What's new

Since Mickey Arthur took over, we have taken 80% of catches in Tests

GLORY OF '92

Test Debutant
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Runs
13,473
n Saturday afternoon at Lord’s, Joe Root played a beautiful square cut into the ground. Fielding at backward point, Imam-ul-Haq dived to intercept the ball with his outstretched arms, and grabbed the ball cleanly. In a split-second of athleticism, four runs became none, prompting the entire Pakistan team to run to give Imam a high five.

It was a microcosm of the transformation in Pakistan’s fielding. Imam, like all of Pakistan’s young players, is dynamic in the field; rewind 15 years, and his uncle, the brilliant batsman Inzamam, would reach down to field balls with the air of a man rather insulted at being asked to do so.

After an England Test defeat as abject as Lord’s, fingers have inevitably been pointed at Twenty20 - for England’s shoddy shot selection, the marginalisation of the County Championship, and probably the inclement May weather too. But ask Pakistan about the impact of T20, and their answer will be very different: the shortest format has done more than anything else to improve the standards of Pakistani fielding.

To understand the roots of Pakistan’s brilliant fielding performance at Lord’s - when they did not drop a single catch and, until a couple of pieces of poor ground fielding on the third evening, barely missed a ball either - it is necessary to understand the impact that the Pakistan Super League has had on cricket in the country.

Pakistan cricket’s nine years in exile have cost the board about $200 million (£151million), because of the extra costs of playing their home matches in the UAE instead and the loss of ticket revenue. For the next generation, it has also deprived them of the opportunities of learning from foreign coaches, as few have been willing to stay in Pakistan for long.


The PSL, which launched in 2016, changed all this. For one month a year in the UAE, Pakistan’s best young players play for leading foreign coaches and with leading international stars. As this is in the format of the game which most demands athleticism, fielding has been emphasised like never before. A measure of this shift is that a higher proportion of catches are taken in the Pakistan Super League than Australia’s Big Bash.

At Lord’s, England did not just glimpse the batting and bowling skills of a team being regenerated, but also saw a new generation of effervescent fielders. Shadab Khan is both in keeping with the stereotypes of Pakistani cricket - he is a brilliant teenage legspinner - and also completely removed from them: he is a vivacious fielder too and, indeed, a genuinely three-dimensional player of the ilk that Pakistan have seldom produced. Shadab was known as a precocious fielder even before the PSL but the tournament honed his athleticism, just as it did for Imam and Faheem Ashraf.

When elevated to the national squad, these players sharpened their fielding and fitness methodically and meticulously. After Mickey Arthur was appointed head coach in 2016, he appointed the Australian Steve Rixon as fielding coach. “What we’ve done, again, is that uncompromising way we’ve worked with fielding and fitness standards,” Arthur explained before Lord’s.

Before his very first tour - the series in England in 2016 - the team trained with the army; the sight of Pakistan’s players doing press-ups on the Lord’s outfield two years ago was an acknowledgement of how this had helped. This time - as he has made the norm - Arthur oversaw a pre-series camp in Pakistan and, during the early tour matches and the Test in Ireland, honed the side’s slip fielding. Asad Shafiq’s diving catch from second slip on the first day, to account for Jos Buttler, amounted to stunning vindication.

Playing in Dubai, Arthur believes, has forced Pakistan to achieve new heights of fitness. “You get to Dubai and you get to 50, and it’s 40 degrees, you have guys throw their wickets away. Well now their fitness standards allow them to go on and get 80s and 100s.”

Arthur was not the first foreign coach to stress the importance of fielding. In many ways he shares many of the same qualities as Bob Woolmer, who also coached South Africa before doing the Pakistan job: the demeanour of an amiable uncle, a determination to improve Pakistan in their historical weaknesses without impinging upon their traditional strengths and his embrace of Pakistan as a country as well as a cricket team.

During his celebrated stint as Pakistan coach, from 2004 to 2007, Woolmer brought a new emphasis to fielding as a core skill, not merely a nice garnish on the side, introducing a rigour to fielding sessions. If there was only so much that could be done to make Inzamam more agile, Woolmer pushed the elevation of more dynamic fielders, like Shoaib Malik and begun a broader cultural shift in Pakistani cricket.

Arthur is completing the revolution that Woolmer started. Since he took over as Pakistan coach, they have taken 80 per cent of catches in Tests; only New Zealand and South Africa have been better. Pakistan have always been capable of out-batting and out-bowling opponents. Now, they routinely out-field them too.

Related Topics
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/2018/05/30/pakistan-turned-fielding-joke-one-best-sides-world/

===========
Only SA and NZ have done better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think a big part of that is due to Steve Rixon. I don't know what he did but he made our team into one of the best fielding sides in the world. I expect our fielding standards to take a dip once he leaves after the England series. I would have really loved for him to stay on till 2019 WC, but family comes first I guess.

I hope Steve's successor can continue his good work.
 
Damn this line from the article though:


"Pakistan have always been capable of out-batting and out-bowling opponents. Now, they routinely out-field them too. "
 
Dude, what about the 20% dropped catches? These are significant game changing drop catches as well. Cannot be happy with this statistic, dropped catches need to come down to 5% atleast.
 
Dude, what about the 20% dropped catches? These are significant game changing drop catches as well. Cannot be happy with this statistic, dropped catches need to come down to 5% atleast.

You are missing the context. Massive improvement by us.
 
I think we got rid of droppers in the team, that's why we are taking catches. Plus all younger players are naturally athletic and betters fielders than their predecessors.
 
So, it's not about the dusty, stony outfield and poor diet then................... neither English is a problem I guess.
 
I think a big part of that is due to Steve Rixon. I don't know what he did but he made our team into one of the best fielding sides in the world. I expect our fielding standards to take a dip once he leaves after the England series. I would have really loved for him to stay on till 2019 WC, but family comes first I guess.

I hope Steve's successor can continue his good work.

I agree , people are underestimating Steve Rixon contribution. He has very good cricketing brains. He is good enough to become Head Coach.
 
Dude, what about the 20% dropped catches? These are significant game changing drop catches as well. Cannot be happy with this statistic, dropped catches need to come down to 5% atleast.

Especially if you are Amir!
 
So, it's not about the dusty, stony outfield and poor diet then................... neither English is a problem I guess.

From early 2000's, I have never believed that language barrier is as big of an issue for national level cricketers and how they would work with foreign coaches. I have always believed that this has been an issue that is inflated by ex cricketers and their media friends to ensure that ex cricketers have some sort of opportunity to make money after retirements.

Our cricketers, even the ones who get drafted from small towns and start playing at very young age have good enough of cricketing abilities that they can understand a foreign coach well. I would even say that high school level cricketers (from small towns) would have no problem understanding foreign coaches to the point that it will sharpen their cricketing skills.
 
From early 2000's, I have never believed that language barrier is as big of an issue for national level cricketers and how they would work with foreign coaches. I have always believed that this has been an issue that is inflated by ex cricketers and their media friends to ensure that ex cricketers have some sort of opportunity to make money after retirements.

Our cricketers, even the ones who get drafted from small towns and start playing at very young age have good enough of cricketing abilities that they can understand a foreign coach well. I would even say that high school level cricketers (from small towns) would have no problem understanding foreign coaches to the point that it will sharpen their cricketing skills.

It's the least of problems in Cricket, compared to any other team sports - and I can categorically prove that.

First, talk about cricket. It's a British game, expanded in former British colonies with most of it's terminologies being universal. South Asia being British colony for almost 200 years, most languages here have picked significant amount of English words/terms in their vocabulary. Explaining cricket technicalities for a British or Aussie (Or Kiwi/West Indian) to an English illiterate South Asian cricketer is much easier than a Latin soccer Coach/player in Europe or Africa or Middle East or East Europe or Far East. Even at club level, most of the cricket terms (technical cliches & jargon) are understood by the players, which isn't the case for a native French, Dutch, German, Italian, Russian, Chinese or Arabic speaking players from Spanish or Portuguese speaking coaches - and often, there is no common language (none is good in English). Besides, cricket is far slow in nature (for communication) compared to interactive faster paced games like Soccer, basketball, hockey or volleyball.

2nd, for a professional sportsman, learning language is essential, if it's required for his game development. And, it doesn't take much to learn workable language. For example, again take soccer - many of the professionals in European leagues come from war torn Africa, or from slums of drug infested Latin america. Often these kids were raised in UN camps, or Govt. asylums without family and they had very little to no formal education, grooming - basically a human beast with exceptional soccer skills. These kids come to Europe at 18/19 and in 3 to 6 months time, facilitated by the club, learn the local language - be English, French, Spanish, German, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Turkish, Russian, Greek or Italian. In a 12-15 years pro career, some of them plays 3/4/5 leagues, under several Managers and by the time of retirement most of them becomes multilingual - for someone like Samuel Etto, he's fluent in 9 languages, on top of his tribal mother tongue.

3rd example is from PAK itself. Can't tell about now, but 35-25 years back almost entire PAK field hockey team used to play in German, Dutch & Spanish hockey leagues - it's highly unlikely that, these players had the command of local language; lower chances are that Dutch, German or Spanish coaches were reasonable with Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi or Pushtu ....... Still Hasan Sardar, Sahbaz Ahmed, Khalid Bashir, Sohail Abbas, Md. Salman ........ managed, and some of them actually led their side, means they had to do pep talks with team, understand/adopt strategy with coach and debate with referee .....

Language is absolutely no issue, trust me - ABSOLUTELY no issue. If required, a player can spend some time to learn and it'll be MUCH, MUCH easier for a south Asian cricketer to learn workable English than a Latin kid to learn German or English, or an African kid Spanish - almost 25% of our (South Asian) vocabulary these days are from English language; for cricket talks, it's probably 50%+. I give an unpopular example - our Rafique was raised in streets (raised by the hapless mom, whose husband left her with few infants), he couldn't speck proper Bangla, let alone English (And, he was a genuine angutha chap, signed contract papers with thumb mark); nature gave him cricket talent, some kind people sponsored him at club level, so he made the highest level and played under 5/6 coaches who had no clue for standard Bangla (let alone Rafique's Bangla), then he played club cricket in UK & AUS ....... We had a Russian volleyball coach for sometimes & quickly both BD players and the coach found a way to communicate. We had several German, East European & Latin soccer coaches in last 5 decades at club & national level without much issues. Several PAK players used to play Cricket & Hockey in Dhaka league, and they could understand even tricky jokes in Bangla after couple of seasons ...... most linguistics has a common bond - it's much easier to learn than any other skills.

The issue is the work load that a pro coach demands on the fitness and practice - add to that diet regime - add to that single standard for the 100 Test veteran & the debutante kid, when it comes to drills and stressing. And, he won't share % of his wage with PCB people ........................... I don't blame ex cricketers, because everyone would like to have a bite on the juicy chop - it's the problem with PCB & it's decision makers who lend ears to those pet media, despite being well aware of the motive.

Also, it takes around 100 hours to learn workable English for most South Asians and that's proven (from zero base it might take a little longer) - still, Ul Haq struggled with his yes, no, very good for 2 decades, knowing that as a player & captain he'll be on podium & in front of camera with mic. several times in life, and 25% of his one match fee was enough to hire an English teacher for 6 months, if such - so you can't blame it on PCB only.
 
Rixon has done a good job. Never thought I would see us so good in the field.
 
Back
Top