What's new

So spinners bowled more in order to fix over-rate in 1st Test?

Xoib

ODI Debutant
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Runs
8,931
Because we were behind the over rate and captain was afraid he would be banned next game and we will be docked points.

It was madness to see Haris and Iftikhar operating together in Australia off all places sure they would still have managed 500 plus and we still lose by an innings but really what message are we sending to the opposition I am surprised not much is being talked about this here.
 
Waqar explained:

"At one stage that was the issue [Spinners bowling a lot of overs], we were behind on over-rate so we didnt want to lose any points because of that; This is the WTC and we have to be watchful and we dont want to lose any points"

Also Naseem Shah is being used very carefully.
 
We were out of this match long time ago, atleast protect our championship points, and it's not if Pacers were doing anything special. Haris actually got Pak 2 wickets.
 
So you want pacers to bowl constantly and break their backs?

On a lifeless pitch?

What are you? You would have cried if the pacers were overbowled.

Our awaam is never happy.
 
I don't think Naseem didn't bowl due to the over-rate. Shaheen and Imran bowled plenty of overs today too, he could have bowled some of those overs if they wanted him to.

Pretty sure Naseem didn't bowl because 1. he's a teenager 2. he's on debut 3. playing in Australia is tough for newbies 4. the match was pretty much gone 5. we have another Test against Aus, then Tests against SL coming up.
 
This is defeatist mentality. Sadly Misbah and his pals have brought this mentality in a winning nation. It all started from Misbah and Waqar era in the early 2010s.
Did you read the second part. Pacers were not doing much(and were inexperienced) and Haris got 2 wickets. So for similar or worse results would it have been wise to risk losing your captain as well as championship points ?
All this noise about Misbah and Waqar this and that is pointless they hardly ha e been with Pak team in this current management, and only mistake they have made thus far is selecting Imran Khan in the squad when Mohd Abbas is there(even in bad form). I'm not saying they are good or bad, time will tell but Mickey was no better in tests.
 
Last edited:
Did you read the second part. Pacers were not doing much(and were inexperienced) and Haris got 2 wickets. So for similar or worse results would it have been wise to risk losing your captain as well as championship points ?
All this noise about Misbah and Waqar this and that is pointless they hardly ha e been with Pak team in this current management, and only mistake they have made thus far is selecting Imran Khan in the squad when Mohd Abbas is there(even in bad form). I'm not saying they are good or bad, time will tell but Mickey was no better in tests.
[MENTION=143023]SarfiBabarHaris[/MENTION] is angry over Sarfraz sacking.

You can't expect any rational thoughts and logic from someone who is unhappy with the sacking of Sarfraz, Malik and Mickey Arthur .
 
[MENTION=143023]SarfiBabarHaris[/MENTION] is angry over Sarfraz sacking.

You can't expect any rational thoughts and logic from someone who is unhappy with the sacking of Sarfraz, Malik and Mickey Arthur .

Everyone in this forum can clearly see who is taking it very personal whenever Misbah is mentioned in any post while no one referred to the poster.
 
Everyone in this forum can clearly see who is taking it very personal whenever Misbah is mentioned in any post while no one referred to the poster.

Okay, thanks.

Now you can continue promoting your hate mongering and campaigning for Sarfraz. :najam
 
Okay, thanks.

Now you can continue promoting your hate mongering and campaigning for Sarfraz. :najam

I never mentioned Sarfraz in any post lol and unlike you guys i never mentioned and target any poster like you and your crew used to do here. Not my level!
 
Back
Top