What's new

Shoaib Akhtar's bowling action and chucking allegations... let's revisit

Ahmad Shah

Tape Ball Regular
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Runs
491
i know this thread in past has been debated to death
but this time i have came across some thing unseen
which might spice up the debate

shoaib akhtar action has been put in question in past
but ICC cleared him giving him the benefit of doubt due to his hyper extension but even after clearance he faced chucking allegations

for instance his action was cleared in year 2000
but during India tour to Pakistan in 2006 then Indian coach Greg chapel raised question on his action. according to him his action is pretty normal when he bowls in the range of 140 to 145 kph but the moment he put extra effort to increase pace his every single "EFFORT BALL" clearly shows chucking he usually get away with this allegation as his normal delivery is pretty much legal but not the "EFFORT BALL" that enables him to bowls 150kph +

while watching the old videos of shoaib akhtar on youtube
i exactly felt the same that his normal delivery was legal
but deliveries above 150kph defenitely raise eyebrows

i seen the same deliveries multiple times in slow motion too and couldnt disagree with chappel.
let me share some screenshots directly take from youtube
none of them is edited all of them were taken in real time
i can even share links of these youtube videos . watch it in slow motion and decide it yourself

iam sorry iam convinced if this was not chucking what else was??
akhtar vs south africa in 2007 his famous 4 wicket haul video
WhatsApp Image 2020-04-27 at 06.26.01 (2).jpg

akhtar vs india in 2007 odi series WhatsApp Image 2020-04-27 at 06.26.02 (1).jpg

akhtar vs bangladesh in 2003 test series his famous 6 wicket haul
WhatsApp Image 2020-04-27 at 06.26.01 (3).jpg

akhtar famous beamer to dhoni in 2006 test series
WhatsApp Image 2020-04-27 at 06.26.02.jpeg

akhtar famous bouncer to kristen which injured him 2003 series
WhatsApp Image 2020-04-27 at 06.26.01.jpg
akhtar 150 kph delvivery to ganguly in 2007 odi series
WhatsApp Image 2020-04-27 at 06.26.01 (1).jpg
 
He chucked a lot and bowled hundreds of illegal deliveries. We indians knew it but didn't mind, as it was fun to see someone bowl at that furious pace.
 
all the guys saying that he had hyper extention in arms
i just have one question

while bowling a normal delivery of 140 to 145 you just cant spot chucking it appears completely ok even in slow motion
but when he tried to bowl over 150 kph the chucking aspect was clearly visible

if there was hyper extension then in every delivery irrespective of pace there should ve been visible chucking which was not the case
 
Honestly what difference does it make? Players should be judged based on the rules and the way they were enforced during the time they played. There's nothing to be done if someone has been judged to be within the rules. What the rules should be(I personally am not opposed to a slight bend being allowed to improve the balance between ball and bat) is a more complicated question that may be worth considering.
 
he hyper extended even when throwing from the boundary. he could control it at slower pace but couldn't when he was going all out.

he action deteriorated as he got older though.
 
The only thing obvious here, is that is hyper extension of the elbow and not chucking.

He is at the beginning of the stride here, you can see his body is leaning back and his arm is behind his head, not in front. The forearm here is bent backward behind the bicep, this natural flexibility gave him the extra "sling shot" that added a few more clicks to his bowling.

Of course this hyper extension will be more prominent with the "effort" ball, with more force loaded and bending the arm further back.

Bowlers who actually chuck, bend their elbow when ending their stride, when the arm is ahead of the head, and their body is leaning forward, the elbow is bent with the forearm ahead of the bicep, kind of like a bicep curl.
 
This hyperextension gave him injury problems as well. The UWA authorities were shocked at his ability to bowl fast with these problems.
 
It is now irrelevant whether he chucked or not. He is retired now.

ICC allowed him to continue bowling and that should be good enough.
 
He chucked a lot and bowled hundreds of illegal deliveries. We indians knew it but didn't mind, as it was fun to see someone bowl at that furious pace.

Ah yes the famous Indian eyes known for spotting chuckers from miles away.
 
People made these allegations throughout his career. In 2006, I think during Pakistan's home series against India, Michael Holding did a video analyzing Shoaib's action and concluded his action looked the way it did due to hyper-extension in his elbows.

To the naked eye, Murali's action would still come across as chucking to many. In reality that was ofcourse not true.

If Shoaib was a chucker he would have been banned long ago like Shabbir.
 
Last edited:
If a guy like Shabbir (who chucked sometimes but not always) got caught, I find it very hard to believe that Shoaib wouldn't.
 
Funny thing is that Shoaib wasn't even the only one with hyper-extension. RP Singh had it too. But I guess since he didn't have a substantial playing career people never questioned his action as much. Here is the video I was talking about. Ten Sports did it after Greg Chappell said Shoaib's action doesn't seem right. Here is the video I was talking about. I urge you to watch it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vndvFPbBde0
 
As Shoaib Akhtar speaks he removes his green Pakistan tracksuit top, rolls up the sleeve of his white shirt and bends his elbow at about 45 degrees. Nothing unusual in that, you might think, except that Shoaib's arm is bent back in the opposite direction from the usual hinge, so that his arm looks like the aftermath of a hideous industrial accident. His party trick is not for the squeamish; the Guardian's photographer almost keels over at the sight of it.

But it is an ability which has defined his cricket career. It means the extra whip generated by forcing his arm against all expectations of nature allows him to hurl a ball quicker than anyone has ever been recorded bowling: 161kph, which translates into the somehow more impressive 100.3mph. It also means that, particularly in Australia where they take a dim view of blokes from the sub-continent at the best of times, his turn of speed has been largely dismissed as the result of a dodgy action. Twice he has been banned by the International Cricket Council for the unholy cricketing sin of chucking.



And the odd thing about this 27-year-old known as the Rawalpindi Express (just as well he doesn't come from Slough; he'd be stuck behind a failed train at Acton) is that the elbow is merely the start of it. "I am not blessed with normal joints," he says. "I have hyper-tension in my wrists, my knees, everywhere, look at my fingers, see?"

To demonstrate he pulls his thumb and forefinger back unnecessarily far, resulting in a click which reverberates so loudly round the lobby of the hotel in Leicester which is his temporary home that it makes the trio of professional autograph hunters waiting to pounce wince.

"Normal knees bend there," he continues on his muscular-skeletal guided tour. "Mine bend way back; that's bad for the hamstring, bad for the pelvis, bad for the shoulder."

Just as it seems he has finished and we can move on to, say, discussing the prospects of his Pakistan team in the NatWest series against England starting tomorrow, he produces the medical coup de grce . "Did I say I was flat-footed? Nothing, no contours, flat as a pancake, I can take my shoes and socks off and show you if you like."

I take his word for it. "Flat, completely," he continues. "Every time I'm in England I go to Birmingham to get special boots made. I went yesterday. I always see a couple of doctors when I buy them and get everything measured properly. Have to. See, I'm not normal. I couldn't walk when I was five. My mum will tell you."

Shoaib discovered how unusual he was when he took legal action against the ICC and consulted the academics in the human performance department at the University of Western Australia in Perth about his bowling action.

"In a way they were so ****** off with me," he says of the Perth doctors. "They freaked out. 'How can you be the fastest bowler in the world? You are just patheti cally abnormal.' They measured each single thing about me. They discovered that, where a normal person's joints move about 20%, maximum, my elbow can move 42%. Same with all my joints. It's not nice to have all this, it is why I have had so many injuries."

But what the Perth eggheads did resolve conclusively was that he does not throw the ball. Despite the wavering in the preamble, his arm is straight at the point of delivery, the principle of bowling. Thus reinstated and vindicated, how did Shoaib celebrate his reprieve? By being banned again, this time for ball tampering.

It happened in Sri Lanka, during the most recent of the incessant tournaments in which the modern international cricketer is obliged to compete (he says he has been home for two weeks in the past 12 months). He was caught trying to scratch the surface of the ball with his thumbnail, a trick which allows the ball to wobble more unpredictably through the air. The result was a two-match ban, which covered the final of the Sri Lankan tournament and the first game against England this week. Shoaib claims his actions were misunderstood.

"I was banned unnecessarily. They took it out too hard on me. I was cleaning the ball, just using my thumbnail to remove some grass stains."

Ah, the old hygiene defence. "Man, you cannot tamper with a Kookaburra," he says of the ball used on the sub-continent. "You try and put a nail into the surface. It's so hard, so smooth, your nail just skims off."

Does that mean he has tried in the past, shall we say, to make a few personal re-adjustments? "No, no, but I've felt the outside of the ball. The only thing I was doing was cleaning the grass off the ball. I think they went pretty hard on me. I accept the laws, they banned me three times. I had to go through legally to prove them wrong about chucking. I thought this time I deserved a bit better than that."

It means that English fans will be deprived of the sight of the quickest man on the planet in the first of this month's three-match series. And if we are disappointed in his absence, it is nothing compared to his own dismay.

"In Sri Lanka I worked so hard to put the team in the final," he recalls. "And then they said I couldn't play. I was walking up and down all day, pacing out my run-up in the pavilion, I was abusing and cursing. I knew if I had been there we would have won comfortably. I was abusing myself, telling myself I had let my country down. 'Just leave the f****** ball alone, man, you know the rules.' "

Anyone who has seen a Shoaib appeal, in all its leaping, snarling, yelling passion, will appreciate that this is a man who puts a lot into his cricket. Yet, partly because of his physical oddities, in a country where boys can bowl before they can walk he didn't pick up a ball until he was 15.

"My brother was captain of the local club," he recalls of his first outing. "I went to watch him play and they were a guy short. I said: 'I'll play.' My brother laughed: 'You?' But the others persuaded him. I think everyone was quite impressed when I came on to bowl."

Within three years he was in the national side, hurling the ball down at unprecedented speed. Indeed, such was his pace, his critics reckoned he was obsessed, bowling with one eye on the speed clock, more interested in breaking personal records than the opposition's resolve. It is a charge that infuriates him.

"It pleased me, yeah [to reach 100mph], but it's a people thing, a media thing. I've never boasted I'm the fastest ever. Who knows, they didn't have speed guns before. But I promise you it doesn't please me if my bowling is not winning matches."

In fact, he says, he would happily bowl a straight 130kph trundler rather than see a wayward, if record, quick one beat everyone and surrender four byes. "I have never known in the six years I have been playing international cricket a team win by batting. Bowlers win matches. But, you know, it's a team game. I deliver the ball to the edge of the bat, it gets nicked but one of the fielders has to catch it. I can't run round to the slips and take it. So I try to make a lot of my dismissals bowled or lbw. But sometimes you have to rely on your team-mates."

He sounds as if he has had some problems in that department. "Imagine if I was playing for Australia," he says, as if in confirmation. "With [Glenn] McGrath and [Jason] Gillespie softening them up, then I come on, I'd have got more wickets than anyone ever, mate. Because when I play for Pakistan, with Wasim [Akram] and Waqar [Younis] they are in decline. They were great but they're not match-winning bowlers any more. Wasim has not won a match since 1996. So I have to make it all happen on my own. There is so much expectation on my shoulders. But, if I come on after those two [Australians], when the ball's a bit older and swinging. Imagine, it would be 'see you, mate, talk to you later' every time."

As the inflection in his voice suggests, despite the Australian Cricket Board's constant sniping at his action, Shoaib admires Australians more than any other cricketing nation. He played grade cricket in Sydney in 2002 and says it opened his eyes to the game's possibilities.

"Positive, aggressive, so hard, so professional," he almost drools when describing the Australian way. "But best of all is their fitness. Go back a decade, people in cricket didn't believe in the gym. But these blokes were in there at six in the morning, or in the pool. They're eating the right things, taking the right supplements, following the science of America. Thank God the Americans aren't in cricket, because sports science-wise they are so far ahead. And those Australians have followed that example."

But the thing that most surprised him, he says, was the look in the batsmen's eyes when he came flying up to the crease, the way they faced up to the fastest bowler in history, who didn't pull his punches even against a bunch of part-timers. "You know what, mate," he says, his Sydney side accent growing by the moment. "They weren't scared. These are club cricketers and they played me just like a normal bowler. That's a mentality, mate. That's what we've all got to match."

Particularly that means England this week. But does all this Aussie-philia mean he will be heading over there permanently as soon as he can? "No way, man, there's only one place I want to live," he says, grinning his wide, affable smile. "Here. Man, it was 51 degrees when we left Lahore. When the plane touched down in Scotland it was six degrees. Bliss. The cold, the rain, I love it."

And he does not appear to be joking. It seems that, like his elbows, Shoaib Akhtar's meteorological taste buds got inverted at birth.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2003/jun/16/cricket.comment
 
Tbh if you look at Shoaib's action in 1999 (WC 99 or Aus tour) then his action does not look dodgy at all and looks clean to the naked eye. How did it deteriorate over the years?
 
He had a very clean action in the early part of his career. As his career progressed, his action changed substantially
 
Back
Top