What's new

The joy of six has not been entirely lost, but it’s getting there

jnaveen1980

T20I Captain
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Runs
44,993

The joy of six has not been entirely lost, but it’s getting there​


Here’s a boring bit of cricket terminology: six.

Six used to have its own cachet, standing for a risk taken, a shot well and sometimes audaciously hit, a frisson in flight, some doubt about whether it would clear the fielders or the boundary, exultation when it did. Sixes were rare enough for each to be a landmark in a game.

But six has become the new two. And two is just about the most ho-hum score in cricket. It’s not a smartly taken single. It’s not three because threes don’t exist in Twenty20 cricket. And it’s not four or more. It doesn’t rotate the strike. Even when two is on, it’s usually baulked anyway.

Two is a mechanical, quotidian thing, a device to advance the score. Which is what six has become. Sixes happen along now at the rate twos once did. There were 42 in one match in the Indian Premier League the other day. They were like planes at Heathrow, flying over every couple of minutes.

They’ve been about 850 sixes in the IPL already this season, with a third of the tournament still to play out. That’s roughly 20 a match. Sunrisers Hyderabad are going at 12 a match by themselves. Jake Fraser-McGurk has hit 20 or them, or is it 50, or 35? It doesn’t matter. Never mind precision, feel the quantity. That’s how the IPL works.

But do you see what’s happening here? The fact of a six no longer matters; it’s the accumulation that counts. It’s not how or even what, it’s how many. The record for one IPL season is 1124 last year, and projections say it will be broken easily.

I blame Matthew Hayden. Twenty or more years ago, when he was mis-hitting sixes in front of the wicket, it became apparent that the game was up, and up, and up. A go-to of commentators who use terms like go-to is: “He didn’t get all of that.” The trouble is that now he doesn’t have to get all of it. He doesn’t need to get much of it at all.

Adam Gilchrist with his long swing and Glenn Maxwell with his backhand whacks at least had the decency to look like they were and are hitting sixes. Fraser-McGurk looks like he’s knocking in a new bat.

It’s not quite like that for everyone all the time, of course. The joy of six has not been entirely lost. Good batters sometimes muscle or improvise good balls for six, and that’s impressive. Maxwell’s the exemplar.

But more often, it’s just business. There’s little sense of weighing up in a split second risk, ability and reward. It’s that ball there, belted for six. If it doesn’t come off, there’s alway the next bloke, always tomorrow. It’s almost six and out, oh well.

There’s a trajectory here. Bats get bigger, forearms too. Grounds are made smaller, fielding restrictions tighter, the bowler’s target area contracts. The IPL now has an impact player, akin to baseball’s designated hitter, just in case not enough sixes are being hit. Doing is not enough, there must be overdoing.

It’s all of a piece with an ethos that seems to govern much sport now. Once, the saying was, when you’re on a good thing, stick to it. Now it is, when you’re on a good thing, load up on it, labour it and flog it until it collapses under its own weight. When it doesn’t work any more, get a new one. It works for computer games, so why not real ones?

It is one thing – an important thing – to refresh and reinvigorate a sport to stay in line with the times, another to indulge it to death

What’s next? Here’s one thought, not mine or new: why call it six when you can make it 10? This was what English marketing man Stuart Dalrymple envisaged when he first anticipated and articulated what became the T20 revolution in cricket a quarter of a century ago. He thought this was how it would be by 2010, so we’re running behind schedule (but please don’t let the BCCI know).

What’s after that? Well, LIV Golf has a watering hole, and if that means a participant occasionally gets hit in the head by a water bottle thrown by a drunkard and we all have to avert our eyes to the role of alcohol in the crisis of domestic violence that besets the country right now, that will have to be written off as collateral. You want more? Coming right up.

Eighty-odd years ago, the inimitable Neville Cardus wrote about a festival match at Scarborough. “A bowler bowls, the batsman makes a stroke, not a single fielder moves and the ball is returned from the boundary. The essence of any game is conflict. And there was no conflict here; the superiority on one side was too overwhelming.”

The batsman was Don Bradman. Substitute half the IPL roster for Bradman in Cardus’ snapshot, and you have T20 cricket now. That’s the trouble with the game: any old slogger can be made to look like Bradman. Like six becoming two, it’s a devaluation. Sixes are now like between-wars German currency: they come in wheelbarrows.

https://archive.ph/o/yvlHP/https://www.smh.com.au/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To me it gets boring. A six should be something audacious or as a result of player doing something out of the ordinary, not something that is run of the mill.

However it depends on what the masses want. The game will ultimately go the way that the fans want and if in this case Indians are happy with sixes galore then the pitches etc will be modelled to allow that happen more.
 
To me it gets boring. A six should be something audacious or as a result of player doing something out of the ordinary, not something that is run of the mill.

However it depends on what the masses want. The game will ultimately go the way that the fans want and if in this case Indians are happy with sixes galore then the pitches etc will be modelled to allow that happen more.
Wdym by doing out of the ordinary?

You swing your arms and voila a six happens?
 
No that's not what I mean.
Do you mean pitches to support bowling making it difficult for a batter to hit? I agree but here's the thing,

The numbers for IPl also are exaggerated on the should such Indian pitches be banned thread.

The match where Travis head and abisheikh chased 160+ in just 10 overs, well the team they were playing against made 165 in 20.

It's not like every batter in IPL is scoring and smacking. You can still tell why people like abisheikh, Travis head, Mcfraser are a class apart.

Infact players like pandya and Warner are struggling.
 
To me it gets boring. A six should be something audacious or as a result of player doing something out of the ordinary, not something that is run of the mill.

However it depends on what the masses want. The game will ultimately go the way that the fans want and if in this case Indians are happy with sixes galore then the pitches etc will be modelled to allow that happen more.
I think we need to start appreciating the skill and the talent on display aswell. The audacity with which the likes of Travis Head play, you can still consider this a rare skill that needs impeccable execution.
 
Do you mean pitches to support bowling making it difficult for a batter to hit? I agree but here's the thing,

The numbers for IPl also are exaggerated on the should such Indian pitches be banned thread.

The match where Travis head and abisheikh chased 160+ in just 10 overs, well the team they were playing against made 165 in 20.

It's not like every batter in IPL is scoring and smacking. You can still tell why people like abisheikh, Travis head, Mcfraser are a class apart.

Infact players like pandya and Warner are struggling.
I haven't watched the IPL just seen the discussion here but am talking about overall trends.

I think we need more sporting pitches, minimum boundary sizes and increased bouncers in T20 cricket to make the game more even.
 
I think we need to start appreciating the skill and the talent on display aswell. The audacity with which the likes of Travis Head play, you can still consider this a rare skill that needs impeccable execution.
Every era has some players that push the boundaries but the overall game doesn't shift too much.

Head is good. It seems he has really nailed the Indian bowlers but he also has amazing international excellence to back it up.

However year after year the trend is that scores are increasing and the number of sixes etc are increasing. You can attribute this all to a collective increase in batting skill and talent if you like. However it takes away from the magic of the game. If the game is tilting so much towards the batters I think some help needs to be given to the bowlers to even things out.

Look at how much batting has changed over the years - bigger better bats, excellent safety equipment that has got lighter but offers more protection, helmets, power plays, restrictions on types of deliveries, freehits.

Where is the equivalent change to bowling?
 
In the IPL. LOL. Who cares? Let them have their fun. Just bring in the boundary rope a few more metres for more 6s.

Thankfully the leg side pies have not infiltrated Test Cricket.
 
I wish to lose the joy of sixes as a Pakistan fan…



Oh wait, we never hit any!
People want new rules to avoid excess six hits as the game is progressing.

If we go back to the old era then six hitting will be a pipe dream for Pakistan. Pakistan is already barely able to hit 6 has it is
 
People want new rules to avoid excess six hits as the game is progressing.

If we go back to the old era then six hitting will be a pipe dream for Pakistan. Pakistan is already barely able to hit 6 has it is
They can then try to argue how the ability to convert 1s into 2s is a supreme skill in the modern era
 
People want new rules to avoid excess six hits as the game is progressing.

If we go back to the old era then six hitting will be a pipe dream for Pakistan. Pakistan is already barely able to hit 6 has it is
Tbh so be it if it's a pipe dream.

In my eyes a player that can hit big sixes in difficult conditions is worth 10 times the player than those who can barely clear the boundary on short grounds.

Let the weaklings get found out if that's the case.
 
There is only one 6 worth remembering, and after the Miandad 6, Indians never wanted to see a 6 again.

I guess normalising 6s is a coping mechanism.
 
There is only one 6 worth remembering, and after the Miandad 6, Indians never wanted to see a 6 again.

I guess normalising 6s is a coping mechanism.

Or the Boom Boom Afridi one during the Asia Cup
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're a Pakistan fan, it's very much not lost. In fact, it even has sex appeal. Why do you think so many girls crushed over Afridi?

I bet if we were to calculate fewest sixes by any team in the last 5-10 years, Pakistan would be on top.
 
Every era has some players that push the boundaries but the overall game doesn't shift too much.

Head is good. It seems he has really nailed the Indian bowlers but he also has amazing international excellence to back it up.

However year after year the trend is that scores are increasing and the number of sixes etc are increasing. You can attribute this all to a collective increase in batting skill and talent if you like. However it takes away from the magic of the game. If the game is tilting so much towards the batters I think some help needs to be given to the bowlers to even things out.

Look at how much batting has changed over the years - bigger better bats, excellent safety equipment that has got lighter but offers more protection, helmets, power plays, restrictions on types of deliveries, freehits.

Where is the equivalent change to bowling?
Agreed, but the way this game is being pushed towards entertainment, only the batsmen have a higher ceiling in terms of improvements that can be made.

The common fan comes to the stadium to see boundaries, and unless that changes, bowlers will be relegated to being a footnote, atleast in this form of cricket.

Regardless, you have to appreciate the ability of these batsmen. Specially as a Pakistani fan, I have to appreciate this insane ability as nobody in our whole country can play in this way.
 
We might see many sixes but it does take some courage and skill to execute the type of shots, the batters are playing nowadays. We can debate on the pitches not supporting a bowler, yes, but cannot take anything away from a batter who is playing some fabulous shots every now and then.
 
We might see many sixes but it does take some courage and skill to execute the type of shots, the batters are playing nowadays. We can debate on the pitches not supporting a bowler, yes, but cannot take anything away from a batter who is playing some fabulous shots every now and then.
It's not even slogging, these are proper cricketing shots.

People can choose to keep living in denial, but the reality of LOI cricket has changed due to so many enforced changes in favor of the batsmen. ICC and cricket boards around the world will certainly not reverse the direction they have.

While we might not see 250+ scores in the West Indies, I definitely think par scores will be stretched during the World Cup.
 
Yes, it's true, but cricket is not all about hitting sixes. However, as cricket is commercial now, hitting sixes is a big part of the deal for franchise cricket.
 
It's the evolution. Hitting a six is now an expectation.

Next steps: separate the big hitters from the small hitters. I would like to propose that a six beyond 100m should be counted as 10 runs.
 
It's the evolution. Hitting a six is now an expectation.

Next steps: separate the big hitters from the small hitters. I would like to propose that a six beyond 100m should be counted as 10 runs.
Pakistan will be relegated to minnow level if that requirement ever comes in to play :sarf2
 
Tbh so be it if it's a pipe dream.

In my eyes a player that can hit big sixes in difficult conditions is worth 10 times the player than those who can barely clear the boundary on short grounds.

Let the weaklings get found out if that's the case.
Well some players like Travis head aren't weakling, the final pitch was difficult infact 240 is actually a difficult score their. I think 220 was par on that pitch. It was wxtremly difficult to play once 10 overs have been bowled hence why both India and Australia tried to attack early before going tuk tuk mode.

Yet Travis head was head and shoulders > Anyone and was basically chilling his way through, even though labu and Rahul and kohli even struggled big time. I fact this Indian bowling lineup packed up sa and Sri Lanka despite the pitches being batting friendly.

However if what you say gets implemented then that means the babar and rizwan and misbah regime gets exposed 1000x over. Not that they haven't already been exposed lol.
 
Well some players like Travis head aren't weakling, the final pitch was difficult infact 240 is actually a difficult score their. I think 220 was par on that pitch. It was wxtremly difficult to play once 10 overs have been bowled hence why both India and Australia tried to attack early before going tuk tuk mode.

Yet Travis head was head and shoulders > Anyone and was basically chilling his way through, even though labu and Rahul and kohli even struggled big time. I fact this Indian bowling lineup packed up sa and Sri Lanka despite the pitches being batting friendly.

However if what you say gets implemented then that means the babar and rizwan and misbah regime gets exposed 1000x over. Not that they haven't already been exposed lol.
Yes that's what I mean let Babr and Rizwan or any others be exposed. The good players like Head can still be effective if the bowlers are given some assistance.

We need to try and protect the game overall.
 
Its not easy to hit a 6.

Ask Babar or Rizwan.
Babar will hit a 6 every 50 balls. Whoever the unlucky bowler is to bowl the 50th ball to Babar is getting sent to the ball boys on the sidelines!!!

Rizwan will wait for the 3rd or 4th weak link seamer to send one over deep midwicket by shuffling across his crease. Then take a single next ball
 
How is Pakistan not minnow level as it is? They are ranked 7 amongst 8-9 teams that play cricket seriously
Their actual rank is 8. Pakistan currently is not superior to Afghanistan.

Afghanistan has decent openers and while the middle order is on the weaker side, it's not non existent like Pakistan.

Infact they have actual allrounders. The innings rashid Khan played against Sri Lanka last year is beyond what shadab will ever play.

And their spinners and even pacers are superior atm.

Only issue with Afghanistan was that their coaching staff was crap not communicating well with the team but that seems to have been ironed put. Also the iconic pressure chocking tag against Pakistan is gone now, now that they have that 1 Win, every contest between them will probs end with them winning if they chase. Our only chance to win is if we bat first and hope for some chockes.
 
Yes that's what I mean let Babr and Rizwan or any others be exposed. The good players like Head can still be effective if the bowlers are given some assistance.

We need to try and protect the game overall.
What I'm trying to say is, we still have pitches that are bowling friendly. And while yes tye bats and safety equipment is better, we can't have another 24 year old murder so those rules need to be put in play. The final was a bowling friendly pitch and a quality side like India had no problems dismissing sides for 50 or 37 all put lol.

League cricket needs adjustments for entertainment and money, but the pitches prepared in international are balanced. The whole quality thing was just an excuse when these rules have been in play for 10+ years now.

If international was truly a batting paradise and Pakistan just suffered because of eras, then a side like India or Australia wouldn't be packing up players. Infact 2015 Australian attack wouldn't be effective at all yet they proved their class.

Maybe the clause in leagues can change but in international the reality is Pakistan is a poor bowling team and even worse batting and fielding team. Us getting tonked in 2023 wc has nothing to do with pitches.
 
How many ICC tournaments has India won since hitting these 6s with monstrous SRs? 11 years and counting.

Let me remind the millennial cricket folk - Cricket has, is, and always will be, a thinking man's game, or simply, mindset trumps physical strength.
 
How many ICC tournaments has India won since hitting these 6s with monstrous SRs? 11 years and counting.

Let me remind the millennial cricket folk - Cricket has, is, and always will be, a thinking man's game, or simply, mindset trumps physical strength.
Well if you do use your thinking brain, you will realise West Indies who are a six hitting side has 2 world cups, powerhouse Australia have won 1, England have won 1

How many times have ‘thinking man’s teams’ won the World Cup??
 
How is Pakistan not minnow level as it is? They are ranked 7 amongst 8-9 teams that play cricket seriously

With the amount of money that PCB has and the results they are producing, you could argue it's worse than minnow level. Minnows are feeding off scraps but most of them are still punching above their weight.

Misbah is one of the architects of Pakistan's sub-minnow mentality.
 
How many ICC tournaments has India won since hitting these 6s with monstrous SRs? 11 years and counting.

Let me remind the millennial cricket folk - Cricket has, is, and always will be, a thinking man's game, or simply, mindset trumps physical strength.

Is that why Pakistan flopped in 2023 World Cup?
 
I have to call out few shots that they play for six these day which were not actually played for sixes before.

1) One is the backfoot lofted shot for six. A spinner bowls tad short of a length. They were hardly hit for sixes. Often they were cut for four. But guys like Abhishek, Head goes back deep into the crease and plays a straight pull for six.

2) Wide yorker reverse scoop for six. Wide yorker for a large period of T20 history was a trustworthy strategy. At worst few edges used to go for four not six. But batsmen are readly to actually hit it by reversing

3)Medium pacer short of a length. This is similar to no.1 where batsmen goes back and pumps it either over off side or on side for a six

4) Batsmen converting yorker into a full toss or half volley is getting better and better

Overall batsmen have started using the crease better. COmbination of that and intent have made them more dangerous. Just watch how Head moves before he receives. He is kind of open to all options.
 
Nowadays given that league cricketers are famous batsmen don't practice defense. They practice range hitting. It requires some technique that needs to be acquired. Not everyone can swing as hard as they can and hit a six. It requires some skill.
People practice. McGurk shots are very similar to a golfer. He picks he length and adjusts the bat swing according to length hits it thorugh from standing position. This is something you cannot control going forward. Most teams acquire these skills just to become rich through leagues. It indirectly benefits the international team they represent.

In league cricket it will be even more obvious because teams can mix spin bashers and fast bowling bashers.
 
I have to call out few shots that they play for six these day which were not actually played for sixes before.

1) One is the backfoot lofted shot for six. A spinner bowls tad short of a length. They were hardly hit for sixes. Often they were cut for four. But guys like Abhishek, Head goes back deep into the crease and plays a straight pull for six.

2) Wide yorker reverse scoop for six. Wide yorker for a large period of T20 history was a trustworthy strategy. At worst few edges used to go for four not six. But batsmen are readly to actually hit it by reversing

3)Medium pacer short of a length. This is similar to no.1 where batsmen goes back and pumps it either over off side or on side for a six

4) Batsmen converting yorker into a full toss or half volley is getting better and better

Overall batsmen have started using the crease better. COmbination of that and intent have made them more dangerous. Just watch how Head moves before he receives. He is kind of open to all options.
Why isn't abishekh in the squad?

I think he's a good pick?
 
Because after boom boom afridi and Abdul Razzaq, we dont have solid six hitter
We do, but their in the abyss or gone or discarded.

Hafeez and malik were spin 6 bashers, Sharjeel was a fast bowling 6 hitter.

Saud isn't a natural six hitter but can hit them as shown in warmup games and psl, Abdullah actually ended our streak of not hitting a six in first 10 which lasted nearly 60 games straight.

Fakhar is not a six hitter until he settles, after that he's a sox hitter. Haris amd saim are six hitters and so is usman khan but they haven't been able to settle in international as of yet.

Azam Khan is also another one of them.

Problem is these players are at fault for not capitalising chances in international. Babar and rizwan are at fault in some cases not all.

Azam Khan should have performed in power order, Usman Khan should have performed at no 3 when given the chance, Haris shpuld have had a better psl.

Fakhar, Saud and Abdullah have been done dirty though.
 
For me, the most fascinating thing in cricket will always be high quality fast bowling.
Unfortunately, it’s a rare sight these days, hence my lack of interest in cricket.
 
We do, but their in the abyss or gone or discarded.

Hafeez and malik were spin 6 bashers, Sharjeel was a fast bowling 6 hitter.

Saud isn't a natural six hitter but can hit them as shown in warmup games and psl, Abdullah actually ended our streak of not hitting a six in first 10 which lasted nearly 60 games straight.

Fakhar is not a six hitter until he settles, after that he's a sox hitter. Haris amd saim are six hitters and so is usman khan but they haven't been able to settle in international as of yet.

Azam Khan is also another one of them.

Problem is these players are at fault for not capitalising chances in international. Babar and rizwan are at fault in some cases not all.

Azam Khan should have performed in power order, Usman Khan should have performed at no 3 when given the chance, Haris shpuld have had a better psl.

Fakhar, Saud and Abdullah have been done dirty though.
Bro are you telling me that Azam Khan and Hafeez are better six hitter than Abdul Razzaq?
 
I am not sure what I am supposed to be watching any more. The IPL has catered for a market and no doubt this market is big but it does nothing for me
 
Cricket has 3 formats catering to different fans. If people wants to like T20 they better get used to new order. With so many leagues coming up with lucrative offers batsmen will try to sharpen their T20 skills than Test match skills. They just have to be effective for 4 or 5 overs.
 
For me, the most fascinating thing in cricket will always be high quality fast bowling.
Unfortunately, it’s a rare sight these days, hence my lack of interest in cricket.
Stumps flying, batsmen ducking and diving against fast bowlers or getting into a tangle against spin is more attractive to me than every ball going for 6.

One dayers around 270 - 290
T20s - 160 - 180.

Good solid tussles between bat and ball.

For example two recent tussles that Pakistan lost but was high quality cricket from the opposition for me were the ODI WC game aginst South Africa were Makram played an absolute gem of a knock.

And the T20 WC final where Ben Stokes saw through a spell of hostile bowling against Naseem Shah to get his team over the line in the end.

I'd take that type of cricket any day over 250+ scores in T20.
 
I wish ground staffs and pitch curators throughout the world will create more sporting pitches so we could get to see more balance between bat and ball. We don’t need a run fest in T20s or even in ODI cricket. A target of 180 and + should put teams in a comfortable position in T20s. Batsmen should possesses real hitting and stroke making skills. Cricket is losing its charm because of this boring run fest.
 
Wonder what the next stage in the evolution of cricket towards becoming a real life computer game. I propose they put targets around the ground. If they hit them they get higher scores. 10 for a hit on the bounce and 20 for a direct hit on the full. With maybe the ultimate challenging target being 50 then big hitting could be fun to watch again for those who enjoy it. I like T20 cricket normally but the IPL has been beyond tedious this year.
 
Back
Top