What's new

Sunil Gavaskar 221 at The Oval - Fortieth anniversary today: How great was it?

Harsh Thakor

First Class Star
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Runs
3,520
Post of the Week
2
40 years ago on this day the cricket world witnessed one of its greatest epics.Sunil Gavaskar simply gave one of the most majestic displays of batting ever seen on a cricket field defining batting perfection at it's highest zenith.Few innings ever in the history of test cricket have led such a resurgence in a team .Gavaskar blended the technical skill of a surgeon with the concentration of a Buddhist monk and the temperament of a soldier.In the whole innings he did not concede a single chance.It is hard to even visualize a more clinical batting performance.Displayed mental resilience or concentration at it's optimum level..That day Gavaskar was simply a boat sailing in the most turbulent of seas travelling unperturbed .It was a sight to behold witnessing Gavaskar grinding himself to lay a carpet. like a sculpting a statue to perfection .For sheer grammar it was close to the best innings of all time and the best ever in a 4th innings.There is hardly an adjective that can describe the intensity of Gavaskar that day,with his batting resembling meditation,like a cocoon of concentration.Above all it enabled India to stage one of the greatest 4 th innings comebacks,if not the greatest ever in the history of the game.Now Gavaskar gave the final slap in the face to those critiques who rejected his stature as an all-time great batsmen or best opening batsmen in the world.





India started the 2nd innings with their backs to the wall chasing a record target of 438 runst o win to square the series.India had been outplayed for most of the series facing a humiliating defeat at Edgbaston.Gavaskar had been a model of consistency but still a really big innings was due from him.



Gavaskar started cautiously with partner Chetan Chauhan to enable India to reach 76-0 at the close of the 4th day.On the 5th day needing another 365 to win both the openers got down to business from the word go.Gavaskar punished every bad ball in his characteristic manner. while partner Chetan Chauhan played a perfect supporting role. as an accomplice.The opening stand was broken with 213 on the board.Vengsarkar now joined Gavaskar and the 2 took India within sight of a famous win taking India to 328-1 when the mandatory overs began.India needed around five and half runsper over to win and looked on target to coasting hom,e before the departure of Vengsarkar with the score at 366 after making a well compiled 52.India were still favourites before skipper Venkatraghvan made the gross blunder of sending in Kapil Dev before Vishwanath who held out on the ropes lashing out on the 1st ball.Next Yashpal Sharma came in who again fell cheaply before Vishwanath was ultimately sent in .With 8 overs to go and 49 needed Gavaskar eventually perished holding out to Gower off the bowling of Botham.It almost looked as though India 's victory prospects had dimmed or even diminished before Vishwanath launched a thrilling counter resurgence.With the artistry of a painter he dispatched 3 balls to the boundary and India again looked as though they were sailing home.To me at this point the game had its gravest fate.Vishy hit a bump ball which was caught by Brearley and was wrongly declared out.It was reminiscent of a weaver's hands being cut off giving the final touches to a dress .A few overs later Yashpal Sharma and Yujivender Singh were given doubtful LBW decisions and Venkataraghvan wrongly adjudged run out.In the final over India needed 13 runs still with 2 wickets remaining and played out for a draw,The umpires had come to the rescue of England to rob India of untold glory and morally thus it was 13 Englishman that played that day.



Still India had morally won the day and salvaged glory.After being so battered and overpowered India ressurected itself to come within touching distance of the pinnacle of glory as few teams ever did ..Although living in England at that time I can visualize the jubilation and elevation of spirit in the hearts of the people in India,with their pocket radios fixed on their ears.Every run or boundary of Gavaskar elevated the pulse or took the morale of the Indian people to its crescendo.It was reminiscent of a nation on the brink of a glorious victory against a great colonial power ,defining the spirit or pulse of the nation as few sportsman could ever do.Sadly India lost the series in the end but still won it's self respect.India came within 9 runs of achieving the record winning total in a4th innings which if acheived would have stood as a record till this day.Above all Gavaskar scored over 50 % of the team's runs which was remarkable.I still dream of a situation of Vishy giving the perfect finishing touches to take India across the line,giving the final icing to the cake whose foundation was laid by Sunny.There was hardly any criticism for the dubious umpiring decisions by the English media .Still India had won many a fan amongst the Englishman and in the final session even went on to the side of India,feeling they deserved to win. I was saddened that day by the unsporting tactics of the Englishman led by Mike Brearley,trying to slow down the game when India were cruising home.



After the game Len Hutton paid a big tribute to Gavaskar's knock as so did Jim Laker.They stated that it was proof that Gavaskar was the best opening batsmen in the world.Hutton also regarded Gavaskar as the best batsmen in the world .Mike Brearley described it as the most flawless exhibition of batting he ever witnessed where every good ball was treated on its merit and every bad ball dispatched for four.True there have been more attacking or artistic displays of stroke play.but considering the adverse circumstances faced few could ever match,let alone beat Gavaskar's herculean effort.Very hard to envisage even the likes of Viv Richards.Sachin Tendulkar or Virat Kohli equalling Sunny on that day.



Personally I rank this innings among the dozen best test innings of all time and 4 best ever in a run chase. Only Lara's unbeaten 153 v Australia and Kusar Perara's unbeaten 154 v South Africa in my book rank ahead and arguably Ben Stoke's latest 135 v Australia.Considering percentage of team's score it edged even Ben Stoke's effort recently.No doubt Gordon Greenidge gave a more breathtaking display when scoring 214 n.o at Lords taking domination to regions of the divine,but he hardly faced such a grave situation. Probably the bets innings ever by an opening batsmen in a run chase.



I rank India's performance as the best ever 4th innings effort in a draw among s the 3 best ever in a 4th innings run chase.
 
Please come here [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] [MENTION=139595]Ab Fan[/MENTION] [MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION]. @Freelance Cricketer
 
I think gavaskars 96 vs Pakistan 4th innings in a losing cause was much better.
 
Just excellent, to hold together an impossible charge against very good bowling (Willis, peak
Botham, the underrated Hendrick and Edmonds) like that.

Lovely to see Bluey Bairstow got a late order fifty too.

England were staring down the barrel at 380-3 but then Botham - who else? - started a collapse.
 
Just excellent, to hold together an impossible charge against very good bowling (Willis, peak
Botham, the underrated Hendrick and Edmonds) like that.

Lovely to see Bluey Bairstow got a late order fifty too.

England were staring down the barrel at 380-3 but then Botham - who else? - started a collapse.
What about the unfair umpiring?Did it not cost India a famous win?Where would you rank this innings?
 
Interestingly one of Younis Khan’s many double hundreds (his last one in 2016) came at the Oval. I saw that live and it was a great innings to watch. But the Oval pitch is pretty flat...
 
Interestingly one of Younis Khan’s many double hundreds (his last one in 2016) came at the Oval. I saw that live and it was a great innings to watch. But the Oval pitch is pretty flat...

It changes. Was a spin paradise in the fifties. Flat in seventies. Was the fastest track in England in the eighties and nineties. They gave Murali a dustbowl in 1998, stupidly.
 
Would have been the greatest inning of all-time by an opener if India would have won the match.

Gavaskar was truly the greatest opener the game has seen.
 
Would have been the greatest inning of all-time by an opener if India would have won the match.

Gavaskar was truly the greatest opener the game has seen.

I would put Hobbs, Sutcliffe and Hutton ahead of him.
 
I would put Hobbs, Sutcliffe and Hutton ahead of him.

These are all pre-war era players. Its pointless to assume that pre-war era players were superior to modern era players. The game has developed so much and the benchmark has been raised massively. They were, no doubt, legends in their own rights because of what they achieved in their era but there is no way sports will be going backwards over a course of 75-80 years.

There is a reason why England don't have a batter(let alone opener) who has been an equivalent to Gavaskar in last 40 years.

I even doubt we would find any England batsmen or bowler names in top 10 list in the last 40 years of international cricket. Possibly, Ian Botham, that's it in the all-rounder league.
 
Did this221 At Oval not rank amongst the greatest ever ?

It is one of the best knocks but in my opinion 96 vs Pakistan at Bangalore was better than this,the reason is it was his last test match,how come anyone will play like that type of innings on that turning track especially when its your last test match?
 
I would put Hobbs, Sutcliffe and Hutton ahead of him.

Agree on Hobbs who mastered wet tracks better than even Bradman and had s staggering run aggregate.To me a virtual dead heat with Hutton as Gavaskar was more prolific against the greatest pace men ever and played for a weaker team.Len was marginally ahead technically and on bad wickets but Gavaskar broke more records in his day.Gavaskar was more accomplished than Sutcliffe if you assess opposition faced.All experts ranked Gavaskar above Sutcliffe like John Woodcock or Cristopher Martin Jenkins.Honbs 197 centuries speaks for itself who may have even been the best of all batsmen.
 
Would have been the greatest inning of all-time by an opener if India would have won the match.

Gavaskar was truly the greatest opener the game has seen.

Not the equal of Hobbs on wet sticklers.Nor was even Bradman.In all conditions Hobbs could have been the best of all.Technically Hutton was the best of all and a whisker ahead of Sunny on bad surfaces.Still
A draw as Gavaskar faced better bowling.Also case for Barry Richards who was the ultimate doyen.
 
Agree on Hobbs who mastered wet tracks better than even Bradman and had s staggering run aggregate.To me a virtual dead heat with Hutton as Gavaskar was more prolific against the greatest pace men ever and played for a weaker team.Len was marginally ahead technically and on bad wickets but Gavaskar broke more records in his day.Gavaskar was more accomplished than Sutcliffe if you assess opposition faced.All experts ranked Gavaskar above Sutcliffe like John Woodcock or Cristopher Martin Jenkins.Honbs 197 centuries speaks for itself who may have even been the best of all batsmen.

Lindwall, Miller, Johnston and Davidson were great paceman too. Hutton lost six peak years to the war, came back from it with a shortened arm and was still excellent.

Happy to call Gavaskar the best opener since 1960. Probably by some distance.
 
Lindwall, Miller, Johnston and Davidson were great paceman too. Hutton lost six peak years to the war, came back from it with a shortened arm and was still excellent.

Happy to call Gavaskar the best opener since 1960. Probably by some distance.

Gooch maybe very close as well as Greenidge .Barry Richards not ahead?
 
Lindwall, Miller, Johnston and Davidson were great paceman too. Hutton lost six peak years to the war, came back from it with a shortened arm and was still excellent.

Happy to call Gavaskar the best opener since 1960. Probably by some distance.

Remember Bradman chose Barry Richards in all time XI being a greater match winner and Greenidge was a more attacking batsmen.Against pure genuine pace Gococh could have been the best with his great record v West Indies pacers.I feel even if Sunny best a close affair and not Gavaskar by a mile.For some time in the 1990s Greenidge was the best batsmen in the world.
 
I would put Hobbs, Sutcliffe and Hutton ahead of him.

Hahahaha! Amazing! So you dont rate innings that you havent seen, ( Post no 8, in this thread by you), but you rate batsmen you never watched live? Or were you born in the 18th century? Lolz, farkin hilarious, the kind of bias and hatred people show here!
 
Not the equal of Hobbs on wet sticklers.Nor was even Bradman.In all conditions Hobbs could have been the best of all.Technically Hutton was the best of all and a whisker ahead of Sunny on bad surfaces.Still
A draw as Gavaskar faced better bowling.Also case for Barry Richards who was the ultimate doyen.

I will go with this XI:-

Hobbs
Gavaskar
Bradman
Tendulkar
Lara
Sobers
Gilchrist (wkt)
Wasim
Warne
Marshall
McGrath

Among those I watched live:-

Hayden
Smith
Lara
Tendulkar
Kallis
Waugh(c)
Gilchrist (wkt)
Wasim
Warne
Ambrose
McGrath
 
Please come here [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] [MENTION=139595]Ab Fan[/MENTION] [MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION]. @Freelance Cricketer

Well, I'm going to be a little contrary here.

I played my first ever innings in a helmet that fifth day, wearing a riding hat!

It was a superb innings by a consummate technician, but there was literally no point when I thought that India would chase down the target.

At Lunch I thought they would run out of time around 60 short of the target because I thought that Willis and Botham would strike with the second new ball around Tea time, and at Tea I came in after my own innings and thought they would still fall around 60 short. I just thought it was a certain draw.

I was then surprised when Gavaskar started to hit a flurry of boundaries, but the wickets kept tumbling and I knew that Gavaskar would just shut up shop rather than risk another defeat.

Wonderful innings, but I never reached the point where I thought India might win (or lose).
 
Well, I'm going to be a little contrary here.

I played my first ever innings in a helmet that fifth day, wearing a riding hat!

It was a superb innings by a consummate technician, but there was literally no point when I thought that India would chase down the target.

At Lunch I thought they would run out of time around 60 short of the target because I thought that Willis and Botham would strike with the second new ball around Tea time, and at Tea I came in after my own innings and thought they would still fall around 60 short. I just thought it was a certain draw.

I was then surprised when Gavaskar started to hit a flurry of boundaries, but the wickets kept tumbling and I knew that Gavaskar would just shut up shop rather than risk another defeat.

Wonderful innings, but I never reached the point where I thought India might win (or lose).

So you followed that match live. Read that the umpiring was pretty dubious and England's over rate in the finishing stages a farce. In his opening post Harsh does make points about India getting many bad decisions on the final day, do you second that?
 
So you followed that match live. Read that the umpiring was pretty dubious and England's over rate in the finishing stages a farce. In his opening post Harsh does make points about India getting many bad decisions on the final day, do you second that?
Absolutely, the umpires were David Constant and Ken Palmer. Let’s just say that they were both patriotic gentlemen.
 
Absolutely, the umpires were David Constant and Ken Palmer. Let’s just say that they were both patriotic gentlemen.

To give 4 wrong decisions! Vishy,venkat,yashpal and yujvinder within 10 overs !India would have surely won without those blunders.
 
Well, I'm going to be a little contrary here.

I played my first ever innings in a helmet that fifth day, wearing a riding hat!

It was a superb innings by a consummate technician, but there was literally no point when I thought that India would chase down the target.

At Lunch I thought they would run out of time around 60 short of the target because I thought that Willis and Botham would strike with the second new ball around Tea time, and at Tea I came in after my own innings and thought they would still fall around 60 short. I just thought it was a certain draw.

I was then surprised when Gavaskar started to hit a flurry of boundaries, but the wickets kept tumbling and I knew that Gavaskar would just shut up shop rather than risk another defeat.

Wonderful innings, but I never reached the point where I thought India might win (or lose).

Surely amongst the greatest innings of all time and amongst the very top amongst openers!Agree?
 
To give 4 wrong decisions! Vishy,venkat,yashpal and yujvinder within 10 overs !India would have surely won without those blunders.
That’s how Cricket was before Imran Khan bullied world cricket into accepting neutral umpires.

The umpires were active participants on behalf of their country, the home team.
 
Back
Top