Robert
Test Star
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Runs
- 37,604
- Post of the Week
- 1
Of course Bush said that.
He didn’t say “kill Muslims”. Listen to your own link. You’ve done it again, making stuff up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course Bush said that.
Because the thread is about the murder of a British MP in Britain by an alleged terrorist who is Muslim. You asked why the MSM only talks about Muslim terrorists in Britain and I replied that they also talk about hard-right terrorists.
As for Northern Ireland, there are a few Prod Republicans and a few Catholic Loyalists so the relationship between religion and nationalism is not absolute though there is a strong correlation. The UVF and UDA were Protestant and I heard them mentioned on the news as “Protestant paramilitaries”.
I never mentioned “British lives”. You really should stop making up stuff you think people have sad when they didn’t.
He didn’t say “kill Muslims”. Listen to your own link. You’ve done it again, making stuff up.
No! Brits always tell us about British lives as if they are from a different world, i hate it when they do that like the American's do. So non British lives mean nothing or Britain going abroad to kill innocent Muslim's?. 9/11 had nothing to do with the UK at all then why did it get involved. Christian terrorists is the term you are looking for not this "Hard right terrorists" or such terms used by the biased media. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were Christian terrorism as were the first two world wars.
Same applies to Islam that such suicide bombings have nothing to do with the faith so here your double standards can clearly be seen. Rangers and Celtic the Scottish Football clubs hate each other for religious reasons too. Jayda Fransen the member and one of the founders of "Britain First" is a devout bible thumping devout Catholic too but we never hear all this.
Once more why does the media not use the term "Christian terrorism"?. You are indeed implying that British lives are more important then that off others. Next you will tell me National Front and a humanitarian organisation!
So you accept that they are driven to murder innocents by a political view.
Islamism is a Western term which can be defined as a political system of thought which posits that modern nation states should be rebuilt constitutionally, economically and legally in the terms of what it considers total Islamic practice. Islamism would therefore be opposed to liberal democratic institutions.
It first appeared in history in a US court in 1891. It came into common use in French academia in the 1970s and the use spread into English, replacing the term “Muslim fundamentalism”.
An example of Islamism began the emergence of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928. The movement is non-violent. It became political in attempting to end British control of Egypt through nonviolent means. However it is classed as a terrorist organisation by many states including some Arab states and Russia.
Jihadism is separate from Islamism - the use of violence to achieve political Islam, as practiced by Al-Qaeda, ISIL, and further back the assassins of Anwar Sadat.
They murder because they are deluded and driven by western state terrorism , as some sort of revenge or war. MI5 chief explained this perfectly.
Westerners don't own the world. They can make up any nonsense terms to fit their agenda but this doesn't mean the world must adhere to this. You can as you support western policy inc invading and destroying nations but Muslims don't need to.
Im glad you have accepted these terms are western concepts, so please don't align them with Islam. Islam as an ideology is far advanced than any western ideology when it comes to murder, self defence and how to conduct war.
The biggest threat to world in terms of terrorism is state terrorism , economic and military by nation states. Israel, US and UK are in a league or their own but you apologise on their behalf.
ISIS and Al-qeada will be pleased at your support.
An intelligent post as per usual from you.
I don't support them but you support Australian soldiers invading and killing innocent people in a country which has never attack the bush.
An interesting point which may resonate, criminals killed more natives when taking over their land, what is known as Australia today, compared to those groups killing people in the west.
You British are the ones that killed the Aboriginals in Australia, it was your government that stole the land from them, its about time your government did something to compensate them. It was your government and you have to take responsibility for it, I know you won't and come up with some lame excuse like you normally do.
Brush up on your own history before pointing fingers at others. Criminals who became settlers committed numerous massacres of the natives. You and other Aussies should compensate them, as you are a descended of these settlers.
Learn your own history, it was the British government that killed the natives in Australia, it was the British government that took the land, what did they teach you in history, everyone (well half intelligent people) knows that it was the British that invaded and claimed Australia. as you are a descendant of these invaders its time to pay.
British were the initial invaders. Eventually the criminals who set up house also turned into blood thirsty animals. They must teach it was angels who arrived with wings , wrongly convicted by the Brits?
Im glad you have accepted these terms are western concepts, so please don't align them with Islam. Islam as an ideology is far advanced than any western ideology when it comes to murder, self defence and how to conduct war..
Brush up on your own history before pointing fingers at others. Criminals who became settlers committed numerous massacres of the natives. You and other Aussies should compensate them, as you are a descended of these settlers.
Learn your own history, it was the British government that killed the natives in Australia, it was the British government that took the land, what did they teach you in history, everyone (well half intelligent people) knows that it was the British that invaded and claimed Australia. as you are a descendant of these invaders its time to pay.
Seventy Britons died in 9/11. NATO declared Article Five for the first time ever. An attack on one NATO state is an attack on all. UK is a NATO state.
Celtic and Rangers fans are not murdering each other for religion so this is an irrelevant point.
Fransen isn’t a terrorist because she hasn’t murdered anyone - she was jailed for racially motivated harassment of Muslims.
Once more - the British media doesn’t use the term “Christian terrorism” because there are no terrorists who kill in the name of Jesus in the UK. Even the example of the IRA is inappropriate because they were nationalists who wanted a united Ireland and British troops off NI streets. They were never engaged in holy war.
That’s highly debatable given the expansionism of the Caliphates, the exterminations that took place, as well as a slave trade which dwarfed the Atlantic Passage in scope and duration.
More recently the Caliphate of ISIL was guilty of religious totalitarian barbarity, until stopped by various states.
So let’s not pretend that Islam is somehow advanced over Western systems when it has not prevented its adherents committing horror on a massive scale too.
The Western slave trade was on an industrial level, nothing compared to what Muslims did.
ISIL are a bunch of criminal mercenaries, paid by the likes of Saudi, UAE who are allies of the west. They don't have any authority in the Muslim world. Only BBC and CNN take their caliphate seriously, in order to further their propaganda.
Islam is far advanced than any western systems, always has been and always will be.
I dispute that. Twice as many Africans and Europeans were taken by the various Caliphates as were taken on the Atlantic Passage. The latter stopped in 1865, while the former continued until WW1. Now there were no plantations which were generational prison camps, and a taken slave could eventually become a member of a household after long service, but that still doesn’t excuse at least thirty million human souls being ripped from their families and forced to do manual labour or be concubines. Including Britons, I might add - thousands of Cornish people were enslaved by the Barbary Corsairs.
I think people who were oppressed by ISIL took them seriously enough. Several Arab states assisted in the destruction of ISIL so they took them seriously too.
Islam was more advanced than Western cultures up until 1200 CE or so, and equal in technology and learning until 1600 CE or so but then stalled, while the Renaissance brought new systems of thinking, politics, technology, art and literature and Europe overran the world.