What's new

Steve Smith reclaims No.1 Test ranking from Virat Kohli

Ultimately greats are mainly remembered due to test performances, and somewhat ODI performances.

For greatness I weight each format as:

Test - 70%
ODI - 30%

This is just my personal view, some people may differ from this.
T20I doesn't count for me, players might become extremely popular due to T20I but they aren't remembered as greats, a perfect example is Gayle.
 
Kohli is a all format complete batsman. Thats his game. Smith isnt.

Thats why i rate Kohli higher.

Smith is a run machine. But fugly to watch. Kohli is equally a better batsman. HE wasted a few easy scoring opportunities in West Indies. In terms of talent Kohli is second to none. And a fantastic player to watch. Smith is a better accumulator.
 
Kohli in ODIs is just another version of Amla, king of soft runs, meaningless 100s. I will always prefer Smith in that format, only in T20s is Kohli ahead because of his WT20 exploits. Right now Smith is close to Bradman level in tests, averages 10 more than nearest competitor, just like difference between Kohli and Rahane.
 
Kohli averaged above 50 in both the 2015 and 2019 WCs, and played his part as a young player in the winning 2011 campaign. Any comparisons to Amla is silly.

Only mark against Kohli in ODIs is that he chokes in the WC semifinals and CT finals.

And that's fair.


Why don't we use similar arguments for Smith in tests?

Out for 23 when he needed to hang in with Wade to win the Ashes.

Needed to go big in SA to match AB but had a run of 25, 11, 5, 7 before succumbing to cheating.

Out for 17 in the final innings of the India series when a big score would have meant an Indian choke in the 4th innings. Also had the "DRS brainfade cheating" moment as well.

Didn't do much when they got blanked 3-0 by SL.

Smith doesn't really deliver in decisive innings of big test series?
 
Kohli averaged above 50 in both the 2015 and 2019 WCs, and played his part as a young player in the winning 2011 campaign. Any comparisons to Amla is silly.

Only mark against Kohli in ODIs is that he chokes in the WC semifinals and CT finals.

And that's fair.


Why don't we use similar arguments for Smith in tests?

Out for 23 when he needed to hang in with Wade to win the Ashes.

Needed to go big in SA to match AB but had a run of 25, 11, 5, 7 before succumbing to cheating.

Out for 17 in the final innings of the India series when a big score would have meant an Indian choke in the 4th innings. Also had the "DRS brainfade cheating" moment as well.

Didn't do much when they got blanked 3-0 by SL.

Smith doesn't really deliver in decisive innings of big test series?

In the ashes if you look at smith he scores ton in 1st match of ashes and scores another in 3rd innings or in 4th test match he scores double ton and score important 82 in 3rd innings. Smith's knock in both test would have been useless if he wouldn't have scored in next inning.
 
Kohli is now within 1 point of Smith in the test ranking and can overtake him in next match

1r9ye9x7qgs31.jpg
 
This is now at the level of Federer-Nadal battle in Tennis

Kohli bringing the fight to Smith here, not lying down


If Smith is Federer of this generation, Kohli is Djokovic
 
Smith vs Kohli reminds me of Lara vs Sachin in late 90's.
Rating will Smith will remain ahead of Kohhli because of his extreme consistency. Kohli will have short lean patches but will make up in high peaks.
I am expecting Smith to go past 950 rating. While Kohli should get to 940+ as peak rating.
[table=width: 500, class: grid, align: center]
[tr][td]All Time Rating [/td][td]Rat. [/td][td]Name [/td][td]Nat. [/td][td]Career Best Rating [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]1 [/td][td]961 [/td][td]D.G. Bradman [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]961 v India, 10/02/1948 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]2 [/td][td]947 [/td][td]S.P.D. Smith [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]947 v England, 30/12/2017 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]3 [/td][td]945 [/td][td]L. Hutton [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]945 v West Indies, 03/04/1954 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]4 [/td][td]942 [/td][td]R.T. Ponting [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]942 v England, 05/12/2006 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]4 [/td][td]942 [/td][td]J.B. Hobbs [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]942 v Australia, 23/08/1912 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]6 [/td][td]941 [/td][td]P.B.H. May [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]941 v Australia, 27/08/1956 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]7 [/td][td]938 [/td][td]G.S. Sobers [/td][td]WI [/td][td]938 v India, 17/01/1967 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]7 [/td][td]938 [/td][td]I.V.A. Richards [/td][td]WI [/td][td]938 v England, 31/03/1981 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]7 [/td][td]938 [/td][td]C.L. Walcott [/td][td]WI [/td][td]938 v Australia, 15/06/1955 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]7 [/td][td]938 [/td][td]K.C. Sangakkara [/td][td]SL [/td][td]938 v England, 05/12/2007 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]11 [/td][td]937 [/td][td]V. Kohli [/td][td]IND [/td][td]937 v England, 22/08/2018 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]12 [/td][td]935 [/td][td]M.L. Hayden [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]935 v England, 11/11/2002 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]12 [/td][td]935 [/td][td]J.H. Kallis [/td][td]SA [/td][td]935 v New Zealand, 22/11/2007 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]12 [/td][td]935 [/td][td]A.B. de Villiers [/td][td]SA [/td][td]935 v Australia, 24/02/2014 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]15 [/td][td]933 [/td][td]Mohammad Yousuf [/td][td]PAK [/td][td]933 v West Indies, 01/12/2006 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]16 [/td][td]927 [/td][td]R.G. Pollock [/td][td]SA [/td][td]927 v Australia, 23/02/1970 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]16 [/td][td]927 [/td][td]E.D. Weekes [/td][td]WI [/td][td]927 v New Zealand, 07/03/1956 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]18 [/td][td]922 [/td][td]K.D. Walters [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]922 v South Africa, 23/02/1970 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]18 [/td][td]922 [/td][td]A.D. Nourse [/td][td]SA [/td][td]922 v England, 11/06/1951 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]20 [/td][td]921 [/td][td]R.N. Harvey [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]921 v South Africa, 10/02/1953 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]20 [/td][td]921 [/td][td]M.E.K. Hussey [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]921 v West Indies, 27/05/2008 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]22 [/td][td]917 [/td][td]J.E. Root [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]917 v Australia, 10/08/2015 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]22 [/td][td]917 [/td][td]D.C.S. Compton [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]917 v Australia, 12/07/1948 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]24 [/td][td]916 [/td][td]S.M. Gavaskar [/td][td]IND [/td][td]916 v England, 03/09/1979 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]25 [/td][td]915 [/td][td]G.A. Headley [/td][td]WI [/td][td]915 v England, 25/01/1948 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]25 [/td][td]915 [/td][td]K.S. Williamson [/td][td]NZ [/td][td]915 v Sri Lanka, 19/12/2018 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]27 [/td][td]914 [/td][td]K.F. Barrington [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]914 v New Zealand, 12/07/1965 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]28 [/td][td]911 [/td][td]B.C. Lara [/td][td]WI [/td][td]911 v South Africa, 06/01/2004 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]29 [/td][td]909 [/td][td]K.P. Pietersen [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]909 v West Indies, 01/06/2007 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]30 [/td][td]907 [/td][td]H.M. Amla [/td][td]SA [/td][td]907 v Pakistan, 17/10/2013 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]31 [/td][td]901 [/td][td]S. Chanderpaul [/td][td]WI [/td][td]901 v New Zealand, 23/12/2008 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]32 [/td][td]900 [/td][td]M.J. Clarke [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]900 v Sri Lanka, 30/12/2012 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]33 [/td][td]898 [/td][td]S.R. Tendulkar [/td][td]IND [/td][td]898 v Zimbabwe, 25/02/2002 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]34 [/td][td]897 [/td][td]W.R. Hammond [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]897 v New Zealand, 04/04/1933 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]35 [/td][td]895 [/td][td]A. Flower [/td][td]ZIM [/td][td]895 v South Africa, 18/09/2001 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]35 [/td][td]895 [/td][td]S.R. Waugh [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]895 v England, 07/07/1997 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]37 [/td][td]892 [/td][td]R. Dravid [/td][td]IND [/td][td]892 v Pakistan, 20/03/2005 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]38 [/td][td]891 [/td][td]C.C. McDonald [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]891 v Pakistan, 17/11/1959 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]39 [/td][td]888 [/td][td]C.A. Pujara [/td][td]IND [/td][td]888 v Sri Lanka, 07/08/2017 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]39 [/td][td]888 [/td][td]H. Sutcliffe [/td][td]ENG [/td][td]888 v Australia, 03/01/1933 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]41 [/td][td]886 [/td][td]C. Hill [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]886 v South Africa, 12/11/1902 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]41 [/td][td]886 [/td][td]G. Gambhir [/td][td]IND [/td][td]886 v Sri Lanka, 28/11/2009 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]43 [/td][td]885 [/td][td]Javed Miandad [/td][td]PAK [/td][td]885 v New Zealand, 28/02/1989 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]44 [/td][td]883 [/td][td]D.P.M.D. Jayawardene [/td][td]SL [/td][td]883 v India, 20/11/2009 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]44 [/td][td]883 [/td][td]G.S. Chappell [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]883 v Pakistan, 05/01/1977 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]46 [/td][td]880 [/td][td]Younus Khan [/td][td]PAK [/td][td]880 v Sri Lanka, 25/02/2009 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]46 [/td][td]880 [/td][td]D.A. Warner [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]880 v India, 13/12/2014 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]48 [/td][td]878 [/td][td]W.M. Lawry [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]878 v West Indies, 18/02/1969 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]49 [/td][td]877 [/td][td]A.R. Border [/td][td]AUS [/td][td]877 v England, 31/08/1981 [/td][/tr]
[tr][td]49 [/td][td]877 [/td][td]A.D. Mathews [/td][td]SL [/td][td]877 v New Zealand, 30/12/2014 [/td][/tr]
[/table]
 
Last edited:
Yes. Overall average make that difference bigger. But if we strictly go by recent performances not much seperate them. It is not true Smith is "light years" ahead of Kohli as some claim.
 
Their stats over the last 3 years are a lot closer than you guys make it seem.

View attachment 95906

Smith since Oct 2016 has mostly played big series. India 2017, Ashes 2017, SA 2018, Ashes 2019. He didn't face weak side in easy conditions. Kohli scored lots of runs in home conditions during 2016-17 and then that srilankan tour to india where he scored 2 back to back double hundreds where he was not out as well.
 
Smith since Oct 2016 has mostly played big series. India 2017, Ashes 2017, SA 2018, Ashes 2019. He didn't face weak side in easy conditions. Kohli scored lots of runs in home conditions during 2016-17 and then that srilankan tour to india where he scored 2 back to back double hundreds where he was not out as well.

Kohli has also played in SA, Australia, and England.

Why is an Australian playing in England considered difficult but India playing in Sri Lanka is easy? Sri Lanka has a better record than England in recent times, having beaten Australia at home, Pakistan away, and SA away.
 
Smith since Oct 2016 has mostly played big series. India 2017, Ashes 2017, SA 2018, Ashes 2019. He didn't face weak side in easy conditions. Kohli scored lots of runs in home conditions during 2016-17 and then that srilankan tour to india where he scored 2 back to back double hundreds where he was not out as well.

He also scored almost 600 runs in England. Outscored everyone by some distance in SA.
 
Kohli has also played in SA, Australia, and England.

Why is an Australian playing in England considered difficult but India playing in Sri Lanka is easy? Sri Lanka has a better record than England in recent times, having beaten Australia at home, Pakistan away, and SA away.

For one thing,Asian teams get tougher pitches when they visit countries like England/SA. They don't do the same for Australian team since they are used to bouncy conditions.
 
Kohli is now within 1 point of Smith in the test ranking and can overtake him in next match

1r9ye9x7qgs31.jpg

If a batsman scores above his average does his rating go up or stay constant?
 
Smith since Oct 2016 has mostly played big series. India 2017, Ashes 2017, SA 2018, Ashes 2019. He didn't face weak side in easy conditions. Kohli scored lots of runs in home conditions during 2016-17 and then that srilankan tour to india where he scored 2 back to back double hundreds where he was not out as well.
lol at excuses to undermine Kohli's achievements. As some said, Kohli was by far the best batsman in SA and Eng, that's 2 totally different batting conditions than what he finds at home.
 
Yes. Overall average make that difference bigger. But if we strictly go by recent performances not much seperate them. It is not true Smith is "light years" ahead of Kohli as some claim.
This!
 
he can't talk at all. Aussies are kings of doctoring at home. lmao.
sandpaper
DRS cheating
nicks not given
umpire favours.


smith has had it all.

Yes, but he doesn't get to play all his games at home. In case he did, like I said, he would average 100+.
 
Steve Smith showed off his remarkable powers of adaptability and concentration in his final tune-up ahead of the home Test season, scoring the slowest century of his first-class career in the Marsh Sheffield Shield on Tuesday.

Just a week after his jaw-dropping 80 not out from just 51 balls in a T20 against Pakistan, Smith faced nearly six times as many deliveries for his 42nd first-class ton across the first two days of NSW's match against Western Australia at the SCG.

The 290 balls it took him to reach the milestone are the most he's ever faced to reach triple figures, 'eclipsing' his marathon 261-ball ton at the Gabba in the opening Test of the 2017-18 Ashes series.

It means he's now scored two of the three slowest centuries of his career in his past two Shield games, having posted a 235-ball hundred against Tasmania last month before heading off for international duties.

Not only was the knock against WA an ominous sign for Pakistan, for whom dismissing Smith will undoubtedly be their bowlers' top priority for their two-Test Domain Series, it also highlighted the right-hander’s unrivalled ability to change gears.

Back-to-back T20 campaigns against Sri Lanka and Pakistan required Smith to constantly get bat on ball and hit boundaries from early in his innings.

He did that with aplomb in stroking two unbeaten half-centuries in three hits during the two series victories, displaying extraordinary stroke-play in his innings at Manuka Oval last Tuesday.

To then bat for nearly six hours in composing a laborious hundred on a sluggish SCG surface where scoring proved difficult necessitated an entirely different set of skills and mental approach.

"The wicket kind of dictated (Smith's approach)," opener Daniel Solway said on day one after he put on 82 for the second wicket with Smith.

"If you bowl disciplined, you need to take risks to score and they (WA) bowled quite well.

Smith was eventually dismissed for 103 in bizarre fashion before lunch on day two, appearing nonplussed at the decision to give him out caught behind after trying to ramp a Marcus Stoinis bouncer, with WA keeper Josh Inglis standing up to the stumps.

Smith almost single-handedly held together Australia's top order together earlier this year to ensure the visitors retained the Ashes urn for the first time since 2001.

He admitted the five-Test series, in which he spent more than 32 hours at the crease and scored 774 runs at 110.57, left him exhausted.

"It was probably a bit of everything: mental, emotional, physical," Smith said last month.

"Towards the last Test match, it got to day two and my mind was saying ‘keep going’ but my body had shut down and wouldn't let me do anything.

"I was a little bit sick after that."

Now, however, Smith looks as fresh as ever to resume his run-scoring feats.

STEVE SMITH'S SLOWEST FIRST-CLASS CENTURIES

290 balls - NSW v Western Australia, SCG (November 2019)

261 balls - Australia v England, Gabba (November 2017)

235 balls - NSW v Tasmania, Drummoyne Oval (October 2019)

227 balls - Australia v India, Ranchi (March 2017)

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/ste...ss-dismissal-caught-marcus-stoinis/2019-11-12
 
Steve Smith was fuming at this dismissal. After belting 103, he had every right to be

Steve Smith warmed up for next week’s First Test against Pakistan with a chanceless, albeit somewhat protracted, century for New South Wales against Western Australia at the SCG.

Smith seemed more focused on occupying the crease for long periods on Monday, but picked up the scoring rate to a degree on day two to reach his second century of the Sheffield Shield summer in a 290-ball knock spread over five and half hours at the crease.

Smith, however, was given out caught behind in the following over off the bowling of Marcus Stoinis for 103, although the Test superstar seemed unhappy at the decision with only a modest appeal submitted by WA.

Smith clearly didn’t believe he’d struck the ball and ferociously shaking his head as he left the field. Looking at the replay, he’s got fair reason to be annoyed.

After resuming at 2-221, the Shield leaders went to lunch at 4-331 with Nick Larkin on 14 and Peter Nevill on 4.

Moises Henriques did the bulk of the scoring on the second morning advancing comfortably from his overnight 4, before failing for 91 off 116 balls after flicking a catch to mid-wicket off the bowling of Liam O’Connor. Henriques and Smith put on 141 for the third wicket.

Without fast bowling spearhead Jhye Richardson on Australia A duty, it has been four gruelling sessions in hot conditions for the WA attack. Leg-spinner O’Connor has been the pick of the bowlers with 2-52, while medium- pacer Stoinis has returned 2-45.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricke...g/news-story/d83e099d9cd3f4a8c9c3074cddf8a82a
 
Smith back as top-ranked Test batsman

Australia’s Steve Smith is back on top of the list of batsmen in the MRF Tyres ICC Test Player Rankings after India captain Virat Kohli could manage only 21 runs in his two innings in the first Test against New Zealand in Wellington, which his side lost by 10 wickets to concede a 1-0 lead in the two-match series.

This is the eighth time that Smith is on top of the rankings after first occupying the top position in June 2015. The last batsman apart from Smith and Kohli to be No. 1 is New Zealand’s Kane Williamson, for an eight-day period in December 2015.

https://www.icc-cricket.com/media-releases/1625316
 
Two greats battling it out at the very top
 
Two legends fighting it out for top spot in ICC rankings in test cricket and I see a certain poster always keeps on claiming that on current form, Babar is ahead of Kohli.
 
Provided Babar plays more home series against SL, Ban etc but unfortunately he's got to tour Eng and NZ in the next year.

So don't see that happening. :)

Eagerly waiting for his comeback post.. Won't see that coming though
 
Eagerly waiting for his comeback post.. Won't see that coming though

Actually, Babar started to improve his ranking when he played against SA, ENG, NZ, and AUS (second tour). Before that, he was struggling against WI and SL. But now he performs against all opposition.

Also, Virat doesn't play against SL and BD? or is it only a problem when Babar does. Babar has only played a total of 4 innings at home while Kohli has been playing home since the start of his career.
 
Actually, Babar started to improve his ranking when he played against SA, ENG, NZ, and AUS (second tour). Before that, he was struggling against WI and SL. But now he performs against all opposition.

Also, Virat doesn't play against SL and BD? or is it only a problem when Babar does. Babar has only played a total of 4 innings at home while Kohli has been playing home since the start of his career.

But Kohli has nothing to prove overseas, he has performed as a player and captain against Aussies in Oz while Babar failed miserably. He bashes Bangladesh, just another minnow basher.
 
Actually, Babar started to improve his ranking when he played against SA, ENG, NZ, and AUS (second tour). Before that, he was struggling against WI and SL. But now he performs against all opposition.

Also, Virat doesn't play against SL and BD? or is it only a problem when Babar does. Babar has only played a total of 4 innings at home while Kohli has been playing home since the start of his career.

kohli can retire now..He is already an ATG. He has scored vs everybody. Nothing to prove.
 
But Kohli has nothing to prove overseas, he has performed as a player and captain against Aussies in Oz while Babar failed miserably. He bashes Bangladesh, just another minnow basher.

Babar scored a 100 and 97 across 4 innings in Australia with zero support from the other end — his batting partners were all tail enders. Saying that he failed miserably is a gross manipulation of the facts to present an unfavorable analysis. When’s the last time Kohli hit a century whether home or away? Babar’s hitting a hundred every game for the last several tests.
 
Babar scored a 100 and 97 across 4 innings in Australia with zero support from the other end — his batting partners were all tail enders. Saying that he failed miserably is a gross manipulation of the facts to present an unfavorable analysis. When’s the last time Kohli hit a century whether home or away? Babar’s hitting a hundred every game for the last several tests.

To further elaborate: he’s hit a hundred in every single game against Australia, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh since the start of the WTC.
 
But Kohli has nothing to prove overseas, he has performed as a player and captain against Aussies in Oz while Babar failed miserably. He bashes Bangladesh, just another minnow basher.

Babar Azam averages 42.57 against SENA vs his overall average of 45. In other words, you are wrong.
 
Babar scored a 100 and 97 across 4 innings in Australia with zero support from the other end — his batting partners were all tail enders. Saying that he failed miserably is a gross manipulation of the facts to present an unfavorable analysis. When’s the last time Kohli hit a century whether home or away? Babar’s hitting a hundred every game for the last several tests.

Just one test ago.
 
I don't get how the rankings work! a player fails in a test and loses 20+ points..

and players who were averaging mid 30 just three tests ago is now ranked 5th after feasting on minnows.
 
I don't get how the rankings work! a player fails in a test and loses 20+ points..

and players who were averaging mid 30 just three tests ago is now ranked 5th after feasting on minnows.

Higher rating points require better performances to maintain the rating. The higher the rating, the higher the requirement to maintain it.

Babar is averaging 65 in Tests over the last 2 years.
 
Two legends fighting it out for top spot in ICC rankings in test cricket and I see a certain poster always keeps on claiming that on current form, Babar is ahead of Kohli.

Top spot in ICC rankings doesn't mean everything. Even if Kohli stayed number 1 Smith is way ahead as a test batsman.

If I am the poster you are referring to then :
- Don't think I said Babar is ahead of Kohli
- I first made this comment on the 9th of november "On courent form, overall I will have Smith as the undisputed number 1; Kohli/Babar on tie for 2nd position and Williamson at 4. " Then, was mocked with arguments like "Babar has 1 test century", "Babar averages 35 in Test Cricket", "Babar isn't in top 10 ranked batsman" and many other things like that.

Just look at what happened since and in only 3 months the big strides that Babar has made in Test cricket. There is no reason for him to not continue this way. His next big challenge will be in England this summer.
 
I don't get how the rankings work! a player fails in a test and loses 20+ points..

and players who were averaging mid 30 just three tests ago is now ranked 5th after feasting on minnows.

Let off the jealousy man. Babar is a superb batsman.
 
Babar Azam averages 42.57 against SENA vs his overall average of 45. In other words, you are wrong.
babar is a good player but kohli is kohli. Long way to go for babar.

Soon Rahul will be as good as babar. QDK, Rahul vs babar the future.
 
Smith claimed what's rightfully his..in tests there's no comparison between Smith and Kohli, forget the rankings..
 
I don't get how the rankings work! a player fails in a test and loses 20+ points..

and players who were averaging mid 30 just three tests ago is now ranked 5th after feasting on minnows.

Its harder to be on top but easier to climb as of now.
 
Smith 911
Kohli 886
Williamson 813
Root 764

Interesting but I was told Kohli and Root are about at same level while Smith is way ahead.
 
Smith 911
Kohli 886
Williamson 813
Root 764

Interesting but I was told Kohli and Root are about at same level while Smith is way ahead.
The rankings are based on some kind on recent performances.
The other discussion was on overall career.

Just like Babar Azam with 800 points is a lesser test Batsman than Taylor with 677 points.

You, yourself rate QdK higher than Babar when Babar has 800 points and QdK has 706 points.

Hope it clarifies things for you.
 
The rankings are based on some kind on recent performances.
The other discussion was on overall career.

Just like Babar Azam with 800 points is a lesser test Batsman than Taylor with 677 points.

You, yourself rate QdK higher than Babar when Babar has 800 points and QdK has 706 points.

Hope it clarifies things for you.

QDk vs Babar is not a good analomy. QDk is a wicket-keeper batsmen so he will always have lesser ratings and points than a world class specialist batsmen who will be hitting 850+ points quite easily.

I only brought QDk into context in a thread where it was argued who is the next best in terms of age after the Fab four? Whenever will talk about Qdk's ICC rankings or his stats as batsmen it should be taken into consideration that he keeps gloves as well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top