Sherlock
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Runs
- 14,293
We have fast bowlers that can't bowl fast. The ineptness in not being able to take early wickets has been going on since the CT and continues unabated and looked at. What is Azhar doing exactly? Does he not teach the bowlers the basics of quick bowling?
Not one fast bowler has improved since he's been employed, barring Hasan Ali and he's been inconsistent like the rest.
Inzi and Micky Arthur have a lot to answer for. Why rest players, which I agree on, bit replace them with 3rd rate replacements? Why not give those spots for youngsters that have done well in domestic cricket?
Why do we have to see Yasir Shah again? Why go to Umar Akmal in ODIs again when he's been better in T20s only? This was a massive chance to try out players that we've not seen before. It's a chance missed and something that will come back and bite us in the backside when the WC starts.
We have all-rounders that aren't good enough to be called all-rounders. Namely one specific player that is a club-level cricketer getting to play international cricket and travel worldwide, while doing absolutely nowt.
Then we have spinners that can't spin the ball. Imad, only good for T20 cricket and watching him bowl in ODIs makes me wanna pull my remaining hair out. Shah likewise is an awful, awful choice in ODIs. He's basically a leg-spinner that cannot bowl the googly.
Then the issue with the batting continues, and has continued for years now.
We have openers that aren't very good. Be it Fakhar/Imam etc. We don't have players that can boost the runrate when needed, and when they try to, they give their wickets away.
On a final note, the fielding has deteriorated since Rixon left and has only gotten worse. The players look like they're always on their heels and fumble around as if we're back in the 80's playing on bumpy outfields.
Oh and btw, this isn't a thread after watching the last 2 matches, this is one I've been thinking about since the squad was announced.
Not one fast bowler has improved since he's been employed, barring Hasan Ali and he's been inconsistent like the rest.
Inzi and Micky Arthur have a lot to answer for. Why rest players, which I agree on, bit replace them with 3rd rate replacements? Why not give those spots for youngsters that have done well in domestic cricket?
Why do we have to see Yasir Shah again? Why go to Umar Akmal in ODIs again when he's been better in T20s only? This was a massive chance to try out players that we've not seen before. It's a chance missed and something that will come back and bite us in the backside when the WC starts.
We have all-rounders that aren't good enough to be called all-rounders. Namely one specific player that is a club-level cricketer getting to play international cricket and travel worldwide, while doing absolutely nowt.
Then we have spinners that can't spin the ball. Imad, only good for T20 cricket and watching him bowl in ODIs makes me wanna pull my remaining hair out. Shah likewise is an awful, awful choice in ODIs. He's basically a leg-spinner that cannot bowl the googly.
Then the issue with the batting continues, and has continued for years now.
We have openers that aren't very good. Be it Fakhar/Imam etc. We don't have players that can boost the runrate when needed, and when they try to, they give their wickets away.
On a final note, the fielding has deteriorated since Rixon left and has only gotten worse. The players look like they're always on their heels and fumble around as if we're back in the 80's playing on bumpy outfields.
Oh and btw, this isn't a thread after watching the last 2 matches, this is one I've been thinking about since the squad was announced.
Last edited: