- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 217,977
Fujitsu, the technology company that built the flawed Horizon IT system at the heart of the Post Office scandal, has admitted for the first time that it should contribute to financial redress for victims.
During evidence sessions, at which MPs on the business and trade committee heard that Horizon victims were “falling apart” while waiting for compensation, Fujitsu’s European boss, Paul Patterson, admitted the company had known the IT system was faulty since the 1990s.
Asked if the Japanese-owned company should contribute to redress for victims, estimated to reach £1bn, he agree it should but said the exact amount would have to wait until the end of the inquiry, led by a judge, Sir Wyn Williams.
A general view of sign outside a Fujitsu office
‘How much is Fujitsu going to pay?’ Questions for Post Office IT firm as it faces MPs
Read more
“I think there is a moral obligation for the company to contribute,” Patterson said. “The right place to determine that is when our responsibility is very clear. There are many parties involved in this travesty.”
He said Fujitsu knew that the Horizon system was flawed at the time that the firm was supporting the Post Office in prosecuting more than 700 post office operators.
“Fujitsu would like to apologise for our part in this appalling miscarriage of justice. We were involved from the very start. We did have bugs and errors from the start and we did help the Post Office with prosecutions of subpostmasters.”
MPs heard from two former post office operators, Joan Hamilton and Alan Bates, the man at the centre of a recent ITV drama that some have credited with spurring political action, including a promise by the government to take the highly unusual step of legislating to overturn convictions en masse.
Both said that claims for redress were being held up by red tape, adding to the suffering of those who had been wrongly prosecuted or convicted.
“It is frustrating to put it mildly,” Bates said. “I mean, there is no reason at all why full financial redress shouldn’t have been delivered by now. It’s gone on for far too long. People are suffering, they’re dying … And it just seems to be tied up in bureaucracy.”
According to Neil Hudgell, a solicitor representing former post office operators claiming redress, just three of 73 claimants he represents have received full payment.
Hamilton described the compensation system as like a “factory of bureaucracy that just swallows up paperwork”.
“I know a lot of the group and they are literally falling apart waiting for the end of this.”
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
Bates referred to a 91-year-old former post office operator who was still waiting to be made good. “How many more years has she got to wait for financial redress? It’s very unfair and it’s cruel.”
Hamilton said it was “almost like being retried” and went on to describe the experience of being accused of crimes by the Post Office. “They convinced me that it was all my fault. I wasn’t tech savvy … I thought I’d made a hash of it. They’d gaslit me for about three years.”
Hudgell said senior staff at the Post Office must have been convinced that Horizon would “catch out a nation of dishonest people”.
Lord Arbuthnot, the peer who has long campaigned on behalf of Horizon victims, said the scandal went unquestioned for so long because it involved “people who have been convicted of crime, up against the most trusted brand in the country”.
“But it was actually most trusted because of the relationships that subpostmasters had with communities.”
Nick Read, the chief executive of the Post Office, said the organisation was committed to “get off Horizon”, which still runs Post Office systems and is scheduled to do so until 2025 after contract extensions.
Fujitsu has earned £2.4bn from the contract, which will have run for more than a quarter of a century by the time it concludes.
www.theguardian.com
During evidence sessions, at which MPs on the business and trade committee heard that Horizon victims were “falling apart” while waiting for compensation, Fujitsu’s European boss, Paul Patterson, admitted the company had known the IT system was faulty since the 1990s.
Asked if the Japanese-owned company should contribute to redress for victims, estimated to reach £1bn, he agree it should but said the exact amount would have to wait until the end of the inquiry, led by a judge, Sir Wyn Williams.
A general view of sign outside a Fujitsu office
‘How much is Fujitsu going to pay?’ Questions for Post Office IT firm as it faces MPs
Read more
“I think there is a moral obligation for the company to contribute,” Patterson said. “The right place to determine that is when our responsibility is very clear. There are many parties involved in this travesty.”
He said Fujitsu knew that the Horizon system was flawed at the time that the firm was supporting the Post Office in prosecuting more than 700 post office operators.
“Fujitsu would like to apologise for our part in this appalling miscarriage of justice. We were involved from the very start. We did have bugs and errors from the start and we did help the Post Office with prosecutions of subpostmasters.”
MPs heard from two former post office operators, Joan Hamilton and Alan Bates, the man at the centre of a recent ITV drama that some have credited with spurring political action, including a promise by the government to take the highly unusual step of legislating to overturn convictions en masse.
Both said that claims for redress were being held up by red tape, adding to the suffering of those who had been wrongly prosecuted or convicted.
“It is frustrating to put it mildly,” Bates said. “I mean, there is no reason at all why full financial redress shouldn’t have been delivered by now. It’s gone on for far too long. People are suffering, they’re dying … And it just seems to be tied up in bureaucracy.”
According to Neil Hudgell, a solicitor representing former post office operators claiming redress, just three of 73 claimants he represents have received full payment.
Hamilton described the compensation system as like a “factory of bureaucracy that just swallows up paperwork”.
“I know a lot of the group and they are literally falling apart waiting for the end of this.”
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
Bates referred to a 91-year-old former post office operator who was still waiting to be made good. “How many more years has she got to wait for financial redress? It’s very unfair and it’s cruel.”
Hamilton said it was “almost like being retried” and went on to describe the experience of being accused of crimes by the Post Office. “They convinced me that it was all my fault. I wasn’t tech savvy … I thought I’d made a hash of it. They’d gaslit me for about three years.”
Hudgell said senior staff at the Post Office must have been convinced that Horizon would “catch out a nation of dishonest people”.
Lord Arbuthnot, the peer who has long campaigned on behalf of Horizon victims, said the scandal went unquestioned for so long because it involved “people who have been convicted of crime, up against the most trusted brand in the country”.
“But it was actually most trusted because of the relationships that subpostmasters had with communities.”
Nick Read, the chief executive of the Post Office, said the organisation was committed to “get off Horizon”, which still runs Post Office systems and is scheduled to do so until 2025 after contract extensions.
Fujitsu has earned £2.4bn from the contract, which will have run for more than a quarter of a century by the time it concludes.

Fujitsu admits for first time it should help compensate Post Office victims
European boss says company has ‘moral obligation’ to contribute but exact sum will have to wait until end of inquiry