What's new

Scotland can’t afford to host Pakistan before the Women’s World Cup 2026– Should the ICC or bigger boards step in?

zaidbk

Debutant
Joined
Sep 8, 2024
Runs
11
Gpz6y10XQAAxdxt.jpeg

Steve Snell, the Performance Head at Cricket Scotland, has confirmed to Wisden that Pakistan’s women’s team won’t be touring there this July — not because of scheduling or logistics, but because Scotland simply cannot afford to host them. All this because they didn’t qualify for the Women’s ODI World Cup.


Here’s the kicker: Pakistan were really keen to tour. And given how closely fought the qualifiers were — Pakistan vs Scotland was a tight match, and Scotland even pulled off an upset win over tournament favourites West Indies — a short bilateral series could’ve been a great build-up for Pakistan before the World Cup. But now that Scotland are out, the funding has dried up.


This could really affect Pakistan’s preparations — they’re headed to a World Cup with fewer competitive games under their belt. And for Scotland, it’s a missed opportunity to build experience and visibility for their women’s team.


One has to ask: should Pakistan invite Scotland to play in Pakistan instead? Or better yet, should the ICC or the Big Three (India, England, Australia) step in and fund these kinds of tours? It makes no sense that two teams willing to play can’t, just because one of them can’t afford to host.


Also — with 16 nations actively playing women’s ODIs, is an 8-team World Cup format really fair anymore? Aren’t we holding back the growth of the women’s game by limiting such big stages to just a few?


Would love to hear what others think. Should cricket boards with more resources do more to support situations like this? And what’s a fairer model for global women’s tournaments going forward?
 
Yes. ICC should step in. Just like they should have stepped in when Cricket Ireland was struggling with the same issue last year. Will they? Nope. But that just reflects where international cricket is today in the hands of the ICC.

It's all about lining your pockets, rather that doing what's best for the future of the game.
 
Why should anyone step in? These are first world Rick countries who have sports culture and spend billions on multiple sporting infrastructure. If they are struggling then there is no demand for cricket. Why prop up a sport which no one wants to watch? I fit were a poor or a developing country it makes sense.
 
Why should anyone step in? These are first world Rick countries who have sports culture and spend billions on multiple sporting infrastructure. If they are struggling then there is no demand for cricket. Why prop up a sport which no one wants to watch? I fit were a poor or a developing country it makes sense.
The ICC ( and cricket playing countries) have to try to create a market too, and grow the game by spending money.

The ICC has stipulated that for full membership you have to have a womens team and for associate members you have to have a pathway for women. Clearly, they want to grow the womens game and should step in to support it where needed. If it just becomes about money eventually we will have a situation where only India plays cricket.
 
Ali Tareen should step in and sponsor Scotland cricket , will be good philanthropy and will help him in his global image
 
Back
Top