What's new

The US and Iran engaged in indirect talks to revive nuclear deal

Iran further increases stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels: UN​


Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels in defiance of international demands, a confidential report by the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog said Thursday.

The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency said that as of Aug. 17, Iran has 164.7 kilograms (363.1 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60 percent. That’s an increase of 22.6 kilograms (49.8 pounds) since the IAEA’s last report in May.

Uranium enriched up to 60 percent purity is just a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 percent.

The IAEA report, which was seen by The Associated Press, says Tehran has also not reconsidered its September 2023 decision to ban the most experienced nuclear inspectors from monitoring its nuclear program and that IAEA surveillance cameras remain disrupted.

The report further says that Iran has still not provided answers to the nuclear watchdog’s years-long investigation about the origin and current location of man-made uranium particles found at two locations that Tehran has failed to declare as potential nuclear sites.

 

Top Iranian politician appeals to Trump to restart nuclear deal negotiations​

A senior Iranian politician has appealed to Donald Trump to begin new negotiations with Tehran over its civil nuclear programme, saying: “I hope that this time around, [Trump 2.0] will be more serious, more focused, more realistic.”

Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s vice-president for strategic affairs, pointed out that the returning US president had not reappointed figures from his first term such as the former secretary of state Mike Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton, who persuaded him in 2018 to quit the nuclear deal on the basis that withdrawal would lead to the regime’s collapse.

Instead, Zarif said, withdrawal had left Iran closer to obtaining a nuclear bomb, with the components including highly enriched uranium, although he claimed Tehran was not interested in actually making such a weapon.

Zarif, probably the best known Iranian diplomat in the west, was speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos in his first remarks outside Iran since his country’s election of a reformist government.

He said the continuation of US sanctions was hitting the most vulnerable in Iran hardest and insisted Iran did not want to become a nuclear power. “If we wanted to build a nuclear weapon we could have done so a long time ago,” Zarif said.

He also gave the impression that Iranian society was liberalising, saying women could be seen on the street not wearing the hijab. He said the Iranian leadership had decided not to put pressure on women to obey the law. “It’s a step in the right direction but it is not enough,” he said.

This led to criticism in Iran from those who said Zarif failed to acknowledge that many women still felt harassed and he ignored the price many women had paid for seeking greater freedom during the protests two years ago.

But he gave little sign that Iran was prepared to end its support for groups in the region deemed terrorists by the US, such as Hamas in Gaza. He said: “There’ll be more groups, with or without Iran’s help. Iran has always supported the struggle of people for their human rights, for their right to self determination, and we’ll continue to support that.” But the groups’ resistance stemmed from the injustice suffered by Palestinians, and not Iranian interference, he said.

Zarif said of Hamas’s attack on Israel on 7 October 2023: “We didn’t know … We were set to meet the Americans on JCPOA [the Iran nuclear deal] renewal on 9 October, but the operation destroyed it.”

The nuclear deal was designed to ensure UN inspectors had access to Iran’s nuclear sites and could certify that Iran’s nuclear programme was solely for civilian energy purposes. Trump left the deal in 2018, opting to impose harsh sanctions on Iran, but so far he has been opaque about whether he will now try to strengthen those sanctions or endorse an Israeli government attack on Iran’s nuclear sites.

Two rounds of talks between EU negotiators and Iranian officials in Geneva last month will have given the US intelligence on the kind of preconditions Iran would set in any talks on a new deal, including the sequencing of any lifting of sanctions. Iran wants a – possibly unobtainable guarantee that the US would not again walk out on a deal.

Marco Rubio, the new US secretary of state, acknowledged there were divisions in Tehran about whether a new deal with the US on its nuclear programme was desirable. But some regard Iran’s current weakness, including its damaged air defences, as a good reason to strike. A decision is unavoidable since the key clauses in the original 2015 deal are due to expire in October.

Rafael Grossi at the IAEA board meeting
Diplomats fear growing power of Iranian factions that want nuclear weapons
Read more
Zarif acknowledged these divisions, adding: “Iran is not a single voice, a uni-voice society. We have many voices and many views, and we cannot shut them down.”

It is not clear if the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, thinks the lifting of US sanctions, requiring difficult concessions, is necessary. In a speech on Wednesday, Khamenei said it was realistic for Iran to achieve 8% annual growth.

In a potential sign the hardliners may still dominate in Iranian security policy, the head of the UN nuclear weapons inspectorate, Rafael Grossi, said Iran was pressing the gas pedal on uranium enrichment, He said: “Before it was [producing] more or less 7kg [of uranium enriched to up to 60%] per month, now it’s above 30 or more than that. So I think this is a clear indication of an acceleration.” He said Iran had about 200kg of uranium enriched to up to 60%.

Gulf states have become increasingly vocal in opposing an Israeli attack on Iran. The Saudi foreign minister, Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, in Davos urged Tehran to engage with the US on its nuclear programme. “Obviously a war between Iran and Israel, any war in our region, is something we should try to avoid as much as possible,” he added.

Qatar’s influential prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani, said: “I do not want to see an arms race in the region,” adding he hoped the Gulf states would come together to call for a peaceful path. “I hope we defuse this completely now,” he said.

Source: The Guardian
 
Iran threatens to end nuclear talks with Europe after Mandelson comments

Iran’s foreign minister has threatened to end all talks with European officials over its nuclear programme after Peter Mandelson, the UK ambassador to Washington, appeared to side with US calls to eliminate Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities.

It was not clear if Lord Mandelson’s remarks during a question and answer session at the Atlantic Council in Washington revealed an unannounced change in UK policy or if, in seeking to side with Donald Trump, he had spoken in a way to allow misinterpretation.

After five rounds of talks between Iran and the US mediated by Oman, the two sides remain at loggerheads over Iran’s continued ability to enrich uranium, which Tehran regards as a sovereign right and which the US fears leaves open a path to an Iranian nuclear bomb.


 
Explosive new intelligence report reveals Iran's nuclear weapons program still active

A new intelligence report claims Iran is continuing with its active nuclear weapons program, which it says can be used to launch missiles over long distances.

The startling intelligence gathering of Austrian officials contradicts the assessment of the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told a Senate Intelligence Committee in March that the American intelligence community "continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003."

Austria’s version of the FBI — the Directorate State Protection and Intelligence Service— wrote Monday in an intelligence report, "In order to assert and enforce its regional political power ambitions, the Islamic Republic of Iran is striving for comprehensive rearmament, with nuclear weapons to make the regime immune to attack and to expand and consolidate its dominance in the Middle East and beyond."


 
Exclusive: Saudi warned Iran to reach nuclear deal with Trump or risk Israeli strike

Saudi Arabia's defence minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian officials in Tehran last month: take President Donald Trump's offer to negotiate a nuclear agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel.

Alarmed at the prospect of further instability in the region, Saudi Arabia's 89-year-old King Salman bin Abdulaziz dispatched his son, Prince Khalid bin Salman, with the warning destined for Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to two Gulf sources close to government circles and two Iranian officials.

Present at the closed-door meeting in Tehran, which took place on April 17 in the presidential compound, were Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, armed forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri and Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the sources said.

While media covered the 37-year-old prince's visit, the content of the King Salman's covert message has not been previously reported.

Prince Khalid, who was Saudi ambassador to Washington during Trump's first term, warned Iranian officials that the U.S. leader has little patience for drawn-out negotiations, according to the four sources.

Trump had unexpectedly announced just over a week earlier that direct talks were taking place with Tehran, aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme in return for sanctions relief. He did so in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had travelled to Washington hoping instead to win support for attacks on Iranian nuclear sites.

In Tehran, Prince Khalid told the group of senior Iranian officials that Trump's team would want to reach a deal quickly, and the window for diplomacy would close fast, according to the four sources.

The Saudi minister said it would be better to reach a deal with the U.S. than face the possibility of an Israeli attack if the talks broke down, according to the two Gulf sources.

He argued that the region - already riven by recent conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon - could not withstand a further escalation in tensions, said the two Gulf sources and one senior foreign diplomat familiar with the discussions.

Iranian authorities did not respond to a request for comment before this story was published, but after its publication Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei "categorically denied" Reuters' report, according to Iran's semi-official Fars news agency. Authorities in Saudi Arabia did not respond to a request for comment.

The visit by Prince Khalid - the younger brother of Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman - was the first by a senior member of the Saudi royal family to Iran in more than two decades. Riyadh and Tehran had long been bitter rivals, often backing opposing sides in proxy wars, until a rapprochement brokered by China in 2023 helped to ease the tensions and restored diplomatic ties.

Over the past two years, Iran's regional position has been undermined by heavy military blows inflicted by Israel on its allies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, and toppling of its close ally, Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad. Western sanctions, meanwhile, have hit its oil-dependent economy hard.

Mohanad Hage Ali, an expert on Iran at the Carnegie Middle East Center think tank in Beirut, said that Tehran's weakness had offered Saudi Arabia the opportunity to exert its diplomatic influence, seeking to avoid a regional conflagration.

"They (the Saudis) want to avoid war because war and confrontation with Iran will have negative implications on them and their economic vision and ambitions," he told Reuters.

IRAN WANTS A DEAL

Reuters was unable to determine the impact of the prince's message on Iran's leadership.

In the meeting, Pezeshkian responded that Iran wanted a deal to ease economic pressure through the lifting of Western sanctions, the four sources said.

However, the Iranian officials, the sources added, expressed concerns over the Trump administration's "unpredictable" approach to negotiations — which have veered from allowing limited uranium enrichment to demanding the complete dismantling of Tehran's enrichment program.

Trump also has threatened to use military force if diplomacy fails to rein in the clerical establishment's nuclear ambitions.

One of the Iranian sources said that Pezeshkian emphasized Tehran's eagerness to reach a deal but that Iran was not willing to sacrifice its enrichment program just because Trump wanted an agreement.

The ongoing talks between Washington and Tehran have already been through five rounds to resolve the decades-long nuclear dispute, but multiple stumbling blocks remain, including the key issue of enrichment.

Reuters reported on Wednesday that Iran might pause uranium enrichment if the U.S. releases its frozen funds and recognises its right to refine uranium for civilian use under a "political deal" that could lead to a broader nuclear accord, according to two Iranian sources familiar with the talks. The semi-official Fars news agency in Iran quoted a foreign ministry spokesman denying the report.

The White House did not directly address Reuters' questions about whether it was aware of the Saudi warning to Iran.

"President Trump has made it clear: make a deal, or face grave consequences, and the whole world is clearly taking him seriously, as they should," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.

Trump said on Wednesday he warned Netanyahu last week not to take any actions that could disrupt nuclear talks with Iran, and said the two sides were "very close to a solution now".

Israeli authorities did not respond to a request for comment.

HIGH STAKES

A four-day visit by Trump to the Gulf this month annointed Saudi Arabia as the most prominent member of a new axis of Sunni states in the Middle East, filling the void left by Iran's shattered alliance. During the trip, Saudi Crown Prince Mohamed Bin Salman mediated a reconciliation between Trump and Syria's new Sunni leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa.

Tehran's regional sway, meanwhile, has been diminished by military setbacks suffered by Iran and its allies in the Shi'ite-dominated Axis of Resistance, which include Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen, and Iraqi militias

In the meeting, Prince Khalid urged Iran to rethink its regional policy, noting such a shift would be welcomed, especially by Riyadh, the sources said.

Although he stopped short of directly blaming Iran, the Saudi minister voiced concern over a possible repeat of the 2019 drone attacks on the facilities of state oil company Aramco - attacks the kingdom attributed to Iran and its Houthi allies, despite Tehran's denial.

Iranian officials maintained that while Tehran holds some influence over the Houthis, it does not fully control their actions, the Iranian sources said.

Decades of hostility between the Shi'ite Iran and Saudi Arabia destabilised the Gulf and fuelled regional conflicts from Yemen to Syria. The 2023 detente was driven in part by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed's economic ambitions and desire for stability, and has led to increased contacts between the governments.

However, neither Saudi Arabia nor other regional powers see Iran as a dependable partner for peace and they fear its actions could jeopardize their ambitions for economic development, diplomats and regional experts say.

Prince Khalid implored the Iranians to avoid actions by them and their allies that might provoke Washington, stressing that Trump's response would likely be more strident than his predecessors, presidents Joe Biden and Barak Obama.

In turn, he assured Tehran that Riyadh would not let its territory or airspace to be used by the United States or Israel for any potential military action against Iran, the sources said.

REUTERS
 
Iran demands sanctions relief guarantee in nuclear talks with US

Iran has demanded that the United States clarify exactly how sanctions will be lifted if the two sides are to reach a new agreement on Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Esmail Baghaei made the comments on Monday, days after the US submitted what it described as an “acceptable” proposal. Unverified reports claim that Iran sees the offer as a “non-starter” and is preparing to reject it.

The pair has conducted seven weeks of negotiations over the nuclear programme, with the US seeking assurances that it is peaceful, while Iran hopes to escape punishing sanctions that have battered its economy in recent years.

However, Tehran is now demanding Washington detail what it is offering, reflecting scepticism voiced earlier this year by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

In remarks carried by the official IRNA news agency, Baghaei stressed the need for guarantees regarding the “real end of the sanctions”, including details on “how and through what mechanism” they would be removed.


 
Iran’s Khamenei dismisses US nuclear proposal, vows to keep enriching uranium

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that abandoning uranium enrichment was “100 per cent” against the country’s interests, rejecting a central US demand in talks to resolve a decades-long dispute over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.

The US proposal for a new nuclear deal was presented to Iran on Saturday by Oman, which has mediated talks between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff.

After five rounds of talks, several hard-to-bridge issues remain, including Iran’s insistence on maintaining uranium enrichment on its soil and Tehran’s refusal to ship abroad its entire existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium — possible raw material for nuclear bombs.

Khamenei, who has the final say on all matters of state, said nothing about halting the talks, but said the US proposal “contradicts our nation’s belief in self-reliance and the principle of ‘We Can’”.

“Uranium enrichment is the key to our nuclear programme and the enemies have focused on the enrichment,” Khamenei said during a televised speech marking the anniversary of the death of the Islamic Republic’s founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

“The proposal that the Americans have presented is 100pc against our interests … The rude and arrogant leaders of America repeatedly demand that we should not have a nuclear programme. Who are you to decide whether Iran should have enrichment?” he added.

“Independence means not waiting for the green light from America and the likes of America.”

Khamenei said, “If we have 100 nuclear power plants but don’t have enrichment, they will be of no use to us,” because “nuclear power plants need fuel” to operate. “If we cannot produce this fuel domestically, we have to reach out to the United States, which may have dozens of conditions.”

Tehran says it wants to master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and has long denied accusations by Western powers that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.


 
They have been wanting to take down Iran for a long time. This might just be the excuse.
 
Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Iran to be unveiled soon, minister says

Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Tehran should be unveiled soon, Minister of Intelligence Esmail Khatib told state TV on Sunday, describing them as a “treasure trove” which will strengthen Iran’s offensive capabilities.

Iranian state media reported on Saturday that Iranian intelligence agencies had obtained a large trove of sensitive Israeli documents. Khatib said these were related to Israel’s nuclear facilities and its relations with the United States, Europe and other countries, and to its defensive capabilities.

There was no immediate official comment from Israel.

It was not clear whether the information breach was linked to a reported hacking of an Israeli nuclear research centre last year, which Tehran is only disclosing now amid heightened tensions over its nuclear programme.


 
Iran says to submit own nuclear proposal to US soon

Iran said on Monday it will soon present a counter-proposal on a nuclear deal with the United States, after it had described Washington’s offer as containing “ambiguities”.

Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to thrash out a new nuclear accord to replace the deal with major powers that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018.

The longtime foes have been locked in a diplomatic standoff over Iran’s uranium enrichment, with Tehran defending it as a “non-negotiable” right and Washington describing it as a “red line”.

On May 31, after the fifth round talks, Iran said it had received “elements” of a US proposal, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi saying later the text contained “ambiguities”.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei criticised the US proposal as “lacking elements” reflective of the previous rounds of negotiations, without providing further details.


 
Iran threatens to strike US bases if conflict erupts over nuclear programme

Iran’s defence minister has said his country would target US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out with the United States, as President Donald Trump said he was losing confidence that a nuclear deal would be agreed.

Washington and Tehran have held five rounds of talks since April as Trump seeks an agreement that would place constraints on Iran’s uranium enrichment. He has threatened to attack Iran if no deal can be agreed.


 
@The Bald Eagle have you any information who's has landed at the Karachi recently?

Hint - This would explain all the sudden love for Pakistan by the US. Wait for something big going to happen in Iran.

Bookmark this Post.

:kp
 
Initial reports that Naval Support Activity Bahrain, the home of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and U.S. Fifth Fleet, as well as other bases near the Persian Gulf have been placed on “High Alert”, with the dependents of servicemembers being told to prepare for evacuation.

Israel attack is imminent on Iran back by USA .

:kp
 
The US base in Al Dhafra, UAE, begins evacuating families of employees. :kp
 
US preparing to partially evacuate Iraq embassy over regional security risks, sources say

The United States is preparing a partial evacuation of its Iraqi embassy and will allow military dependents to leave locations around the Middle East due to heightened security risks in the region, U.S. and Iraqi sources said on Wednesday.

The four U.S. and two Iraqi sources did not specify which security risks had prompted the decision and reports of the potential evacuation pushed up oil prices by more than 4%.


 
Looks like war.

Iran will absolutely hit back massively in response to any strike I feel. Their country is utterly huge, there is no air force other than the US that can cover it and strike every facility. Even the US isn't sure it can. And Iran would still be able to hit back.
 
Global watchdog finds Iran failing to meet nuclear obligations

The global nuclear watchdog's board of governors has formally declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years.

Nineteen of the 35 countries on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) voted for the motion, which was backed by the US, UK, France and Germany.

It says Iran's "many failures" to provide the IAEA with full answers about its undeclared nuclear material and activities constitutes non-compliance. It also expresses concern about Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium, which can be used to make reactor fuel but also nuclear weapons.

Iran condemned the resolution as "political" and said it would open a new enrichment facility.


 
Back
Top