very bad match, so it’s unfortunate. But that’s how it is.”

Instead, his older brother, Mischa, is the last Zverev standing after he beat Benoit Paire, 6-3, 6-2, 3-6, 6-7 (3), 7-5, to reach the third round.

Fifth-seeded Marin Cilic, the 2014 United States Open champion, is now the highest remaining seed in the bottom half of the draw.

On a night when the tournament lost one rising star, another one grew brighter as 18-year-old Denis Shapovalov of Canada ousted eighth-seeded Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, 6-4, 6-4, 7-6 (3), in a night match at Arthur Ashe Stadium. Shapovalov upset the top-ranked Rafael Nadal at the Rogers Cup in Montreal this month during a run to the semifinals. Shapovalov, playing in his first United States Open, will meet Kyle Edmund of Britain in the third round.

Nick Kyrgios, the mercurial Australian star, offered courtside spectators a running commentary during his first-round match against his countryman John Millman on Wednesday afternoon. Kyrgios complained about his right shoulder, which he appeared to reinjure. He barked an obscenity, which drew a code violation. And he bemoaned his bad fortune, which led to another early exit.

Kyrgios, the No. 14 seed, never goes down quietly. In that sense, his 6-3, 1-6, 6-4, 6-1 loss to Millman felt like more of the same: same fiery temper, same lack of composure, same disappointing result.

The twist, at least this week, was that Kyrgios arrived at the U.S. Open with his game and his emotions seemingly intact. He was coming off a fine run at the Western & Southern Open in Cincinnati, where he defeated Rafael Nadal in the quarterfinals and later advanced to the final before losing to Grigor Dimitrov.

But against Millman, Kyrgios appeared to aggravate a lingering shoulder injury, which forced him to retire from a match at the Citi Open in Washington this month. On Wednesday, during a changeover in the third set, Kyrgios shared his troubles with a physiotherapist who massaged his shoulder.

“I’m feeling good, I finally have a good week last week, and then I come to the U.S. Open,” Kyrgios said.

As the match wore on, Kyrgios exhausted his allotment of medical treatments. He commemorated losing the third set by smashing his racket into the general shape of the letter G. (He earned a point penalty for that bit of pyrotechnics.) He spent the rest of the match shaking his head. — SCOTT CACCIOLA

Sharapova’s Run Continues

This time Maria Sharapova did not shed any tears or fall to her hands and knees as if she had won a championship. She merely smiled, waved and advanced.

Sharapova, who made her emotional return to Grand Slam tennis on Monday with a striking victory over second-seeded Simona Halep, defeated Timea Babos of Hungary, 6-7 (4), 6-4, 6-1, in Arthur Ashe Stadium on Wednesday in what she described as a “scrappy” match during an interview on court afterward.

Sharapova’s victory over Halep was her first Grand Slam match since the Australian Open in January 2016, after which she served a 15-month doping suspension.

In the third round on Friday, Sharapova will play Sofia Kenin, an 18-year-old who, like Sharapova, was born in Russia but moved to the United States as young child. Kenin beat another young American, Sachia Vickery, 6-3, 4-6, 7-6 (0).

Kenin was one of several American women to win on Wednesday, including CoCo Vandeweghe (who beat her fellow American Alison Riske), Jennifer Brady, Shelby Rodgers (who beat her fellow American Kayla Day), Nicole Gibbs, Christina McHale and Sloane Stephens, who upset No. 11 Dominika Cibulkova, 6-2, 5-7, 6-3, in 2 hours 42 minutes.

And the dean of all American women, ninth-seeded Venus Williams, advanced to the third round with a 7-5, 6-4 win over Oceáne Dodin at Ashe.

After rain suspended or postponed all but nine matches on Tuesday, Wednesday’s schedule is bursting. There were 87 matches, a mix of first-rounders and second-rounders.

■The last match to finish was fifth-seeded Caroline Wozniacki’s 6-2, 6-7 (5), 6-1 loss to Ekaterina Makarova. It ended at 12:11 a.m.

■Garbiñe Muguruza’s second-round match did not start until after 10 p.m., but she quickly dispatched Ying-Ying Duan, 6-4, 6-0, in 1 hour 5 minutes.

■ John Isner, the No. 10 seed and highest-ranked American man, moved on to the third round with a 6-3, 6-4, 7-5 win over Hyeon Chung of South Korea. No. 17 Sam Querrey joined Isner in the next round with a 6-4, 6-1, 6-4 victory over Dudi Sela. Another American man, Jared Donaldson, pushed No. 16 seed Lucas Pouille to a fifth set, but lost, 7-5, 6-4, 4-6, 3-6, 6-4.

■ Sixth-seeded Dominic Thiem quickly finished off a match suspended Tuesday, defeating Alex de Minaur, 6-4, 6-1, 6-1. Thiem will next face the 19-year-old American Taylor Fritz, who gained his first win at a Grand Slam tournament, beating Marcos Baghdatis, 6-4, 6-4, 6-3. Read more about Fritz here.

■ Fourth-seeded Elina Svitolina lost the second set after her first-round match against Katerina Siniakova resumed, but won the match, 6-0, 6-7 (5), 6-3. No. 10 Agnieszka Radwanska and No. 13 Petra Kvitova also advanced.

■ The No. 14 seed Kristina Mladenovic, who has struggled since the French Open, lost to Monica Niculescu, 6-3, 6-2. No. 22 Shuai Peng was beaten by Donna Vekic, 6-0, 6-2.

■ Nicolas Mahut, a qualifier, knocked out 20th-seeded Albert Ramos-Viñolas, 4-6, 6-4, 4-6, 6-3, 6-0 in a second-round match. Richard Gasquet, the No. 26 seed on the men’s side, fell in the first round to Leonardo Mayer, 3-6, 6-2, 6-4, 6-2. Mayer earned a spot in the main draw as a lucky loser from qualifying. The qualifier Stefano Travaglia upset his Italian countryman Fabio Fognini, the No. 22 seed, 6-4, 7-6 (8), 3-6, 6-0. No. 27 seed Pablo Cuevas also lost, 7-5, 7-6(3), 6-1, to Damir Dzumhur.

■ Seventh-seeded Grigor Dimitrov, who won the Cincinnati event last week, cruised into the second round with a 6-1, 6-4, 6-2 win over Vaclav Safranek. He will play Andrey Rublev on Thursday.

■ Tomas Berdych, the No. 15 seed, topped the American Ryan Harrison, 6-4, 6-2, 7-6 (4). No. 24 Juan Martin del Potro won his first-round match, 6-4, 7-6 (3), 7-6 (5), on Ashe Stadium against Henri Laaksonen.

■ Gaël Monfils, the No. 18 seed and a semifinalist last year, opened his tournament with a 7-6 (6), 6-3, 6-4 victory against his fellow Frenchman Jérémy Chardy. Ben Austen recently profiled Monfils for The New York Times Magazine. Monfils will next play Donald Young of the United States.

■ CiCi Bellis, a U.S. Open crowd favorite, served for the match against Nao Hibino, but lost 12 of the last 15 points to fall, 6-3, 4-6, 7-5, in the first round.

■ Brienne Minor, the reigning N.C.A.A. Division I women’s singles champion, lost her U.S. Open debut to Ons Jabeur, 6-1, 7-5. Read about Minor and her tennis-loving family.

Eugenie Bouchard, ranked No. 76, was the surprise headliner of Wednesday’s packed schedule, slotted into the first match on Arthur Ashe Stadium against 89th-ranked Evgeniya Rodina.

Bouchard, who reached two Grand Slam semifinals and a Wimbledon final in 2014, was a rising star of the game but has sputtered recently. She seemed out of sorts in the match, hitting 46 unforced errors to Rodina’s 18 in a 7-6(2), 6-1 loss.

“It’s one of those matches you kind of want to forget about,” she said. “I know obviously the unforced error count was a bit too high, especially at the end of that first set. Yeah, I just didn’t really know what to do out there.”

Bouchard admitted she had low hopes coming into the match. “My confidence is not high at all at this point in time, and I definitely had question marks about what my level would be like coming out today,” she said.

Further complicating the scene, Bouchard is the plaintiff in an active lawsuit against the U.S.T.A., seeking damages for a concussion she sustained at the tournament in 2015, which she said was caused by a slippery floor. The U.S.T.A. is denying liability for the injury, and the case could go to trial in the coming months.

“I’m able to concentrate on the tennis when I’m here, but, I mean, I definitely have bad memories from here two years ago,” she said.

With her struggles and her litigation, Bouchard acknowledged that she, too, was surprised by her court assignment.

“I was surprised, yeah,” Bouchard said. “But it’s always an amazing opportunity to play on the biggest tennis court in the world.” — BEN ROTHENBERG

Mladenovic’s Struggles Continue

Kristina Mladenovic, the No. 14 seed, was the first seeded player to lose on Wednesday, falling to Monica Niculescu, 6-3, 6-2, in a first-round match that began Tuesday.

Mladenovic had been one of the most dominant players early in the season. From February through the fourth round of the French Open, she compiled a 31-8 record, which included a title in St. Petersburg; finals in Acapulco, Stuttgart and Madrid; and a semifinal in Indian Wells.

But after an electrifying win in the fourth round of the French Open over the defending champion Garbiñe Muguruza, Mladenovic has stalled, going 7-10 and losing her last five matches, all in straight sets.

Mladenovic in May was ranked as high as fourth in the year-to-date rankings, which determine the field for the year-ending WTA Finals in Singapore. She is currently ninth in that race, one spot out of the top-eight cutoff. She is likely to fall further after this U.S. Open. — BEN ROTHENBERG

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/30/sports/tennis/us-open-results.html
 
Last edited:
Federer just went through, tough battle against the American youngster.

Got feeling it Nadal will win this over Federer, as Federer 1st game he did look like he had a injury
 
Look at how disgraceful the crowd are towards Fed's opponents all over the world. Youzhny is hitting some ridiculous winners and you have hardly anyone clapping.
 
Federer wins 6-1 6-7 4-6 6-4 6-2. So far, it's not been the cruise he would have been hoping for in the initial rounds.
 
NEW YORK (AP) — Shelby Rogers knew she was in for a tough match, facing a quick opponent who runs down a lot of shots.

More than 3 1/2 hours later, she finally won it.

The 62nd-ranked American prevailed in the longest women's match in U.S. Open history, beating No. 25 Daria Gavrilova of Australia 7-6 (6), 4-6, 7-6 (5) on Thursday in the second round.

"I didn't feel like it was the longest match ever," Rogers said. "But it's starting to set in a little bit now. Going to be sore."

The match lasted 3 hours, 33 minutes, with Gavrilova finishing with a 133-132 edge in total points won.

"Got the last one, that's all that matters," the 24-year-old Rogers said.

Johanna Konta won the previous longest match, beating Garbine Muguruza in a 2015 second-round meeting that lasted 3:23.

Gavrilova was asked what she thought was the difference in the match.

"The two last points," she replied.

The winner of her first career title last week at the Connecticut Open, Gavrilova wouldn't have had to worry about losing in a tiebreaker if she was playing in another Grand Slam tournament. The U.S. Open is the only one of the four that uses a tiebreaker in the decisive set, but she wouldn't have been interested in playing more games anyway.

"No, it was a 3 1/2 (hour) match," she said. "Just get it done. Get it over with."

When Rogers finally did, she moved on to a third-round match against No. 4 seed Elina Svitolina. But first, she stopped off for some treatment — and a well-deserved meal.

"Ice bath, straight to dining," she said. "That was a long time to go without eating."

http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2017...evails-in-longest-us-open-womens-match/69002/
 
Federer has done a lot better in the fourth set. A decider is imminent.

As soon as Youzhny was hitting 1st serves at sub 100mph. Very easy to do "a lot better" when your opponent can barely hit a decent serve.

That's the problem with the majority of tennis fans, they only see the sport through the eyes of Federer or Nadal and for the rest of us is nauseating.

Tell me, what do you think of how the crowds around the world have treated Federer's opponents. That's why when Djokovic in particular decides to batter them, it's a thing of beauty. No better way to shut the Fed brigade up.
 
Both Nadal and Federer not at their ruthless best. Perhaps some signs of a minor injury, especially in the case of Fed. So perhaps Cilic could win his 2nd slam? He was a long way from winning in SW London, but perhaps this is his opening.
 
As soon as Youzhny was hitting 1st serves at sub 100mph. Very easy to do "a lot better" when your opponent can barely hit a decent serve.

That's the problem with the majority of tennis fans, they only see the sport through the eyes of Federer or Nadal and for the rest of us is nauseating.

Tell me, what do you think of how the crowds around the world have treated Federer's opponents. That's why when Djokovic in particular decides to batter them, it's a thing of beauty. No better way to shut the Fed brigade up.

Are you trying to imply that Federer was playing at his usual base level and not very sub-par due to rustiness as a result of recovering from his back spasms in Montreal?

As far as Djokovic is concerned, the only thing he can decide right now is to turn the telly on and watch Federer winning matches and tournaments at an age where almost every other male tennis player has retired at.
 
Federer does have a back injury, should go past feliciano Lopez. Dimitrov and tsonga are both out
 
As far as Djokovic is concerned, the only thing he can decide right now is to turn the telly on and watch Federer winning matches and tournaments at an age where almost every other male tennis player has retired at.

I've already made my thoughts on this matter clear. All I'll say is if it sounds too good to be true, it almost always is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All I'll say is if it sounds too good to be true, it almost always is.

If I read this correctly, this statement refers to the insinuations doing the rounds about both Federer and Nadal and their remarkable returns to form and fitness this year. As much as I like seeing a fellow mid-30's guy holding his own, I have to say that I'm inclined to agree: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.
 
Both Nadal and Federer not at their ruthless best. Perhaps some signs of a minor injury, especially in the case of Fed. So perhaps Cilic could win his 2nd slam? He was a long way from winning in SW London, but perhaps this is his opening.

Oh well, that fizzled out. :usman
 
I've already made my thoughts on this matter clear. All I'll say is if it sounds too good to be true, it almost always is.

If I read this correctly, this statement refers to the insinuations doing the rounds about both Federer and Nadal and their remarkable returns to form and fitness this year. As much as I like seeing a fellow mid-30's guy holding his own, I have to say that I'm inclined to agree: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.

I know why bones is saying what he/she is saying, but [MENTION=22846]Nostalgic[/MENTION] I'd expect you to at least have followed the tennis season to know why both are doing well in their respective strong suits. Firstly, Federer has a highly aggressive game which is based on first strike (trying to end the point as quickly as possible) tennis and minimising his on court time and he has done that in almost all tournaments this year other than the AO which was in January and when Federer was the freshest he's been in many years because of the injury break and the last two matches at the USO. Also the biggest improvement for Federer has been the forehand and backhand with the new, bigger racquet he started using 3 and half years ago - he can now but winners effortlessly with either stroke and particularly the backhand was the story of the season and in his triumphs over Nadal. Also just to mention other key factors as to his success, it is because Djokovic has gone off the boil and was playing awfully in similar fashion to Federer in 2013, so his main competition has declined and now sidelined by injury. One final point about Federer - he won 3 out of 5 tournaments (Indian Wells, Halle and Wimbledon) all in straight sets and minimal on court time, Not sure whether that requires PED enhanced stamina to accomplish.

As for Nadal, I'm not a fan either of him and both and Novak's streaks in the past of playing outrageously long matches and still recovering to win the following matches have been far more suspicious than Federer because they play a more conservative, grinding style. IIRC Nadal has won all 4 of his titles this year on clay and has struggled elsewhere to beat the top players and whilst he definitely looks better this year, he also played more aggressively on clay and was ending matches much quicker than he usually did in years gone by. Another point to note is that his nemesis on clay - Djokovic the bugger was awful this time around and hence Nadal was afforded a comfortable path to the FO title as Federer skipped the entire 2 month clay season to preserve his body (surely need PEDs to do that).

Federer also got injured a couple of weeks ago at Montreal and has been hampered thus far at the Open for his last two matches - guess he needs to upgrade his PEDs?
 
John Isner, the highest-ranked American man, is out of the US Open.

Mischa Zverev, the 23rd seed from Germany, ousted the No. 10 Isner 6-4, 6-3, 7-6 (5) to reach the fourth round in New York. Zverev never lost his serve and broke the hard-serving Isner three times.

Zverev also took advantage of 41 unforced errors by Isner, compared to just seven of his own. Zverev, who reached the Australian Open quarterfinals in January, has a chance to match that feat at Flushing Meadows if he can beat his next opponent and the last American man left, Sam Querrey.

The 17th-seeded Querrey blasted 19 aces and 49 winners on his way to a 4-6, 6-2, 6-4, 6-4 victory over Radu Albot of Moldova.

Querrey, who reached the Wimbledon semifinals this year, has previously gone as far as the fourth round at the US Open in 2008 and 2010.

EDITOR'S PICKS

Sharapova advances, fires back at Wozniacki
Maria Sharapova rolled past 18-year-old American Sofia Kenin into the US Open's fourth round Friday night.

Serena Williams gives birth to first child
"I'm super excited," Venus Williams said when asked about becoming an aunt by ESPN's Pam Shriver before Friday's match. "Words can't describe."
Meanwhile, 18-year-old Denis Shapovalov of Canada became the youngest man to reach the fourth round since Michael Chang in 1989.

Shapovalov needed to go through three qualifying matches just to get into the main draw at Flushing Meadows, so he has played a half-dozen times in an 11-day span.

"It's been a long ride,'' said Shapovalov, who was born in Israel to Russian parents and moved when he was a baby to Canada. "It feels like I have been here a month already.''

There will be a first-time Grand Slam finalist at the US Open now that 2014 champion Marin Cilic exited in the third round -- and the entertaining-on-court, engaging-off-it Shapovalov is one of those who still have a shot at getting that far.

Just 2 1/2 months after his runner-up finish at Wimbledon, the No. 5-seeded Cilic bowed out with 80 unforced errors in a 4-6, 7-5, 7-5, 6-4 loss to No. 29 Diego Schwartzman of Argentina.

Not much later, Shapovalov advanced when Kyle Edmund of Britain stopped playing in the fourth set because of an injured neck.

"It's never great to win this way,'' Shapovalov said. "Hopefully, it's nothing too serious.''

Neither he nor Schwartzman had ever been to a major's fourth round before, nor had another of the afternoon's winners, 35-year-old Paolo Lorenzi of Italy, who actually began his Grand Slam career with an 0-13 record.

As it is, Cilic was the only owner of a major title on the entire bottom half of the draw when the tournament began.

"That's right: A few surprises and lots of withdrawals,'' Schwartzman noted. "This is the moment to take advantage.''

That part of the bracket originally included three-time Grand Slam champion Andy Murray, but he withdrew because of a hip injury, part of a depleted-at-the-outset field also missing Novak Djokovic, Stan Wawrinka, Kei Nishikori and Milos Raonic.

"It's kind of a transition time for the ATP,'' Shapovalov said, "but I think there is a lot of talent coming up.''

His next opponent is No. 12 Pablo Carreno Busta, the highest-seeded man remaining in that half. The Spaniard earned a spot in the US Open's fourth round for the first time by easily eliminating Nicolas Mahut 6-3, 6-4, 6-3. Carreno Busta will be the first man at any Grand Slam tournament in the Open era, which began in 1968, to face four qualifiers.

Shapovalov is an up-and-coming player who won the Wimbledon junior title just last year.

He made his Grand Slam main-draw debut there in July, losing in the first round, but has taken significant strides since.

At Montreal last month, he became the youngest man ever to reach the semifinals at a Masters event, and he grabbed attention this week by knocking off No. 8 seed Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, a finalist at the 2008 Australian Open.

"The month of August,'' Shapovalov said, "has been absolutely life-changing for me.''

He is a crowd-pleaser, someone who plays a fluid, aggressive game featuring a big lefty forehand and a one-handed backhand, and he shows plenty of emotion while he's at it. He also plays wearing a baseball cap with its band tightened to an extreme degree, drawing plenty of attention on social media.

"I have a small head,'' he said with a smile. "It's just kind of become a little bit of my trademark.''

http://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/20537126/friday-us-open-men-fourth-round
 
I know why bones is saying what he/she is saying, but [MENTION=22846]Nostalgic[/MENTION] I'd expect you to at least have followed the tennis season to know why both are doing well in their respective strong suits. Firstly, Federer has a highly aggressive game which is based on first strike (trying to end the point as quickly as possible) tennis and minimising his on court time and he has done that in almost all tournaments this year other than the AO which was in January and when Federer was the freshest he's been in many years because of the injury break and the last two matches at the USO. Also the biggest improvement for Federer has been the forehand and backhand with the new, bigger racquet he started using 3 and half years ago - he can now but winners effortlessly with either stroke and particularly the backhand was the story of the season and in his triumphs over Nadal. Also just to mention other key factors as to his success, it is because Djokovic has gone off the boil and was playing awfully in similar fashion to Federer in 2013, so his main competition has declined and now sidelined by injury. One final point about Federer - he won 3 out of 5 tournaments (Indian Wells, Halle and Wimbledon) all in straight sets and minimal on court time, Not sure whether that requires PED enhanced stamina to accomplish.

As for Nadal, I'm not a fan either of him and both and Novak's streaks in the past of playing outrageously long matches and still recovering to win the following matches have been far more suspicious than Federer because they play a more conservative, grinding style. IIRC Nadal has won all 4 of his titles this year on clay and has struggled elsewhere to beat the top players and whilst he definitely looks better this year, he also played more aggressively on clay and was ending matches much quicker than he usually did in years gone by. Another point to note is that his nemesis on clay - Djokovic the bugger was awful this time around and hence Nadal was afforded a comfortable path to the FO title as Federer skipped the entire 2 month clay season to preserve his body (surely need PEDs to do that).

Federer also got injured a couple of weeks ago at Montreal and has been hampered thus far at the Open for his last two matches - guess he needs to upgrade his PEDs?

Guys can we take this particular discussion on to a new thread?
 
Haroon786 the stats are almost unbelievable. Fed's BH average speed is higher now than during 2012, where I think it's safe to say he was in better condition and closer to peak age. Nadal's FH and average first serve speed is as high as it's been since 2014 where of course he was 3 years younger but in more devastating form. Some will use the performance and results, they're meaningless without a key ingredient which is facts courtesy of stats. Unfortunately we don't measure groundspeed and reaction time in tennis, well not yet anyway, but we do measure a lot of other areas in a game and it's quite remarkable the stats that we are seeing about both Federer and Nadal.

For the record, Djokovic's average first serve speed and his average groundstroke speed were down by 4mph and 2mph respectively from his incredible 2015 to 2016 when his decline began. His serve has gone done a further 1mph and his forehand speed is down 0.5mph in 2017 further. I'm not saying he's an angel, because his feats in AO2012 were too good to be true surely and the same the following year when he played Wawrinka Berdych in the same way. But we can't measure something like that, well not yet anyway.
 
Cilic lost to a decent player in Schwartzman. People look down on Diego but he's been causing the big names problems all year so I'm not shocked by Cilic's exit. Diego looks good to go the Semi-Final even. That half is an absolute joke. We can now see what tennis will look like when the big guys are gone. If Pouille, Schwartzman, Anderson and Querrey are the best players in 1 half of a draw, what does it say about the competition. If you had Raonic, Nishikori and Wawrinka at least there would be some decent competition and guys who could compete near the back end.

Nadal and Fed look ordinary at the moment, but there's no one who can stop them from winning other than themselves via injury.
 
Wasn't Federer the one who was calling for stringent testing in tennis anyway? He was tested after the Australian Open and found to be clean. The guy is just an exceptional athlete an let's leave it at that.
 
Confident start for Federer against Lopez; probably wants to avoid another 5-setter... :stokes
 
http://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/...federer-hit-stride-keep-semifinal-date-intact

NEW YORK -- Rafael Nadal was approaching his breaking point, thanks to his inability to convert break points. Deep in the second set Saturday evening at the US Open, he trailed Leonardo Mayer 6-7 (2), 3-3. Thirteen break points had escaped Nadal's grasp, like objects in an anxiety dream. He crouched to receive the 14th chance, brow furrowed.

Mayer hit a second serve and then walloped an inside-out forehand off Nadal's return. The shot flew long. The spell broken, the crowd erupted as Nadal pumped both arms, pounded his heart three times with his right hand and bellowed, "Vamos!"

It was quite a demonstration, given that this was just a third-round match, and Mayer, who didn't make it through qualifying, reached the main draw only as a "lucky loser," taking the place of a player who withdrew before the tournament began. Nadal went on to win the match 6-7 (2), 6-3, 6-1, 6-4 over the course of 3¼ hours. But it was a grind.


Rafael Nadal gave a yell after his third-round victory over Leonardo Mayer in four sets. Geoff Burke/USA TODAY Sports
That's how it has been for Nadal -- as well as for his collegial rival, Roger Federer -- so far at this US Open.

The two icons are expected to meet in the semifinals, which entails a measure of pressure they have lived with for a long time. But the absence of several top names, along with the collapse of the bottom half of the men's draw, has put the onus on them to carry and perhaps even save this tournament.

To make things a little more hinky, nobody left in the lower half of the draw at the midpoint of this event has reached a Grand Slam singles final. The highest seed left there is No. 12 Pablo Carreno Busta.

Although the fourth round hasn't started, Federer and Nadal are already battle-scarred, tarnished, seemingly off their feed and looking like they're carrying the weight of the world on their shoulders.

Federer, Nadal cruise into US Open round of 16

After laboring through a pair of uncomfortable five-setters to begin the US Open, Roger Federer was at his hard-to-beat best against Feliciano Lopez in advancing to the fourth round. Rafael Nadal also won as the two inched closer to a semifinal clash.

US Open tournament schedule, scores and coverage
Get the 2017 US Open tennis tournament's dates, TV schedule, news coverage, live scores and results on ESPN.
Nadal denied feeling an unusual degree of pressure due to the unusual, tumultuous circumstances, but he also admitted that he's searching -- thus far unsuccessfully -- for the requisite A-game of a US Open champion.

"I hope that the last three sets can be a good turning point for me," Nadal said after he defeated Mayer. "In my opinion, I played much better later in the match today than the two previous days."

Those were days on which Nadal bemoaned the disconnect between his satisfying practice sessions and his on-court performance. Taro Daniel, ranked No. 121, threw a first-set scare into Nadal and then dug in and went blow-for-blow with him another three sets. "I am practicing well," Nadal declared after that one, "[but] I need to compete better."

Federer also has been grousing about his competence, but he might have scored the kind of turning point Nadal spoke of in his 6-3, 6-3, 7-5 deconstruction of No. 31 seed Feliciano Lopez on Saturday night. "I was happy I had good energy," Federer said afterward, "because I think that was my biggest worry: that somehow after the two five-setters that I had, I was going to feel a little slow, hard to throw the engine on, you know, that I would have to force myself so much I would get tired from that."

A five-time champion in New York, Federer had applied caveats to his hopes at the start, largely because a recent bout of back pain left the 36-year-old feeling ill-prepared and "rusty."


Roger Federer had his best showing of the tournament in his straight-sets win over Feliciano Lopez in the third round. "I was happy I had good energy," Federer said afterward. Al Bello/Getty Images
Sandbagging? Hardly. For the first time in his career, Federer was forced to five sets in back-to-back matches to start a Grand Slam.

He said he was thrilled to survive those matches but acknowledged that it might impact him adversely if he goes deep in the tournament. "So here we are," he said after winning a harrowing second-round encounter with Mikhail Youzhny. "It is what it is. I'm pretty confident that I'm only going to get better from here."

Federer isn't quite as tunnel-visioned as Nadal, but he's more sensitive to the pressure he and Nadal are under. He has caught the disruption vibe that has been bubbling below the surface of this event. "When you see a lot of seeds going out, I don't know, you naturally put the focus on you for it not to happen to you," he said. "You become more ... not worried, but you're, like, more aware of it, that it seems a tournament of the upsets, so it's going to get you, too."

Unfortunately for Federer, the draw hasn't opened as wide for him as it has for Nadal, who would face just one seeded player on his way to the semifinals (No. 9 David Goffin or No. 18 Gael Monfils in the quarters). Federer's fourth-round opponent will be No. 33 Philipp Kohlschreiber, who hasn't beaten the 19-time Grand Slam champion in 11 tries. After that, Federer, the third seed, would face resurgent former US Open champ and No. 24 seed Juan Martin del Potro or hard-charging No. 6 seed Dominic Thiem to get to the semis.

Still, Nadal, the No. 1 seed, has a tricky opponent in the next round in Alexandr Dolgopolov. Nadal leads their series 6-2, but the two wins by "Dog" were three-setters at big events. "He has the ability to hit the ball very quick and to take the ball very early," Nadal said. "So if I am not playing aggressive, I [won't be] playing long. If I let him play from good positions, then it's going to be very, very difficult."

Maybe not as difficult as Federer could be in the semis, but more than tough enough -- for now.
 
Last edited:
Rafael Nadal has criticised US Open organisers after they waited three days before suspending Italian Fabio Fognini for verbally abusing a female umpire.

Fognini, 30, used insulting language to Louise Engzell during his first-round defeat by compatriot Stefano Travaglia.

But the world number 26 played twice in the doubles before the Grand Slam board defaulted him on Saturday, saying they had to wait for a translation.

"Three days for that? I don't think so," world number one Nadal said.

"He has been out winning two matches since then. It is not the ideal situation. It would be much better to do it immediately, not three days later."

Fognini apologised for his behaviour in a post on Twitter, saying: "I would apologise to you fans, [and] to the referee for what happened.

"It was just a very bad day, but it did not forgive my behaviour in the match. Although I'm a hot-head (and though I've been right in most circumstances) I was wrong. But in the end, it's only a tennis game."

A US Open tournament statement said he was provisionally suspended "pending a final determination whether a major offence has been committed".

It confirmed Nicholas Monroe and John-Patrick Smith, who lost to Fognini and compatriot Simone Bolelli in the third round of the doubles, would take their place in the quarter-finals.

Fognini had already been fined a total of $24,000 (£18,500), which will be deducted from his $50,000 prize money for losing in the first round of the singles.

If he is found to have committed a major offence, Fognini could be fined up to $250,000 (£190,000) and potentially suspended from future grand slams.

At Wimbledon in 2014, the Italian was given the biggest penalty in the tournament's history when he was fined $27,500 for throwing his racquet and arguing with an umpire and another official.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/411...bbc_sport&ns_source=twitter&ns_linkname=sport
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING: Denis Shapovalov has been eliminated from the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/USOpen?src=hash">#USOpen</a> after losing to Spain’s Pablo Carreno Busta.<a href="https://t.co/o5Z1aHD5uF">https://t.co/o5Z1aHD5uF</a> <a href="https://t.co/fvmqdH9T3k">pic.twitter.com/fvmqdH9T3k</a></p>— Sportsnet (@Sportsnet) <a href="https://twitter.com/Sportsnet/status/904408516282245120">September 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Normally week 1 is enjoyable for the sheer choice of match to choose from. At times I was flicking through 3/45 at a time. Week 2 is about the quality of the matches. Real shame with who we have in the bottom half of the draw.
 
Very disappointing from Pouille. He has the game to cause loads of people problems, that's perhaps why Federer practises with him so often. But isn't fulfilling that talent. Got can hit with serious pace off both wings, but as we all know soaking up pace and defending is just as important as the offensive side.

We have a QF with Anderson and Querrey and another with Schwartzman and Careno-Busta. I know they say fresh faces are good for the game, but I don't know if any of these 4 have a game that can excite fans and I doubt any of them can bring news fans to the sport.

At this moment in time I would give anything for the winner of the tournament to come from the Thiem vs Del Po match. At least it'll be different from the usual slam winners and they've both got likeable characters with a enjoyable game.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">There's a teenager in the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/USOpen?src=hash">#USOpen</a> men's quarter-finals!<br><br>Andrey Rublev has beaten David Goffin. <br><br>Up next...Nadal! &#55357;&#56393;<a href="https://t.co/pyIdbBdMXs">https://t.co/pyIdbBdMXs</a> <a href="https://t.co/V0jYAKPs8u">pic.twitter.com/V0jYAKPs8u</a></p>— BBC Tennis (@bbctennis) <a href="https://twitter.com/bbctennis/status/904781570615246850">September 4, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Spain's Pablo Carreno Busta is into the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/USOpen?src=hash">#USOpen</a> semis for the first time after beating Diego Schwartzman.<br><br>Report &#55357;&#56393; <a href="https://t.co/iijqservQb">https://t.co/iijqservQb</a> <a href="https://t.co/aMaBThQvSW">pic.twitter.com/aMaBThQvSW</a></p>— BBC Sport (@BBCSport) <a href="https://twitter.com/BBCSport/status/905135537580802049">September 5, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Job done ✅<br><br>Rafael Nadal is through to the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/USOpen?src=hash">#USOpen</a> semi-finals.<br><br>Over to you, Roger Federer.<br><br>Reaction <a href="https://t.co/HlNoaTJKmY">https://t.co/HlNoaTJKmY</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/bbctennis?src=hash">#bbctennis</a> <a href="https://t.co/Z7HydRJjpb">pic.twitter.com/Z7HydRJjpb</a></p>— BBC Sport (@BBCSport) <a href="https://twitter.com/BBCSport/status/905522376573689856">September 6, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Amazingly enough, Federer and Nadal have never played each other at the US Open. They never may.
 
It all depends on Del Potro. If he serves like a monster and hits dictates play with his FH he will cause Nadal problems so much so that I think he would beat Nadal in 4. But Del Po's movement and his BH will be exposed by Nadal I fear.

Head says Nadal in 4. Heart says Delpo in 4.
 
Amazingly enough, Federer and Nadal have never played each other at the US Open. They never may.
Never say never, ever. There's always 2018 to look forward to, besides the GOAT needs to overtake the next best in overall GS tally :48:
 
Never say never, ever. There's always 2018 to look forward to, besides the GOAT needs to overtake the next best in overall GS tally :48:

That's why I said never may, not never will.
 
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xAzXyImHGNw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>.
 
JMdP has to fancy his chances. Winner of his semi-final wins the tournament.

Kevin Anderson or Carreno-Busta in a Slam final. Lol.
 
Madison Keys and Sloane Stephens will meet in the first all-American women’s final at the US Open in a decade and a half after winning their semi-finals on Thursday night at Arthur Ashe Stadium.

There is still another match to be played in this most improbable tournament but one thing is certain: the United States is guaranteed a grand slam champion not named Williams for the first time since Andy Roddick in 2003 – and the first on the woman’s side since Jennifer Capriati in 2002.

Venus Williams v Sloane Stephens: US Open women's semi-final – as it happened
Game-by-game report: Sloane Stephens won 6-1, 0-6, 7-5 over Venus Williams in the US Open semi-finals. Look back at Bryan Graham’s running report
Read more
“I just don’t want anyone to ever ask me about the state of American tennis ever again,” Stephens said on court after a seesaw 6-1, 0-6, 7-5 win over Venus Williams in the night’s opening match. “The proof is in the pudding.”

Stephens was two points from defeat against Williams when she outlasted the seven-time major champion in a marathon 25-shot rally, ending it a with backhand up the line that passed Williams. The Florida native went on to win nine of the final 11 points, including a decisive break in Williams’ final service game, to close the show.

The first two sets were mostly forgettable: a nervy Williams bowed quickly in the opener amid a blur of errors while Stephens buckled in the second with the finish line within sight. But both raised their level for a gripping decider that featured marathon baseline rallies and superb shotmaking over 74 tense minutes.

Williams, the oldest woman in the top 300, was attempting to reach her third major final of the season after runner-up finishes at the Australian Open and Wimbledon. But the 37-year-old made a total of 51 unforced errors, more than twice Stephens’ 24, after averaging 24 in her five previous matches.

It’s been a stunning run for the 25-year-old Stephens, who was ranked 957th only last month after missing nearly a year with a stress fracture that required surgery and extensive rehabilitation, including nearly four months on a self-described “peg leg” when she was unable to put weight on her foot. Now she’s become only the fourth unseeded player to reach the US Open final since the majors allowed professionals to compete with amateurs in 1968.

The 15th-seeded Keys had a far easier outing against CoCo Vandeweghe, breaking the No20 seed in her first two service games and winning 20 of the first 24 points overall. It was a near-flawless performance for Keys, who won 91% of her first-serve points in the first set, finished with 25 winners to only nine unforced errors and never faced a break point in a 6-1, 6-2 victory over 66 minutes.

“It was one of those days where I came out and I was kind of in a zone, and I just kind of forced myself to stay there,” Keys said. “I knew I was going to have to play really well in order to beat her and I feel like once things started going, it just kind of fell into place.”

Madison Keys beats CoCo Vandeweghe in US Open semi-final – as it happened
Game-by-game report: Keys books her place in the final against Sloane Stephens with a comfortable win over fellow American Vandeweghe
Read more
Keys, like Stephens, has overcome injury to make her first grand slam final. The 22-year-old confessed to playing through excruciating pain during a breakthrough 2016 season that saw her climb into the top 10, undergoing two wrist surgeries before coming back to win the title at Stanford over Vandeweghe this summer.

Thursday’s star-spangled semi-finals marked only the sixth all-American last four at a major in the Open era and the first since 1981. Now it’s produced the first grand slam final to feature two American players since the 2002 US Open, when Serena defeated Venus in the third of their four straight major final meetings.

“[It] says a lot about American tennis and where we are right now,” Stephens said. “I don’t think I would have had it any other way. I’m just super proud and honoured to be a part of what these four girls were, what we did tonight.”

It’s a matchup that few could have imagined at the start of a topsy-turvy fortnight – the first grand slam of the Open era where the top eight women’s seeds were eliminated by the quarters or earlier – but it’s one that should finally put a rest to the decade-long hand-wringing over the future of the domestic game once the Williams sisters finally walk away.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/sep/07/us-open-semi-finals-stephens-venus
 
Who will win nadal vs del Potro ?

Del potro can beat anyone if his game is on at the same time he can play some awful tennis and chances of a humiliation from rafa is also their anyway this will be the most exciting match of this tournament

Most probably the winner of the game going to take the slam

Del potro seriously deserves a slam for all the heroics he had done to his carrier so far so i wish he can
 
Del potro can beat anyone if his game is on at the same time he can play some awful tennis and chances of a humiliation from rafa is also their anyway this will be the most exciting match of this tournament

Most probably the winner of the game going to take the slam

Del potro seriously deserves a slam for all the heroics he had done to his carrier so far so i wish he can

Multiple slams
 
I've just watched the del potro v Federer highlights.

That's was nearly as good as his grand slam win over Federer.

Federer stupid shot in the tie break cost him.

However del potro forehand - when it's at his best - could be one of the greatest shots ever.

I've got Nadal beating del potro - he knows he backhand ain't to his previous best.
I've got Nadal winning in 4 sets - Nadal will go to his old school defensive style to win.

Del potro got to move as good from the start like he did against Federer to stand a chance
 
Considering Federer was not quite at his best in this US Open, I think del Potro actually has a better chance of winning against Nadal than he did (assuming he plays well). However, he's an unpredictable player and can be great at one moment and terrible the next.
 
Solid start for Carreno Busta. The final is likely to be between the two Spaniards.
 
Kevin is overpowering Pablo at this point. A final between the two 6.6ft giants would be interesting.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">HE'S DONE IT!<br>South Africa's Kevin Anderson beats Pablo Carreño Busta 4-6, 7-5, 6-3, 6-4 to book his spot in the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/USOpen?src=hash">#USOpen</a> final. <a href="https://t.co/t3dJ7IFkUZ">pic.twitter.com/t3dJ7IFkUZ</a></p>— SuperSport (@SuperSportTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/SuperSportTV/status/906295696944398339">September 8, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">His 23rd Grand Slam final. His 3rd Grand Slam final of 2017.<br><br>Rafael Nadal is into the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/USOpen?src=hash">#USOpen</a> final once again. <a href="https://t.co/xsA1tR3D1E">pic.twitter.com/xsA1tR3D1E</a></p>— BBC Tennis (@bbctennis) <a href="https://twitter.com/bbctennis/status/906342881480372224">September 9, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The 2017 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/USOpen?src=hash">#USOpen</a> final is between<br>Kevin Anderson (South Africa)<br>&<br>Rafael Nadal (Spain) <a href="https://t.co/XRfx7ATov5">pic.twitter.com/XRfx7ATov5</a></p>— Mohandas Menon (@mohanstatsman) <a href="https://twitter.com/mohanstatsman/status/906342914308972544">September 9, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Vintage Rafael Nadal was on full display on Friday at the US Open. Behind a bevy of bludgeoning blasts and a hyper-aggressive gameplan, the World No. 1 will play for his third title in New York after streaking past Juan Martin del Potro 4-6, 6-0, 6-3, 6-2.
Racing around the court and attacking off the ground with authority, Nadal secured his place in a fourth US Open final after two hours and 30 minutes. After dropping the opening set, Nadal sprinted to the finish line with a clinical performance, striking 45 winners, to just 20 unforced errors.

In what has been a resurgent 2017 campaign, the Spaniard made a statement in his bid to finish the year atop the Emirates ATP Rankings. Now a three-time Grand Slam finalist this year, Nadal will face Kevin Anderson for the crown at Flushing Meadows.
In total, Nadal will bid for a 16th Grand Slam title in what will be his fifth meeting with Anderson. He leads 4-0, with just one set lost.
The Spaniard's last hard-court title came in Doha in 2014.

"After a couple of years of tough moments, it has been an emotional year," Nadal told ESPN in the post-match interview. "But being back on this amazing court and in front of this amazing crowd, and having the chance to fight for this title is amazing for me."
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Anderson Fells Carreno Busta To Reach US Open Final

It was sweet revenge for Nadal, who extended his FedEx ATP Head2Head advantage over del Potro to 9-5, emerging victorious in their first encounter at the US Open since winning just six games in the 2009 semi-finals. He has now claimed 15 consecutive Grand Slam semi-final wins since that defeat eight years ago, and has halted a two-match skid against the big-hitting Argentine, who had most recently prevailed in a deciding tie-break at the 2016 Rio Olympics.

"I played well," said Nadal. "It was an important day for me. An important victory against a great opponent. I am playing well almost the whole season. So today was the day to play well (smiling). That's the real thing. I was playing so-so at the beginning of the tournament and I have been playing better and better every day.

"Today was the day to play the best match of the tournament since that moment, because I played against the toughest opponent in that moment, and that opponent as I said before, was coming with big confidence. I woke up today and said to myself that today is the day that I'll play with the right energy and I needed to increase the level of my game.

"And I knew that. A lot of times I know that and it didn't happen, but today it happened. I felt that I was playing at the right level to win the match. And I did and I'm very happy."

With actors Robert Redford and Leonardo DiCaprio, golfing legend Tiger Woods and fashion icon Anna Wintour in attendance, del Potro seized the first break for 3-2 as a forehand struck the net cord and dribbled over. The fortuitous bounce would be all the luck the Argentine needed, closing out the opener with eight of 10 service points won. He would punctuate the first set with a forehand fired down the line, his 12th winner.

Both players came out swinging on a brisk summer evening in New York. Nadal entered the semi-final with a tournament-leading 58 per cent of baseline points won, but it was del Potro who unloaded from the back of the court in the initial proceedings. Looking to create space with his thunderous forehand and blasting his backhand with full force, he pushed Nadal off the baseline and sent an early message.

With actors Robert Redford and Leonardo DiCaprio, golfing legend Tiger Woods and fashion icon Anna Wintour in attendance, del Potro seized the first break for 3-2 as a forehand struck the net cord and dribbled over. The fortuitous bounce would be all the luck the Argentine needed, closing out the opener with eight of 10 service points won. He would punctuate the first set with a forehand fired down the line, his 12th winner.

But as Nadal has done throughout his career, he found a way to flip the momentum in a flash. The swing was swift and sudden. The Spaniard was more hestitant to pull the trigger on his forehand down the line in the first set, but that would change in the second. Four quick winners off that wing was the reply he needed to put del Potro on his heels. Playing much faster and with more intensity, Nadal gave a big fist pump as he snatched a break for 2-0 and another two games later. Del Potro was suddenly rattled as his opponent employed more variety, firing drop shot winners and opening the angles. A bevy of deep returns earned him a third break, sealing the set with an emphatic 6-0 bagel after just 27 minutes.

Nadal refused to release his grip on the match as the third set got underway. Another forehand winner earned him the quick break in the second game and the rout was on. As fatigue began to set in for del Potro, Nadal's confidence reached atmospheric heights. Flying around the court with an injection of energy, he would reel off nine straight games before del Potro halted the skid with a hold for 1-3. With chants of 'DelPo!' 'DelPo!' raining down from all corners of Ashe, the Tandil native sought to give the boisterous Argentine contingent something to cheer for, but Nadal continued to exploit the tired legs of his opponent. He would sprint to a two-sets-to-one lead with a flurry of fist pumps after launching a forehand smash over the back wall and continued his assault in the fourth set. Nadal broke twice more and punctuated the affair with a backhand winner.

The stat of the match? Second serve points won. Nadal claimed an efficient 72 per cent of points in defending his second serve, while del Potro won just 28 per cent. The 2009 champion leaves Flushing Meadows with his head held high after a heroic run to the semi-finals. Following four wrist surgeries, he is back to playing some of the best tennis of his career. The former World No. 4 capped an inspiring run in New York, having saved two match points in stunning Dominic Thiem in the Round of 16, followed by a four-set win over Roger Federer on Wednesday.

"Rafa just played even better the last three sets of the match and I couldn't hit my backhand as good as I did in the beginning of the match," said Del Potro. "He played so smart from the second set until the end of the match. He was dominant. He played well. He played so smart the second set, the third and the fourth. To be honest, I'm angry to lose a chance like this, but maybe tomorrow and after tomorrow, I will see how big the tournament was for me."

http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/news/us-open-2017-friday2-nadal-del-potro
 
Nadal breaks. Kevin has started nervously, similarly to his first-set performance against Pablo.
 
Too easy for Nadal

Not looking good for Anderson. Nadal hasn't even hit the top gear so could be far worse for Anderson
 
A sign of things to come in the tennis world? We have been spoiled with Federer, Djokovic, Nadal and Murray in recent years. And now we have journeymen like Kevin Anderson making Slam finals. Zzzzzzz.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">3 US Open wins. 16 Grand Slam titles.<br><br>Not bad, Rafael Nadal. <a href="https://t.co/OmozaWIlTj">pic.twitter.com/OmozaWIlTj</a></p>— ESPN (@espn) <a href="https://twitter.com/espn/status/907014146012708864">September 10, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
A sign of things to come in the tennis world? We have been spoiled with Federer, Djokovic, Nadal and Murray in recent years. And now we have journeymen like Kevin Anderson making Slam finals. Zzzzzzz.

Actually no, Anderson has taken advantage of the circumstances. With Murray, Nishikori, Djokovic, Stan etc around and actual draw for a slam, he'd have made it to QF at best.

Anderson is a big server and they can go deep in any slam except for the French, if they get on a serving roll, which he has.

A sign of things to come? Not really. All 4 slams were won by guys winning them 10 years ago.
 
Boring final, this :misbah2

The only final wuth this version of Nadal that would have been competitive is against a healthy Djokovic. Other than that no one has the consistency on the BH wing and the return of serve to bother him. Del Potro hit his BH well for 1 set and then couldn't soak it up any more due to his lack of movement.

I keep saying it, but it sounds too good to be true. The two guys who were dominating tennis 10 years ago are dominating again.
 
Congrats Rafa indeed Sweet Sixteen

With this performance level i dont think even Federer could have defeated Rafa
 
Back
Top