What's new

This is Cricket, rub of green and luck can not go with out all the time

Sarwar89

Local Club Regular
Joined
Jun 23, 2017
Runs
1,570
1) Australia v West Indies 1992 World Cup last group stage match. Australia only scored 216. It was 60% in West indian favor at half time. But Aussie pacers did the job and Pakistan progressed towards Semi Finals. People do not that how lucky we were actually that Windies could not even chase 217.

2) T20 World Cup 2010.
Pakistan lost to Kiwiz by 2 runs due to Salman Butt’s poor shot. Lost to England as well. But managed to beat Proteas and that day Paul Collingwood’s England beat Kiwiz and Pakistan progressed despite 2 points from 3 matches. Mike Hussey’s innings snatched their semi Final win later on and converted it into Aussie win.

3) Gulbadin Naib’s over went for 18 runs and rest is history.
4) 1999 World cup. Pakistan was the biggest beneficiary. Lost 3 straight matches against Bangladesh, S Africa and India. After easy wins over Zimbabwe and due to marginal high NRR ended up playing Kiwiz again in Semis.

Now people are complaining that Why india did not win.
These sort of scenarios cannot always go your way. That is how life goes on
 
1) Australia v West Indies 1992 World Cup last group stage match. Australia only scored 216. It was 60% in West indian favor at half time. But Aussie pacers did the job and Pakistan progressed towards Semi Finals. People do not that how lucky we were actually that Windies could not even chase 217.

2) T20 World Cup 2010.
Pakistan lost to Kiwiz by 2 runs due to Salman Butt’s poor shot. Lost to England as well. But managed to beat Proteas and that day Paul Collingwood’s England beat Kiwiz and Pakistan progressed despite 2 points from 3 matches. Mike Hussey’s innings snatched their semi Final win later on and converted it into Aussie win.

3) Gulbadin Naib’s over went for 18 runs and rest is history.
4) 1999 World cup. Pakistan was the biggest beneficiary. Lost 3 straight matches against Bangladesh, S Africa and India. After easy wins over Zimbabwe and due to marginal high NRR ended up playing Kiwiz again in Semis.

Now people are complaining that Why india did not win.
These sort of scenarios cannot always go your way. That is how life goes on
In 1999 luck had nothing to do with PCT

4) PCT needed only one win coz super six ,that tournament India was the unlucky one coz effin Zim made it to super six instead of England whom we had beaten, that would had meant after Pak win we needed to beat Nz in last match, but that match had no importance to us.
 
We lost by 1 run in 2010 to NZ, Butt was the reason we got close in the first place. It was Abdur Rehman that played a poor shot
 
Pakistan used up all their luck for the next decade during CT.

This is things evening out.
 
We lost by 1 run in 2010 to NZ, Butt was the reason we got close in the first place. It was Abdur Rehman that played a poor shot

No. The reason was NZL hit a six of last ball to make it 132. Tht last ball changed dynamics.
 
Kids poking holes in pakistan’s Excellent 99 World Cup. I see it all the time.. you fellas need to educate yourself about the 99 World Cup. Pakistan bossed the whole tournament till the final. And one group game SA which we lost when it looked it we were trying to win.

Against Ind and BD you could tell we were not even trying because we knew were through
 
In 1992 Pak went through after the match against England they were set to lose was washed out. After losing to West Indies in the WC as always they deserve to be eliminated.
 
Kids poking holes in pakistan’s Excellent 99 World Cup. I see it all the time.. you fellas need to educate yourself about the 99 World Cup. Pakistan bossed the whole tournament till the final. And one group game SA which we lost when it looked it we were trying to win.

Against Ind and BD you could tell we were not even trying because we knew were through

Were you not trying in the final either? :yk

4 defeats in a World Cup and you call it bossing. :23: :23:
 
Kids poking holes in pakistan’s Excellent 99 World Cup. I see it all the time.. you fellas need to educate yourself about the 99 World Cup. Pakistan bossed the whole tournament till the final. And one group game SA which we lost when it looked it we were trying to win.

Against Ind and BD you could tell we were not even trying because we knew were through

You are trying to lecture someone who has even witnessed 1987 world cup. Pakistan never bossed 1999 world cup. Scrapped through West indies with poor batting reduced to 42/4 and just got over the line n defended 229. Narrowly beat Auusies in group stage and top order struggled against scotland.
Thrashed by Bangladesh, Beaten by South Africa and thrashed by India and ended up putting lowest ever total of 132 in world cup final. Bossed ? Aussies and Proteas bossed that world cup.
Try to watch some cricket before putting childish comments.
 
In 1992 we also lost points due to sa game rained off. So luck and bad luck balanced each other.
 
Kids poking holes in pakistan’s Excellent 99 World Cup. I see it all the time.. you fellas need to educate yourself about the 99 World Cup. Pakistan bossed the whole tournament till the final. And one group game SA which we lost when it looked it we were trying to win.

Against Ind and BD you could tell we were not even trying because we knew were through

I already talked about his error of 99 and luck, but you are incorrect as well, against India the team wasn't through, it needed one win, which came in the next match against Zim, which for all you know could had washed out.
 
I already talked about his error of 99 and luck, but you are incorrect as well, against India the team wasn't through, it needed one win, which came in the next match against Zim, which for all you know could had washed out.

Which error you are highlighting mate. India was thrashed in their opening two matches of the 1999 world cup against South Africa and Zimbabwe. That was poor display, lost to Aussies and lost to Kiwiz in super six. What unluck ?
 
Which error you are highlighting mate. India was thrashed in their opening two matches of the 1999 world cup against South Africa and Zimbabwe. That was poor display, lost to Aussies and lost to Kiwiz in super six. What unluck ?

And by the way India only managed to beat England in 1999, due to reserve day. Otherwise match would have been called off with 1 point each. India got away with it due to relaxed rules. Eng would have advanced with 7 points.
 
Which error you are highlighting mate. India was thrashed in their opening two matches of the 1999 world cup against South Africa and Zimbabwe. That was poor display, lost to Aussies and lost to Kiwiz in super six. What unluck ?

That luck was with PCT, PCT was tremendous in that cup 99 they did boss around most teams.

Also India was thrashed yes but we had lost Sachin unfortunately coz his fathers death , and to zim lost by 4 runs and no one expected Sa to lose to zim which is what caused the misery!

Basically Zim and Pct were the only teams in super six needing one win to move to semis lol.
 
That luck was with PCT, PCT was tremendous in that cup 99 they did boss around most teams.

Also India was thrashed yes but we had lost Sachin unfortunately coz his fathers death , and to zim lost by 4 runs and no one expected Sa to lose to zim which is what caused the misery!

Basically Zim and Pct were the only teams in super six needing one win to move to semis lol.

Had Pakistan played South Africa or Australia in Semi finals it was certain bye bye. Yes Zimbabwe win over South Africa was shocking. They actually played well against Aussies too in super sixes.?
 
Had Pakistan played South Africa or Australia in Semi finals it was certain bye bye. Yes Zimbabwe win over South Africa was shocking. They actually played well against Aussies too in super sixes.?

Yes Zim played well but we screwed up against them, that was defn the day it felt like its Sachin or bust.

Yes Pak escaped not playing SA, but i think That could had gone either way, just Aus were mighty in momentum by then.

The whole WC started well but so many shady matches!
 
Yes Zim played well but we screwed up against them, that was defn the day it felt like its Sachin or bust.

Yes Pak escaped not playing SA, but i think That could had gone either way, just Aus were mighty in momentum by then.

The whole WC started well but so many shady matches!

If my memory serves me well in ind v zim game, javagal srinath hit giant sixes in the end and run rate was never an issue i think, who was tht guy Henry olonga, he did few things.
 
You are trying to lecture someone who has even witnessed 1987 world cup. Pakistan never bossed 1999 world cup. Scrapped through West indies with poor batting reduced to 42/4 and just got over the line n defended 229. Narrowly beat Auusies in group stage and top order struggled against scotland.
Thrashed by Bangladesh, Beaten by South Africa and thrashed by India and ended up putting lowest ever total of 132 in world cup final. Bossed ? Aussies and Proteas bossed that world cup.
Try to watch some cricket before putting childish comments.

That's a very fiery tone but quite misplaced. Pakistan topped the group stage, while losing only one game and then entered semis as #1 team. Their losses were in games, where their #1 position was almost certain. No one cared. And very few expected what happened in the final. And while we are at it, I watched 87 World Cup, and some of the ones before too (not sure if I should be boldly claiming this or not)
 
Last edited:
Yes we can't blame India too much, we really should have won that game against Australia. And against India and WI, we shouldn't have thrashed to the extent by which we did.
 
That's a very fiery tone but quite misplaced. Pakistan topped the group stage, while losing only one game and then entered semis as #1 team. Their losses were in games, where their #1 position was almost certain. No one cared. And very few expected what happened in the final. And while we are at it, I watched 87 World Cup, and some of the ones before too (not sure if I should be boldly claiming this or not)

So why should India care about losing to England in this world cup? This thread and million other threads on PP whining and crying started after India lost against England.

I don't know what your position is in that regards but most of Pakistani PPers are complaining you should tell them this piece of history where "Pakistan did not care". Now India doesn't care.
 
Fact is we’re not consistent enough to be considered top 4. If we get through on others misery then ofc we’d take it but on our performance so far..we shouldn’t.
 
I agree in a tournament like this you need a bit of luck. Prime example of this is the contrasting fortunes of Pakistan and New Zealand. So far, New Zealand have a little bit more luck than Pakistan.

Both Pakistan and New Zealand had 1 game rained out. New Zealand's game was with India meanwhile Pakistan's game was against Sri Lanka. Not to say that beating Sri Lanka was a foregone conclusion but I would take my chances of beating Sri Lanka over India any given day. And of course New Zealand could've beaten India but that would be a pretty big upset.

Sri Lanka is even unluckier in this regard. The two games they've had rained out were Pakistan and Bangaldesh.

Also factor in the fact that New Zealand have had 3 very narrow victories (South Africa, Bangaldesh and West Indies).

So yes, luck has played its part and so far it's gone against Pakistan and Sri Lanka while heavily favoring New Zealand. But OP is right, you can't control luck and sometimes it goes for you other times it doesn't.

Overall, this hasn't been a disastrous world cup for Pakistan except the loss against West Indies. But again small margins, Pakistan could've lost to Afghanistan and that would've been calamitous.
 
Back
Top