What's new

Salman Rushdie’s grave fears for Indian democracy

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,903
Salman Rushdie signed a letter expressing “grave concerns about the rapidly worsening situation for human rights in India” and contributed a short piece to a collection about India at 75 before he was stabbed on stage at an event in New York.

The writer was one of 102 signatories to the PEN America letter to Droupadi Murmu, who has served as India’s president since July. The letter, dated 14 August, was sent to coincide with the 75th anniversary on 15 August of India’s independence from British rule.

The letter says: “We write to express our grave concern regarding the myriad threats to free expression and other core rights that have been building steadily in recent years, since the Bharatiya Janata party-led government has come to power.

“We urge you to support the democratic ideals promoting and protecting free expression in the spirit of India’s independence, and restore India’s reputation as an inclusive, secular, multi-ethnic and -religious democracy where writers can express dissenting or critical views without threat of detention, investigation, physical attacks or retaliation.”

Other writers who signed the letter include Ayad Akhtar, Kiran Desai, JM Coetzee, Elif Shafak, Colm Tóibín and Anne Tyler.

Rushdie, who was born in India, remains in hospital after Friday’s attack at a literary festival, but has been removed from a ventilator. The man suspected of attacking him, Hadi Matar, pleaded not guilty at the weekend to charges of attempted murder and assault at a brief court appearance where he was denied bail.

In addition to signing the letter, Rushdie also contributed to PEN America’s India at 75, a collection of short writings by authors from India and the Indian diaspora. The collection asked writers to express what they felt in response to “an acceleration of threats against free speech, academic freedom and digital rights, and an uptick in online trolling and harassment” since the 2014 Indian election.

The collection records “ideas of what India was and ought to be, and what it has become”.

Rushdie’s contribution was written before the attack on him, said PEN America.

In the short piece, Rushdie reflects on the collective history of “Hindustan Humara”, translated as “our India”, when “we celebrated one another’s festivals, and believed, or almost believed, that all of the land’s multifariousness belonged to all of us”.

But, he goes on to write, that “dream of fellowship and liberty is dead, or close to death” and, calling on imagery from JRR Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, “the Ruling Ring – one might say –has been forged in the fire of an Indian Mount Doom”.

Other writers in the India at 75 collection include Angela Saini, Hari Kunzru and Preti Taneja.

Rushdie’s words, written before last week’s attack in New York, are aired in a new anthology alongside other leading authors


https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...ished-in-pen-anthology?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
 
I love how the article states

"Rushdie’s contribution was written before the attack on him, said PEN America."

Sure, lets grant the notion for a minute, how comes then his statement wasn't released before the attack considering Rushdie's "Grave Concerns"?

Answer is simple, he now truly fears for his life and is appeasing and pandering towards Muslims.

If this guy had a shred of humanity and honesty towards Muslims the he'd be writing about the plight of Palestinians, of course, he will never bite the hand that feeds him!
 
Salman Rushdie signed a letter expressing “grave concerns about the rapidly worsening situation for human rights in India” and contributed a short piece to a collection about India at 75 before he was stabbed on stage at an event in New York.

The writer was one of 102 signatories to the PEN America letter to Droupadi Murmu, who has served as India’s president since July. The letter, dated 14 August, was sent to coincide with the 75th anniversary on 15 August of India’s independence from British rule.

The letter says: “We write to express our grave concern regarding the myriad threats to free expression and other core rights that have been building steadily in recent years, since the Bharatiya Janata party-led government has come to power.

“We urge you to support the democratic ideals promoting and protecting free expression in the spirit of India’s independence, and restore India’s reputation as an inclusive, secular, multi-ethnic and -religious democracy where writers can express dissenting or critical views without threat of detention, investigation, physical attacks or retaliation.”

Other writers who signed the letter include Ayad Akhtar, Kiran Desai, JM Coetzee, Elif Shafak, Colm Tóibín and Anne Tyler.

Rushdie, who was born in India, remains in hospital after Friday’s attack at a literary festival, but has been removed from a ventilator. The man suspected of attacking him, Hadi Matar, pleaded not guilty at the weekend to charges of attempted murder and assault at a brief court appearance where he was denied bail.

In addition to signing the letter, Rushdie also contributed to PEN America’s India at 75, a collection of short writings by authors from India and the Indian diaspora. The collection asked writers to express what they felt in response to “an acceleration of threats against free speech, academic freedom and digital rights, and an uptick in online trolling and harassment” since the 2014 Indian election.

The collection records “ideas of what India was and ought to be, and what it has become”.

Rushdie’s contribution was written before the attack on him, said PEN America.

In the short piece, Rushdie reflects on the collective history of “Hindustan Humara”, translated as “our India”, when “we celebrated one another’s festivals, and believed, or almost believed, that all of the land’s multifariousness belonged to all of us”.

But, he goes on to write, that “dream of fellowship and liberty is dead, or close to death” and, calling on imagery from JRR Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, “the Ruling Ring – one might say –has been forged in the fire of an Indian Mount Doom”.

Other writers in the India at 75 collection include Angela Saini, Hari Kunzru and Preti Taneja.

Rushdie’s words, written before last week’s attack in New York, are aired in a new anthology alongside other leading authors


https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...ished-in-pen-anthology?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Great words and concerns expressed by a great writer. But things in India, as always are not black and white and are more layered and sociologically complex.

But, at the end leaders are elected by the majority via a truly democratic system which functions without any outside influence.

It may be Modi today or Rahul Gandhi tomorrow or Kejriwal 10 years down the line. Ethos of democracy and democratic elections will stand strong.

Since it’s a Pakistani forum so from
That perspective I think something Pakistan can learn from.

Also irrespective of any government of the day the relationship with western neighbor will still carry the same mistrust.

Both countries are at very different stages of their evolution now and though things look common because of shared language culture , they are not anymore.
 
I love how the article states

"Rushdie’s contribution was written before the attack on him, said PEN America."

Sure, lets grant the notion for a minute, how comes then his statement wasn't released before the attack considering Rushdie's "Grave Concerns"?

Answer is simple, he now truly fears for his life and is appeasing and pandering towards Muslims.

If this guy had a shred of humanity and honesty towards Muslims the he'd be writing about the plight of Palestinians, of course, he will never bite the hand that feeds him!

Huh? Pandering towards Muslims for what? To avoid another nutter from finishing the job that this weekend's assailant couldn't?
 
Wow!

I wonder how the BJP suppprters would react now. They were supporting him before.
 
I wonder what Rushdie said when his book was banned in India in 1980s, there was no BJP government then.

While Rushdie may be an atheist and supports absolute FoS, India isn't governed by such laws.
 
Wow!

I wonder how the BJP suppprters would react now. They were supporting him before.

Still support him, and he is correct, India has it's issues no one will deny, however none of the minorities are endangered species...
 
Nothing wrong in having fears. Some may be true and some may be delusions.

He may want to update his grave fear list now.
 
The bjp bhakts will be very disapppointed with rushdie now
 
Don't try to derail this thread by bringing Pakistanis into discussion. Bhakhts will indeed be unhappy with Rushdie now. :inti

I was only pointing out the inability to handle criticism from both parties. Perhaps both nations do not have a better option than Modi and Imran.
 
For a second I thought he signed this from his hospital bed. I am sure he will have a different perspective of some of Modi govt’s policies now.
 
For a second I thought he signed this from his hospital bed. I am sure he will have a different perspective of some of Modi govt’s policies now.

Why? Do you think he is a massive hypocrite beyond all the idealist lectures on free speech?
 
For a second I thought he signed this from his hospital bed. I am sure he will have a different perspective of some of Modi govt’s policies now.

Modi does not have an anti Iran policy if thats what you are angling for.
 
Why? Do you think he is a massive hypocrite beyond all the idealist lectures on free speech?

I am only finding it ironic that we live in times where Imran Khan plays clips of our (Indian) foreign minister from the BJP appointed by Modi as an example of how India is getting their policies right and on the flip side fans of Imran Khan have to take refuge in Salman Rushdie who they are not really fans of to show how Indian govt is killing democracy.

That’s all there was to it lol.
 
I am only finding it ironic that we live in times where Imran Khan plays clips of our (Indian) foreign minister from the BJP appointed by Modi as an example of how India is getting their policies right and on the flip side fans of Imran Khan have to take refuge in Salman Rushdie who they are not really fans of to show how Indian govt is killing democracy.

That’s all there was to it lol.

Right, so it was nothing to do with what you posted, is that what you are saying? Because it read like you were talking about Rushdie maybe changing his view on Modi's policies in India, now you are saying actually you were really talking about Imran Khan fans.
 
I am only finding it ironic that we live in times where Imran Khan plays clips of our (Indian) foreign minister from the BJP appointed by Modi as an example of how India is getting their policies right and on the flip side fans of Imran Khan have to take refuge in Salman Rushdie who they are not really fans of to show how Indian govt is killing democracy.

That’s all there was to it lol.

I think you are confusing a multitude of issues here. There is no doubt India has a strong governance structure which does not see interference from the military, THAT was the only point Imran was trying to make. Governance should be done by publicly elected officials, that includes Foreign and Domestic policies. This unfortunately is not happening in Pakistan.

The issues these guys are trying to bring to the fore are related to the marginalization of minorities or the extreme rise of Hindu nationalism which has nothing to do with the overall strength in governance India has. Perhaps the issue might be with the elected officials' support of the unwanted rise in Hindu nationalism, but thats not what this thread is about. I thought it was important for us to delineate the two. You can have a number of good qualities and bad at the same time.
 
One more thing, the strong governance structure India has was there long before Modi and BJP so the criticism of Modi govt and praise of India's foundational democratic system are not mutually exclusive.
 
I think you are confusing a multitude of issues here. There is no doubt India has a strong governance structure which does not see interference from the military, THAT was the only point Imran was trying to make. Governance should be done by publicly elected officials, that includes Foreign and Domestic policies. This unfortunately is not happening in Pakistan.

The issues these guys are trying to bring to the fore are related to the marginalization of minorities or the extreme rise of Hindu nationalism which has nothing to do with the overall strength in governance India has. Perhaps the issue might be with the elected officials' support of the unwanted rise in Hindu nationalism, but thats not what this thread is about. I thought it was important for us to delineate the two. You can have a number of good qualities and bad at the same time.

So India has good foreign policies or buys cheap petrol only for Hindus?

Hindu nationalism or lack of it is India’s problem not Pakistans. The objection here is we don’t need lessons on secularism from (not you personally) but people who cheerlead for Taliban, China etc.

At best Hindu nationalism will boycott a movie, they aren’t going to do sar tan se juda and surpringly Rushdie out of all people should know that who left the country after his book was banned during a time when BJP wasn’t even a political force.

Anyway it’s his perspective and no issues whatsoever if he feels that way. No biggie.

Wish him nothing but speedy recovery
 
One more thing, the strong governance structure India has was there long before Modi and BJP so the criticism of Modi govt and praise of India's foundational democratic system are not mutually exclusive.

The praise was specifically for a speech given by a foreign minister belonging to a particular government headed by Modi.

The foreign minister toes the line of his govt foreign policy or formulates it after sign off from the PM.

Imran wasn’t talking about Indias democratic structures. If he was, the first thing that should come to his mind is staring right in front of him which is the fact that Indian courts and army stay away from the democratic process. He obviously didn’t go there.
 
I think you are totally missing the point.

Imran praised the fact that India's governance is not hindered or interfered by the Military. This was a subtle jab by him at the military establishment of Pakistan who basically rule Pakistan through subterfuge. Let us not mistake any of this as "unqualified" or "unconditional" praise of the current Hindu nationalist government of India because this strong foundational structure of India was ever present even before the takeover by the hindu nationalists.
Their foreign or domestic policies might favor all Indians and in some cases only Hindus, once again thats not mutually exclusive. I already said things are not just black and white in real life.
 
Last edited:
Yes things are not black and white when it doesn’t fit a narrative.

However things are as black and white as it gets when it comes to things that suits your narrative.

Anyway let’s see if these 50 shades of gray translates everywhere.

Yes, you are right. Case in point, Rushdie. You guys were all praise when his narrative fit your agenda and now just look at you guys.
Cute little babies crying! AWWWW!
 
Back
Top