What's new

US officially leaves World Health Organization

Ball Blazer

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 13, 2025
Runs
4,887
The US has officially withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), leaving the UN agency without one of its biggest donors.

US President Donald Trump signed an executive order signalling the withdrawal a year ago, having criticised the organisation for being too "China-centric" during the Covid pandemic.

The US Department of Health and Human Services said it took the decision due to the WHO's alleged "mishandling" of the pandemic, an inability to reform and political influence from member states.

The WHO has rejected these claims and its director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the withdrawal was as a loss for the US and the world.
The organisation pointed to its global efforts to combat polio, HIV aids, maternal mortality, and its international treaty on tobacco control.

In the wake of the pandemic, WHO member states worked to create an international pandemic treaty designed to prevent, prepare for, and respond to future pandemics, including sharing vaccines and drugs more fairly.

The treaty was finally agreed in April last year by all WHO member states, apart from the US.

Washington has traditionally been one of the biggest donors to the WHO, but has not paid its fees for 2024 and 2025, which has already caused huge job losses at the organisation.

Although WHO lawyers suggest the US is obliged to pay the arrears - estimated at $260m (£193m) - Washington said it saw no reason to do so.

It said that all US government funding to the WHO has been terminated, US personnel and contractors have been recalled from the WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland and its offices worldwide, and hundreds of US engagements with WHO have been suspended or discontinued.

"The WHO tarnished and trashed everything that America has done for it," a joint statement from US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy and Secretary of State Marco Rubio read.

The pair said the organisation had "abandoned its core mission and acted repeatedly against the interests of the United States", including failing to return the American flag based at its Geneva headquarters.

"Going forward, U.S. engagement with the WHO will be limited strictly to effectuate our withdrawal and to safeguard the health and safety of the American people," they added.

The US department said it would have bilateral relations with other countries to ensure disease surveillance and pathogen sharing, but were unable to provide information about which specific countries they had such links with so far.

In response to a question about global efforts to combat polio or HIV, officials said the US would partner with "NGOs and faith based groups" to continue that work, but could not give details of any partnerships yet established.

Asked whether the US would continue to participate in information sharing for and development of the annual global flu vaccine, officials were not sure.

After Trump signed the withdrawal order at the start of his second term, the WHO wrote that it hoped the US would reconsider, and said the "WHO and the USA have saved countless lives and protected Americans and all people from health threats".

Its reconsideration would have been for the "benefit of the health and well-being of millions of people around the globe", it concluded.

The WHO said on Friday that the US withdrawal was on the agenda for its upcoming board meeting from 2-7 February.

It told the BBC that its secretariat will act according to the advice from the governing bodies.

 
WHO is a corrupt organization anyways.

UN should also be dissolved. The most useless organization ever.
 
Sad to see you go dear. Leave the memories alone. It’s been a tough week. Bangladesh left the T20 World Cup, Pakistan left Palestinians and now TACO bhai leaving WHO bro it’s very sad indeed.
 
WHO is a corrupt organization anyways.

UN should also be dissolved. The most useless organization ever.
Whether the WHO is a corrupt organisation is one matter. I agree it is. It's bloated, bureaucratic and yes corrupt. I have personal knowledge of the kind of funding it wastes money on in India.

The issue is that we have nothing to replace it with. The Indian bureaucracy is also bloated, bureaucratic and corrupt. Should we just abolish and stop funding it?

Along with all the waste that WHO does, it has also served very useful purposes. The global eradication of Smallpox and near eradication of diseases like Measles, Mumps, Polio wouldn't have been possible without WHO co-ordination. Similarly WHO is the only organisation that facilitates information, research and knowledge sharing globally.

Burning and abandoning is easy. Where's the alternative though? If the US believes it can live as an island while countries in Africa contract and die from new diseases, it's mistaken. Unless you guys in the US are willing to cutoff complete contact with the rest of the world, seal your borders and live in a cocoon, you'll have to engage with this stuff and find a fix rather than give up. For example, hundreds of thousands of Pakistani-Americans still visit home country. Now with the elimination of WHO funding, I suppose the already tricky polio vaccination program will be even more ineffective. Are you confident these visitors will not bring any pathogens back to the States?

I suppose you're now willing to throw the dice on the next pandemic and hope things work out.
 
o “or HIV, officials said the US would partner with "NGOs and faith based groups" to continue that work, but could not give deta”

Faith based groups for HIV , means they will say prevention is all we can offer , see bible . Expect those with this will get no help .

This is about vote bank from the growing Christian right and saving a little money for a nation in dangerous debt
 
o “or HIV, officials said the US would partner with "NGOs and faith based groups" to continue that work, but could not give deta”

Faith based groups for HIV , means they will say prevention is all we can offer , see bible . Expect those with this will get no help .

This is about vote bank from the growing Christian right and saving a little money for a nation in dangerous debt
Probably will go down the route that HIV is only for gays so we don't need to bother.

The US administration seems to be in a battle to go back in time.
 
Whether the WHO is a corrupt organisation is one matter. I agree it is. It's bloated, bureaucratic and yes corrupt. I have personal knowledge of the kind of funding it wastes money on in India.

The issue is that we have nothing to replace it with. The Indian bureaucracy is also bloated, bureaucratic and corrupt. Should we just abolish and stop funding it?

Along with all the waste that WHO does, it has also served very useful purposes. The global eradication of Smallpox and near eradication of diseases like Measles, Mumps, Polio wouldn't have been possible without WHO co-ordination. Similarly WHO is the only organisation that facilitates information, research and knowledge sharing globally.

Burning and abandoning is easy. Where's the alternative though? If the US believes it can live as an island while countries in Africa contract and die from new diseases, it's mistaken. Unless you guys in the US are willing to cutoff complete contact with the rest of the world, seal your borders and live in a cocoon, you'll have to engage with this stuff and find a fix rather than give up. For example, hundreds of thousands of Pakistani-Americans still visit home country. Now with the elimination of WHO funding, I suppose the already tricky polio vaccination program will be even more ineffective. Are you confident these visitors will not bring any pathogens back to the States?

I suppose you're now willing to throw the dice on the next pandemic and hope things work out.
Valid points.

But US cannot be the main funder for all these organizations. US annual contributions is 22% of the WHO funds. A country with debt closing in on 40 Trillion. Other countries must step up and African countries need to do a better job and start taking ownership of their own people. How long will they be living on the kindhearted donations of the Western nations? When and where does this end?
Only US has left. Other countries still are in it. They can continue to fund WHO. Arab nations can easily donate a billion a year to keep WHO running.
 
Valid points.

But US cannot be the main funder for all these organizations. US annual contributions is 22% of the WHO funds. A country with debt closing in on 40 Trillion. Other countries must step up and African countries need to do a better job and start taking ownership of their own people. How long will they be living on the kindhearted donations of the Western nations? When and where does this end?
Only US has left. Other countries still are in it. They can continue to fund WHO. Arab nations can easily donate a billion a year to keep WHO running.
It can and has to be. In fact, I would argue it's paying less than it's share - US GDP is currently 23-26% of global GDP. So poorer countries are essentially subsidising US contribution to the WHO (they're not. Actually Europe is).

Your cribbing sounds like the 1% who complain - "I don't use the road more than a minimum-wage earner. In fact, I fly over them in my chopper. Why should I pay more taxes than them?" If I have to teach you basic economics on why the Rich pay more taxes than the poor, I'm afraid the battle is lost before it starts.

It's one thing for uneducated, unaware rednecks to cheer this news and believe the uninformed nonsense peddled by the orange buffoon. It's another for turkeys like you who actually have experience in developing countries to start voting for Thanksgiving.
 
Back
Top