Varun
Senior Test Player
- Joined
 - Dec 25, 2012
 
- Runs
 - 26,237
 
- Post of the Week
 - 1
 
	^There you go. Three strikes and you're out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
	I hope he scores runs against Pakistan but Australia lose, so that his average is not disturbed....
Usman or somebody else
Khawaja gets an unfair rap on here, he scored one of the best centuries I've ever seen in the pink ball test against South Africa last year. He is such a classic player as well in the mold of Gower, which gets him extra brownie points for moi. Yeah, the lad has issues against spin but Australia's haphazard selection policies have done him no favours.
It was poor of me to forget the Khawaja made his debut in the 2010/11 Ashes, smoking his second delivery to the fence off Tremlett.
Well Sharma is playing at no.5 ,which is perfect place for him. It is more of a mental issue. I am not talking about this test, even test when ball was not seaming when he came to bat and he still failed.
Actually today he played much better, he did the hard work and then threw it like Pujara.
![]()
^There you go. Three strikes and you're out.
HTB is an over-simplification. Runs don’t come free at home.
I'm more dismayed at Rahane unfairly getting the chop because Rohit has to get a game.
These Yuvrajs, Rainas, Rohits should be and should have been stickered with an 'LoI only' tag so it doesn't hurt the bonafide test prospects from missing out on crucial tours such as this one.
Note I said Home Track Bully, not Flat Track Bully. Make of that what you will.
It still reflects poorly on you that you can only score in one country out of eight that you potentially play in, and that you are already 30 years of age and don't have the youngster tag to use as a copout.
Not that he has performed like Pujara in India either. He has got lots of easy home runs .
Not that he has performed like Pujara in India either. He has got lots of easy home runs .
Well the place he bats mostly (at 6) if it's flat deck most top order scores all run and you feel it's easy run for him and in india i don't think any team troubled him when he was playing so it's not his fault as well. Surely he can't replace rahane in side but he can bat at 6 in overseas. Even though pandya's peformance in tests has been great i still can't surely trust him as an all rounder to do well. (So maybe give chance to rohit on green top and on flat decks play pandya or 5 bowlers)
I think today's performance by Pandya has been fantastic to say the least and this would mean he deserves a long rope now as 4th seamer and no.6 or no.7 batsmen.
Rohit can be brought back to the team after the overseas tours end and I will happily replace Rahane with him.
I am okay with Rohit being dropped but about pandya do you think he will be good in next test matches and odi series? He had a good share of luck today as well.
So Rohit Sharma is called a FTB where as another player with similar stellar LOI record and also similar HTB stats is hailed as Mr.Cricket
Problem with Subcontinent fans pretty much
So Rohit Sharma is called a FTB where as another player with similar stellar LOI record and also similar HTB stats is hailed as Mr.Cricket
Problem with Subcontinent fans pretty much
Clarke and Hussey were heavily dissed by me personally right through their careers, but they are long since retired and this is not the day or thread for that.
Australian bats being FTBs and HTBs is consensus in any case.
One innings [MENTION=132715]Varun[/MENTION]. Amazing!
Please make one more thread about how Kohli doesn't belong in international cricket because he knicked one off to a ball that was an 8th stump line.
All it takes is one frickin innings to make a judgement after all.
One innings!? The guy has played 15 away tests all over the place - Australia, South Africa, Lanka, West Indies, England, you name it.
His average at the end of it all? 25 and dropping like a stone.
You're welcome.
Virat has stats but surely he is not best in testing condition. Rahane and vijay are alot better performance. Kohli milks runs in easy condition mostly.
One innings!? The guy has played 15 away tests all over the place - Australia, South Africa, Lanka, West Indies, England, you name it.
His average at the end of it all? 25 and dropping like a stone.
You're welcome.
Virat has stats but surely he is not best in testing condition. Rahane and vijay are alot better performance. Kohli milks runs in easy condition mostly.
Note I said Home Track Bully, not Flat Track Bully. Make of that what you will.
It still reflects poorly on you that you can only score in one country out of eight that you potentially play in, and that you are already 30 years of age and don't have the youngster tag to use as a copout.
And when was the last away test he played?
What has that got to do with anything? We've stacked up our calendar with series after series against Lanka, Bangladesh, Australia and West Indies at home so obviously it's a long time ago. Why, what has changed since Rohit's last overseas test? Something I've missed?
Edit: For the record - it was vs Sri Lanka in 2015. Unlike the rest, he couldn't even fill his boots over there. Averages 33. POOR.
Well Kohli is not in the firing line at the moment. Not for his batting anyway. For being chums with Sharmaji and picking him over Rahane? Hell yes.
Average of 46.90 is not bad by any standards. In fact it is damn good.


That's the strike-rate
85.44 and 25.72 are the averages.![]()
Pretty absymal comparison. Sharmaji comparison is Usman Khwaja not those two.
You can compare someone like Pujara to Clarke and Hussey though.
Usman Khwaja really? I guess Khwaja is one of the most sought after player in 2 out of 3 formats of the game then
Rahane was dropped for Rohit makes no sense in any universe esp when everyone knows how Rahane actually plays swing and seam better than Rohit.
It makes sense in the universe where Rahane isn't a holy cow and Rohit isn't an outcaste.
Their average has literally a difference of less than two though Rahane has been backed to the hilt and Rohit has never gotten any consistent run.
Rohit is in unbelievable form and in a great place. Rahane can't touch the ball or score a run against mediocre attacks when his teammates are scoring for fun. Absolutely nothing suggests he will suddenly score in hostile conditions.
HTB is an over-simplification. Runs don’t come free at home.
Rohit has issues with lateral movement, but he is a high class batsman and if India give him consistent chances, he will eventually come good.
Khawaja on the other hand is pretty average. Awful against spin, decent against lateral movement and a very good timer of the ball.
However, he comes across as a very irritating individual.
HTB is an over-simplification. Runs don’t come free at home.
Rohit has issues with lateral movement, but he is a high class batsman and if India give him consistent chances, he will eventually come good.
Khawaja on the other hand is pretty average. Awful against spin, decent against lateral movement and a very good timer of the ball.
However, he comes across as a very irritating individual.
Yeah but Khawaja is of Pakistani origin while Sharma is Indian. You don't need to objectively look at the batsman as a player and analyse his stats to come to a conclusion that Sharma is obviously by far the better batsmanSharma is a limited overs player, not a test batsmen. He doesn't have the defensive technique to survive on pitches which are fast, bouncy or have lateral movement.
Khawaja is a much better test player, not even close.
Sharma is a limited overs player, not a test batsmen. He doesn't have the defensive technique to survive on pitches which are fast, bouncy or have lateral movement.
Khawaja is a much better test player, not even close.
Goes for an airy-fairy shot, gets dropped.
Next over fishes at a ball wide outside off stump. Bowled.
But hey, talent. Potential. For a guy who debuted in 2007.
Sheesh.

Yeah but Khawaja is of Pakistani origin while Sharma is Indian. You don't need to objectively look at the batsman as a player and analyse his stats to come to a conclusion that Sharma is obviously by far the better batsman![]()

Lol at making it seem as if they are on similar level.Not a test-class player. His weakness against the moving ball aside, he simply does not have the defensive game for test cricket. Maxwell, Morgan and Umar Akmal are in the same category.
Pujara is the biggest HTB out there, but for some reason OP will only have a go at R Sharma.