What's new

'Test cricket is too hard, no wonder players opt for T20 leagues' : Sanjay Manjrekar

giri26

T20I Debutant
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Runs
8,487
Post of the Week
1
Former India batsman Sanjay Manjrekar stressed that Test cricket is losing out on its popularity due to the players giving more importance to T20 leagues around the globe. “Today’s Test cricket is played in front of empty stands and IPL in front of frenzied crowds of 50,000 plus and millions watching on TV. It’s about playing the IPL (Indian Premier League) at all cost, player injuries surface before and after the IPL. IPL offers you fame and money and who will say no to this?” Manjrekar said while delivering the ninth Dilip Sardesai Memorial lecture at the Cricket Club of India in Mumbai on Monday.

“Also, Test cricket is just too damn hard, so it’s no wonder that many are choosing T20 leagues over Test matches,” he said.

The 53-year-old former batsman-turned-commentator questioned India’s reluctancy to host day-night Test matches which will help increase viewership. “The only way to get more people to watch Test cricket, increase its viewership, popularity and thereby its quality is day-night Test matches,” said Manjrekar.

“Why aren’t we playing more day-night Test matches, when it’s a no-brainer that it will draw more viewership,” he said.

Manjrekar revealed that an offer to host a day-night Test match was turned down by India due to the players’ concerns. “The players are wary of it, wary of the pink ball, the dew factor. I always believed that conditions aren’t unfair if it is the same for both the sides,” he said.

He also advised administrators not to get influenced by players’ views. “I believe that people at the top should get their (players) views and not get dictated by those,” he said.

Meanwhile, Manjrekar blamed the batsmen after India were humiliated 1-4 to England in the Test series recently. “Interestingly, it was the batting that let India down this time (in England), the bowlers kept getting India back in the match and the batsmen kept letting those chances slip.

“It wasn’t temperament that was letting these batsmen down. In South Africa and in England it was purely a technical problem, specifically defensive technique,” he said.

https://www.cricketcountry.com/news...s-opt-for-t20-leagues-sanjay-manjrekar-751347
 
Says a lot about the current cricketers as there thinking also clouded by lure of fame and fortune which is easier and quicker in shorter formats of the game
 
Says a lot about the current cricketers as there thinking also clouded by lure of fame and fortune which is easier and quicker in shorter formats of the game

Earlier only handful of them will be making any income. Now there are lot of safe opportunities to make money. Lot of them come from very humble background, so you can't fault them for playing safe.
 
Still you need skills to survive in any format! Average cricketers lived even in the golden era of Test Cricket!
 
I only regard Tests as having any importance. Perhaps the ODI WC in isolation but otherwise LOI cricket sickens me.
 
It's called delusion when you think just by having the test matches in night, public will develop some sort of love for the format. I am sure most people have better things to do in life than watching 7-8 hours of boring cricket at 3 runs an over, all in the name of patience and temperament. Just because it's night, it doesn't mean that people don't have lives.
 
No wants to play Test cricket, everyone wants to be called a test cricketer, injure himself or perform poorly or do something to get out of the team and be on the sidelines of the team. They want to leverage the test position for IPL, advertisements.The way govt. doctors use their licence and set up a private practice. This is the real problem. People who do not have the ability and mindset like Rohit, Dhawan, Dhoni etc... cook up such theories, spoil the team and then want to come back. If they are not allowed, they say test cricket is demanding, I will focus on short formats of cricket. The same story with Rashid of England, happened..poor attitude is the issue of current crop of cricketers. Then we have players like Pujara who only play test cricket and score at 25/30 SR and say I have to focus on county cricket. The solution as I see it, select players who really have the performance to back it up, not team/captain/coach management. Unfortunately, players who perform poorly like vijay, rahane are given loads of chances. Get in new players, rotate players after every 2-3 years, it is about time their potential shows up or the fake performance masks are torn down.
 
Last edited:
Test cricket is awesome, but T20 has ended its importance
 
Watching 5 straight days only for the match to end in a draw.

Only way Test Cricket can survive is absolute minefields where even Mohammad Yousuf can seam the ball.
 
Whatever happened to the 4 day tests with stipulated overs for each team. I am aware purists salivate at a tough fighting draw but it doesn't interest a regular fan anymore. Tests need to be result oriented and just blocking for 3 hours should not be rewarded
 
It's not just hard, it's also boring. People don't have time for tests. Nobody watches a full test match. Doesn't help that the pay is bad too, outside Eng and Aus. How much does Rohit Sharma make compared to Pujara?

So basically what tests are:
For fans- Too boring, no time
For players - Too taxing on body, not enough money

Tests should be limited to Ashes so that ICC can save money for infrastructure in associate nations and expand cricket. Tests are irrelevant to fans and new players outside Aus and Eng.
 
Yes, test cricket is very hard which is why test failures will have next to no legacy when they retire. A true great of the game will leave his mark in the five-day game.

Also, no true fan of cricket will ever disparage the purest form of the game. Threads like this help expose the T20 casual crowd and for that they are quite useful.
 
Last edited:
Whatever happened to the 4 day tests with stipulated overs for each team. I am aware purists salivate at a tough fighting draw but it doesn't interest a regular fan anymore. Tests need to be result oriented and just blocking for 3 hours should not be rewarded

"Regular fans" need not watch test cricket. You wouldn't force someone who has no appreciation or knowledge of history into a museum, why would you force people who do not have the capacity to enjoy test cricket to watch test cricket?

We have ODIs and T20s for that. Test cricket has survived much, much longer than any other form of cricket, it won't die off any time soon especially when all the best players in the world and the administrators still hold it in high regard.
 
"Regular fans" need not watch test cricket. You wouldn't force someone who has no appreciation or knowledge of history into a museum, why would you force people who do not have the capacity to enjoy test cricket to watch test cricket?

We have ODIs and T20s for that. Test cricket has survived much, much longer than any other form of cricket, it won't die off any time soon especially when all the best players in the world and the administrators still hold it in high regard.

There is an emphasis on reviving test cricket. AT the end of the day money talks and tests cant survive without fanbase. I'm not talking about block buster series like Ashes. It's test cricket in general and administrators need to find ways to engage people
 
Yes, test cricket is very hard which is why test failures will have next to no legacy when they retire. A true great of the game will leave his mark in the five-day game.

Also, no true fan of cricket will ever disparage the purest form of the game. Threads like this help expose the T20 casual crowd and for that they are quite useful.

Agreed
 
There are people who are willing to go to a ground and watch 5 day test matches, but these broadcasters have zero marketing sense, they are not willing to put the time in to find out how best to market these games. I remember a game in Abu Dhabi where Younis made a double century and it was free entrance, and the ground was 3/4's full. Are you telling me that there are not enough Indians in a city willing to watch Virat Kohli play?? Raise awareness
 
I love Test Cricket the most. But i think it is high time that people accept it as a TV audience sport. No need to fill up the stadium. Empty stadium does not mean there is no interest. Lot of them are following it through TV, online etc
 
Agreed with Manjarekar. IPL is the benchmark now.

You would want to be a Gayle rather than being a Pujara.
 
Agreed with Manjarekar. IPL is the benchmark now.

You would want to be a Gayle rather than being a Pujara.

Gayle as a test cricket is 10 times better than Pujara. No one should want to be Pujara because he's just not a good batsmen, format doesn't matter. Since he is not good enough for ODI/T20 so some commentators and fans get emotional about it and emphasize that Pujara only plays test cricket and so should be in the squad. They don't get it that 1. He doesn't play ODI/T20 because no one selects him 2. Its a national test team and not an employment agency where the ones who don't have jobs should be given preferance over others.
 
I have always loved Test cricket the most since the 90's. Now, I'm not ramming my opinion down anyone's neck, but you all can love the other formats of the game, we have no problem. I just wish Test cricket doesn't die during my lifetime. I love ODI cricket as well, but not as much as Test cricket. As for T20 cricket,I won't even dignify that format by giving my opinion on it.
 
Yes, test cricket is very hard which is why test failures will have next to no legacy when they retire. A true great of the game will leave his mark in the five-day game.

Also, no true fan of cricket will ever disparage the purest form of the game. Threads like this help expose the T20 casual crowd and for that they are quite useful.

Test Cricket doesn't draw crowds or money.
 
Good points about day night tests but that alone will not make tests the priority. As much as purists hate it, T20s will continue to mushroom.

Not one 11-2 year old I have talked to wants to see Tests, all absolutely love IPL, T20Is and ODIs in that order. Obviously a personal anecdote but for mea good enough indicator.

Another one is if it’s a ODI or T20s, cricket is almost always on TV sets at small shops. During tests, it’s mostly cinema or news channels in there unless a big name player is near a landmark or India is closer to a test win.
 
Good points about day night tests but that alone will not make tests the priority. As much as purists hate it, T20s will continue to mushroom.

Not one 11-2 year old I have talked to wants to see Tests, all absolutely love IPL, T20Is and ODIs in that order. Obviously a personal anecdote but for mea good enough indicator.

Another one is if it’s a ODI or T20s, cricket is almost always on TV sets at small shops. During tests, it’s mostly cinema or news channels in there unless a big name player is near a landmark or India is closer to a test win.

Tests are history.

T20 and ODI is where the future lies.
 
T20 is easy and good money. Test Cricket has to keep evolving to make it interesting for players.
 
Test Cricket doesn't draw crowds or money.

So? Cricket as a whole does not draw much compared to some other sports.

There is an emphasis on reviving test cricket. AT the end of the day money talks and tests cant survive without fanbase. I'm not talking about block buster series like Ashes. It's test cricket in general and administrators need to find ways to engage people

Test cricket has a dedicated fanbase already. Just like in any other sport, the best match-ups draw the most money and test cricket is no different. Enough people tune in to watch the big series and that is all test cricket needs.

The casuals and new fans will be drawn in by T20 and the money will come in through that venue as well.
 
Test cricket is only fun to watch when played in Australia or England tbh. I don't know too many people who can watch 5 day cricket in a work week.

I think T20 has really helped keep the game alive in places like West Indies and Pakistan.
 
Test cricket is for marathon lovers.. lovers of a detailed war rather than short battles.. the war contains winning sessions, giving up sessions to win the match. Interesting setup duels, spinners working out a batsman, partnerships building, ball getting old, captains waiting for the new ball (and sometimes a new day) to break a frustrating partnership..

I don't know about others, but for me, there is no better sight in cricket than a newcomer young batsman, scoring a fighting century on the last day to save the test match.

I prefer such hard fought draws in Test cricket, to an ODI runfest where both teams score 400+ and bowlers are just spectators ..
 
There have been some nail biting test matches where your character has been tested. It is always the real and true form of cricket.

T-20 and ODI's have their seperate value.
 
There have been some nail biting test matches where your character has been tested. It is always the real and true form of cricket.

T-20 and ODI's have their seperate value.

I don't get the "real" and "true" terms.. are ODIs fake and false ?
 
Yes, test cricket is very hard which is why test failures will have next to no legacy when they retire. A true great of the game will leave his mark in the five-day game.

Also, no true fan of cricket will ever disparage the purest form of the game. Threads like this help expose the T20 casual crowd and for that they are quite useful.

Not true entirely.

Bevan and Dhoni are not remembered exactly for their Test credentials. Bevan was a failure, and Dhoni was reasonably successful in Test matches, while both are ODI legends.

If you are an exceptional ODI cricketer, you will have a legacy and people will remember you for years.

I don't agree with terms like "pure" and "true" form of the game. ODIs are also pure and true, but just different form where different skills are needed.

There have been boring Test matches, and boring ODIs .. both have their special exciting moments .. it's like classical music vs Bhangra.. neither is purer than the other.
 
Almost all the veterans who won the ODI WC, remember the final match of their WC winning journey to be the best moment in their cricketing career.

Wonder why they never mention any Test series victory as their best moment .. if Test cricket is so pure, why ODI WC is more important and brings tears to people's eyes more than a Test series victory.
 
There are very few Test matches in the greatest rivalry in the world India-Pakistan which either side remembers fondly..

Javed Miandad has scored double hundreds against India.. but ask anyone in India who he is.. the guy who hit a last ball six to win Australasia cup.. that six still haunts Indian cricket fans..

Apart from the 1999 Test series, not a single series is remembered between these two great rivals.. while ODI matches of WC, CT, Sharjah, even Toronto are remembered ..
 
Test cricket is awesome. But the UAE is a disgraceful place to play it. Horrible pitches
 
Test cricket is for marathon lovers.. lovers of a detailed war rather than short battles.. the war contains winning sessions, giving up sessions to win the match. Interesting setup duels, spinners working out a batsman, partnerships building, ball getting old, captains waiting for the new ball (and sometimes a new day) to break a frustrating partnership..

I don't know about others, but for me, there is no better sight in cricket than a newcomer young batsman, scoring a fighting century on the last day to save the test match.

I prefer such hard fought draws in Test cricket, to an ODI runfest where both teams score 400+ and bowlers are just spectators ..

Yes, there is a certain adrenaline you get which builds up over a long period over 5 days, where by when that last day arrives, you are fully invested and strapped in for a great ride, where even experts cant predict what might happen next.
 
Test cricket is for marathon lovers.. lovers of a detailed war rather than short battles.. the war contains winning sessions, giving up sessions to win the match. Interesting setup duels, spinners working out a batsman, partnerships building, ball getting old, captains waiting for the new ball (and sometimes a new day) to break a frustrating partnership..

I don't know about others, but for me, there is no better sight in cricket than a newcomer young batsman, scoring a fighting century on the last day to save the test match.

I prefer such hard fought draws in Test cricket, to an ODI runfest where both teams score 400+ and bowlers are just spectators ..

Can completely understand how much love a marathon runner gets by running marathon. I would still not know what joy one would get by watching a marathoner running. I would like to know who won the marathon, but I am not going to sit idle and watch a man running 50 kms. I would rather watch Usain bolt in a 100 metres dash.
 
Can completely understand how much love a marathon runner gets by running marathon. I would still not know what joy one would get by watching a marathoner running. I would like to know who won the marathon, but I am not going to sit idle and watch a man running 50 kms. I would rather watch Usain bolt in a 100 metres dash.

I think I gave enough reasons.. result is not all important thing in some sports.. Most of the chess matches end in draw.. even Football/Hockey matches go to draws..

I would anyday prefer a hard fought draw than one sided victory.
 
So? Cricket as a whole does not draw much compared to some other sports.

T20 and ODIs draw.

Test cricket has a dedicated fanbase already. Just like in any other sport, the best match-ups draw the most money and test cricket is no different. Enough people tune in to watch the big series and that is all test cricket needs.

The casuals and new fans will be drawn in by T20 and the money will come in through that venue as well.

Why are the grounds empty most of the time then?
 
T20 and ODIs draw.



Why are the grounds empty most of the time then?

People like to enjoy test cricket from the comfort of their homes. You don't have to watch every ball of a test match live in order to be a dedicated fan. Test cricket is a unique sport and offers something different.

Not true entirely.

Bevan and Dhoni are not remembered exactly for their Test credentials. Bevan was a failure, and Dhoni was reasonably successful in Test matches, while both are ODI legends.

If you are an exceptional ODI cricketer, you will have a legacy and people will remember you for years.

I don't agree with terms like "pure" and "true" form of the game. ODIs are also pure and true, but just different form where different skills are needed.

There have been boring Test matches, and boring ODIs .. both have their special exciting moments .. it's like classical music vs Bhangra.. neither is purer than the other.

Bevan has almost no legacy compared to someone like Michael Clarke. Dhoni wasn't a complete failure in test cricket and he's overhyped by casuals just like Afridi. Even then, Rahul Dravid and Sunil Gavasker are far greater cricketers.

Test cricket is the purest form because it is the original format. You can't claim that spin-offs like street soccer and beach soccer are just as pure as mainstream soccer or that Hong Kong Sixes or the new T10 format are just as pure as test cricket is.

ODIs of course have built their own legacy but it is a pond compared to the ocean of test cricket. Think about it, arguably the greatest player of all time, Bradman, never played ODIs. Neither did Sobers.
 
People like to enjoy test cricket from the comfort of their homes. You don't have to watch every ball of a test match live in order to be a dedicated fan. Test cricket is a unique sport and offers something different.

Not when it's almost 2020.

ODI and T20s should be the way forward.

Tests have no place in modern day Cricket.
 
Bevan has almost no legacy compared to someone like Michael Clarke. Dhoni wasn't a complete failure in test cricket and he's overhyped by casuals just like Afridi. Even then, Rahul Dravid and Sunil Gavasker are far greater cricketers.

I am not sure I understand you. Clarke has more legacy than Bevan ? Dhoni is similar to Afridi in hype ?

I am sure we are living in different worlds.
 
There are very few Test matches in the greatest rivalry in the world India-Pakistan which either side remembers fondly..

Javed Miandad has scored double hundreds against India.. but ask anyone in India who he is.. the guy who hit a last ball six to win Australasia cup.. that six still haunts Indian cricket fans..

Apart from the 1999 Test series, not a single series is remembered between these two great rivals.. while ODI matches of WC, CT, Sharjah, even Toronto are remembered ..
 
There are very few Test matches in the greatest rivalry in the world India-Pakistan which either side remembers fondly..

Javed Miandad has scored double hundreds against India.. but ask anyone in India who he is.. the guy who hit a last ball six to win Australasia cup.. that six still haunts Indian cricket fans..

Apart from the 1999 Test series, not a single series is remembered between these two great rivals.. while ODI matches of WC, CT, Sharjah, even Toronto are remembered ..

Exactly.

Cricket would be dead if the only format was Tests.
 
It's all about effort and reward and at the end of the day money is king and money lies in T20s, not tests.
 
Not when it's almost 2020.

ODI and T20s should be the way forward.

Tests have no place in modern day Cricket.

Lol, says a random fan who was never a test cricket fan in the first place? Stick to your T20s.

I am not sure I understand you. Clarke has more legacy than Bevan ? Dhoni is similar to Afridi in hype ?

I am sure we are living in different worlds.

No, we are not. Michael Clarke has a far better legacy than Bevan, just like Younis Khan has a better legacy than Saqlain Mushtaq. Test cricket builds legacies.
 
There are very few Test matches in the greatest rivalry in the world India-Pakistan which either side remembers fondly..

Javed Miandad has scored double hundreds against India.. but ask anyone in India who he is.. the guy who hit a last ball six to win Australasia cup.. that six still haunts Indian cricket fans..

Apart from the 1999 Test series, not a single series is remembered between these two great rivals.. while ODI matches of WC, CT, Sharjah, even Toronto are remembered ..

That is because of the culture of the lower and middle classes in the subcontinent that do not have the time, money or taste for test cricket. The fact that Indo-Pak tests were played on boring pitches did not help either.

Ask Australians or Englishmen about how many ODIs matches they remember compared to tests. T20s are not even a factor.
 
Lol, says a random fan who was never a test cricket fan in the first place? Stick to your T20s.

There is a reason why T20s and ODIs are far more popular than Test Cricket.

Party is over grandpa, Test cricket doesn't draw viewers.

It's not 1989 anymore.
 
Lol, says a random fan who was never a test cricket fan in the first place? Stick to your T20s.



No, we are not. Michael Clarke has a far better legacy than Bevan, just like Younis Khan has a better legacy than Saqlain Mushtaq. Test cricket builds legacies.

Test cricket builds legacy, but a good Test cricketer is not better than an ATG ODI cricketer.. and legacy in the eyes of whom ?

Dhoni's Test career is nowhere as prolific as some of the greats of Indian cricket, but he commands his place in Indian public as a cricketing role model, and given the due respect by Indians.
 
That is because of the culture of the lower and middle classes in the subcontinent that do not have the time, money or taste for test cricket. The fact that Indo-Pak tests were played on boring pitches did not help either.

Ask Australians or Englishmen about how many ODIs matches they remember compared to tests. T20s are not even a factor.

Why should Australians or Englishmen decide what is important and what is not ? Why should the opinion of lower middle class Indians be ignored ?

BTW, Javed Miandad is known in India mostly for that six even in the cricketing expert circle.. very few remember his Test exploits..

OK, let me give you another example.. ask Sunil Gavaskar or Sachin Tendulkar.. two of the greatest Test cricketers India has produced.. what is the defining moment of their career.. they both would rate their ODI WC victory as the best moment of their careers.. why didn't Gavaskar name his 10k runs or Test victories against WI ?
 
Back
Top