Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CPL 2021 stats:
Innings 10
Runs 67
Average 7.44
Strike rate of 59.82
As I said previously it was the correct decision by the PCB to leave him out of the 2011 World Cup probables. His career was done and dusted then. Unbelievable to think he is playing ten years later. Iftikhar Ahmad was much more impressive in the recent National T20 cup and should have been selected if Sohaib was not available.
Yes, let’s leave out Malik for the WC but take Misbah, Younis and Asad Shafiq instead lol ok![]()
Not sure what Hayden might be thinkingSeems like Shoaib enjoying his role with the side. Wonder if we will see him bowl against India?
View attachment 112483
I am not a fan and never will be but he played brilliantly today. If you wanted a batsman to hit on slow wickets, Malik would be your man. Well done Malik
I think it's more than hitting big on slow wickets. Many in Pak team can hit big on slow wickets but it's more of holding the innings together and don't crack under pressure.
It's having a solid temperament (like Cpt Rishwat said above) that is a rare commodity in Pak squad.
Everyone has jumped on the Asif Ali bandwagon (and rightly so), but Malik was the unsung hero tonight for holding it all together - and providing a platform for Asif to execute. Plan worked!
Intelligence has never been Maliks problem, performance under pressure has been poor over the last decade. Malik owed us that innings.
To be very honest, I was most against Malik`s selection. Never thought that he still had it in him to see through Pakistan in a tricky run-chase like this. Kudos to him. Well played! However, I would advise against getting carried away just yet. Still quite a few matches left, and one good innings in an entire tournament of at least five matches wouldn't be enough from a man of 23 years experience behind him.
Either way, I hope that he carries the good form.
This is precisely why me and [MENTION=153791]UzmanBeast[/MENTION] were saying we needed Malik in the side all along.
Had he not been there at the other end keeping his calm, Asif would never have had the license to hit those sixes and the side could easily fallen to another collapse.
This is the benefit of experience. Having young players is great...and exciting. But in certain situations you need guys with a calm head, who have been around the block a few times.
The fact that you admitted that the chase would be tricky is enough to understand the point made in my post, brother. Thanks. Also, I hope that you're doing well.Are you serious?
This match was won when Pak kept NZ at 135. Of course the chase would be tricky on a slow sharjah track.
It qas asif who hit 2 sixes to turn the match. Malik wasnt going anywhere.
Also, a quick look at the thread suggests that quite a few people are lauding Malik's little innings, and I don't think that the thread itself was bumped to say that Malik played no role in the win, or was it? I just happen to be one of those who are appreciating him, unless I'm missing out on anything.Are you serious?
This match was won when Pak kept NZ at 135. Of course the chase would be tricky on a slow sharjah track.
It qas asif who hit 2 sixes to turn the match. Malik wasnt going anywhere.
Agreed.
I think the bigger issue is Mohammad Hafeez and how he slots into the team, and at what batting position.
Looking at our team combination, Asif and Malik have justified their selections without a doubt.
The issue is how we cover up the poor form of Hafeez and Fakhar Zaman's hot-cold nature.
I would perhaps do the following changes in the lineup:
Mohammad Rizwan (wk)
Fakhar Zaman
Babar Azam (c)
Shoaib Malik
Mohammad Hafeez
Asif Ali
Hasan Ali
Shadab Khan
Imad Wasim
Shaheen Shah Afridi
Haris Rauf
For the game against Afghanistan, I might be tempted to bring Babar out in the middle overs and let Fakhar Zaman get going against their spinners up top.
At the same time, however, I would not want to risk Babar's form.
Tough call, because Haider has a weakness to spin as well.
Agreed.
I think the bigger issue is Mohammad Hafeez and how he slots into the team, and at what batting position.
Looking at our team combination, Asif and Malik have justified their selections without a doubt.
The issue is how we cover up the poor form of Hafeez and Fakhar Zaman's hot-cold nature.
I would perhaps do the following changes in the lineup:
Mohammad Rizwan (wk)
Fakhar Zaman
Babar Azam (c)
Shoaib Malik
Mohammad Hafeez
Asif Ali
Hasan Ali
Shadab Khan
Imad Wasim
Shaheen Shah Afridi
Haris Rauf
For the game against Afghanistan, I might be tempted to bring Babar out in the middle overs and let Fakhar Zaman get going against their spinners up top.
At the same time, however, I would not want to risk Babar's form.
Tough call, because Haider has a weakness to spin as well.
Hafeez is not a problem in my eyes. Looking at his body language today, it was obvious he meant business. I felt he was quite unlucky to get out the way he did because the ball was in the gap. You simply have to tip your hat to Conway who took the catch of the tournament.
Plus Hafeez's importance with the ball cannot be understated. He adds so much depth to the attack. Because you cannot expect all 5 of your front-line bowlers to show up in every game. And in a tournament where match-ups and data have become so integral, its important to have a bowler with such an incredible record against left-handers.
I'm not worried about Fakhar either. He's a high-impact player. One or two failures should not change that. The damage he can do when he is on-song is much more important. I'm sure he will step-up. And I would keep him at 3 because I don't think we should fix something that isn't broken.
For the game against Afghanistan, I would (if anything) consider dropping Fakhar down. Because I feel Mujeeb has his number. He has been dismissed by Mujeeb 2 out of 2 times. And on both occasions for a duck. That's a negative match-up for Pakistan that they should try and avoid. So I say keep the openers where they are and promote Hafeez to 3 because he is a good player of spin. Fakahr drops to 4. Malik stays at 5 because you need someone credible in the middle too.
The fact that you admitted that the chase would be tricky is enough to understand the point made in my post, brother. Thanks. Also, I hope that you're doing well.![]()
That makes sense as well.
We're playing Afghanistan at Sharjah right?
Agree on Hafeez. He looked in menacing form, even the shot he got out on looked well hit. Body language is big for me, and both Shoaib and Hafeez looked super focused.
OK, lets go in a little bit more detail. The rrr was climbing with every ball during Malik at the crease UNTILL Asif came in.
When that leg spinner bowled his last over I expected Malik to take his chance and he even got 2 balls at leg stump which he failed to hit.
Win predictor had NZ winning BEFORE the Southee over. It was Asif who changed everything with those 2 hits.
I know the standards with Malik are low. What he did yesterday was nothing special.
That is also the reason he has such a poor record in ICC events.
Dubai.
And tbh, I'd rather play them there than at Sharjah or Abu Dhabi.
malik deserves credit, he settled the team down when we were ina bit of bother, he had the anchor role and played it well in my opinion, hit 4 and 6 when needed but also rotated strike put fielders under pressure and know doubt was a calming influence on asif at the end. he should have come ahead of imad who looked a bit panicky and was all over the place.
Hafeez also came out looking like a man on a mission, 6 first ball and it took a freak catch to dismiss him, if that had also gone for 4 momentum would have been with pak and we would have seen the game of easily.
I doubted malik selection however in UAE and lower scores, his nudging into gaps could be exactly what we needed, rathe than the power of azam / kushdil etc.
Minnow basher in full force today.
Lets hope and pray we do not need him in the SF, as we all know how that will be:
Malik vs the AUS pace.
Can’t believe how negative our own fans can be.
Minnow basher in full force today.
Lets hope and pray we do not need him in the SF, as we all know how that will be:
Malik vs the AUS pace.
Minnow bashing is a problem when you don't well in important games.
Malik has done very well in every match so far.
Can’t believe how negative our own fans can be.
Minnow basher in full force today.
Lets hope and pray we do not need him in the SF, as we all know how that will be:
Malik vs the AUS pace.
Negative?
Its a fact, he cant play pace.
Kick him out already!
The WC is done and he should be removed as well.
Pathetic dismissal from such a experienced player.
Shocking brainfade from him today. Especially because he is the antithesis of laziness and lethargy.
Being an experienced player he can't let blunders like this happen, because even the slightest mistake will bring his haters out of the woodwork in unison.
With the next WC in Australia time for Malik to retire no chance of him doing well over there at over 40 years of age which leaves a year to groom and develop a batsman to replace him.
If he's performing he can play till 50. I really don't care.
Age is just a number. Some players being their careers at 30, others retire at 33. Some play well over their 40s and continue performing for their team.
I haven't seen the fans of any country as obsessed with the ages of players as much as Pakistani fans are. I think its about time the age factor was given a rest.
What do you think about his dismissal today from such as experienced campaigner.
If he's performing he can play till 50. I really don't care.
Age is just a number. Some players being their careers at 30, others retire at 33. Some play well over their 40s and continue performing for their team.
I haven't seen the fans of any country as obsessed with the ages of players as much as Pakistani fans are. I think its about time the age factor was given a rest.
And Pakistan fans and selectors are probably the only country who will allow mediocre players like Malik and Hafeez who consistently fail at top level to play 300 games plus for their country .
Malik got lucky this World Cup as he was able to make hay against Scotland , whereas Hafeez failed as usual in pressure chases against Kiwis and Afghanistan !
Stop living in a fantasy world where you think Pakistan is brimming with talent. If Malik and Hafeez really were so mediocre, they would have been replaced long ago. The fact that they aren't shows how spectacularly Pakistan have failed when it comes to finding guys to develop their limited-overs middle-order in the last few years.
Even outside Malik and Hafeez Pakistan's best limited-overs batting prospect (who hasn't established himself in the side) is Iftikhar who is probably the same age as these two.
I would rather lose games with new comers than see these clowns and win the games. Literally no shame and self-respect.
I would rather lose games with new comers than see these clowns and win the games. Literally no shame and self-respect.
If he's performing he can play till 50. I really don't care.
Age is just a number. Some players being their careers at 30, others retire at 33. Some play well over their 40s and continue performing for their team.
I haven't seen the fans of any country as obsessed with the ages of players as much as Pakistani fans are. I think its about time the age factor was given a rest.