maddgenius
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2013
- Runs
- 9,862
I was going through stats while selecting my players for ongoing test draft so thought it's worth sharing the list I compiled.
I set the cut off of minimum 100 wickets. Only exception is Alan Davidson who got 90+ wickets in both 1950's and 1960's but his bowling average of 20 was too good to be ignored in a decade where only one bowler with over 100 wickets had sub 25 average i.e. Trueman

Preference was given to bowling average apart from the following exceptions where the difference in average was negligible compared to the number of wickets taken:
2010's: Steyn and Anderson ahead of Rabada and Philander
1960's: Graham McKenzie ahead of Peter Pollock
I set the cut off of minimum 100 wickets. Only exception is Alan Davidson who got 90+ wickets in both 1950's and 1960's but his bowling average of 20 was too good to be ignored in a decade where only one bowler with over 100 wickets had sub 25 average i.e. Trueman

Preference was given to bowling average apart from the following exceptions where the difference in average was negligible compared to the number of wickets taken:
2010's: Steyn and Anderson ahead of Rabada and Philander
1960's: Graham McKenzie ahead of Peter Pollock
Last edited by a moderator:



Take that haters! I say the man walked the talk!