Bhaijaan
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Runs
- 73,321
- Post of the Week
- 1
In my lifetime, there’s been only one truly great Ashes series, followed by a handful of decent contests.
The rest have largely been low-quality, one-sided affairs.
England usually gets mauled in Australia.
Australia, in turn, hasn’t won an Ashes series in England for nearly two decades.
Given this pattern, it’s fair to ask whether a five-Test series still makes sense.
Wouldn’t a three-Test Ashes produce tighter, more competitive cricket and cut out the dead rubber fatigue?
What do you reckon?
The rest have largely been low-quality, one-sided affairs.
England usually gets mauled in Australia.
Australia, in turn, hasn’t won an Ashes series in England for nearly two decades.
Given this pattern, it’s fair to ask whether a five-Test series still makes sense.
Wouldn’t a three-Test Ashes produce tighter, more competitive cricket and cut out the dead rubber fatigue?
What do you reckon?

