IAJ
ODI Star
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Runs
- 33,052
- Post of the Week
- 1
No worse or better than all the others we have seen.
Would take Shehzad over him any day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No worse or better than all the others we have seen.
That's your bias kicking in. Almost every batsman has survived some close shouts early on in this match.What good start? He was just lucky to survive some close shouts etc. Reminds me of Imran Farhat, poor batsman.
That's your bias kicking in. Almost every batsman has survived some close shouts early on in this match.
Ultimately he has failed, but deserves the 2nd test before we think of dropping him. If we start dropping players one match into the series it's not fair and sends out the wrong message to the players coming in.
That's your bias kicking in. Almost every batsman has survived some close shouts early on in this match.
Ultimately he has failed, but deserves the 2nd test before we think of dropping him. If we start dropping players one match into the series it's not fair and sends out the wrong message to the players coming in.
Agree with your analysis. However do you not agree he's played some innings worthy of potential? At the moment I don't think he'll be a long term prospect. But he has shown some good signs so deserves the next test as a last chance.No bias at all. I saw him in UAE and he was a walking wicket outside off there as well. He might score a 50 or 2 on this tour but you can clearly see he is not a good opener, big lbw candidate, very slow reflexes and poor outside off.
He needs to leave those balls.
Would take Shehzad over him any day.
Team should stick with him, but drop Hafeez pls.
For me Shazad would be just as poor on these wickets as this guy.
Am sure the job of openers in england is to see off the new ball which he done.
Looks like he got selected due to his connections but still I think the fans should be patient with him during this tour, I doubt any Pakistan openers will do any better then masood.
+ he isn't going to learn anything from opening with Hafeez.
Honest question
Just take a look at this FC average or average in any other format http://www.espncricinfo.com/canada/content/player/233901.html
Definitely not becoming of an opener, especially when we have guys with phenomenally higher first-class averages like say Fawad Alam on the brink. Don't want this to turn into a Fawad Alam fan club thread (even though I am a fan), but let's skip that.
But I honestly want to know, what is it about him. Some of the "sensationalist" theories here are that it's nepotism...but what nepotism??? What ties does he have to the PCB? Please back your arguments up with facts.
EDIT: Apparently he is in line to replace Shehzad in the test series, which is why I am asking. Seems like a great kid though (personality wise).
Honest question
Just take a look at this FC average or average in any other format http://www.espncricinfo.com/canada/content/player/233901.html
Definitely not becoming of an opener, especially when we have guys with phenomenally higher first-class averages like say Fawad Alam on the brink. Don't want this to turn into a Fawad Alam fan club thread (even though I am a fan), but let's skip that.
But I honestly want to know, what is it about him. Some of the "sensationalist" theories here are that it's nepotism...but what nepotism??? What ties does he have to the PCB? Please back your arguments up with facts.
EDIT: Apparently he is in line to replace Shehzad in the test series, which is why I am asking. Seems like a great kid though (personality wise).
Fakhar has to prove himself in the A tour first , so far he has failed to impress in the A tour. The one day leg will decide what he is made of.
Look, some of the shots he plays are brilliant to watch. It takes ability to play shots like that.
He's had a good education and his schooling of cricket comes from England, so his base in terms of learning cricket has been very good.
However, I feel... He simply does not have the quality to play top level cricket. He is likable but not ready for International cricket atm. He should be groomed as the Pakistan captain instead and I think he would be more effective in the ODI's.
English schooling does not necessarily teach you more than Pakistani schooling. You just learn different things.
Exactly. The said poster probably has never visited Pakistan. Pakistani private schools are way superior to British public schools and at par with private. This is evident by the fact that they have better GCE results than those.
There's a simple solution. Drop Masood, get Azhar to open since he's always there in the first 2-3 overs. Play Shafiq at 3 and bring Babar Azam at 6. If not, then we can also try Sami Aslam as an opener. Shan Masood is a pathetic joke of a tailender.
I can see what the team management and coach want. A left and right-hand-combo. But that invariably works when they're actually 2 decent players.
Hafeez and Masood are walking wickets, and when Anderson sees these 2 at the crease he'll be licking his lips.
They both get bogged down often and don't help the runrate in any way. I just feel the plans won't change and they'll stick with both the openers. Hope I'm wrong though.
I don't know why people bring up Anderson. Shan struggles against everyone.
I don't know why people bring up Anderson. Shan struggles against everyone.
Pakistan cant afford to keep losing 2 wickets at the start of the inns so easily and cheapily, Masood has already been worked out and should not be opening for rest of this series.
[MENTION=3393]godzilla[/MENTION]
No Conflict of Interest rules in PCB?
Can someone please remind me what exactly is Shan Masood's father's position in the pcb setup? i remember reading he is quite high up.
Jimmy Anderson is just checking the england fixture lists to see when pakistan next tour is so he can gain a few more gift wickets..
sits on the board of governors
Like i have said on many times, Shan could be the best player in pakistan and this would still be a conflict of interest.
Mansoor masood khan?
I see no recent FC performances from him to justify his selection.
I see no recent FC performances from him to justify his selection.
Inzamam was actually asked this question.
He answered that shan masood made a comeback in the west indies tour where he only played one match. It would be unfair to drop him so quickly as he only played one match after his comeback. This is why he has been given a chance in this series.
Inzamam was actually asked this question.
He answered that shan masood made a comeback in the west indies tour where he only played one match. It would be unfair to drop him so quickly as he only played one match after his comeback. This is why he has been given a chance in this series.
Sharjeel got banned just before the tour.
Sami Aslam got dropped coz he ate something which the team management had forbidden.
So Masood got picked. There weren't many other options...
Does Sami know where his off-stump is? Yes.
Does Shan know where his off-stump is? No.
Selectors: But does Sami (allegedly) eat Chicken Karahi?
![]()
Sharjeel got banned just before the tour.
Sami Aslam got dropped coz he ate something which the team management had forbidden.
So Masood got picked. There weren't many other options...
Among all the openers including Shehzad, Shan has the best technique & temperament. He was part of PAK U16, U19 teams for almost 5 years, long before his uncle became Secretary. I am a Bangladeshi, but know from 2008 that the kid Shan Masood has a very good forward defense, very good measurement of his off stump & he doesn't throw his starts. Shan Masood is classic example of how young players are treated in PAK. Hafeez proved his class time & again against SAF, even ZIM, so Shan debuted against SAF, made a "Opener perfect" 75 on debut. Indeed failed in next 2 of 3 innings (his 21 at DSC was second highest out of 99, & a proper knock), but selectors retained Manzoor for SRL & now Hafeez Shahab is back as all-rounder.
Masood is extremely unlucky in 3 ways -
1. he is close relative of an influential person, which 'll always raise question mark on his inclusion. However, I am surprised to know that in PAK position of Finance Secretary is so powerful that his nephew can get into National side. I mean, there are at least 3 dozens of federal ministers, 273 federal MP, at least half a dozens of 4 star General, Cabinet Secretary, 5 dozens of full secretary, 5 state governors, 5 High Court Chief justice, Director General of Police .....I mean don't these guys have any son, brother, nephew playing cricket? If F. Secretary can make his nephew play Test cricket, in order of hierarchy, these guys are either parallel or higher & I have left out the opposition party, state government, commercial CIPs, PCB office bearers & former cricket greats.
2. He was debuted against SAF & then got dropped - after that PAK is bashing SRL, AUS & Kiwi bowlers in UAE - had there been just a couple of Tests in between, even in WI or NZ, Shan probably would have been required to be called back, without the memo of his uncle. Not many PAK openers are capable of shoulder arming all 6 balls of Steyn.
3. In sub-continent we are very much fond of cult movie culture - the Dilip Kumars, the Amitabhs, the Mithuns - all those deprived, poor, orphan road rockers. Here heroes are born in poverty, learns from survival & fights against nepotism, double standards. If a player comes from rich, influential family, if he has a graduation from a UK University, if he has an influential relative - he simply can't be talented, though his technique, his fitness & performance might defy, but formula doesn't lie.
I think he still has weakness against spin. But still, I would have continued with him for few more Tests because
1. He is a lefty - great to have a left-right opening combination
2. He has a very good technique against moving balls - I ave hardly seen him disturbed by pacers. Got out to a swinging ball indeed, but that was a shocker of a decision. I wonder this same umpire gave BoD to Latham against Adil on 1st morning
3. He is among very few PAK players for whom it took 2 absolute beauty to get him out. This guy put value to his wicket & 'll made bowlers to earn him
4. He is a much better rotator than someone like Azar. Always looks for singles & knows his limitations
5. His footwork is better than most PAK batsmen barring YK & may be Asad
6. Tendency to play on ground - only twice he lofted & it cleared the boundary. In fact, I can't recall a single shot in both innings where the ball traveled more than 5 metres in air, unless it was meant to be.
7. He is a brilliant specialist fielder - I see him occupying a vital catching position for years
But, things that impressed me most are
1. His learning curve - just about a couple of days time, he seems to work out a method to survive against spinners. May not be eye catching, but got his job done. His spin play reminds me the old memory of 2 ugly Aussies - who used to start like No. 10 & 11, but knew how to survive & after an hour or two of struggle in the middle, for rest of the match bowling side 'll keep wondering what's going on - Langer & S Waugh.
2. Cricket intelligence - some of the improvisations we very intelligent, like he never tried hit against the spin unless it's a long hop, used the gap intelligently to rotate the strike, stretched his front pad out side line whenever in confusion, used soft hands whenever blocked a ball. This are signs that this guy knows how to survive & very much aware to ways a batsman can get the benefit of 50-50 doubts.
Only talent can't take a batsman to top level. In fact an outstanding talent with poor work ethics & game applications probably 'll end inferior to a less talented but true grit batsman. The Laras, Pontings & Tendulkars had both, but statistically Chanderpaul isn't behind any of them. I can only say that what little I have seen, if he can match Shan in intelligence, work ethics, grit (Value for own wicket) - Umar Akmal has enough talent to play 125+ Tests for PAK, but I don't back him to play even 25. Talent is nothing if the dedication, discipline or application is not there - Shan has lots of those, a perfect foil for Test opener. My only fear is PCB Selectors might play him in ODI for the 2 SIX he hit - 'll be a disaster, just like Taufique Umar 13 years back.
Rubbish
Inzis own nephew would have been a better pick let alone somebody like J Ali