I don't think that India lost the match deliberately. I just think that the law of average just caught up with them, and it does catch up in cricket except if you're Australia. Also, on a flat track like the one yesterday, England will just brush aside any team on every day of the week, except maybe an almost equally explosive Australian batting line-up. You can replay yesterday's match another nine times on the same or a similar pitch, England will still win at least eight times more. Their impatient batting is just tailor-made for such a track. Where England have been mightily fortunate in this tournament is that they finally have a very potent bowling attack. Containing the opposition and drying up the runs is the kind of bowling that suits this bowling attack.
Still though, the target was chaseable. People have questioned India's tactics, especially being 27/1 in the first 10 overs. I don´t think that India lost the match there. They just batted according to their capacity. Kohli and Rohit are no Roy, Maxwell, Buttler etc. So this was expected. But where India lost the game was that as soon as a batsman of theirs looked to be taking the match away, he got out: first Kohli, then Rohit and then finally Pandya´s dismissal brought down the curtains on the run-chase.
The turning point in my opinion were the two overs bowled by Adil Rashid and then Archer towards the end, off which hardly 10 runs were made I think. Suddenly from then on India left with over 90 required off eight overs. Please remind me the last time as many runs were chased down in as many overs in a world cup match - not a bilateral series match.
What won England the game yesterday was brilliant bowling the last 10 overs, and some very smart field placements. So the bowlers bowled to their field. Dhoni and Jadhav have been on the receiving end of heavy criticism, and fully justifiably so, but what their batting did was just that it made sure that India got nowhere close to the target - nowhere. I still don´t think that the required run-rate was manageable for them. So India would still have lost, but maybe by 10 to 15 runs. They should definitely have showed more intent as you can´t go for a draw in ODI cricket, but remember that even Pandya struggled a lot once the fifth fielder went on the boundary for the last Powerplay. He got off to a flier but then his innings lost its pace from then on.
Both Dhoni and Jadhav just did what they´re capable of; Jadhav anyway and MS at this stage of his career. Absolutely no timing, no power and zero intent. But again, England bowled really well. They mixed up the pace nicely.