What's new

Ranking Test Pitches by Country

QalandarFan

ODI Debutant
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Runs
8,719
Which countries produce the best test pitches and which countries produce the worst? For me a good test pitch is one in which there is balance between bat and ball. A pitch which is too slow or flat is boring to watch from a bowlinng perspective. On the other hand a rank turner or a green mamba isn’t ideal either as the test match may end within 3 days on such a pitch. However, I don’t mind a green pitch in Test Match cricket under cloudy conditions, as we don’t see much green pitches anymore. That being said how do you rank the pitches in each country that host’s Test Match Cricket?

For me it would have to be

1. England by far

2. New Zealand

3. South Africa

4. West Indies

After this it’s a bit hard for me to differentiate between the subcontinent pitches, and Zimbabwe and Australia. All those pitches seem dead and spinner friendly and Australia pitches these day’s are so flat, yeah they have bounce but the pitches are just road down there. Honestly, I don’t see much of a gap between these countries pitches, 5-11 is very close imo. But this is what I would say.

5. Australia

6. Pakistan

7. Sri Lanka

8. India

9. Bangladesh

10. UAE

11. Zimbabwe
 
Australian pitches are only better than UAE ones. Can’t rank them below subcontinent pitches.
 
Australian pitches are only better than UAE ones. Can’t rank them below subcontinent pitches.

The thing about the other subcontinent pitches is that they at least have something in it for the spinners at times, and at other times they are dead like UAE pitches. However, with UAE you’re always going to get the same slow and dead pitch all the time. It’s gotten so boring to watch over the past decade, I’m glad we’re starting to play more of our matches in Pakistan.
 
England (seam , swing and sometimes turn for spinners later on..... True test of a batsman's technique and temperament)

South Africa (pretty much England minus cloud cover + extra bounce)

West Indies (No M.O really but certainly bowler friendly)

India (Always something there for the spinners , reverse swing for the faster bowlers)

New Zealand (sometimes green mambas, sometimes flat pattas)

Sri Lanka (movement early on and assistance for spinners throughout)

Australia (Good pace and bounce but minimal movement except for the pink ball )

Bangladesh (turn from ball one)

Zimbabwe

Nepal

Scotland

Namibia

A bunch of other associate nations....

50 feet of sand



U.A.E
 
Last edited:
PAK wickets are better than both India & Srilanka.. oao!!!!! I thought one of the main reasons the stroke-less wonders that I see batting for PAK in last two decades was due to the wickets they play on but ......
 
England, South Africa and West Indies are in the top three.
 
PAK wickets are better than both India & Srilanka.. oao!!!!! I thought one of the main reasons the stroke-less wonders that I see batting for PAK in last two decades was due to the wickets they play on but ......

More variety imo, there’s dead wickets, flat wickets, spinning tracks and even some swinging tracks in the northern parts. Yeah our domestic pitches haven’t been up to standard we all know that, however the variety of the pitches is why I put Pakistan pitches higher.

Anyways at the end of the day it’s up to each individual’s preference, what would your ranking be?
 
Lol at Pakistan pitches being better than Indian pitches. When cricket was played in Pakistan, I remember most pitches being an absoluter batting bore fest.

Indian pitches in general are one of the best. There will be a rank turner every other series, but most grounds will have something for good spinners. Pacers can also extract swing with the new ball and reverse swing with the old ball. IIRC last cricket season in India, pace bowlers took most of the wickets against SA and Bangladesh. 90% matches produce results and there is rarely a batting bore fest.

I also like Bangladesh pitches, however they are more spinner oriented than India.

I can’t rack them in an order, put in a tier

Best pitches - England, India, South Africa, West Indies

OK pitches - Bangladesh, Sri Lanka

Poor pitches - Australia, Pakistan
 
England (seam , swing and sometimes turn for spinners later on..... True test of a batsman's technique and temperament)

South Africa (pretty much England minus cloud cover + extra bounce)

West Indies (No M.O really but certainly bowler friendly)

India (Always something there for the spinners , reverse swing for the faster bowlers)

New Zealand (sometimes green mambas, sometimes flat pattas)

Sri Lanka (movement early on and assistance for spinners throughout)

Australia (Good pace and bounce but minimal movement except for the pink ball )

Bangladesh (turn from ball one)

Zimbabwe

Nepal

Scotland

Namibia

A bunch of other associate nations....

50 feet of sand



U.A.E

This. Spot on. Pakistanis just not willing to accept Indian pitches have been quite good in past few years.
 
More variety imo, there’s dead wickets, flat wickets, spinning tracks and even some swinging tracks in the northern parts. Yeah our domestic pitches haven’t been up to standard we all know that, however the variety of the pitches is why I put Pakistan pitches higher.

Anyways at the end of the day it’s up to each individual’s preference, what would your ranking be?

Bro, I have written enough of PAK wickets - if I start again, “fans” will get after me; particularly after not congratulating the PAK team for this highly successful & credible English tour, where only a bad session & rain prevented PAK from winning it 3-0.

Coming to the topic - PAK wickets are not only by far worst in Test world, it includes some associates as well. And, to an extent I actually would say I am inclined to arrange Test in UAE than PAK, because wickets are equally dross, but UAE at least allows 450 overs to be bowled, therefore most Test will end in direct results. One of the main reason for resurgence of Indian cricket is the paradise shift of Indian tracks - they play Test cricket on turners (that’s also changing - last NZ, BD series of was played on wickets that will put even some English wickets in shame), because that’s their unique advantage, but the wickets for domestic games are fantastic.

No, there is absolutely no variety in PAK wickets - similar low, dead slow tracks built on soft base which dies with time, means slows down further and gets lower with time. Survival is not a big deal because of the slow & lowness of the track, basically you can dead bat block for few hours; but man, playing horizontal bat shots are near impossible there & if you try any shot on back foot.... players like Misbah, Fawad, Azhar, Usman (Sallauddin), Asad, Farhat.... roost in PAK domestics for a reason.

For pacers, basically, there is only two moods of dismissal and that has killed the wicket taking art from PAK pace attack - what Shaheen or Naseem did in England in swing friendly condition with new ball should give you a clue. In last few years, worst nightmare for PAK pacers has been the new ball - they have learned every other thing but can’t put six balls on channel with upright seem - that’s the outcome of bowling on absolute rubbish where if you pitch it on attacking length, means you are giving batsmen the only chance to score some runs planting front foot & pushing through the line with low back lift.

The second major bowling issue is, the clay content is not in proper mix, there is too thick top layer built on soft base .... result is even on day 5 top surface doesn’t break for spinners. It does turn, but dead slow and below ankle - result, darters rule there. It’s the worst wicket for classical spinner and the adverse effect is the foot work of PAK players against spin - even Babar was struggling at times against Bess. Imagine these are the successors of Zaheer Abbas!!!!!!

The variety you are saying is from climate, not wicket. PAK being a country stressed north south by over 1000 miles either side of Tropic of Cancer, provides a variety of climate for wickets - from the breezy sea shore of Karachi, to the hot humid mid county and the hilly north; add to that the difference of cricket seasons temperature, rain/dew fall in different parts of county brings diversity- BUT the wickets are absolutely identical because the curators are from same school (if we take PCB’s ground committee a school).

Long back, Gen. Zia brought a pro guy to fix the wickets and for few years that time (2001-2-3) there were some very good wickets and that PAK-IND series of 2002 was a treat to watch, otherwise PAK wickets are one of the main reasons for de-popularisation of Test cricket. I heard Aga Zahid is finally kicked out - only for that one, I would have extended WK‘s contract!!!!! Now, he needs to bring couple of pros from UK to teach some basics of wicket making for Test/FC cricket.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think SENA countries have the best Test pitches.

After that, I like Sri Lankan pitches.

After that, I like Indian, Bangladeshi, and Pakistani pitches.

Worst are probably UAE and West Indies pitches.
 
1. England
2. Pakistan

These two are in a different league

3. New Zealand
4. South Africa
5. Bangladesh
6. West Indies
7. Sri Lanka
8. Zimbabwe
9. Australia
10. India - known for its heavily biased pitches
 
Bro, I have written enough of PAK wickets - if I start again, “fans” will get after me; particularly after not congratulating the PAK team for this highly successful & credible English tour, where only a bad session & rain prevented PAK from winning it 3-0.

Coming to the topic - PAK wickets are not only by far worst in Test world, it includes some associates as well. And, to an extent I actually would say I am inclined to arrange Test in UAE than PAK, because wickets are equally dross, but UAE at least allows 450 overs to be bowled, therefore most Test will end in direct results. One of the main reason for resurgence of Indian cricket is the paradise shift of Indian tracks - they play Test cricket on turners (that’s also changing - last NZ, BD series of was played on wickets that will put even some English wickets in shame), because that’s their unique advantage, but the wickets for domestic games are fantastic.

No, there is absolutely no variety in PAK wickets - similar low, dead slow tracks built on soft base which dies with time, means slows down further and gets lower with time. Survival is not a big deal because of the slow & lowness of the track, basically you can dead bat block for few hours; but man, playing horizontal bat shots are near impossible there & if you try any shot on back foot.... players like Misbah, Fawad, Azhar, Usman (Sallauddin), Asad, Farhat.... roost in PAK domestics for a reason.

For pacers, basically, there is only two moods of dismissal and that has killed the wicket taking art from PAK pace attack - what Shaheen or Naseem did in England in swing friendly condition with new ball should give you a clue. In last few years, worst nightmare for PAK pacers has been the new ball - they have learned every other thing but can’t put six balls on channel with upright seem - that’s the outcome of bowling on absolute rubbish where if you pitch it on attacking length, means you are giving batsmen the only chance to score some runs planting front foot & pushing through the line with low back lift.

The second major bowling issue is, the clay content is not in proper mix, there is too thick top layer built on soft base .... result is even on day 5 top surface doesn’t break for spinners. It does turn, but dead slow and below ankle - result, darters rule there. It’s the worst wicket for classical spinner and the adverse effect is the foot work of PAK players against spin - even Babar was struggling at times against Bess. Imagine these are the successors of Zaheer Abbas!!!!!!

The variety you are saying is from climate, not wicket. PAK being a country stressed north south by over 1000 miles either side of Tropic of Cancer, provides a variety of climate for wickets - from the breezy sea shore of Karachi, to the hot humid mid county and the hilly north; add to that the difference of cricket seasons temperature, rain/dew fall in different parts of county brings diversity- BUT the wickets are absolutely identical because the curators are from same school (if we take PCB’s ground committee a school).

Long back, Gen. Zia brought a pro guy to fix the wickets and for few years that time (2001-2-3) there were some very good wickets and that PAK-IND series of 2002 was a treat to watch, otherwise PAK wickets are one of the main reasons for de-popularisation of Test cricket. I heard Aga Zahid is finally kicked out - only for that one, I would have extended WK‘s contract!!!!! Now, he needs to bring couple of pros from UK to teach some basics of wicket making for Test/FC cricket.

Thanks for this, it was a good read.

I know it's only one or two series but I saw an improvement in the wickets during the Sri Lanka and that one test against Bangladesh. They seemed to be a lot more in it for the bowlers and the pace of the wickets was definitely not on the slower end. But I don't know if they can sustain that because maybe those conditions were merely achieved because of the the winter weather perhaps?
 
Australian pitches are only better than UAE ones. Can’t rank them below subcontinent pitches.

Where would you rank the Aussie wickets of the 2000s? I feel there was a bit more grass as well as pace and bounce prior to the 2010s.
 
Where would you rank the Aussie wickets of the 2000s? I feel there was a bit more grass as well as pace and bounce prior to the 2010s.

Yes. Drop in wickets have made a big difference. Also Perth has changed. It used to be lightening fast.

And I agree with the general consensus -- anything, anything (including my back lawn) is better than the UAE
 
Yes. Drop in wickets have made a big difference. Also Perth has changed. It used to be lightening fast.

And I agree with the general consensus -- anything, anything (including my back lawn) is better than the UAE

It’s so sad to see what’s become of the great lighting fast and bouncy Aussie wickets. They’ve become absolute roads, it’s no fun to watch test cricket on flat pitches.
 
Karachi: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is aiming to buy advanced technology for the betterment of pitches in the country, ARY News reported.

According to the details, PCB will issue a tender soo to buy advanced technologies. PCB is considering buying Cregg Hammer which is an advanced instrument used to evaluate better ball bounce and pace on pitches.

Moreover, Pogo Meter will also be bought which will help in Pogo Meter which will be used for testing grass & pitch moisture. As many as six advanced kits will be bought for six cricket centres in the country.

On the other hand, a number system has been introduced to calculate the number of matches played on a single pitch. The quality of pitches will be made better particularly for all three formats of the game. Meanwhile, PCB is also looking forward to making sure the construction of a new pitch every offseason.

https://arysports.tv/pcb-buy-advanced-technology-betterment-pitches/
 
1. England
2. Pakistan

These two are in a different league

3. New Zealand
4. South Africa
5. Bangladesh
6. West Indies
7. Sri Lanka
8. Zimbabwe
9. Australia
10. India - known for its heavily biased pitches

Lol at Pakistan number 2.

India produces the fairest pitches in Asia.

Saffers and Aussies have PhD ad doctoring pitches.
 
Karachi: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is aiming to buy advanced technology for the betterment of pitches in the country, ARY News reported.

According to the details, PCB will issue a tender soo to buy advanced technologies. PCB is considering buying Cregg Hammer which is an advanced instrument used to evaluate better ball bounce and pace on pitches.

Moreover, Pogo Meter will also be bought which will help in Pogo Meter which will be used for testing grass & pitch moisture. As many as six advanced kits will be bought for six cricket centres in the country.

On the other hand, a number system has been introduced to calculate the number of matches played on a single pitch. The quality of pitches will be made better particularly for all three formats of the game. Meanwhile, PCB is also looking forward to making sure the construction of a new pitch every offseason.

https://arysports.tv/pcb-buy-advanced-technology-betterment-pitches/

This is good news.
 
Karachi: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is aiming to buy advanced technology for the betterment of pitches in the country, ARY News reported.

According to the details, PCB will issue a tender soo to buy advanced technologies. PCB is considering buying Cregg Hammer which is an advanced instrument used to evaluate better ball bounce and pace on pitches.

Moreover, Pogo Meter will also be bought which will help in Pogo Meter which will be used for testing grass & pitch moisture. As many as six advanced kits will be bought for six cricket centres in the country.

On the other hand, a number system has been introduced to calculate the number of matches played on a single pitch. The quality of pitches will be made better particularly for all three formats of the game. Meanwhile, PCB is also looking forward to making sure the construction of a new pitch every offseason.

https://arysports.tv/pcb-buy-advanced-technology-betterment-pitches/

That's great we really need to make the pitches better in Pakistan, over the last 5 years any international cricket we've played has been on absolute flat pitches, or UAE type slow pitches. Really need to improve the pitch quality, along with a plethora of other things.
 
Is Pakistan now the worst in terms of pitches?
 
Back
Top