What's new

The decline of Afghanistan cricket: A result of political friction with Pakistan?

Major

Test Star
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Runs
38,481
Post of the Week
7
During 2000 - 2008 era, when Afghanistan Cricket was trying to establish its board, its cricket team and its presence on the cricketing map, they made sure not to indulge in to politics. No matter how the Karzai govt viewed Pakistan, the ACB stayed neutral.

In return, Afghanistan cricketers were allowed to train in Pakistan, had their players play for Pakistan Custom and Nowshera in the grade 2 and quaid e azam trophy. Were allowed to field a team by the name of Afghan Cheetas in our domestic t20 tournament and were even allowed hosting games with our A team in Pakistan. So much so, ex players from Pakistan like Kabir Khan, Rashid Latif and Inzamam ul Haq were hired as coaches by the Afghans and some of our domestic Pakistani players from Peshawar went on to represent Afghanistan aswell.

But than, post 2016, all this changed. For some weird reason, Afghanistan decided to choose a side and allowed its Cricket Board to make cricketing relations on the basis of their govt politics.

Afghanistan went on to make one of the most controversial decisions of their cricketing history and that was when they decided to choose India as the country host series. They would even further go on and make statements by saying how it was their second home. Ironic, considering how many of them grew up in the Pakistani club circuit.

Now BCCI may had given the Noida stadium to the Afghans to host matches, but the BCCI placed the Afghans on a leash and made sure not to give too much leverage.

This is something that we would see during 2019, when after Afghanistan had burned its bridges with Pakistan cricket board completely, sees the success of PSL in a foreign country, makes a request to BCCI. The ACB makes a request to BCCI that they wanted to host their own T20 tournament in India, thus requesting for stadiums to host, in return BCCI would say no. If that embarrassment was not enough, they further requested if their players could play in the Ranji trophy, to which again BCCI said no.

All these requests were those that PCB would had accepted had ACB remained neutral and maintained its relations with PCB.

ACB has digged a deeper hole now after in 2025 they pulled out of series against Pakistan and let their cricketers make statements that seemed like indirect jibes at Pakistan.

Its sad to see how low ACB has bought itself down and forgotten the board that helped them exist on the cricketing map. Their recent Asia Cup outing in the actual tournament, rising cup and u19 tourny showed all is not good in the Afghanistan cricket camp.

I take no pleasure in seeing the Afghans in this state, and sincerely hope their board comes to it senses, or else it will become another bang/zim type team
 
Can totally understand India not giving them space to hold T20 series. They are very protective of their T20 cricket leagues.

Also they didn't treat Afghanistan too great by giving them a stadium where they were using toilet water for cleaning.

Unfortunately you cannot make Talib type people see sense. They will always make negative choices. Personally I think Pakistan should still extend the olive branch to their team and players.
 
Can totally understand India not giving them space to hold T20 series. They are very protective of their T20 cricket leagues.

Also they didn't treat Afghanistan too great by giving them a stadium where they were using toilet water for cleaning.

Unfortunately you cannot make Talib type people see sense. They will always make negative choices. Personally I think Pakistan should still extend the olive branch to their team and players.
Interestingly the current chairman of afghanistan cricket is Mirwais Ashraf. He was an ex Afghan player that made his way into the age group sides etc. Yet, under him i have seen ACB alienate itself
 
Afghanistan deserve no sympathy. They brought this on themselves.

Pakistan played a significant role in Afghanistan’s development as a cricketing nation, yet has repeatedly been met with hostility from various Afghan stakeholders. This includes the ACB, incidents of Afghan fans attacking Pakistani supporters and Afghan players making inflammatory or ill-considered statements.

While terms like “namak haram,” along with derogatory labels such as "naan and kebab cricketers” are inappropriate and should be condemned, it was inevitable that Afghanistan would face backlash and ridicule given their rhetoric and the alliances they have chosen.
 
Interestingly the current chairman of afghanistan cricket is Mirwais Ashraf. He was an ex Afghan player that made his way into the age group sides etc. Yet, under him i have seen ACB alienate itself
In subcontinent and Asia boards are extension of government.

There was a thread fee years back where I mentioned that after Taliban takeover their cricket would be finished

Surprisingly they have stayed afloat and actually done well.
BCCICC have kept them afloat too by not reprimanding them for lack of women's team. That probably should have killed their cricket there and then.
 
A country going thru so much political turbulence will not produce sporting excellence. Not sure the Taliban is a fan of cricket - given its Western origin. Also a lot of domestic cricket in Afghanistan was sponsored by Western powers. Like Germany built a stadium. All that funding is gone

All this is true for Pakistan / Sri Lanka / Bangladesh as well. As long as they face political / economic woes things wont improve
 
We really need to appreciate the Pakistani talent. We have been systematically ROBBED by the corrupt mafia (not touching that subject) and yet, we still compete at some level in some ways. Kudos Pakistani kids for at least TRYING and sometime even succeeding. 😞
 
They have declined a bit but I think they are still good enough to cause upsets here and there.

They are like Zimbabwe from the 90's.
 
I don’t see much of a decline. They still have some very good cricketers. Their issue is their batting. They need to find a star batsman who can help put competitive scores on the board. Gurbaz has not progressed much. The rest look more like utility players.

More than Afghanistan declining, teams like Pak and BD have improved. Hence we don’t see Afghanistan winning against these teams much.

One star batsman can change their fortunes.
 
The problem is their cricketing culture is still quite immature / teenager like. Despite playing cricket at a high level now for many years (unlike the Zimbabwe team of the 90s who were mature). When you have that mentality your progression will hit a ceiling and i think Afghanistan have hit their ceiling. Until they grow up they are not going to get any better.
 
Even teams like SL have have not recovered after 2011. They had a 16 year period of excellence and then went back into obscurity.

I'm not sure it's relations with PCB that's hurting their cricket.

They will never be a Test class nation just like ZIM, Ireland etc. will never be one.

They have very little money to invest in their domestic structure, pathways etc. and that's not gonna change anytime soon.

How much have Ireland progressed since 2007? Barely.

Heck, Bangladesh have had Test status since 2001 and they have done nothing of note in any format.
 
Even teams like SL have have not recovered after 2011. They had a 16 year period of excellence and then went back into obscurity.

I'm not sure it's relations with PCB that's hurting their cricket.

They will never be a Test class nation just like ZIM, Ireland etc. will never be one.

They have very little money to invest in their domestic structure, pathways etc. and that's not gonna change anytime soon.

How much have Ireland progressed since 2007? Barely.

Heck, Bangladesh have had Test status since 2001 and they have done nothing of note in any format.
This is why a two-tier test cricket is good for the game, I think. Let these second tier teams play longer format with each other before they can compete with the bigger teams. They surely need to play more longer format cricket in order to become good at it. You can't be good in test match cricket when you only play it for 1-2 months and for the rest of the year you play T20 cricket.
 
This is why a two-tier test cricket is good for the game, I think. Let these second tier teams play longer format with each other before they can compete with the bigger teams. They surely need to play more longer format cricket in order to become good at it. You can't be good in test match cricket when you only play it for 1-2 months and for the rest of the year you play T20 cricket.
This is why a two-tier test cricket is good for the game, I think. Let these second tier teams play longer format with each other before they can compete with the bigger teams. They surely need to play more longer format cricket in order to become good at it. You can't be good in test match cricket when you only play it for 1-2 months and for the rest of the year you play T20 cricket.

Let's be realistic. Test cricket is not the future. And it's unfair to expect these nations to ever compete at the level of Australia.

Its an expensive sport and requires huge investment in grassroots and first class cricket to ever see any meaningful results.

And except a few series , it's difficult to avoid financial losses and there's zero incentive for an Afghan/Irish cricketer to pursue a Test career.

They should have a first class system to develop well rounded players but it should be geared towards long term competitiveness in white ball cricket, where it's also likely that more nations can participate and look to compete.

Results like USA upsetting Pakistan and Ireland upsetting England (2022) are great for the sport and we need more of that. It'll hardly ever happen in Test cricket.

Then there's the general truth that a few nations will always dominate any sport.

Look at the 100 year history of football and only 8 nations have ever won a FIFA World Cup, despite being played seriously by a huge number of nations.

Cricket has actually done better with 6 nations having won the 50 over World Cup despite being played seriously by 8-9 nations over a far shorter period (50 years)

Afghanistan with its political climate and lack of revenues did exceptionally well to even have reached the highs of the last 2 years
 
And what pride Shall we take in AFG cricket regression, when PCB has alot of things scattered in their shelf.
 
Can totally understand India not giving them space to hold T20 series. They are very protective of their T20 cricket leagues.

Also they didn't treat Afghanistan too great by giving them a stadium where they were using toilet water for cleaning.

Unfortunately you cannot make Talib type people see sense. They will always make negative choices. Personally I think Pakistan should still extend the olive branch to their team and players.

The Afghanistan cricket board serves as a symbol of Afghan sentiments. The relationship between Afghanistan and Pakistan is far from straightforward; it is laden with historical complexities and challenges.

It is no secret that the actions of the Pakistani establishment in Afghanistan have often been a source of tension and frustration. While it is important to acknowledge the immense support Pakistan has offered by providing refuge to millions of Afghan refugees over the years, it is equally essential to recognise that Pakistani establishment’s involvement has had consequences.

It will be quite difficult to overturn the hate which Afghanis have for Pakistan, but I agree Pakistan must still try to ease the relations.
 
every team goes through peaks and troughs, unfortauntely for young nations what this means is that the peak gets them to international standard, and the subsequent trough makes them arguably sub international standard. afghanistan have good spinners, which is important for t20 and will keep them competitive. but nabi is irreplaceable, and once rashid hits his downward trajectory they will be in trouble. gurbaz is probably their best long term potential player.
 
Back
Top