Savak
World Star
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
- Runs
- 50,272
- Post of the Week
- 3
Just compare him to Williamson. Williamson put his hand up and rose to the occasion with that knock in the third test match. Williamson knows he is the best batsman in his team and put a ten times higher price on his wicket knowing how much his own team depended on him.
Williamson as an on field captain is head and shoulders above Sarfaraz with his field placements, bowling changes while Sarfaraz constantly puts fielders on the boundary and leaks singles and loses the plot under pressure which effects the entire team.
Sarfaraz is just not improving at all, i just don't see any signs or anything that he is actually even capable of improving. He does not look like someone with a wealth of captaincy experience behind him.
But what are the alternatives realistically? Does the lack of alternatives justify carrying a passenger and unfit player in the test side? Sometimes players need a big kick up their back sides to get them work hard again, our players get into a huge comfort zone once they establish themselves as senior players and in the squad which is a huge shame
Williamson as an on field captain is head and shoulders above Sarfaraz with his field placements, bowling changes while Sarfaraz constantly puts fielders on the boundary and leaks singles and loses the plot under pressure which effects the entire team.
Sarfaraz is just not improving at all, i just don't see any signs or anything that he is actually even capable of improving. He does not look like someone with a wealth of captaincy experience behind him.
But what are the alternatives realistically? Does the lack of alternatives justify carrying a passenger and unfit player in the test side? Sometimes players need a big kick up their back sides to get them work hard again, our players get into a huge comfort zone once they establish themselves as senior players and in the squad which is a huge shame