What's new

'UK has been colonised by immigrants', says INEOS boss and Man Utd co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe

BouncerGuy

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 29, 2023
Runs
42,729
'UK has been colonised by immigrants', says INEOS boss and Man Utd co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe

Britain has been "colonised" by immigrants, who are draining resources from the state, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, one of the country's richest and most influential men, has told Sky News.

Sir Jim, the founder of the INEOS chemicals group and part-owner of Manchester United, warned that Britain faces profound political, social and economic challenges, among them an unprecedented rise in immigration in recent years.

"You can't have an economy with nine million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in," he said. "I mean, the UK has been colonised. It's costing too much money.

"The UK has been colonised by immigrants, really, hasn't it? I mean, the population of the UK was 58 million in 2020, now it's 70 million. That's 12 million people."

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) estimates that the population of the UK was 67 million in mid-2020 and 70 million in mid-2024.

The UK population was estimated at 58.9 million in 2000.

Sir Keir Starmer responded to Sir Jim's remarks on immigration, saying they were "offensive and wrong".

"Britain is a proud, tolerant and diverse country," the prime minister added. "Jim Ratcliffe should apologise."

In his interview with Sky News, Sir Jim - who is a resident of Monaco - signalled that Sir Keir might not be the right man for the top job, saying: "I don't know whether it's just the apparatus that hasn't allowed Keir to do it or, or he's maybe too nice - I mean, Keir is a nice man. I like him, but it's a tough job and I think you have to do some difficult things with the UK to get it back on track, because at the moment I don't think the economy is in a good state."

The chemicals boss said he had met recently with Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, saying of him: "I think Nigel is an intelligent man, and, I think he's got good intentions. But in a way, you could say exactly the same about Keir Starmer. I think it needs somebody who's prepared to be unpopular for a period of time to get the big issues sorted out."

Referring to his role at Manchester United, Sir Jim added: "I've seen quite a bit of this at the football club. If you do difficult things, which we felt that we had to do at Manchester United... we felt like they were the right things to do. But you do become very unpopular for a while."

Sir Jim continued: "Well, I've been very unpopular at Manchester United because we've made lots of changes. But for the better, in my view. And I think we're beginning to see some evidence in the football club that that's beginning to pay off.

"But you've got all the same issues with the country. If you really want to deal with the major issues of immigration, with people opting to take benefits rather than working for a living, if you want to deal with that, then you're going to have to do some things which are unpopular, and show some courage."

Sir Jim Ratcliffe has become increasingly divisive with his actions and rhetoric as the face and voice of Manchester United's leadership.

The INEOS billionaire's outburst on immigration risks further antagonising those inside and outside the club.

The men's squad alone relies on overseas talent, featuring more than a dozen different nationalities.

And then there's the staff - many with global heritage - who keep the club running on a daily or temporary basis from the training ground to Old Trafford.

Sir Jim's view of foreign people coming to Britain collides with the ideals promoted by United and the Premier League.

Sir Jim was talking on the fringes of the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, at which leaders from many of Europe's biggest economies, including France's Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Friedrich Merz, are meeting with industrialists to discuss the fate of its economy.

The summit comes amid a spate of closures across the European chemicals sector, closures that indicate, in the INEOS founder's view, that the European chemicals sector is facing "unsurvivable conditions".

Reacting to Sir Jim's comments to Sky News, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told Sky's Matt Barbet on the Politics Hub that migration - both legal and illegal - was too high under the Conservatives, and that people want to see those arriving "making a contribution" and "not doing that at the expense" of a government that isn't investing in young people.

But she continued: "My dad comes from an immigrant background. I want your viewers to know that I am really proud that Britain is a diverse and tolerant country that is strengthened by waves of immigration."

She added: "I'd be more than happy to speak to him about what we're doing."

 
Did those immigrants force their entry into your country with guns and bombs, or did you willingly welcome them into your country?​
 
Did those immigrants force their entry into your country with guns and bombs, or did you willingly welcome them into your country?​
UK surrendered to globalists. Not just UK, the entire Western world has surrenders to socialists and globalists.
UK should accept the reality instead of crying about it. They got what they wanted and deserved.
 
UK surrendered to globalists. Not just UK, the entire Western world has surrenders to socialists and globalists.
UK should accept the reality instead of crying about it. They got what they wanted and deserved.
I don't mind. They are getting a dose of their own medicine. In fact the immigrants haven't caused 0.000000000000000001% of the damage and havoc that they caused all over the world. Rot in hell!​
 
Did those immigrants force their entry into your country with guns and bombs, or did you willingly welcome them into your country?​

Many Indians come to UK illegally. Maybe Indians should stop doing that? :inti

 
Ratcliffe says 'sorry my choice of language has offended some people'

Ratcliffe has just issued the following statement:

"I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth.

"My comments were made while answering questions about UK policy at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, where I was discussing the importance of economic growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing in the UK.

"My intention was to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs so that long-term prosperity is shared by everyone. It is critical that we maintain an open debate on the challenges facing the UK."

BBC
 
Many Indians come to UK illegally. Maybe Indians should stop doing that? :inti



The argument isn't about legal or illegal immigration. It is about changing the culture of the English nation via immigration from foreign countries. India is one of the most prominent of these, so many Indians are flooding into the country it is changing the whole demographic.

In fact many Indian posters like @Champ_Pal have made this same argument against immigrants from Islamic countries, but the local indiginous population don't want to see their people replaced by ANYONE.
 
UK surrendered to globalists. Not just UK, the entire Western world has surrenders to socialists and globalists.
UK should accept the reality instead of crying about it. They got what they wanted and deserved.

Isn't this the same argument made by the likes of Nick Fuentes and the MAGA movement in America against the likes of yourself invading their country and changing the cultural demographic?
 
Ratcliffe says 'sorry my choice of language has offended some people'

Ratcliffe has just issued the following statement:

"I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth.

"My comments were made while answering questions about UK policy at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, where I was discussing the importance of economic growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing in the UK.

"My intention was to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs so that long-term prosperity is shared by everyone. It is critical that we maintain an open debate on the challenges facing the UK."
 
You can’t reverse globalism. If you did everyone would be poorer. Imagine the complex supply chains that would be impacted if there was no globalisation.

So let me get this straight. If you ask some people on the right in the west, is equating the horrors of Gaza with the Holocaust antisemitism, they will say yes. So logically, lesser suffering of one ethnic group should not be equated with greater suffering of another ethnic group as that is racist, but at the same time they are ok with calling migrants into the west as colonialism, where one ethnic group (White people) has suffered less than another ethnic group (e.g. South Asians from the British colonialism) and that this isn’t racism.
 
Except that is not really the issue for white Brits who believe they represent the highest quality Brits and who want to preserve their cultural heritage.

Assimilation is important but what do they mean by cultural heritage ? This is something they should elaborate on. Is it a more complex idea or does it simply come down to the melanin content in your skin..
 
Utd fan base is a pretty liberal bunch with many minorities. I think there will be some protests and abuse shouted at Jimboy in the upcoming matches.

He now has apologised for his words. Strange old man

Absolutely. Dont know what Planet hes living.

Hes Probably realised, the Commercial revenues UTD generates which he profits from are through FOREIGN companies.

His apology is more reactive to criticism than being remorseful. The guy sees Farage as a Man of Leadership!
 
Globalism is the reason you live where you live. A better argument would be about the quality of immigrants.
No it's not a better argument.

It gives racists a reason to try and wriggle off the hook.

Colonialism, Globalism, Socialism all these buzzwords are used as a front for racist viewed. The people saying these words don't really know what they mean.
 
Globalism is the reason you live where you live. A better argument would be about the quality of immigrants.
Globalism is uncontrolled immigration. Basically countries without borders.

Legal immigration is when country knows how many they can take in areas they may need to help their economy.
 
Assimilation is important but what do they mean by cultural heritage ? This is something they should elaborate on. Is it a more complex idea or does it simply come down to the melanin content in your skin..

It is more complex. For example, in Wembley, you might see the local pub being replaced by a mandir or a mosque, and the local cafe which used to serve bacon butties being replaced by women lining up in sarees to buy jalebis from the local Ambala's.
 
83.6% of people who take benefits are natives. Immigrants have been shown to be more likely to contribute to tax more than taking benefits when compared to natives.

The reason why immigration has increased since brexit is to desperately prop up the economy. Which is ironic as many voted Brexit to reduce it.

I don’t mind arguments about reducing immigration. That is fine. But an unfortunate narrative has been created that the majority immigrants are coming in to uk and just leeching off Uk and living on benefits. It’s just created someone to blame for Uk economy issues.
 
Globalism is uncontrolled immigration. Basically countries without borders.

Legal immigration is when country knows how many they can take in areas they may need to help their economy.
Globalism is more than just uncontrolled immigration. It’s such hypocrisy that a developed nation state can exploit the resources of the less developed nation state, take advantage of supply chains, not share technology, cause disruption for its own benefits but at the same time, doesn’t want migrants from that country.
 
Brexit supporter yet his factories businesses are in the eu . He's building his grenadier vehicle in france with BMW components

Avoids paying tax in billions

And is moaning about 9 million people on benefits the majority whom are white not immigrants and saying its not sustainable eventhough he sacked 100s at Manchester utd in an apparent cost cutting drive .

Has he said anything about the biggest state sponger the royal family and Prince andrew ?
 
It is more complex. For example, in Wembley, you might see the local pub being replaced by a mandir or a mosque, and the local cafe which used to serve bacon butties being replaced by women lining up in sarees to buy jalebis from the local Ambala's.

Is that your view as well .. are you upset at these changes ?
 
Globalism is uncontrolled immigration. Basically countries without borders.

Legal immigration is when country knows how many they can take in areas they may need to help their economy.

When people talk about uncontrolled immigration, it basically means - 'i see too many non-white faces in my country' and the culture of my country is changing.

It is not the economic argument that you're trying to pass it off as.
 
No it's not a better argument.

It gives racists a reason to try and wriggle off the hook.

Colonialism, Globalism, Socialism all these buzzwords are used as a front for racist viewed. The people saying these words don't really know what they mean.

Do you agree that immigrants should assimilate to the dominant culture within the country ? Or is the word assimilate a buzzword ?
 
Is that your view as well .. are you upset at these changes ?

I have always been a staunch supporter of globalism and indeed multiculturalism. I had many productive debates with a former Indian poster here Cricketcartoons who was totally against it. Now I am not so sure and can see the point of the ethno-nationalists.
 
I have always been a staunch supporter of globalism and indeed multiculturalism. I had many productive debates with a former Indian poster here Cricketcartoons who was totally against it.

I don't agree with multiculturalism. I think if you're going to immigrate to a country, you've got to assimilate to the dominant culture/traditions/sensibilities of their country to the best of your ability and not interfere in their way of life. Of course, the hardcore racists will never be satisfied no matter what you do to fit in.

Now I am not so sure and can see the point of the ethno-nationalists.

So you're saying Tommy Robinson was actually right all this time ? Interesting :unsure:
 
I don't agree with multiculturalism. I think if you're going to immigrate to a country, you've got to assimilate to the dominant culture/traditions/sensibilities of their country to the best of your ability and not interfere in their way of life. Of course, the hardcore racists will never be satisfied no matter what you do to fit in.



So you're saying Tommy Robinson was actually right all this time ? Interesting :unsure:


Tommy Robinson is considered a traitor by the ethno-nationalists. He's a sell out.
 
Tommy Robinson is considered a traitor by the ethno-nationalists. He's a sell out.

These low-IQ misinformed sanghis think Tommy Robinson is some populist figure. In reality, he is a fringe nobody.

Tommy is not popular like Trump is with American right. He is not even at Nigel Farage level. If he was, he could've been the head of UK Conservative Party by now.
 
These low-IQ misinformed sanghis think Tommy Robinson is some populist figure. In reality, he is a fringe nobody.

Tommy is not popular like Trump is with American right. He is not even at Nigel Farage level. If he was, he could've been the head of UK Conservative Party by now.
@Rajdeep - can enlighten everyone here, t robinson in his best friend
 
Always baffling to see the aulaad of the colonizers bitching and moaning about immigrants when they are content on benefiting off the portion of the trillions and trillions their great great grand daddies and beyond looted from the nations of the same immigrants today whose regions went from wealthy to broke by their exploits.

Ofc if it’s the percentage of the immigrants causing strife and chaos, I can understand.

But after centuries of taking your bums to regions where you didn’t belong, you get to decide when humans can stop moving across the world? 🤣
 
Majority of the UK natives have immigrant background.

I was speaking to my mother about Sir Jim's comments over dinner earlier. As a native English/welsh her family background was of Scandinavian roots going back centuries ago.

All this nonsense these Ultra Nationalists spout is purely based on Racial discrimination of the immigrants colour, than lack of integration in to society.
 
Manchester United prides itself on being an inclusive and welcoming club

Our diverse group of players, staff and global community of supporters, reflect the history and heritage of Manchester; a city that anyone can call home.

Since launching All Red All Equal in 2016, we have embedded equality, diversity and inclusion into everything we do.

We remain deeply committed to the principles and spirit of that campaign. They are reflected in our policies but also in our culture and are reinforced by our holding of the Premier League's Advanced Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Standard.

We will continue to represent our people, our city and our fans with purpose and pride.
Over the course of this season, we have participated in events and initiatives at our men's and women's games marking mental health, LGBTQ+ inclusion, No Room for Racism, violence against women and girls and homophobic chanting.

We have also celebrated our supporters' clubs' events, including our Disabled Supporters' Association's Christmas Party and our Jewish Supporters' Club's Chanukah event.

In the weeks and months ahead, we will be supporting further initiatives in these areas.

This all sits alongside the incredible work which the Manchester United Foundation undertakes in and around Manchester on a daily basis.

Manchester United reflects the unity and resilience of all the communities we are so privileged to represent.

We will continue to represent our people, our city and our fans with purpose and pride.
 
I don't agree with multiculturalism. I think if you're going to immigrate to a country, you've got to assimilate to the dominant culture/traditions/sensibilities of their country to the best of your ability and not interfere in their way of life. Of course, the hardcore racists will never be satisfied no matter what you do to fit in.



So you're saying Tommy Robinson was actually right all this time ? Interesting :unsure:


Just to expand further, this actually means Islamic nations are more multicultural, since they are quite happy for non-Muslims follow their own culture in their own homes and even in their own places of worship, as long as they don't openly flout the laws of the country.
 
Just to expand further, this actually means Islamic nations are more multicultural, since they are quite happy for non-Muslims follow their own culture in their own homes and even in their own places of worship, as long as they don't openly flout the laws of the country.

Islamic nations, or atleast the Middle East, don't allow foreigners to settle in their country permanently ... like in the UK or US. Maybe they've changed the laws recently and made exceptions.
 
Let's see if you can define assimilation and we can decide if it is a buzzword or not.

That's a tricky question. I'm not sure how to answer that one without sounding parochial.

The most obvious one that comes to mind has to be a common language, in this case English, and being very proficient at it.
 
Islamic nations, or atleast the Middle East, don't allow foreigners to settle in their country permanently ... like in the UK or US. Maybe they've changed the laws recently and made exceptions.
It’s Middle East gulf nations that do this. Not Islamic states. It’s because they use that oil money to give free education, salaries, housing, government jobs etc. Uk government doesn’t do that to those extents. Mostly it’s the British natives on benefits and the amount they give isn’t the extent of what those gulf countries do.

And part of the reason they do this is because they do not have free elections and keep the wealth and control amongst their monarchy. Having their citizens dependent on what they are given helps keep order.

UK and US are examples of countries that have used immigration to its fullest in order to grow their economies. And it’s worked remarkably well for them. There are now calls that it isn’t working well, and yes it’s in those countries rights to reduce immigration if they want to.

Remarks of colonisation are ridiculous. There is no foreign power establishing control of the country. I also think this notion that immigrants are hurting the economy (and have hurt it) are also baseless. As I’ve said it’s most the natives claiming benefits. And uk itself has utilised immigration even recently to offset the hit from brexit, which is why immigration has increased instead of decreased.
 
Better society if we 'embrace other cultures' - Guardiola

Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola says we will "have a better society" by embracing other cultures.

Guardiola was asked for his response to comments made by Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe when he said the UK had been "colonised by immigrants".

Ratcliffe later apologised for "offending some people" but maintained "open debate" on the matter was still needed.

Speaking at a news conference before Saturday's FA Cup fourth round tie against Salford (15:00 GMT), Spaniard Guardiola said: "Everybody wants to have a better life. Every person wants to have a perspective to have a better future for themselves, for their families or their friends. Sometimes opportunities come in the place that you were born and the place that you go.

"That is why the place you were born doesn't make a difference.

"Most people run away from their countries for the problems that are in their country, not because they want to leave.

"The more we embrace other cultures, truly embrace it, then we will have a better society - I do not have any doubts about that."

Guardiola was born in Santpedor, in the Catalan region of Spain, and spent time in his homeland as well as Italy, Qatar and Mexico as a player.

As a manager, the 55-year-old has had spells in Spain, Germany and England - taking charge of Manchester City in 2016.

"It is a problem all around the world," Guardiola said.

"We treat immigrants or people that come from other countries like they are the ones causing problems for our country. It's a big problem because the fact I am Catalan and you are British? What influence did we have on where we were born?

"Everyone wants to have a better life, everyone wants to have a better future for themselves and their families. Sometimes the opportunities are where you are born and sometimes it is in the place where you go.

"The colour of your skin or the place where you were born don't make a difference."

BBC
 
Back
Top