I have read your posts and it is total nonsense. It is no different from claiming rizwan is Pakistan's 2nd best odi batter of all time or misbah and shadab makes it ahead of inzi and afridi in an atg line up.
Abrar is slow as molasses and is useless in normal conditons. Brooks molested him because abrar had zero turn and unlike people like zampa who are smart bowlers, Abrar was clueless on how to bowl with accuracy under such conditons.
Even when touring England he got lucky once with his 7 wicket haul, After that haul he was useless and noman Ali did most of the work.
Just cause abrar is another misbah product, doesn't mean you put him in the same limelight as your hero. Sajid is a proper spinner. He'll get tonked in aus and sa but will be handy everywhere else while abrar will be downright useless in eng and NZ.
Offcourse. My post will be a nonsense to a young fan.
You still have not provided any logic in your post just talking about a batsman doing this against him.
Let me educate you about spinners.
A spinner is judge on three things, his accuracy, his turn and his varieties.
Now look at your thread title, it states why Sajid cannot be an all format bowler. Than you have made a claim that Noman should had debutted for pakistan in 2010 and sajid in 2016.
Now in test cricket, there are three groups. The SENA group. The spin paradise and the flat tracks.
Any spinner that brings the ball in towards the batter and has good accuracy, will do well in a spin paradise. The only thing you need to have is accuracy. Your lack of varieties, lack of turn is not an issue as on a spin paradise the turn comes automatically due to pitch assistance. This is why, many fans are being fooled into believe that Sajid is some big spinner of the ball, when inreality its the spin track doing its tricks.
In SENA and on flat tracks, its very difficult for a spinner to take wickets. You can be accurate, but if you dont have proper turn than you will be a dud in SENA and Flat tracks. In SENA and Flat tracks you not only need to have skill to get turn on your bowling through your wrist or fingers but you need to have variety.
Guys like Zulfiqar Babar and Rehman failed. Even though they both were very accurate, but they couldnt turn the ball through their action and their varieties were limited.
Even Yasir Shah struggled because Yasir had a good turner but his varieties werent there. Still Yasir churned out wickets at Lords.
Than comes limited overs. In limited overs, you need varieties or turn. In limited overs you dont get spin paradises. It happens very rarely. Guys like Abrar not big turner but his varieties make him a threat in limited overs. In limited overs if you keep getting hit, you need to throw in something different. Alot of these guys dont have a googly or doosra so they rely on a carom ball
Sajid Khan doesnt have varieties nor is he big turner on a non spinning pitch. thus he would struggle, and which is why PSL teams wont pick him.
One of the reasons why Asghar fell out in psl and why Quetta lost alot of games is becaue when PSL moved away from UAE to Pakistan, Asghar was in effective and Quetta also had issues as Nawaz was someone that relied on the pitch..
Sajid is a great spinner on a pitch that assists him and so is Nauman, but thats about it. There are reasons for not playong them in all formats as mentioned above.
As for your claims that they should had played in 2010 and 2016, here is a list of spinners that were their in the pecking order, so if you seriously think that Sajid and Noamn should had debutted in 2010 and 2016, than i cant argue any further.
Spinners that we had available 2010 onwards
Danish Kaneria
Ajmal
Abdur rehman
Zulfiqar babar
Yasir shah
Raza Hassan
Adnan Rasool
Kamran Hussain
Imran Khalid