CricketAnalyst
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Runs
- 4,670
First of all I want to clarify one thing: A) I am not assuming anyone cheated just yet. B) If they did, please do not interpret my post as justifying or mitigating their conduct. For example, extreme poverty can explain criminal theft, but not justify it and the same here.
Now, there is also match-fixing in football. Many top sides have been suspended, relegated and punished. However these people rigged matches to try and win. The reason no one rigs games to win is that in those sports players make money. Even in the weakest clubs in European football leagues, players make $30-35k a week. There is no chance to corrupt them.
Now in cricket; on typical matches like PSL games there will be approximately $100 MN wagered minimum on these games. Many of these players will be making maximum Rs 6/7 lakh PKR per year with no career security. Obviously they are a good target. Even rich ones like Sharjeel, who have made it to some degree won't make more 50 lakh PKR or 25 lakh INR in a year. Someone betting on a game, even some third tier bookie in some random city of India or Pakistan can make more in one match in their normal betting without any fix. Isn't this asking for trouble?
Now please don't compare player revenue with average persons and say he should be so happy to have it. Maybe he should, but cricketers are the people generating value and their payments are negligible compared to the gigantic revenues from the events. IPL revenues are STAGGERING. Thousands of crores are made from the event, but some players will get only 30 lakhs (and IPL is MUCH more fair to players than other leagues)
Is it fair that cricketers salary does not even equal to 4 or 5% of revenues generated, and can one realistically expect that there won't be fixing when an event is so popular that people want to wager billions of dollars on something but the person participating is in some cases just flat out poor?
Now, there is also match-fixing in football. Many top sides have been suspended, relegated and punished. However these people rigged matches to try and win. The reason no one rigs games to win is that in those sports players make money. Even in the weakest clubs in European football leagues, players make $30-35k a week. There is no chance to corrupt them.
Now in cricket; on typical matches like PSL games there will be approximately $100 MN wagered minimum on these games. Many of these players will be making maximum Rs 6/7 lakh PKR per year with no career security. Obviously they are a good target. Even rich ones like Sharjeel, who have made it to some degree won't make more 50 lakh PKR or 25 lakh INR in a year. Someone betting on a game, even some third tier bookie in some random city of India or Pakistan can make more in one match in their normal betting without any fix. Isn't this asking for trouble?
Now please don't compare player revenue with average persons and say he should be so happy to have it. Maybe he should, but cricketers are the people generating value and their payments are negligible compared to the gigantic revenues from the events. IPL revenues are STAGGERING. Thousands of crores are made from the event, but some players will get only 30 lakhs (and IPL is MUCH more fair to players than other leagues)
Is it fair that cricketers salary does not even equal to 4 or 5% of revenues generated, and can one realistically expect that there won't be fixing when an event is so popular that people want to wager billions of dollars on something but the person participating is in some cases just flat out poor?