What's new

South Africa drops the 6-Team structure to move to a 15-Team, 2 Tier First-Class system

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,133
Should Pakistan follow suit or are we fine with what we have?

===


JOHANNESBURG: Cricket South Africa’s (CSA’s) Members’ Council has resolved to accept the recommendations of the David Richardson Task Team to restructure the domestic game. This follows months of consultation between CSA and the South African Cricketers’ Association (SACA) after a roadmap for the process was initially drawn up in February 2020.

The roadmap agreement complied with SACA’s requirement to be consulted in terms of the Recognition and Procedural Agreement of July 2018 between SACA and CSA. The recommendations from the Richardson report was presented to the CSA Interim Board. The Interim Board resolved to recommend its implementation to the Members’ Council, who in turn supported the new domestic cricket structure through the passing of a special resolution.

The Acting CSA Members’ Council President, Rihan Richards said, “The resolution to accept and approve the Richardson Committee’s recommendation to restructure the domestic competition is the culmination of a process over many years. It heralds a new era for CSA and its affiliates. I must thank Dave Richardson, his committee, and all who have been involved in the process. The support that the resolution received indicates the buy-in from all the stakeholders and a commitment to strengthening South African cricket. We really hope that the system will improve not only access and opportunity at all levels but will contribute to a sustainable CSA and the game.”

Under the new structure, the current six-team franchise cricket make-up will be dissolved and replaced by a 15-team first-class system. The format will see the teams split 8-7 into a Division 1 and Division 2 arrangement with automatic promotion and relegation to be implemented. This automatic promotion and relegation system aims to provide healthy tension in the system which will enhance a high performance environment, while providing opportunity for those Division 2 Members, who want to be part of a competitive first division.

The calendar for Division 1 will be similar to the current system where the eight teams will play four-day, one-day and the Twenty20 cricket (MSL) all in a single round.

The same eight teams will also compete in a domestic T20 knockout tournament with the seven teams from Division 2, whose season will comprise of a four-day and one-day competition. Division 2 players will have an opportunity to play in the MSL via a Player Draft. Proteas and other international players will also feature in the Player Draft.

The 8-7 divisional split will be determined by a “Bid process” in which each Member will be evaluated based on its performance, both current and historical, against defined Evaluation Criteria, as well as its Strategic Plan for running and sustaining a professional team within this new professional era at Affiliate Member level.

The enhancement will include: an improved contract system, an increase in the number and quality of opportunities as well as an improvement of leadership talent within CSA’s coaching structures. The proposed competition structure will offer more opportunities to players at the highest first-class domestic level, essentially widening the talent pool for the national selectors.

Furthermore, the aim is to also strengthen the development pipeline by offering a clear “line of sight” pathway for all players, wherever they may be based in the country, to progress from club cricket to international cricket.

“After considering the wide-ranging review and consultative process undertaken, the Interim Board recommended adoption of the new domestic cricket structure by the Members’ Council. This new structure will better serve our transformation goals which includes providing increased playing opportunities at the highest domestic level,” remarked Interim Board chairperson Judge Zak Yacoob.
 
While yes it will serve the transformational goals possibly a bit better as the Interim board chairperson said but it looks to be a bargain with overall quality.

SA structure has been a pretty solid one throughout their cricketing history, they actually had provincial teams as well who produced players which went onto to play for franchises.

Not sure how would be the compensation for the players in new system. Maybe they could have possibly increased the franchises to 8 and a separate provincial system just like they already had. Its a huge change to what CSA has been used to and has achieved success through. Will have to wait and watch how it goes.
 
The calls for change to Pakistan's new domestic structure may come out of this (as they are on social media!)
 
Pakistan's FC structure is quite good now, with right balance of number of teams.
 
We technically have 12 teams too. Since there is a second division with B teams
 
Pakistan's FC structure is quite good now, with right balance of number of teams.

The quality that I'm seeing in Pak domestic cricket is that even 6 teams is too many for Pakistan lol.
 
Lol the SA players association was against this fearing that with more teams now, the money in domestic cricket will be spread further from 6 teams to 15 teams which means reduced compensation for players
 
They should have rather added 3 more franchise teams and left it at that. But then again the new structure gets rid of the noise about white players getting denied opportunities because they're white. It will also give rise to club cricket again. Franchise cricket almost killed club cricket. What I do hope happens is that the quality of coaching improves. There's a dearth of quality coaches at domestic levels. One other positive thing about this is that we will go back to producing allrounders again. Franchise cricket has not done well in producing allrounders.
 
Pak system is better than before maybe more money for players can make it better for players
and in about 3-4 years make it 8 teams

just don't play in Karachi that wicket is pathetic, I like the northern wickets

The calls for change to Pakistan's new domestic structure may come out of this (as they are on social media!)
 
Last edited:
Lol the SA players association was against this fearing that with more teams now, the money in domestic cricket will be spread further from 6 teams to 15 teams which means reduced compensation for players

They only care for the players and not the overall game. It became clear that the current system was not financially sustainable. The players union didn't care about this.
 
This may work out well over the long-term. I won't pay any attention to the union who cares about who they represent rather than caring about over development of cricket.
 
I’m not happy with the revised system which allows only 7 confirmed Four day games (am I missing something). Otherwise, 15 team isn’t a bad idea as they are trying to introduce more non white players (means more qualified white players won’t be left out now), which might reduce the quality significantly, but it’ll be covered up by inclusion of more quality white players and the division system to some extent.

I would have loved this had they made it double league FC system - 14 home & away four day games and promo-demo.

For PAK system, I don’t think it’ll work, because of the large pool of players, but lack of quality. PAK ideally should have 8 teams with Karachi & Lahore as separate entity from provincial boundary and Faisalabad being HQ of central/North Punjab; a second XI (not FC status) to feed top tier and a second tier with may be 64 teams (8 in each zone), playing 3/4 day games (not FC status).

That’s a total pool of around 1600 players, (80 X 20) of which, top 256 (32 x 8) playing in top tier and may be around 100 players playing FC cricket for 14 home & away games. That’s actually the Australian system, where they have 6 (or 8 now?) FC teams and around 50-60 grade teams playing two innings games feeding to the FC teams.

SAF player pool is much smaller than PAK, but overall quality of top 250 players are better, therefore this system will serve them better, can accommodate more white players as well which should reduce talent drain - only issue is they have reduced number of FC games significantly.

Without internationals, players need to play at least 12 FC games in a year, if not 18-19.
 
This may work out well over the long-term. I won't pay any attention to the union who cares about who they represent rather than caring about over development of cricket.

One of the things that pleases me with going back to this system is that club cricket will make a comeback. You will be seeing a lot more Glenton Stuurmans pop up with the new set up. I am however worried about the level of coaching at provincial level. The lack of African black batsmen seems to point to a lack of coaching.

A lot of the white players that complained about lack of opportunity will not have a leg to stand on. This is a positive IMO.
 
I’m not happy with the revised system which allows only 7 confirmed Four day games (am I missing something). Otherwise, 15 team isn’t a bad idea as they are trying to introduce more non white players (means more qualified white players won’t be left out now), which might reduce the quality significantly, but it’ll be covered up by inclusion of more quality white players and the division system to some extent.

I would have loved this had they made it double league FC system - 14 home & away four day games and promo-demo.

That would be difficult with 2 T20 competitions scheduled during the season. I also suspect that the number of games cut might have something to with financial considerations. CSA is broke and adding more games that are not worth the money is probably not a good idea.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The main ingredient that is missing from the current system is a lack of team pressure. Does anyone really care whether their side finishes 1st to 6th? Or is QeA more of a showcase for individuals to perform to catch the selectors eye?

I think there needs to be work on how we can implement big win/loss incentives for teams so that our players can develop some mental strength.
 
The calls for change to Pakistan's new domestic structure may come out of this (as they are on social media!)

What do you mean? They’re pretty much copying our structure? They have two divisions 8-7 and we have two divisions 6-6. What’s the difference?
 
The quality that I'm seeing in Pak domestic cricket is that even 6 teams is too many for Pakistan lol.

It really isn't that bad and especially not when you consider how many players are in NZ right now. In fact the stats have been more competitive than they have in previous years where even Hammad Azam could average low 20's with the ball.
 
Pak system is better than before maybe more money for players can make it better for players
and in about 3-4 years make it 8 teams

just don't play in Karachi that wicket is pathetic, I like the northern wickets

Very logical! Seriously?

Dont play in Karachi? The countries biggest city it's economic hub and the home to the largest number of cricket fans. Its this bias attitude that kills fairness in Pakistan. How about suggesting home and away games for the sides in our first class set up? Be constructive
 
That would be difficult with 2 T20 competitions scheduled during the season. I also suspect that the number of games cut might have something to with financial considerations. CSA is broke and adding more games that are not worth the money is probably not a good idea.

Two T20 tournaments are too much, but I guess it brings money. SAF can extend their season by couple of months, but I guess at the end it’s cricket economy that’s the biggest hindrance. Problem is, when there are only 7 games and played simultaneously with international cricket, most of the top players might not even participate in domestic FC games. I hope they spread out the season as such that maximum games can be played by the internationals, otherwise the quality will go further down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very logical! Seriously?

Dont play in Karachi? The countries biggest city it's economic hub and the home to the largest number of cricket fans. Its this bias attitude that kills fairness in Pakistan. How about suggesting home and away games for the sides in our first class set up? Be constructive

calm down lol!

of course I wasn't serious it was more of a dig at the pitches than the city... don't take it personally with biases and all

if I was bias I wouldn't say play in "North" I would have said play in Punjab or Lahore or something (don't like those wickets either)

the cricket in National stadium is pretty boring throughout history with batting tracks I personally don't like it
I like the fast bowling friendly pitches
 
The main ingredient that is missing from the current system is a lack of team pressure. Does anyone really care whether their side finishes 1st to 6th? Or is QeA more of a showcase for individuals to perform to catch the selectors eye?

I think there needs to be work on how we can implement big win/loss incentives for teams so that our players can develop some mental strength.

Well the players that dont perform are either dropped or relegated to seconds XI. We have seen many examples of this during the season.
 
One of the things that pleases me with going back to this system is that club cricket will make a comeback. You will be seeing a lot more Glenton Stuurmans pop up with the new set up. I am however worried about the level of coaching at provincial level. The lack of African black batsmen seems to point to a lack of coaching.

A lot of the white players that complained about lack of opportunity will not have a leg to stand on. This is a positive IMO.

There will be more than enough slots now and no one should complain. I will be slightly worried about quality and support, but overall I think it will work out fine over the long-term.
 
I think we also missed a trick

We should have had 12 teams across 2 divisions.

With division 2 winner promoted and bottom team in division 1 relegated it would have created some competitive value .
 
15 teams means at least 75 white players that can be chosen at one time compared to much less before. Its a solution to a self created problem. However they do it,the white players will still rise to the top because the majority of the black players aren't good enough, particularly the batsman. The solution is to get more black school kids playing the game but doing that is hard work and costly.
 
I think we also missed a trick

We should have had 12 teams across 2 divisions.

With division 2 winner promoted and bottom team in division 1 relegated it would have created some competitive value .

We do have 12 teams across two divisions though. The only difference is we don’t relegate teams, we relegate players which in my opinion is way more efficient and rewarding.
 
Back
Top