What's new

U.S. intelligence believes Pakistan is developing a nuclear-armed ICBM capable of reaching the United States

Bhaijaan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Runs
69,145
Post of the Week
1
It’s about time the world has a serious review of this critical situation. Is it safe to have Pakistan carrying nuclear weapons and ones that could reach United States given 99% Pakistanis hate America with passion

====

Pakistan developing nuclear missiles that can reach United States: Report​


Pakistan is reportedly advancing efforts to build a nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of reaching the continental United States.

According to a Foreign Affairs magazine report, if successful, the development would mark a significant expansion of Islamabad's strategic military reach and could lead Washington to officially classify as a nuclear adversary.

"Although Pakistan claims its nuclear programme is strictly focused on deterring India, which enjoys conventional military superiority, U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that the Pakistani military is developing an ICBM that could reach the continental United States," the report said.

US intelligence agencies believe that this potential ICBM programme is part of Pakistan's broader attempt to deter not only India but also the United States from interfering in any South Asian conflict in the future, as per Foreign Affairs.

Read more: US lawmakers introduce bill to bar Chinese AI in US government agencies

"In acquiring such a capability, Pakistan might be seeking to deter the United States from either trying to eliminate its arsenal in a preventive attack or intervening on India’s behalf in a future Indian-Pakistani conflict," it added.

ICBMs typically have a range exceeding 5,500 km and can be equipped with nuclear or conventional warheads.

The China angle

The report suggests that Pakistan's pursuit of long-range missile capabilities has been boosted by its close ties with China. While Beijing has not openly supported Islamabad's ICBM development, it has consistently provided military and economic assistance. This may have indirectly enhanced Pakistan's missile infrastructure.

The Foreign Affairs report highlighted that China's support may include tacit approval of such programmes, which could further complicate the strategic situation for both New Delhi and Washington.

For decades, Pakistan has viewed its nuclear arsenal as a counterbalance to India's superiority in conventional arms. However, the decision to pursue an ICBM represents an escalation in the region's arms race, sources familiar with South Asian defence atmosphere/expertise told the publication.

Security implications

Concerns over the safety and control of Pakistan's nuclear assets have long troubled US policymakers. Given Pakistan's history of instability and terrorist groups, any expansion of its long-range nuclear capabilities brings renewed fears of unauthorised access or security breaches, as per Foreign Affairs.

"As U.S. officials have noted, if Pakistan acquires an ICBM, Washington will have no choice but to treat the country as a nuclear adversary—no other country with ICBMs that can target the United States is considered a friend," the report noted.

As the nuclear balance shifts in Asia, both the US and India are likely to reassess their strategic policies. The emergence of Pakistan as a long-range nuclear threat adds a new layer of complexity to the global security environment.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The first murmurs have started and the ground is being laid. The world is now slowly turning its attention to Pakistan's nukes and missile tech :sneaky:
 
It is is not in Indias interest for any serious threat against Pakistans missile capability.

If the heat is turned up and there is no way out New Delhi will joining Pakistan on the way down.

No matter who the original aggressor is.
 
Indians really shouldn’t worry, after all, according to them, Pakistani weapons didn’t even make it into India.
 
You have been posting so much about BrahMos and its capabilities that Pak govt heard you, felt inspired and now are at work.

They appreciate the push you gave them.
 
You have been posting so much about BrahMos and its capabilities that Pak govt heard you, felt inspired and now are at work.

They appreciate the push you gave them.

The is more of future strategic signalling from US Deepstate. In actual Pakistan is far behind in missile technology and lacks even the foundational systems needed for an ICBM like a space program or long-range test platforms.

India is actually almost there but I am surprised at the sudden field setting for Pakistan.
 
Narang Vipin and Pranayrvadi...yeah they are going to be the height of impartiality I'm sure. 🤣


They have to listen to subject experts.
Indian scientists are the backbone of modern day sophisticated high tech industries.

There is a reason why BrahMos is the greatest and the most devastating and the most unguardable dagger in the world right now. It is literally unstoppable.

When it comes to missiles, always pay attention to what Al Hindiyyah’s are saying.
 
Well, we know where to drop them before the US even thinks about it…
 
They have to listen to subject experts.
Indian scientists are the backbone of modern day sophisticated high tech industries.


What is admirable about India is that although they have mastered highest of high tech they combine it with ecological low tech to maintain the ecosphere so thoughtfully.


IMAGE-5-Narrow-bylanes-of-Dharavi-1.webp
 
What is admirable about India is that although they have mastered highest of high tech they combine it with ecological low tech to maintain the ecosphere so thoughtfully.


View attachment 155683

That’s a Muslim area.
Under the current govt, such dirty places are being bulldozed and rebuilt as per modern norms.
 
Pakistan is at least a decade and possibly two decades away away from having a true ICBM that can reach America. It will be easily intercepted because of the mediocre technology but we are talking theoretically right now.

By then American would have turned Sanatani however and would have become a friend of the Dar al Khilafa al hindiyya hegemony
 
Indian nerds will now get busy in inventing theories, pages, rhetoric and take this subject forward with passion.
 
Hilarious how Indians here are cra*ping their pants and on other threads staunchly claim Pakistan could not penetrate their defensive systems. So why even worry?

Personally, I think this is fake news or propaganda, most likely started by Indian lobbies. Pakistan has zero means to develop such tools. Not even China will bother with arming an ally with such long range stuff. It serves no purpose whatsoever.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pakistan doesn't need ICBM with that kind of range. Seems like more smoke and mirrors to malign the good name of a country that has maintained and protected its nuclear arsenal diligently. Hypothetically, even if this was the case, i dont think anything can be done to stop it.
 
All the amazing things India can do yet they can't even make their own smart phone.

I would say India is the IKEA of the trading world but that would be pushing it, it's more like Poundland
 
Personally, I think this is fake news or propaganda, most likely started by Indian lobbies. Pakistan has zero means to develop such tools. Not even China will bother with arming an ally with such long range stuff. It serves no purpose whatsoever. Pakistan is always kissing American behind.

ForiegnAffairs is the influential and usually well-sourced magazine, in which the article appeared. It doesn't entertain idle gossip.
 
Has US dealt with North Korea already....why after their own minions yet...they are excessively obedient
 
ForiegnAffairs is the influential and usually well-sourced magazine, in which the article appeared. It doesn't entertain idle gossip.
An American media outlet is not above and beyond suspicions. They all have agendas. American media is probably the most biased when it comes to parroting what their government wants. Just because they don't have the absurd dramatized loons that India and Pakistan have, does not mean they are all 100% accurate.
 
That’s a Muslim area.
Under the current govt, such dirty places are being bulldozed and rebuilt as per modern norms.
Guy got supernatural power like his -Illiterate Modi- how quick he said its muslim area just like his modi who identify people on basis of what they wear and laughs when biden speaks on serious such kind of illiterate modi our prime minister .

Most illiterate prime minister of a country
 
Last edited by a moderator:
An American media outlet is not above and beyond suspicions. They all have agendas. American media is probably the most biased when it comes to parroting what their government wants. Just because they don't have the absurd dramatized loons that India and Pakistan have, does not mean they are all 100% accurate.
They are actually the most nefarious media agencies..absolutely agenda driven by neocons
 
After the peace award nomination of Trump, this is how he repays? :mv
Don't worry. Pakistan have probably already got whatever they wanted when nominating him. In these things Pakistan have a super PHD.
 
You don’t know much about these regions so don’t teach me, I speak truth without giving a damn if it hurts Hindus I don’t care and if it hurts Muslims I don’t care. Only thing I take care of is not to hurt anyones religious sentiments hence I never make Anti Islamic or Anti Religion comments ever.

The worst ghettos you see in India today are overwhelmingly Muslim areas. Mostly illegal Bangladeshi Rohingyas.

You cannot have it both ways that you can criticize and shame India for its souls while not recognising that economic parasite mostly belonging to the Muslim community are the overwhelming contributors to such filthy ghettos.

Either do not mock India using such photos or be a man and acknowledge those who do it.

Out of curiosity I have went to a few such ghettos. They are a different world. One time you are in a swanky MNC office and 10 minutes from there you’re in a ghetto like that where Islamic flags all around, prostitution is rampant, all sort of criminal activities are going on all while Azaan is going on in the background.

That area is Dharavi which is 29% Muslim. It looks like a refugee slum, but at the end of the day town planning isn't done by individuals, it has to be the responsibility of the state. You can't blame the residents for building shanty towns.
 
That area is Dharavi which is 29% Muslim. It looks like a refugee slum, but at the end of the day town planning isn't done by individuals, it has to be the responsibility of the state. You can't blame the residents for building shanty towns.

Exactly this. The GoI deprives the Muslims of funds, jobs and opportunities and then the likes of @Bhaijaan are victim blaming them for living in squalor.
 
Exactly this. The GoI deprives the Muslims of funds, jobs and opportunities and then the likes of @Bhaijaan are victim blaming them for living in squalor.

Not to mention we haven't even looked at the wider implication that the squalor in India is divided along religious lines. Are we supposed to believe that majority Hindus live in comfort and first world conditions while Muslims are living in a slum bubble? This sounds highly unlikely but if that argument is being made then is probably worth a thread in it's own right.
 
That area is Dharavi which is 29% Muslim. It looks like a refugee slum, but at the end of the day town planning isn't done by individuals, it has to be the responsibility of the state. You can't blame the residents for building shanty towns.

Life is not the same in reality as people try to portray in their talks.
I often say, a lot of people here blindly support muslims against Hindus on most topics but if they're actually take to some of these "muslim areas" in India, Bangladesh they would wanna punch some of these "brothers" right in the face. Often times, its not a religion based divide but a class divide and the government and society at large can't be fully blamed for it because certain communities simply "refuse" to develop in our parts of the world.

I live in the real world not a fairy world
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Life is not the same in reality as people try to portray in their talks.
I often say, a lot of people here blindly support muslims against Hindus on most topics but if they're actually take to some of these "muslim areas" in India, Bangladesh they would wanna punch some of these "brothers" right in the face. Often times, its not a religion based divide but a class divide and the government and society at large can't be fully blamed for it because certain communities simply "refuse" to develop in our parts of the world.

I live in the real world not a fairy world or a world of beghairatmand dishonesty.

So which is it? A class divide or a religious divide. You need to get specific here. I have similar problems getting clarity on the grooming gangs thread where once the main purpose of mud slinging is achieved, Indian posters tend to run away when asked the harder questions.
 
It’s about time the world has a serious review of this critical situation. Is it safe to have Pakistan carrying nuclear weapons and ones that could reach United States given 99% Pakistanis hate America with passion

====

Pakistan developing nuclear missiles that can reach United States: Report​


Pakistan is reportedly advancing efforts to build a nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of reaching the continental United States.

According to a Foreign Affairs magazine report, if successful, the development would mark a significant expansion of Islamabad's strategic military reach and could lead Washington to officially classify as a nuclear adversary.

"Although Pakistan claims its nuclear programme is strictly focused on deterring India, which enjoys conventional military superiority, U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that the Pakistani military is developing an ICBM that could reach the continental United States," the report said.

US intelligence agencies believe that this potential ICBM programme is part of Pakistan's broader attempt to deter not only India but also the United States from interfering in any South Asian conflict in the future, as per Foreign Affairs.

Read more: US lawmakers introduce bill to bar Chinese AI in US government agencies

"In acquiring such a capability, Pakistan might be seeking to deter the United States from either trying to eliminate its arsenal in a preventive attack or intervening on India’s behalf in a future Indian-Pakistani conflict," it added.

ICBMs typically have a range exceeding 5,500 km and can be equipped with nuclear or conventional warheads.

The China angle

The report suggests that Pakistan's pursuit of long-range missile capabilities has been boosted by its close ties with China. While Beijing has not openly supported Islamabad's ICBM development, it has consistently provided military and economic assistance. This may have indirectly enhanced Pakistan's missile infrastructure.

The Foreign Affairs report highlighted that China's support may include tacit approval of such programmes, which could further complicate the strategic situation for both New Delhi and Washington.

For decades, Pakistan has viewed its nuclear arsenal as a counterbalance to India's superiority in conventional arms. However, the decision to pursue an ICBM represents an escalation in the region's arms race, sources familiar with South Asian defence atmosphere/expertise told the publication.

Security implications

Concerns over the safety and control of Pakistan's nuclear assets have long troubled US policymakers. Given Pakistan's history of instability and terrorist groups, any expansion of its long-range nuclear capabilities brings renewed fears of unauthorised access or security breaches, as per Foreign Affairs.

"As U.S. officials have noted, if Pakistan acquires an ICBM, Washington will have no choice but to treat the country as a nuclear adversary—no other country with ICBMs that can target the United States is considered a friend," the report noted.

As the nuclear balance shifts in Asia, both the US and India are likely to reassess their strategic policies. The emergence of Pakistan as a long-range nuclear threat adds a new layer of complexity to the global security environment.

Pakistan has no need to waste money on an ICBM to reach US.

Let the irrelevant discussions continue.
 
Are you bipolar or just a hypocrite?

“Muslims are our people - Muslims are filthy and disgusting”

This guy pretending Hindus are clean and sanitary whilst the world associates them with a lack of toilets.

Wake up please.
You don’t know much about these regions so don’t teach me, I speak truth without giving a damn if it hurts Hindus I don’t care and if it hurts Muslims I don’t care. Only thing I take care of is not to hurt anyones religious sentiments hence I never make Anti Islamic or Anti Religion comments ever.

The worst ghettos you see in India today are overwhelmingly Muslim areas. Mostly illegal Bangladeshi Rohingyas.

You cannot have it both ways that you can criticize and shame India for its souls while not recognising that economic parasite mostly belonging to the Muslim community are the overwhelming contributors to such filthy ghettos.

Either do not mock India using such photos or be a man and acknowledge those who do it.

Out of curiosity I have went to a few such ghettos. They are a different world. One time you are in a swanky MNC office and 10 minutes from there you’re in a ghetto like that where Islamic flags all around, prostitution is rampant, all sort of criminal activities are going on all while Azaan is going on in the background.

French speak the same way about Algerian Muslims.

The fact is that the French gave massive financial incentives to large immigrant population post WWII to work in their country but gave them housing far away, discriminated against them and reduced them to margins of the society and now complain that Muslim immigrants live in Ghettos.

Since 1947 Indian state institutions have actively discriminated Muslim minority in education and all other sectors and when Muslim entrepreneurs rise despite all odds then the systematic and organized pogroms (like the Gujarat Riots) fully backed by Indian police torch Muslim businesses and houses and "scorch the earth".

And then "Hindus" say that Muslims live in squalors!
 
No need for that far.. as long as the nukes can reach from Chennai to Calcutta if they don’t restore the indus water treaty !!
 
Would be a waste of money. If Pak ever needs to nuke USA, the world would already be in a nuclear war.
 
French speak the same way about Algerian Muslims.

The fact is that the French gave massive financial incentives to large immigrant population post WWII to work in their country but gave them housing far away, discriminated against them and reduced them to margins of the society and now complain that Muslim immigrants live in Ghettos.

Since 1947 Indian state institutions have actively discriminated Muslim minority in education and all other sectors and when Muslim entrepreneurs rise despite all odds then the systematic and organized pogroms (like the Gujarat Riots) fully backed by Indian police torch Muslim businesses and houses and "scorch the earth".

And then "Hindus" say that Muslims live in squalors!
Turks in Germany are another example, Pakistanis in the UK etc.

Only the assimilated who embed into their societies and imitate them will be accepted. As soon as you adopt agency and demand your rights you become a problem as a Muslim. It’s happening everywhere, Muslims are the new Jews.

If India is the so called fourth best economy, why doesn’t it rid of these shanty towns and develop Chinese style. Provide financial incentives to locals and implement real social reform.

But seeing the behaviour of these selected BJP officials, many of them are the same as Pakistani politicians. So many videos on social media of them abusing their power. Instead of serving the people, these guys on a massive power trip.
 
The US fired a Minuteman III Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) after President Trump called for restarting the nuclear weapons tests. :kp
 
if he believes pakistan have tested nuclear weapons, he will be able to prove it and confirm roughly the dates,

bet he cant, for abvious reasons
 
if he believes pakistan have tested nuclear weapons, he will be able to prove it and confirm roughly the dates,

bet he cant, for abvious reasons
Yeah no one asks Trump for proof because he gives 24 statements a day.. everyone believes what they want to when he speaks..
 
Yeah no one asks Trump for proof because he gives 24 statements a day.. everyone believes what they want to when he speaks..
no, with any caim you mmake, back it up with proof,

Just like you and indians believing, india taking down any pakistan fighter jets in the last scuffle,
 
Washington DC [US], November 7: "My life was completely destroyed... my wife left... I've been living in my motorhome camping for 18 years now," said former CIA counterproliferation officer Richard Barlow, who stated that he had to pay a devastating personal price for exposing Pakistan's clandestine nuclear weapons programme in the 1980s and seeing his life shattered by the very government he served.

In an interview with ANI, Barlow recounted how his relentless pursuit of truth led to professional sabotage, personal ruin, the end of his marriage, and nearly two decades of homelessness, all while Pakistan successfully built and proliferated the "Islamic bomb".

According to the former CIA officer, his ordeal began in 1985 when he joined the intelligence agency as a specialist on Pakistan's nuclear procurement networks, which were run by Abdul Qadeer Khan.

"I was the one who took action against the networks because nobody was doing it," Barlow told ANI.

Despite abundant intelligence showing Pakistan's illegal acquisitions of US materials for uranium enrichment and bomb-making, the Reagan administration prioritised the Afghan war against the Soviets, viewing Pakistan as an indispensable ally for arming the Mujahideen.

"We had superb intelligence on Pakistan's nuclear weapons and enrichment activities...better than on any other programme in history," Barlow revealed. Yet, the Cold War imperatives trumped nonproliferation.

According to Barlow, the then US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski's memo had set the tone: "We cannot let our proliferation policy dictate our foreign policy."

Barlow's breakthrough came in 1987 when he orchestrated the arrest of Arshad Pervez, a Pakistani agent attempting to smuggle 25 tonnes of maraging steel--essential for gas centrifuges--from the US. Working with the Customs Service, Barlow ran an undercover sting that exposed retired Pakistani Brigadier General Inamul Haq as the mastermind directly linked to Khan Research Laboratories (KRL), the core of Pakistan's nuclear programme. The arrest triggered a firestorm.

According to Barlow, US State Department officials, including then Deputy Assistant Secretary Robert Peck, tipped off Islamabad, allowing Haq to evade capture.

"I was ballistic. I couldn't believe it. These are people in my own government, the enemy within," Barlow said.

Barlow revealed that the US Congress, enraged by Pakistan's then-President Zia-ul-Haq's deception amid billions in US aid, invoked the Solarz Amendment, mandating aid cuts for illegal nuclear exports.

Testifying alongside US National Intelligence Officer David Einsel, Barlow defied pressure to downplay evidence.

"I made it very, very brief, that there was no doubt on that issue that they were agents of the Pakistani government. We had hard evidence of this. We got into all the pounds and pounds of documents and evidence and things that were said in undercover meetings that were taped. We had hard evidence. There was no doubt of it," he stated, confirming incontrovertible proof of state involvement.

The former CIA officer further revealed that President Reagan triggered the Solarz Amendment but immediately waived it for national security as Afghan priorities prevailed. Aid flowed, funnelling resources that Barlow believes bolstered Pakistan's bomb.

"Billions of dollars of US military and covert aid. There was a significant portion of it that was funnelled off; knowing how Pakistan works, that may have helped to fund their nuclear programme," he asserted, noting Saudi contributions too.

Barlow's candour earned him enemies.

CIA's Directorate of Operations (DO) officials, focused on the Mujahideen, sought his firing. Promoted with an award by CIA Director William Webster, he was barred from further law enforcement collaboration on Pakistan.

"People were trying to fire me. Well, it ended up with the director, Bill Webster, giving me an award and I got promoted and I got confirmed as a permanent employee. I could have stayed at the CIA for the rest of my working life. But I was informed that I was no longer allowed to work with law enforcement agencies on Pakistan illegal procurement activities. That was a turning point in history right there. I was the only person in the government working on this full time. One person was too much," Barlow lamented.

Resigning in 1989, he joined the Office of the US Secretary of Defence under Dick Cheney. Tasked with assessing Pakistan's capabilities, Barlow's report--for an NSC meeting--detailed F-16 compatibility with nuclear delivery, contradicting official denials. Intercepted and rewritten to omit damning intelligence, his findings were suppressed.

"I was tasked with drafting a full assessment of Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme, looking at everything, delivery systems, and weapons development. And I did for our new Secretary of Defence, Dick Cheney for an upcoming National Security Council meeting on Pakistan. I wrote that paper and a guy who was the regional action officer for Pakistan in another part of the Pentagon was breathing down my neck to change my assessments, And I actually had DIA prepare a separate assessment just on the F-16 delivery issue," Barlow said.

Retaliation escalated with fabricated claims of psychiatric issues, stemming from reported marriage counselling, leading to suspended clearances, a nine-month investigation, and termination, he revealed.

"During this period, Cindy and I had a pretty rough time when I was at the CIA. We were in marriage counselling. And you have to report that when you have the kind of clearances that I have. And so I did. And so my immediate supervisors, they knew exactly what it was about. And in the end, somebody rewrote the assessment that I wrote for Cheney, taking out all the damaging intelligence. They didn't tell me that," Barlow said.

"In the end, I was called into the security office. This is after being given a fire notice. And it turned out, months later, they revealed to me that the allegations were two things. One, that I was going to Congress to tell them the truth, which was an absolute fabrication. And two, that the reason I was doing this was because I was mentally psychotic under psychiatric care when they knew it was just marriage counselling," he noted.

"So a nine-month-long investigation, invading our marriage all over Washington, making everybody think that I was some kind of a spy or had done some horrible security thing. It was all found to be completely fabricated. And I was called in and given my top secret clearance back, but they refused to put me back in my job," the former CIA officer added.

Barlow stated that later Congressional probes deemed the DOD investigation a "cover-up" and by 1993, he was broke and divorced, leaving Washington for Santa Fe, driving a tour bus. Contract work with the CIA and FBI followed, building their counterproliferation unit, but no reinstitution.

"My life was completely destroyed, to put it in a nutshell. My wife left me. I had no money and, I moved to Santa Fe, New Mexico. And I was completely broke. My credit was destroyed. I got a job driving a tour bus off the Plaza and Santa Fe for a while. And eventually the CIA hired me as a contractor out of my house initially, and my clearances were restored," he stated.

"After a year or two, I brought in a contract with the FBI, National Security Division, and I started their counterproliferation program. They didn't have one. And both analytically and operationally. And I ran that for eight years," Barlow stated in rejuvenation.

By 2005, AQ Khan's network bust exposed transfers to Iran, Libya, and North Korea--vindicating Barlow's warnings--and a Senate amendment promised USD 1.8 million in pension equivalency.

Homeless since 2007, Barlow lives in a 24-year-old motorhome on Social Security and a USD 300 monthly mini-pension.

"I've been basically a homeless person living in my motor home camping for 18 years now. And I had money of my own from the sale of my house and my savings," he said.

"I live on my social security. And I have a mini government pension of about USD 300 a month. My pension was calculated to be about USD 90,000 a year. Now I live on about USD 1,600 a month, which is not possible. I mean, I never go to restaurants. I used to go to food banks; it's tough," Barlow lamented.

Barlow's "primary sin"? Arrests that forced truth into the open.

"My primary sin was getting people arrested, because then the truth comes out. And if this was just about me, we wouldn't be here right now. But what happened to me is emblematic of our government's handling of AQ Khan and Pakistan's nuclear programme," he said.

"They did nothing for the next 20-24 years. During which period, it was always very clear that while Pakistan's primary motive for developing nuclear weapons was to counter India, for sure," Barlow added.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link: https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/w...istans-nuclear-secrets-ex-cia-officer-barlow/
 
no, with any caim you mmake, back it up with proof,

Just like you and indians believing, india taking down any pakistan fighter jets in the last scuffle,
Sure or Trump continuously talking about planes lost and Pakistanis consuming it up
 
Washington DC [US], November 7: "My life was completely destroyed... my wife left... I've been living in my motorhome camping for 18 years now," said former CIA counterproliferation officer Richard Barlow, who stated that he had to pay a devastating personal price for exposing Pakistan's clandestine nuclear weapons programme in the 1980s and seeing his life shattered by the very government he served.

In an interview with ANI, Barlow recounted how his relentless pursuit of truth led to professional sabotage, personal ruin, the end of his marriage, and nearly two decades of homelessness, all while Pakistan successfully built and proliferated the "Islamic bomb".

According to the former CIA officer, his ordeal began in 1985 when he joined the intelligence agency as a specialist on Pakistan's nuclear procurement networks, which were run by Abdul Qadeer Khan.

"I was the one who took action against the networks because nobody was doing it," Barlow told ANI.

Despite abundant intelligence showing Pakistan's illegal acquisitions of US materials for uranium enrichment and bomb-making, the Reagan administration prioritised the Afghan war against the Soviets, viewing Pakistan as an indispensable ally for arming the Mujahideen.

"We had superb intelligence on Pakistan's nuclear weapons and enrichment activities...better than on any other programme in history," Barlow revealed. Yet, the Cold War imperatives trumped nonproliferation.

According to Barlow, the then US National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski's memo had set the tone: "We cannot let our proliferation policy dictate our foreign policy."

Barlow's breakthrough came in 1987 when he orchestrated the arrest of Arshad Pervez, a Pakistani agent attempting to smuggle 25 tonnes of maraging steel--essential for gas centrifuges--from the US. Working with the Customs Service, Barlow ran an undercover sting that exposed retired Pakistani Brigadier General Inamul Haq as the mastermind directly linked to Khan Research Laboratories (KRL), the core of Pakistan's nuclear programme. The arrest triggered a firestorm.

According to Barlow, US State Department officials, including then Deputy Assistant Secretary Robert Peck, tipped off Islamabad, allowing Haq to evade capture.

"I was ballistic. I couldn't believe it. These are people in my own government, the enemy within," Barlow said.

Barlow revealed that the US Congress, enraged by Pakistan's then-President Zia-ul-Haq's deception amid billions in US aid, invoked the Solarz Amendment, mandating aid cuts for illegal nuclear exports.

Testifying alongside US National Intelligence Officer David Einsel, Barlow defied pressure to downplay evidence.

"I made it very, very brief, that there was no doubt on that issue that they were agents of the Pakistani government. We had hard evidence of this. We got into all the pounds and pounds of documents and evidence and things that were said in undercover meetings that were taped. We had hard evidence. There was no doubt of it," he stated, confirming incontrovertible proof of state involvement.

The former CIA officer further revealed that President Reagan triggered the Solarz Amendment but immediately waived it for national security as Afghan priorities prevailed. Aid flowed, funnelling resources that Barlow believes bolstered Pakistan's bomb.

"Billions of dollars of US military and covert aid. There was a significant portion of it that was funnelled off; knowing how Pakistan works, that may have helped to fund their nuclear programme," he asserted, noting Saudi contributions too.

Barlow's candour earned him enemies.

CIA's Directorate of Operations (DO) officials, focused on the Mujahideen, sought his firing. Promoted with an award by CIA Director William Webster, he was barred from further law enforcement collaboration on Pakistan.

"People were trying to fire me. Well, it ended up with the director, Bill Webster, giving me an award and I got promoted and I got confirmed as a permanent employee. I could have stayed at the CIA for the rest of my working life. But I was informed that I was no longer allowed to work with law enforcement agencies on Pakistan illegal procurement activities. That was a turning point in history right there. I was the only person in the government working on this full time. One person was too much," Barlow lamented.

Resigning in 1989, he joined the Office of the US Secretary of Defence under Dick Cheney. Tasked with assessing Pakistan's capabilities, Barlow's report--for an NSC meeting--detailed F-16 compatibility with nuclear delivery, contradicting official denials. Intercepted and rewritten to omit damning intelligence, his findings were suppressed.

"I was tasked with drafting a full assessment of Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme, looking at everything, delivery systems, and weapons development. And I did for our new Secretary of Defence, Dick Cheney for an upcoming National Security Council meeting on Pakistan. I wrote that paper and a guy who was the regional action officer for Pakistan in another part of the Pentagon was breathing down my neck to change my assessments, And I actually had DIA prepare a separate assessment just on the F-16 delivery issue," Barlow said.

Retaliation escalated with fabricated claims of psychiatric issues, stemming from reported marriage counselling, leading to suspended clearances, a nine-month investigation, and termination, he revealed.

"During this period, Cindy and I had a pretty rough time when I was at the CIA. We were in marriage counselling. And you have to report that when you have the kind of clearances that I have. And so I did. And so my immediate supervisors, they knew exactly what it was about. And in the end, somebody rewrote the assessment that I wrote for Cheney, taking out all the damaging intelligence. They didn't tell me that," Barlow said.

"In the end, I was called into the security office. This is after being given a fire notice. And it turned out, months later, they revealed to me that the allegations were two things. One, that I was going to Congress to tell them the truth, which was an absolute fabrication. And two, that the reason I was doing this was because I was mentally psychotic under psychiatric care when they knew it was just marriage counselling," he noted.

"So a nine-month-long investigation, invading our marriage all over Washington, making everybody think that I was some kind of a spy or had done some horrible security thing. It was all found to be completely fabricated. And I was called in and given my top secret clearance back, but they refused to put me back in my job," the former CIA officer added.

Barlow stated that later Congressional probes deemed the DOD investigation a "cover-up" and by 1993, he was broke and divorced, leaving Washington for Santa Fe, driving a tour bus. Contract work with the CIA and FBI followed, building their counterproliferation unit, but no reinstitution.

"My life was completely destroyed, to put it in a nutshell. My wife left me. I had no money and, I moved to Santa Fe, New Mexico. And I was completely broke. My credit was destroyed. I got a job driving a tour bus off the Plaza and Santa Fe for a while. And eventually the CIA hired me as a contractor out of my house initially, and my clearances were restored," he stated.

"After a year or two, I brought in a contract with the FBI, National Security Division, and I started their counterproliferation program. They didn't have one. And both analytically and operationally. And I ran that for eight years," Barlow stated in rejuvenation.

By 2005, AQ Khan's network bust exposed transfers to Iran, Libya, and North Korea--vindicating Barlow's warnings--and a Senate amendment promised USD 1.8 million in pension equivalency.

Homeless since 2007, Barlow lives in a 24-year-old motorhome on Social Security and a USD 300 monthly mini-pension.

"I've been basically a homeless person living in my motor home camping for 18 years now. And I had money of my own from the sale of my house and my savings," he said.

"I live on my social security. And I have a mini government pension of about USD 300 a month. My pension was calculated to be about USD 90,000 a year. Now I live on about USD 1,600 a month, which is not possible. I mean, I never go to restaurants. I used to go to food banks; it's tough," Barlow lamented.

Barlow's "primary sin"? Arrests that forced truth into the open.

"My primary sin was getting people arrested, because then the truth comes out. And if this was just about me, we wouldn't be here right now. But what happened to me is emblematic of our government's handling of AQ Khan and Pakistan's nuclear programme," he said.

"They did nothing for the next 20-24 years. During which period, it was always very clear that while Pakistan's primary motive for developing nuclear weapons was to counter India, for sure," Barlow added.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link: https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/w...istans-nuclear-secrets-ex-cia-officer-barlow/

How in the world can you be a CIA intelligence operative and have a 'relentless pursuit of truth'?

That's like a Carnivore's pursuit of being a vegetarian.

If anyone, knows anything about Western counter intelligence, then truth is whatever is beneficial to the organization and nation. Whatever brings more power and control.
 
How in the world can you be a CIA intelligence operative and have a 'relentless pursuit of truth'?

That's like a Carnivore's pursuit of being a vegetarian.

If anyone, knows anything about Western counter intelligence, then truth is whatever is beneficial to the organization and nation. Whatever brings more power and control.
True words!
 
Sure or Trump continuously talking about planes lost and Pakistanis consuming it up
or your still crying and cant admit pakistan took down many airplanes, plus drones within that figure,

considering your own general has ammited to the above, and yet you cant till this day proove otherwise, just sums up what happened,






https://x.com/FM1947PAK/status/1921...ne-has-been-drawn-narendra-modi.317831/page-2

https://x.com/FM1947PAK/status/1921...ne-has-been-drawn-narendra-modi.317831/page-2

https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status...ine-possible-further-losses-cnn.317774/page-3

https://x.com/godfatheriv/status/19...bad-india-tapped-out-before-paf.317800/page-6

https://x.com/clashreport/status/1921545800011669765

https://x.com/MDUmairKh/status/1921...bad-india-tapped-out-before-paf.317800/page-5

https://x.com/RehanSeerat/status/19...bad-india-tapped-out-before-paf.317800/page-4

https://x.com/Irves_Watch/status/19...ficials-narendra-modi-or-someone-else.317840/

https://x.com/americanspress/status...ficials-narendra-modi-or-someone-else.317840/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlxktdMAgM8

https://x.com/MonitorX99800/status/...s-narendra-modi-or-someone-else.317840/page-3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNyiToXqAD8&t=176s

https://x.com/Defence_Index/status/...ine-possible-further-losses-cnn.317774/page-3

https://x.com/GurpreetSSahota/statu...ia-builds-dams-on-shared-rivers.314625/page-6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLOA2uJvWS0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDghXinvVmM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JB6frhHr870

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o353XF9Zyyg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpbYEmMW0aw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqaM_VM7Gmo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZLZBXRLAIg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYLUbJn2ihw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-n_Rjnnqsg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_37aAL2-e4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw-DYLWsnkA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n56-6GobmJ0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANHoZO7hlTQ


enjoy
 
or your still crying and cant admit pakistan took down many airplanes, plus drones within that figure,

considering your own general has ammited to the above, and yet you cant till this day proove otherwise, just sums up what happened,






https://x.com/FM1947PAK/status/1921...ne-has-been-drawn-narendra-modi.317831/page-2

https://x.com/FM1947PAK/status/1921...ne-has-been-drawn-narendra-modi.317831/page-2

https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status...ine-possible-further-losses-cnn.317774/page-3

https://x.com/godfatheriv/status/19...bad-india-tapped-out-before-paf.317800/page-6

https://x.com/clashreport/status/1921545800011669765

https://x.com/MDUmairKh/status/1921...bad-india-tapped-out-before-paf.317800/page-5

https://x.com/RehanSeerat/status/19...bad-india-tapped-out-before-paf.317800/page-4

https://x.com/Irves_Watch/status/19...ficials-narendra-modi-or-someone-else.317840/

https://x.com/americanspress/status...ficials-narendra-modi-or-someone-else.317840/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlxktdMAgM8

https://x.com/MonitorX99800/status/...s-narendra-modi-or-someone-else.317840/page-3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNyiToXqAD8&t=176s

https://x.com/Defence_Index/status/...ine-possible-further-losses-cnn.317774/page-3

https://x.com/GurpreetSSahota/statu...ia-builds-dams-on-shared-rivers.314625/page-6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLOA2uJvWS0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDghXinvVmM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JB6frhHr870

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o353XF9Zyyg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpbYEmMW0aw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqaM_VM7Gmo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZLZBXRLAIg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYLUbJn2ihw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-n_Rjnnqsg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_37aAL2-e4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw-DYLWsnkA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n56-6GobmJ0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANHoZO7hlTQ


enjoy

Post was becoming believable then I saw Pravin Sawhney in one of the videos 🤡
 
Post was becoming believable then I saw Pravin Sawhney in one of the videos 🤡
that your opinion on him on what he has previous stated on other matters - which means nothing, hence you couldnt even elaborate.


dont matter about the other videos i listed,

anyways you've got a problem with a dodgy indian, thats a problem with you and him, nothing about the beating you took,


you deal with your problems with Pravin Sawhney
 
that your opinion on him on what he has previous stated on other matters - which means nothing, hence you couldnt even elaborate.


dont matter about the other videos i listed,

anyways you've got a problem with a dodgy indian, thats a problem with you and him, nothing about the beating you took,


you deal with your problems with Pravin Sawhney

I always said Pakistan 🇵🇰 always beat India in head on battles 😇..
 
It’s about time the world has a serious review of this critical situation. Is it safe to have Pakistan carrying nuclear weapons and ones that could reach United States given 99% Pakistanis hate America with passion

====

Pakistan developing nuclear missiles that can reach United States: Report​


Pakistan is reportedly advancing efforts to build a nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of reaching the continental United States.

According to a Foreign Affairs magazine report, if successful, the development would mark a significant expansion of Islamabad's strategic military reach and could lead Washington to officially classify as a nuclear adversary.

"Although Pakistan claims its nuclear programme is strictly focused on deterring India, which enjoys conventional military superiority, U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that the Pakistani military is developing an ICBM that could reach the continental United States," the report said.

US intelligence agencies believe that this potential ICBM programme is part of Pakistan's broader attempt to deter not only India but also the United States from interfering in any South Asian conflict in the future, as per Foreign Affairs.

Read more: US lawmakers introduce bill to bar Chinese AI in US government agencies

"In acquiring such a capability, Pakistan might be seeking to deter the United States from either trying to eliminate its arsenal in a preventive attack or intervening on India’s behalf in a future Indian-Pakistani conflict," it added.

ICBMs typically have a range exceeding 5,500 km and can be equipped with nuclear or conventional warheads.

The China angle

The report suggests that Pakistan's pursuit of long-range missile capabilities has been boosted by its close ties with China. While Beijing has not openly supported Islamabad's ICBM development, it has consistently provided military and economic assistance. This may have indirectly enhanced Pakistan's missile infrastructure.

The Foreign Affairs report highlighted that China's support may include tacit approval of such programmes, which could further complicate the strategic situation for both New Delhi and Washington.

For decades, Pakistan has viewed its nuclear arsenal as a counterbalance to India's superiority in conventional arms. However, the decision to pursue an ICBM represents an escalation in the region's arms race, sources familiar with South Asian defence atmosphere/expertise told the publication.

Security implications

Concerns over the safety and control of Pakistan's nuclear assets have long troubled US policymakers. Given Pakistan's history of instability and terrorist groups, any expansion of its long-range nuclear capabilities brings renewed fears of unauthorised access or security breaches, as per Foreign Affairs.

"As U.S. officials have noted, if Pakistan acquires an ICBM, Washington will have no choice but to treat the country as a nuclear adversary—no other country with ICBMs that can target the United States is considered a friend," the report noted.

As the nuclear balance shifts in Asia, both the US and India are likely to reassess their strategic policies. The emergence of Pakistan as a long-range nuclear threat adds a new layer of complexity to the global security environment.

The trillions spent on weapons in the Indo-Pak subcontinent is not something to be proud of. While many may take pride in this, we must consider the broader implications. This immense expenditure on armament essentially robs people of their rights and opportunities for a better life.

Imagine the transformative impact such funds could have if redirected towards education and societal modernisation. Investing in education and development could uplift communities, foster innovation, and create a more prosperous and peaceful future for everyone.
 
The trillions spent on weapons in the Indo-Pak subcontinent is not something to be proud of. While many may take pride in this, we must consider the broader implications. This immense expenditure on armament essentially robs people of their rights and opportunities for a better life.

Imagine the transformative impact such funds could have if redirected towards education and societal modernisation. Investing in education and development could uplift communities, foster innovation, and create a more prosperous and peaceful future for everyone.

Disagree from India's POV.

India remains the homeland for Sanatan. Without weapons, we run the risk of being attacked and forcefully converted and our cultural legacy erased.

Not only does India need more and better weapons but India specifically needs to develop the God weapon which would have the potential to upstage 1000 nukes in 1 shot. Something of that level of impact to ensure Sanatan's continuity.
 
Disagree from India's POV.

India remains the homeland for Sanatan. Without weapons, we run the risk of being attacked and forcefully converted and our cultural legacy erased.

Not only does India need more and better weapons but India specifically needs to develop the God weapon which would have the potential to upstage 1000 nukes in 1 shot. Something of that level of impact to ensure Sanatan's continuity.
I do understand where you are coming from, considering the region's history of foreign invaders and attacks. This context certainly adds layers of complexity to the situation.

However, it is important to consider why there is criticism around Pakistan's defence approach. Pakistan's sense of threat from India is a significant factor, and understandably, it influences their strategic decisions. But one might argue that relying heavily on a weaponised strategy can be seen as a loose approach in the long run.

While it's crucial to address security concerns, perhaps there is room for strategies that promote stability and peace more effectively. It is a delicate balance to strike, but a more comprehensive approach might be beneficial for both nations' long-term interests.
 
I do understand where you are coming from, considering the region's history of foreign invaders and attacks. This context certainly adds layers of complexity to the situation.

However, it is important to consider why there is criticism around Pakistan's defence approach. Pakistan's sense of threat from India is a significant factor, and understandably, it influences their strategic decisions. But one might argue that relying heavily on a weaponised strategy can be seen as a loose approach in the long run.

While it's crucial to address security concerns, perhaps there is room for strategies that promote stability and peace more effectively. It is a delicate balance to strike, but a more comprehensive approach might be beneficial for both nations' long-term interests.

India's defense doctrine is based primarily on China, seen as the financially and weapons wise the superior adversary. Pakistan is a credible threat but not one that gives us sleepless nights. China is an unreliable and aggressive power which has already expanded beyond its original demography and is showing no signs of stopping at that. A strong India is a crucial deterrence to China in the region and in the Indian ocean.
 
India's defense doctrine is based primarily on China, seen as the financially and weapons wise the superior adversary. Pakistan is a credible threat but not one that gives us sleepless nights. China is an unreliable and aggressive power which has already expanded beyond its original demography and is showing no signs of stopping at that. A strong India is a crucial deterrence to China in the region and in the Indian ocean.

How many more nukes does India need to give sleepless nights to China?

How many more nukes does Pakistan need to give sleepless nights to India?

When it comes to unreliability and aggressiveness, India has played its fair share.
 
What destructive species humans are, the higher power that made us, whoever or whatever that maybe, definitely did not design and build us correctly, humans are probably the creators biggest mistake.

As long as humans continue to exist there will never be peace on this planet or any other planets they may go to..
 
What destructive species humans are, the higher power that made us, whoever or whatever that maybe, definitely did not design and build us correctly, humans are probably the creators biggest mistake.

As long as humans continue to exist there will never be peace on this planet or any other planets they may go to..
Cue the atheists with self oxymorons.
 
Back
Top