What's new

What shifts might we anticipate in US-Pakistan relations under a second term of Donald Trump’s presidency?

Will US-Pakistan relations improve under Donald Trump's second term as US president?

  • Yes - Increased cooperation on key issues

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4

FearlessRoar

T20I Star
Joined
Sep 11, 2023
Runs
30,521
Donald Trump's recent win over Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. elections secured his position as the 47th President. Historically, Trump’s first term saw U.S.-Pakistan relations characterized by both cooperation and tension, with a transactional approach that primarily focused on Pakistan's role in facilitating the Afghan peace process. Although Trump's strategy improved bilateral ties at the time, his administration also expressed concerns about Pakistan's alleged safe havens for militant groups.

Upon his initial election in 2016, Trump reached out to then-Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, signaling openness to strengthening ties by calling Pakistan a "great country." This marked a departure from his campaign rhetoric, which often questioned Pakistan's role in combating terrorism and raised concerns about its nuclear program. However, Trump’s unorthodox style as a leader often led to unpredictable foreign policy moves.

One of Trump’s early priorities was reducing U.S. military involvement abroad, especially in Afghanistan, where American troops were facing a protracted and difficult conflict. To achieve this, he recognized Pakistan’s strategic role and sought its support in negotiating a peace deal. This eventually led to direct engagement with Prime Minister Imran Khan, facilitated by Trump’s close advisor, Senator Lindsey Graham. In 2019, Trump hosted Khan in Washington, acknowledging him as a "great friend," though these exchanges did not lead to substantial changes in U.S.-Pakistan relations.

With the Biden administration taking office in 2020, the relationship cooled, as Biden deprioritized engagement with Pakistan. The 2021 U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan further reduced Pakistan’s perceived strategic importance for Washington.

Since Trump’s first term, the global landscape has shifted. The U.S. is now navigating heightened tensions in Europe due to the Ukraine conflict, as well as escalating instability in the Middle East. Experts suggest that, although supporters of Imran Khan might be optimistic about Trump’s return, the administration’s immediate focus may remain on more pressing global issues, with Pakistan not necessarily being a primary concern.

Some hope Trump’s administration will take a stance on Imran Khan’s political situation, but analysts argue that while he might make public references to it, direct intervention is unlikely given Trump’s usual prioritization of U.S. interests over foreign political issues.

On the economic front, Trump’s stated plan to raise tariffs on Chinese goods could ignite a new trade conflict, impacting the global economy. Additionally, his opposition to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which includes Pakistan’s involvement, could prompt the U.S. to exert pressure on Pakistan to reconsider its economic ties with China. The Trump administration may also use its influence over the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to discourage bailouts for Pakistan that could be used to offset Chinese debt.

Trump’s earlier efforts included encouraging foreign investment in Pakistan as a counter to China’s CPEC, although future policies may focus on regions with less Beijing alignment. Given Trump’s unpredictable approach, there is always the potential for unexpected overtures to Beijing, which could shift his policy stance.

In terms of broader U.S.-Pakistan relations, experts believe that Trump is likely to maintain a cautious and limited partnership similar to Biden’s strategy, with a focus on narrowly defined mutual interests rather than expanding aid or extensive cooperation in areas like climate change. Counterterrorism and controlled trade engagement may remain on the table, yet larger aid packages or military support are unlikely. The overall relationship, therefore, may see continuity, with efforts to sustain a cordial but selective partnership.
 
FO dismisses speculation that Trump will influence, pressurise Pakistan’s internal politics

Foreign Office (FO) spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch on Thursday dismissed speculations that US president-elect Donald Trump would try to “influence or pressurise Pakistan’s internal politics”.

Republican candidate Trump on Wednesday triumphed in a stunning US election victory over Democrat rival Kamala Harris.

Soon after Trump started his election campaign for the 2024 race, unsubstantiated reports began circulating on social media, stating that if Trump were to win the US presidential election, it would bring favourable outcomes for Imran Khan and US-Pakistan relations.

However, senior PTI leader and former central spokesman, Raoof Hassan, has asserted that no one in the party had ever thought that Imran would be released if Trump won the US elections. Calling the narrative “mere propaganda”, Hassan said that Khan’s release would only materialise after the PTI sat across the table and held dialogue with the powerful establishment in the country.

During a weekly press briefing of the foreign ministry on Thursday, Baloch was asked whether Trump, after becoming the president, would influence Pakistan’s internal politics and whether the Pakistan government would possibly be pressurised by his administration.

“We see this as speculative reporting, and as I just said, Pakistan and the United States are old friends and partners, and we will continue to pursue our relations on the basis of mutual respect, mutual confidence and non-interference in each other’s domestic affairs,” Baloch responded.

She went on to say that Pakistan’s relations with the US were decades old and the country was looking forward to further strengthening and broadening the relationship in all fields.

“As the deputy prime minister said in a tweet yesterday, we look forward to fruitful and mutually beneficial cooperation between Pakistan and the United States.”

Pakistan and the United States established diplomatic relations on August 15, 1947, making the US one of the first nations to recognise Pakistan. The two countries have had a multi-faceted relationship for decades in areas ranging from counter-terrorism to energy to trade and investment.

The US approach towards Pakistan has been called largely “paradoxical” due to varying US interests in the region. While the countries have continued to foster bilateral ties, the constant ups and downs reflect that their relations remain unpredictable when it comes to serving national interests.

In September, US President Joe Biden emphasised that an enduring partnership between Pakistan and the United States was crucial for global and regional stability.

“The enduring partnership between our countries is crucial for global and regional stability,” Biden said in his brief remarks, commending US-Pakistan cooperation in countering terrorism and stressing the importance of building on their shared interests in security, trade, investment, and economic growth.

 
I think testing times ahead for Pakistan government. Not to adopt the state centric approach with US instead of party or stupid politics centered approach.
 
Trump & Pakistan

HOW will the election of Donald Trump affect US-Pakistan relations? Let’s first clear up a myth. It is not true that Pakistan had good relations with the US when Trump was president. He wanted to get out of Afghanistan for which he sought former prime minister Imran Khan’s help in talking to the Taliban.

Khan was rewarded with a visit to Washington and exceptional public praise from Trump. But once the deal with the Taliban was done, Trump turned his back on Pakistan, leaving no imprint on the relationship.

Trump notices only issues of high public interest, which have political traction. The present state of US-Pakistan relations is not one of them, neither are its domestic dynamics. Trump will most likely continue with the Joe Biden policy of low-intensity engagement with Islamabad, marked neither by significant aid levels nor by sanctions, the two extremes between which the relationship oscillated for much of its history.


There was a search under Biden for a new balance in relations that best responds to the completely changed regional and geopolitical landscape, and the shifting US foreign policy that faces challenges at home and overseas. Rising powers abroad are curtailing America’s global primacy by staking a role in reformatting the global economic and strategic order.

At home, the politics and policy of issues like globalisation, China, big power relationships, alliances, and America’s ‘forever wars’ are being reshaped by Trump’s worldview, changing the way the US perceives and is perceived by the world.

Under Trump, the relationship will likely be handled by the State Department and Pentagon whose Pakistan policy has had four elements.

Trump’s approach will focus on what a state has to offer America.

The first has been a derivative of US policies towards China, India and Afghanistan. The US would like to limit China’s political and economic influence in Pakistan, and it also wants Islamabad to not undermine the centrality of India to its Indo-Pacific strategy. As for Afghanistan, its stability is key to the broader regional security including that of Pakistan.

The second element has been a direct US interest in Pakistan, focused on its economic weakness, potential for political instability, and the threat of extremism and regional insurgency to internal security, from which emerges America’s ultimate concern about Pakistan’s possible radicalisation or breakdown threatening the safety of its nuclear assets.


The third factor has been counterterrorism. Here, Pakistan is seen in many different roles: partner, target or victim. Washington needs Islamabad’s cooperation to act against the transnational terrorists who endanger the US and global security. It would also like Islamabad to deal with any militant threat against India and Pakistan’s own stability. Washington is willing to help where possible.

The fourth element is the developing US-Pakistan cooperation in the economic area, principally in energy, IT and agriculture. Investment sentiment remains cautiously hopeful. And the US continues to be the top destination of Pakistan’s exports.

 

‘US won’t interfere in Pakistan’s internal affairs,’ says Khawaja Asif​


Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said on Friday that the United States will not interfere in Pakistan’s internal affairs.

Expressing his thoughts on Samaa TV, Asif lashed out at the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), saying, “Some of the people are causing uproar that US President-elect Donald Trump will release their leader [PTI founder].”

“There is no probability of any pressure from the US in the matters pertaining to the PTI founder,” Asif stated.

Speaking about Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) President Nawaz Sharif, Asif said: “Nawaz Sharif had never kowtow to the United States.”

“Pakistan is having a desire for the balanced relations with the United States,” he said.

Asif maintained: “Releasing anybody or taking somebody else is merely a story."

Source: Samaa News
 

Govt seeks early contact with Trump team​


Pakistan has decided to reach out to Trump's transition team as part of efforts to establish early contact with the incoming administration.

Official sources told The Express Tribune on Sunday that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is keen to speak to US President-elect Trump to personally congratulate him and open a direct channel of communication with his administration.

For this purpose, Pakistan's Embassy in Washington will soon request the Trump's transition team for a telephonic conversation with the new US president.

Trump has been speaking to world leaders after his stunning comeback to the White House. He has already talked to various leaders including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

It is a ritual that world leaders telephone the new US president to congratulate him.

However, President Joe Biden broke the tradition and never spoke to any Pakistani prime minister after winning the race for the White House in November 2020.

Trump on the other hand after winning the election in November 2016 spoke to then prime minister Nawaz Sharif. He did not even wait for the formal oath taking to speak to Nawaz although he was critical of Pakistan's role in the fight against terrorism during his election campaign.

Given Trump's unconventional approach, Pakistani officials are hoping that he will not follow Biden's policy and speak to Shehbaz sooner than later. Since his victory, supporters of former prime minister Imran Khan believe that Trump will call Shehbaz to ensure the release of their leader.

The Foreign Office, however, brushed aside such speculations, saying Pakistan expects that the Trump administration would continue to pursue bilateral ties with Pakistan on the basis of "mutual respect and non-interference" in each other's domestic affairs.

Prime Minister Shehbaz has already congratulated Trump over his win and expressed Pakistan's desire to continue working with the US under his administration.

Although Pakistan's relevance to Washington has diminished following the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, certain areas for common ground between the two countries still exist.

Trump has outlined his priorities, some of which if implemented can negatively impact Pakistan.

The new US president wants to impose 10 to 20 percent tariffs on all goods destined for his country. The US is Pakistan's largest export destination and any such approach by Trump could make things difficult for Islamabad.

Similarly, Trump's hardline stance towards Iran and China, both Pakistan's key neighbours, may make things difficult for the country. However, some in the official circles feel that Saudi Arabia could rescue Pakistan in case of any trouble with the Trump administration.

Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman enjoy close ties. MBS was one of the first leaders to call Trump after his election victory. Interestingly, the day Trump won and MBS spoke to the new US president, Pakistan's army chief General Syed Asim Munir was in Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia, historically, acted as a bridge between Pakistan and the US during difficult times in their relationship. The purpose of Pakistan to seek early engagement with the incoming administration is to ensure that the country's core interests are not hurt due to the change of guards in the White House.

 
The return of Donald Trump as the US president is a bad news for Pakistan, as American strategy shifts uncomfortably and unpredictably fast

Once indispensable for its geographic position near Afghanistan and the Islamic nuclear nation, Pakistan, is becoming less relevant for Trump and far more crucial for the CIA.

This shift underscores two principal motivations: the US will seek to undercut China on all fronts, and India will seek a bargain to undercut Pakistan

Pakistan risks becoming a footnote. For Pakistan’s Chinese client, it’s a deer in the headlights moment. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is in Trump’s sights. Greater political instability in Balochistan is a given. The ‘belt’ could well become a ’noose’.

For the US to take on China meaningfully, it must provide India strategic depth and free-up capability. This involves a choice; India cannot seriously counterbalance China without a freed-up Western front.

In Trump’s new strategic geopolitical balance sheet, India is a valuable asset, while Pakistan is a manageable liability.

As financial pressure mounts, Pakistan’s economy appears vulnerable to an outsized reliance on external help. Pakistan has often been bailed out by the IMF, but Trump’s Washington will not be as accommodating. The IMF will no longer be the familiar lifeline to which Islamabad could turn without incurring painful structural reforms. The US basically has a strong influence over the IMF, and for Pakistan, this may be troublesome

 
Not looking good so far, He has appointed notorious anti muslim, neocons, war mongers in his cabinet. His CIA Director is an Indian American.

Pakistan is screwed.
 
Incoming NSA is India caucus head & fierce China critic Mike Walz. We know where this is heading now.
 
Not much for Pakistan as he doesn’t see Pak as an ally. He will not do anything specific to hurt Pakistan but his picks are pretty anti China. If Pak allies too much with China while he is trying to poke at the dragon, Pak might get caught in the cross fires. There are lots of pro Indian allies and reps in his proposed cabinet and that is something Pak has to thread carefully. None will target Pak but if they somehow get in the middle they will get hurt. Pak should just lay low now.

On the bright side Trump is non interventionist and may not support past CIA activities against IK. So IK might get a breather if he plays up his card well. But all that only after a year. South Asia is very down his focus list.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not much for Pakistan as he doesn’t see Pak as an ally. He will not do anything specific to hurt Pakistan but his picks are pretty anti China. If Pak allies too much with China while he is trying to poke at the dragon, Pak might get caught in the cross fires. There are lots of pro Indian allies and reps in his proposed cabinet and that is something Pak has to thread carefully. None will target Pak but if they somehow get in the middle they will get hurt. Pak should just lay low now.

On the bright side Trump is non interventionist and may not support past CIA activities against IK. So IK might get a breather if he plays up his card well. But all that only after a year. South Asia is very down his focus list.

Agree, Pakistan just needs to keep a low profile, no need to get involved with America's wars with China. Trump won't care much what is going on in Pakistan specifically, I don't think the Belt Road trade can be shut down as there will be a lot of other eastern nations involved with it being a regional hub.
 

Trump cabinet pick criticizes New York’s deal to rent Pakistan’s Roosevelt Hotel for $220 million​


Vivek Ramaswamy, US President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to co-lead a new government department, on Sunday criticized a deal by the New York City government to rent the Pakistan-owned Roosevelt Hotel for a whopping $220 million for what he said were “illegal migrants.”

Cash-strapped Pakistan rented out its iconic Roosevelt Hotel to the New York City government for three years, as per an agreement reached last year.

Pakistan’s then aviation minister Khawaja Saad Rafique said that the New York administration would pay a rent of as much as $210 for each of the 1,025 rooms of the century-old hotel owned by the state-run Pakistan International Airlines (PIA).

The New York City administration has repurposed the Roosevelt Hotel as an arrival center for migrants where they can get access to vaccines, food and other resources.

“A taxpayer-funded hotel for illegal migrants is owned by the Pakistani government which means NYC taxpayers are effectively paying a foreign government to house illegals in our own country,” Ramaswamy wrote on social media platform X, responding to a post by American author John Lefevre.

“This is nuts.”

Roosevelt Hotel was closed by Pakistani authorities in October 2020 during the coronavirus pandemic, as the country’s economy weakened and the aviation sector faced significant losses.

However, the facility accumulated liabilities of around $25 million in taxes and other overheads.

Ramaswamy, a former Republican presidential candidate, will co-lead a newly created Department of Government Efficiency with billionaire Elon Musk. Trump has indicated the department will operate outside the confines of government.

 
Vivek Ramaswamy will make America great again and along with Elon Musk, The Department of Government Efficiency is doing a terrific job already through its proposed spending cuts. Way to go Vivek.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pak envoy meets influential US lawmaker

Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, Pakistan's ambassador to the United States, recently met with Representative Brian Mast, the new Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee in Washington.

The meeting between Rizwan and Mast, who is a US Army veteran hailing from Florida, comes days after he was voted as the head of House Foreign Affairs Committee by the House Republican Steering Committee.

Taking to his social media, the ambassador revealed the details of his meeting with the Congressman and said that the two had an "optimistic discussion" on strengthening bilateral ties between their countries through deeper economic engagement.

In a post on his X account, Rizwan wrote: "Pleased to meet with Rep. Brian Mast @RepBrianMast — an energetic leader — recently selected as Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

"We had an optimistic discussion on strengthening bilateral ties through deeper economic engagement. Explored prospects and avenues of furthering Pak-US cooperation and partnership in the evolving global scenario."

"Cooperation is the best way forward," he quoted Mast as saying as the Congressman recognised the "geo-political and geo-economic significance" of Pakistan.

"Wished him all the best every step of the way in this important new role," Rizwan added.

The Pakistani ambassador has met more than seven US lawmakers in recent days, to boost bilateral ties and also enhance investment and trade.

 
None of consequence. It is for the better for Pakistan. getting too involved with Trump in any capacity is a recipe for disaster. He is very flaky and dangerous.
 
New US Govt interested in Pakistan’s nukes, missile program: Saad Rafique

“You are being sieged, we could not shut out eyes,” addressing a gathering here, former federal minister said.

“No one can bury someone in politics,” he said. “The talks between the government and the PTI must be successful,” Saad Rafique emphasized.

He said the people like Maulana Fazlur Rehman, Hafiz Naeem ur Rehman, Dr. Malik Baloch, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi and Chaudhry Nisar should sit together and must find a way out of this menace.

 

Pakistan anticipates 'tough times' under Trump 2.0 presidency​


Pakistan anticipates 'tough times' ahead under Donald Trump's 2.0 presidency as internal assessment points to potential roadblocks in the bilateral relationship, sources familiar with the development told The Express Tribune on Sunday.

They said that Pakistan's assessment was based on (a) priorities of Trump and (b) number of cabinet members who did not have a positive view of Islamabad. Much focus is on Richard Grenell, Trump's special envoy, for his public outbursts against Pakistan.

However, there are other players occupying key positions within the new administration who also needed to be watched out for, according to the sources. "There are no more people inside the White House symphathetic towards Pakistan," commented a well-placed source.

With Islamabad no longer a priority for the US, the sources said, the Pakistani mission in Washington is struggling to make inroads in the power corridors there. Although outgoing US Ambassador Donald Blome portrayed a rosy picture of the bilateral relationship during President Biden's term, the sources added that the Pakistani mission had limited access to the outgoing administration.

This can be judged from the fact that President Biden never spoke to any of the Pakistani prime ministers during his four-year term. Similarly, there were no high-level visits from the US during that period. Even US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who has travelled to the region, including India, on many occasions, has never made a stopover in Islamabad.

Only weeks before Biden's term expired, his senior aide made a stunning claim that Pakistan's long-range missile programme was a threat to the US. Islamabad squarely rejected the assertion and expressed surprise over the US assessment given the fact that Washington knew Pakistan's missile programme was only India-centric.

However, a member of a Washington-based think tank believed that the statement of the US deputy national security adviser was not surprising as many within policy circles viewed Pakistan with suspicion.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the think tank member was of the opinion that one of the reasons behind the US reaching this conclusion was that Pakistan, during the war against terrorism, had hurt Washington's interests.

While the Biden administration kept the relationship with Pakistan at a certain level, it did help Islamabad secure bailout packages from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). That cooperation could change, feared the Pakistani sources, who thought the Trump administration might not look at Islamabad more favourably.

The potential lifeline in this scenario for Pakistan could be Saudi Arabia, which enjoyed close ties with president-elect Trump. Some sources felt that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman could be Pakistan's best option if the Trump administration resorted to any adverse moves.

 
Pakistan not formal ally, but strong partner: White House official Kirby

Pakistan has played a pivotal role in US counterterrorism efforts over the years, but it has never been a formal ally bound by treaty obligations, senior White House official John Kirby has clarified.

This nuanced positioning underscores the delicate and complex nature of US-Pakistan relations, shaped by shared security concerns and divergent strategic priorities.

At a Washington briefing, White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby candidly addressed the nature of the US-Pakistan relationship, highlighting the absence of any formal defence pact.

“Pakistan was never a technical ally of the United States. I mean, there was no treaty of alliance with Pakistan,” he stated in response to a question.

Despite this, Kirby emphasised the long history of cooperation between the two countries, particularly in combating terrorism in the volatile Afghanistan-Pakistan border region.

“Certainly, over many, many years in the last couple of decades, we partnered with Pakistan as appropriate to deal with the terrorist threat that still exists on that spine between Afghanistan and Pakistan,” he explained.

In August last year, State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel had reaffirmed the US’s commitment to preventing groups like the banned militant group Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) from using Afghanistan as a base for launching terrorist attacks against neighbouring countries.

The next month, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller asserted that the US would continue to stand “shoulder to shoulder with Pakistan in its fight against terrorism”.

A US State Department report released in December noted that Pakistan has made substantial progress in countering terrorist financing and addressing regional extremist networks.

In the most recent bilateral engagement, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi and outgoing US Ambassador Donald Blome discussed strategies for addressing global challenges such as terrorism.

‘Will remain committed to working with Pakistan on common threats’

At the same time, Kirby also acknowledged the human cost of terrorism in Pakistan, recognising that its citizens continue to suffer from cross-border violence.

“We recognise that Pakistan is still — still the Pakistani people fall victim to terrorist violence coming from across that border.

“And we have, and for as long as we’ll be in office here, remain committed to working with Pakistan to address those common threats and challenges. And that’s not — that hasn’t changed. It’s not going to change,” Kirby said during the briefing.

According to the interior ministry, 351 civilians and 573 law enforcement agencies (LEAs) personnel lost their lives in 1,566 terrorism incidents in the first 10 months of 2024.

This acknowledgement reflects a broader trend in the Biden administration’s policy toward Pakistan: a focus on shared security challenges while steering clear of deeper strategic commitments. Washington’s reluctance to treat Pakistan as a formal ally mirrors its broader approach to avoiding entanglement in Pakistan’s internal political dynamics.

For instance, when asked to comment on alleged firing at a PTI rally on November 26, State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller maintained a measured stance.

“We want to see any protests be peaceful, and we want to see the government of Pakistan, as is true with any government around the world, engage with peaceful protests respectfully and to deal with them peacefully,” he said.

This careful approach extends even to strategic issues such as Pakistan’s missile programme. Last month, when the US sanctioned three Pakistani firms for their alleged involvement in supporting the country’s missile programme, Deputy Spokesperson Patel clarified the rationale behind the decision.

“These sanctions that we made in Pakistan are rooted in, as I have said now three times, our longstanding concerns about their long-range ballistic missile programme. It is not a bearing on other areas of cooperation between us and Pakistan,” Patel said.

The Biden administration’s messaging, therefore, signals a deliberate effort to balance criticism with the preservation of a functional working relationship, particularly in counterterrorism.

At the same time, the Pentagon has consistently highlighted its close ties with Pakistan’s military establishment. Spokesperson Major General Patrick S. Ryder, for instance, emphasised the enduring nature of this relationship while discussing counterterrorism efforts at a recent briefing.

“We value Pakistan as a partner in the region and have worked closely with Pakistan on counterterrorism efforts in the past and will continue to have those conversations,” he said.

In another statement, Ryder underscored Washington’s commitment to supporting Pakistan in combating terrorism. “In terms of Pakistani military strategy, as we’ve discussed before, the US of course values Pakistan as a partner when it comes to areas like counterterrorism,” he stated, adding that such discussions would continue.

This careful balancing act — acknowledging Pakistan’s importance in addressing shared security concerns while avoiding deeper strategic obligations — has defined the Biden administration’s approach. It reflects the enduring complexity of US-Pakistan ties, shaped by decades of collaboration, mistrust, and shifting geopolitical priorities.

 
Vivek Ramaswamy will make America great again and along with Elon Musk, The Department of Government Efficiency is doing a terrific job already through its proposed spending cuts. Way to go Vivek.

Way to go Vivek, he’s been removed from DOGE, apparently.
 
Failed PR campaign
====

Mohsin Naqvi meets key US officials, discusses bilateral ties​


Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi participated in the prestigious Lincoln Liberty Ball dinner in Washington, receiving a warm welcome from American officials and dignitaries.

During the event, Naqvi met with prominent figures, including Senator Tommy Tuberville, Congressman Ken Calvert, former British Prime Minister Liz Truss, and Mississippi Governor Philip Bryant. Discussions focused on mutual interests and avenues to strengthen bilateral relations.

The minister also extended congratulations to US senators and congress members on Donald Trump’s assumption of the presidency. “This is a historic day for America,” Naqvi remarked, expressing confidence in the Trump administration’s potential to open a new chapter in US-Pakistan relations.

Naqvi noted the enthusiasm of the American public during the celebrations, calling it a testament to their support for President Trump.

He expressed his best wishes for the American people and reaffirmed Pakistan’s commitment to fostering collaboration.

President Zardari, PM Shehbaz congratulate Donald Trump on assuming office

President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif extended their congratulations to Donald Trump on becoming the 47th President of the United States.

President Zardari conveyed his best wishes to the new US president, while Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed his sentiments in a post on X. “I look forward to working with him to strengthen the enduring Pakistan-US partnership,” PM Shehbaz wrote.

Source: Dawn News
 

Pakistan aims to deepen bilateral engagement with US: Mohsin Naqvi​


Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has emphasised the importance of strengthening bilateral relations with the United States, expressing a desire for enhanced cooperation across all sectors.

During a meeting with US Congressmen Thomas Richard Suozzi and Jack Bergman in Washington, Naqvi discussed matters of mutual interest, including the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan-US relations. The Congressmen represent the Democratic and Republican parties, respectively.

Both sides agreed to promote bilateral ties, with Naqvi extending an invitation for the US lawmakers to visit Pakistan. “Your visit will further strengthen bilateral relations,” Naqvi said.

Congressman Suozzi expressed his commitment to fostering stronger ties with Pakistan, confirming plans to visit the country soon.

Additionally, it was announced that a Pakistan Caucus Conference would be held in Washington on April 30 to bolster collaboration. The meeting underscores Pakistan's intent to deepen engagement with the US on key issues of mutual concern.

 
‘US engagement with Pakistan to remain limited under Trump’

Former Pakistani diplomats on Wednesday expressed concern that US engagement with Pakistan would remain limited under President Donald Trump’s second term, citing Washington’s policies toward India and China and strategic divergences that continue to strain relations between the two countries.

Speaking at a roundtable organised by the Center for International Strategic Studies (CISS), titled Trump 2.0: Implications for Pakistan, prominent former diplomats discussed the shifting dynamics of US-Pakistan relations in the context of growing India-US cooperation and the intensifying US-China rivalry, according to a readout of the discussion provided by the think-tank.

The panel included former foreign minister Jalil Abbas Jilani; Ashraf Jehangir Qazi, who has represented Pakistan in the US, India, and China; Masood Khalid, a former envoy to China; and Dr Qamar Cheema, executive director of the Sanober Institute.

The experts criticised Washington for viewing Islamabad primarily through the lens of its ties with India and China, rather than recognising its independent strategic significance.

Pakistan’s strategic location, makes it a key player in regional and global geopolitics, the readout noted, adding that maintaining goodwill between Washington and Islamabad is essential for future engagement. However, experts feared that a lack of shared strategic priorities continues to impede the development of a substantial, long-term partnership between the erstwhile allies.

The panelists underscored that Pakistan has distinct relationships with both the US and China, each shaped by unique dynamics and priorities. They lamented Washington’s tendency to shape its approach to Pakistan based on its ties with China and India, arguing that this perspective disregards Pakistan’s independent value in the global arena.

The discussion also touched on US support for India as a counterbalance to China in the Indo-Pacific. The diplomats highlighted how New Delhi has strategically leveraged the perceived threat from China to strengthen its position, securing advanced Western military equipment and forging closer ties with Washington.

They pointed to India’s inclusion in the Quad alliance and its participation in foundational agreements such as COMCASA, LEMOA, and BECA, which have bolstered its strategic partnership with the US.

The panel also criticised continued sanctions against Pakistan despite its adherence to stringent nuclear safety and security standards, viewing these measures as discriminatory. They concluded that while the US continues to deepen its strategic alignment with India, meaningful engagement with Pakistan under Trump’s administration is unlikely to progress without a shift in Washington’s regional policies.

DAWN NEWS
 
The status of Pakistan elites in US

View attachment 149979

It’s an opportunistic world. USA sided with Pakistan for decades against Bharat. Now when they are intimidated by China and know there is no other regional power of the level of Bharat to even remotely have a chance to counter China economically, diplomatically and militarily, they wanna be all cozy cozy. I am actually glad we only sent EAM Jaishankar there who sat all quietly rather than looking desperate for photo ops. The man just sat there and met only the relevant people quietly. All class. Big fan of him. If God forbid Modi ji had attended it would have looked a bit embarrassing, you have to show some self respect and spine also. Besides Trump can be ruthlessly straight forward. He’s going to ask every nation to do more for the US, including Bharat, including Pakistan. Better to maintain a relationship from a distance at this point.
 
QUAD leaders meeting gave a glimpse of a where the immediate priorities lie.
 
If I was a Pakistani however, these are things that are an eye opener that how global powers like the US often form alliances based on their own strategic needs, not mutual benefit. Pakistan’s relationship with the U.S. is a prime example. From the Cold War to the War on Terror, Pakistan provided critical support and bore immense costs—social, economic, and human. But when strategic importance fades, so does recognition. Events like Donald Trump’s inauguration, where Pakistan was seemingly overlooked, highlight this recurring pattern.

This isn’t unique to Pakistan. Smaller nations frequently pay the price in such partnerships, left to deal with the fallout while superpowers move on. It’s a stark reminder for nations to protect their own interests and avoid being mere tools in global power games.

Do not repeat the same mistake with the Chinese.
 
It’s an opportunistic world. USA sided with Pakistan for decades against Bharat. Now when they are intimidated by China and know there is no other regional power of the level of Bharat to even remotely have a chance to counter China economically, diplomatically and militarily, they wanna be all cozy cozy. I am actually glad we only sent EAM Jaishankar there who sat all quietly rather than looking desperate for photo ops. The man just sat there and met only the relevant people quietly. All class. Big fan of him. If God forbid Modi ji had attended it would have looked a bit embarrassing, you have to show some self respect and spine also. Besides Trump can be ruthlessly straight forward. He’s going to ask every nation to do more for the US, including Bharat, including Pakistan. Better to maintain a relationship from a distance at this point.

I don't understand these sort of articles being released, not sure where they are coming from either. If Pakistan wants prosperous engagement with any country, why not just open back channels and get on with it? What is the purpose of making noises of disappointment like you are owed something by others?
 

Pakistan ready to engage with Trump administration: FO​


Pakistan has expressed its willingness to engage with the new US administration to strengthen bilateral relations, the Foreign Office said on Thursday.

"We are committed to a strong and robust relationship with the US based on the principle of non-interference in internal affairs," Foreign Office Spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said during his weekly news briefing in Islamabad .

Shafqat Ali welcomed President Donald Trump's oath-taking and stressed the importance of US-Pakistan relations, which cover multiple areas. "We look forward to continuing the positive trajectory of these relations," he added.

The spokesperson also highlighted Pakistan's concerns over the presence of Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) sanctuaries in Afghanistan. "We continue to impress upon the Afghan authorities to address these concerns so that the bilateral relations could achieve its full potential," Khan said.

On the Kashmir dispute, Khan reiterated Pakistan's clear position, citing the world's awareness of the "oppression campaign unleashed in the Indian illegally occupied Jammu and Kashmir". He assured that Pakistan will support any effort directed towards resolving the dispute.

Regarding the Indus Water Treaty, Shafqat Ali stated that Pakistan remains committed to its full implementation, including the dispute settlement mechanism. He expressed hope that India will also implement the treaty in good faith and entirety.

In response to a question, Shafqat Ali Khan mentioned an arrangement with the US to resettle Afghan refugees in the US by September this year. "This arrangement is in place so far," he said.

 
I don't understand these sort of articles being released, not sure where they are coming from either. If Pakistan wants prosperous engagement with any country, why not just open back channels and get on with it? What is the purpose of making noises of disappointment like you are owed something by others?

Everyone knows that US is very pragmatic with its foreign policy. They build relationships only based on vested interests in trade & security. They would naturally gravitate toward countries that align with those goals. Pakistan, with its unique geopolitical location and readiness to play Uncle Sam’s regional lieutenant got a lot of attention from the US historically.

The US did try checking if Bharat was also up for sale to put it against the Chinese but were told to buzz off. Now they’re trying their luck with Bangladesh to have some military presence and political clout in the region through hook or crook. Anyone who’s had even the most basic knowledge of geopolitics would be happy to maintain a safe distance with the US. People aren’t really dancing in Bharat seeing EAM Jaishankar sitting in the front row next to Trump giving inauguration speech, everyone is waiting for his next moves and play accordingly.

Pakistani politicians shouldn’t be desperate to get Trump’s attention. Whenever he’s gonna get to you guys, you know damn well he’s gonna ask ya’ll to get more deeply involved in Afghanistan which you need to stay the hell away from.
 
Everyone knows that US is very pragmatic with its foreign policy. They build relationships only based on vested interests in trade & security. They would naturally gravitate toward countries that align with those goals. Pakistan, with its unique geopolitical location and readiness to play Uncle Sam’s regional lieutenant got a lot of attention from the US historically.

The US did try checking if Bharat was also up for sale to put it against the Chinese but were told to buzz off. Now they’re trying their luck with Bangladesh to have some military presence and political clout in the region through hook or crook. Anyone who’s had even the most basic knowledge of geopolitics would be happy to maintain a safe distance with the US. People aren’t really dancing in Bharat seeing EAM Jaishankar sitting in the front row next to Trump giving inauguration speech, everyone is waiting for his next moves and play accordingly.

Pakistani politicians shouldn’t be desperate to get Trump’s attention. Whenever he’s gonna get to you guys, you know damn well he’s gonna ask ya’ll to get more deeply involved in Afghanistan which you need to stay the hell away from.

I agree. Seems like the only purpose of current leadership in Pakistan is to see if they can serve US interests rather than for any benefit for their own country. What do they get from this? Maybe some personal kickbacks? I don't know, otherwise what is the purpose of pursuing US policies re Afghanistan I have no idea.

No blame attached to US though, if they can buy some help at a good price, might be worth their while. They are looking out for their own interests.
 
I agree. Seems like the only purpose of current leadership in Pakistan is to see if they can serve US interests rather than for any benefit for their own country. What do they get from this? Maybe some personal kickbacks? I don't know, otherwise what is the purpose of pursuing US policies re Afghanistan I have no idea.

No blame attached to US though, if they can buy some help at a good price, might be worth their while. They are looking out for their own interests.

US cannot bluff anyone anymore. Everyone knows they’ve always looked at Pakistan as their most important strategic asset in South Asia. A country with a unique geopolitical location from America’s POV neighbouring Bharat, China, Afghanistan, Iran all of whom remain on US radar constantly. Leaders in Pakistan have the toughest task to balance the relationship dynamics between their two superpower allies in US & China. I don’t see why Pakistan cannot benefit from this if only they make the right decisions keeping their people in mind.
 

Naqvi, US congressman discuss ways to strengthen bilateral ties​


Federal Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi met with US Congressman Alexander Green, briefing him on the incidents of terrorism and infiltration originating from Afghanistan.The meeting took place in Houston.

During the meeting, Interior Minister Naqvi and Congressman Green discussed matters of mutual interest, focusing on promoting Pakistan-US relations.

Naqvi informed Congressman Green about the terrorism and infiltration incidents from Afghanistan. Naqvi also thanked Congressman Green for his significant support for the victims of the recent earthquake and floods in Pakistan.

Mohsin Naqvi highly praised US Congressman Alexander Green's principled stance on the Palestinian issue, stating that Green's strong voice for Palestine is commendable and has received great appreciation.

Naqvi also mentioned that the relationship between Pakistan and the United States is becoming warmer, and in the coming days, Pakistan-US relations will become even stronger.

Congressman Alexander Green said he would revisit Pakistan soon, noting that he had already visited the country four times to express solidarity and assist the people affected by the earthquake and floods.

Pakistan's Consul General in Houston, Mohammad Aftab Chaudhry, and prominent Pakistani-American businessman Tahir Javed were also at the meeting.

Earlier, Mohsin Naqvi said on Sunday that the US lawmakers were being incited against Pakistan, stressing that his current visit aimed at formulating a joint strategy in the fight against terrorism.

Talking to the media in the US city of Houston on Sunday, Naqvi made it clear that he did not attend any anti-China function during his current US visit. He rejected the impression being created about his participation in a youth event as "venomous propaganda".

The minister said he had attended a youth event that had been given the wrong colour through propaganda.

"I did not go to any anti-China function," Naqvi told the media. "The opponents are spreading venomous propaganda, but such propaganda does not matter," he added.

Source: The Express Tribune
 

US aid to Pakistan suspended, key development projects on pause​


US officials have confirmed that, like other countries, US aid to Pakistan has been temporarily suspended, resulting in the halt of several key development projects.

Recently, the US Department of State directed all diplomatic and consular missions to suspend foreign aid programs immediately. This measure is initially for 90 days and applies to aid for countries such as Ukraine, Taiwan, Jordan, and others.

According to US officials, all aid programs for Pakistan have been suspended pending a reassessment, Express News reported.

As a result of this decision, several sectors have been affected.

The US directive has suspended the Ambassador's Fund for Cultural Preservation projects and closed five important energy sector projects.

The US State Department's instructions also affected four economic growth-related programs in Pakistan, while five agricultural development projects have had their aid stopped.

Furthermore, funding for democracy, human rights, and governance-related programs has been temporarily halted, and four education and four health projects have also been suspended. Additionally, 11 governance-related projects have been impacted by this US decision.

US officials stated that this decision is temporary, and after reassessing all aid programs, the future of these projects will be decided.

Trump signed an executive order shortly after taking office for his second term on January 20, directing all federal agencies to implement a 90-day pause on foreign development assistance and to review existing programs.

The order reads, “It is the policy of the United States that no further United States foreign assistance shall be disbursed in a manner that is not fully aligned with the foreign policy of the President of the United States.”

Shortly after, the US State Department issued a memo announcing the suspension of nearly all new funding for foreign aid programs, with exceptions made for the country’s key Middle Eastern allies, Israel and Egypt.

The order also allowed for an exemption for emergency food assistance and related expenses.

In a statement on Sunday, the department defended the measures, quoting President Trump: “President Trump stated clearly that the United States is no longer going to blindly dole out money with no return for the American people.”

Source: The Express Tribune
 
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Wednesday issued a statement regarding United States (US) weapons left behind in Afghanistan and said that the same were used by terrorist organisations against the country, ARY News reported.

The Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday reiterated that the presence of US advance weapons in Afghanistan, left behind in the aftermath of the withdrawal of its troops in August 2021, had been an issue of profound concern for the safety and security of Pakistan and its citizens.

Responding to media queries regarding the US decision to take back advance weapons left behind in Afghanistan, the spokesperson in a press statement said “These weapons have been used by terrorist organizations, including the TTP, to carry out terrorist attacks in Pakistan. We have been repeatedly calling upon the de facto authorities in Kabul to take all necessary measures to ensure that these weapons do not fall into the wrong hands.”

 

Pakistan reviewing US aid suspension, in talks with US officials​


The Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs has issued a response regarding the suspension of US aid to Pakistan.

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan addressed the issue during a weekly briefing, stating that the government is currently reviewing the US President's recent orders and is in communication with US officials about the aid situation.

Khan emphasised that the US and Pakistan have collaborated on various programs across different sectors for years, and Pakistan remains engaged with the US on the matter of assistance.

He also expressed Pakistan's desire to strengthen economic relations with the United States.

Regarding US-India relations, Khan refrained from commenting, stating that Pakistan’s relations with the US are solid. He also clarified that the US aid freeze applies to all countries for 90 days, and cooperation continues in various sectors, including through US assistance to Pakistan.

The spokesperson also noted that US businessmen regularly visit Pakistan and that such visits are not coordinated through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but are part of regular business activities.

Additionally, Khan discussed upcoming naval exercises scheduled from February 7-12, 2025, in which 60 countries will participate, aimed at promoting peace and cooperation.

Khan provided updates on the return of 22 Pakistani nationals from Morocco, following a tragic boat incident. He assured that steps are being taken for their safe return, although further details on the incident were not disclosed due to its sensitivity.

Furthermore, Pakistan condemned attacks on Saudi hospitals in Sweden and Israeli aggression in the West Bank. He also announced a bilateral political consultation meeting between Pakistan and Doha on February 5, 2025, led by the Deputy Prime Minister of Pakistan.

Finally, Khan highlighted the presence of 770 Pakistani prisoners in Indian jails and reiterated Pakistan’s concerns over US weapons being used in terrorism within Pakistan, specifically from Afghanistan, stressing that Pakistan has repeatedly raised this issue on various forums.

 

New York City announces it will close migrant center in Pakistan-owned Roosevelt Hotel​


New York City Mayor Eric Adams this week announced his government would close “in the coming months” a migrant processing center and shelter for asylum seekers housed since 2023 in the Pakistan-owned Roosevelt Hotel, citing the easing of the US migrant crisis.

The Roosevelt Hotel, owned by Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), closed to guests in December 2020 after the coronavirus pandemic shuttered the tourism industry worldwide. The site is one of more than 50 shelters that New York has closed or announced it will shutter as the number of new migrant arrivals has decreased due to strict immigration policies by the previous and new American administrations. Since taking power, US President Donald Trump has ended access to CBP One, a popular scheduling app for asylum seekers, and also stepped up enforcement at the US-Mexico border.

According to the New York City government’s projections, its efforts to reduce care for migrants will save more than $5 billion over the next three fiscal years.

“The Roosevelt Hotel, which has served as both our asylum arrival center and a humanitarian emergency response and relief center for nearly two years, will be closing in the coming months,” Adams said in a video message.

“While we are not done caring for those who came into our care, today marks another milestone in demonstrating the immense progress we have achieved in turning the corner on the unprecedented international humanitarian effort.”

The Roosevelt hotel is located in a prime midtown Manhattan location, steps from Grand Central Terminal and some of the highest-priced office buildings on Park Avenue. As per a report in The New York Times, NYC struck a $220 million, three-year deal with PIA to convert the hotel into a shelter in 2023. The city agreed to pay a nightly rate of $202 per room in the hotel, which has more than 1,000 rooms. The hotel has since served as an arrival center for migrants where they could get access to vaccines, food and other resources.

A report published in Bloomberg said the number of migrants arriving to New York had fallen to 350 a week, down from a peak of about 4,000. It said the Roosevelt Hotel, which had taken in over 173,000 migrants since it opened as a shelter, had “struggled to keep up with the influx” of migrants.

Adams’ announcement comes after Vivek Ramaswamy, now a member of Trump’s cabinet, criticized New York’s deal with PIA in December 2024.

“A taxpayer-funded hotel for illegal migrants is owned by the Pakistani government which means NYC taxpayers are effectively paying a foreign government to house illegals in our own country,” Ramaswamy wrote on social media platform X.

 

Pakistan urges US to reclaim weapons left in Afghanistan to restore regional peace​


Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has highlighted the ongoing security challenges in the region, calling for the United States to reclaim the weapons it left behind in Afghanistan during the withdrawal.

According to spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan, the presence of these weapons in Afghanistan has become a significant issue for regional peace and stability, Express News reported.

He mentioned that Pakistan desires good neighbourly relations with Afghanistan, but Afghan territory is being used for terrorism against Pakistan, and the country has repeatedly urged the Afghan government to address this issue.

Shafqat Ali Khan added that the Torkham border has been closed due to Afghan forces constructing posts in disputed areas. Pakistan condemns the unrest at the Torkham border and calls for the Afghan interim government to resolve this matter seriously.

He also shared that Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar had received a call from the US National Security Advisor, who praised Pakistan’s efforts against terrorism and thanked President Trump for his support. The Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister also congratulated the National Security Advisor on assuming his position.

Shafqat Ali Khan mentioned that the US National Security Advisor reaffirmed the commitment to continue cooperation with Pakistan. He also appreciated President Trump's announcement to retrieve the military equipment left in Afghanistan.

 
New Trump travel ban could bar Afghans, Pakistanis soon, sources say

A new travel ban by President Donald Trump could bar people from Afghanistan and Pakistan from entering the U.S. as soon as next week based on a government review of countries' security and vetting risks, three sources familiar with the matter said.

The three sources, who requested anonymity, said other countries could also be on the list but did not know which ones.

The move harkens back to the Republican president's first term ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.

Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it “a stain on our national conscience.”

The new ban could affect tens of thousands of Afghans who have been cleared for resettlement in the U.S. as refugees or on Special Immigrant Visas because they are at risk of Taliban retribution for working for the U.S. during a 20-year war in their home country.

Trump issued an executive order on January 20 requiring intensified security vetting of any foreigners seeking admission to the U.S. to detect national security threats.


 

US issues new travel advisory for Pakistan, urges citizens to reconsider travel​

The United States has issued a new travel advisory for Pakistan, urging American citizens to reconsider travel to the country due to ongoing security risks, including terrorism and the potential for armed conflict.

In a statement, the US State Department warned that violent extremist groups are continuing to plan attacks, particularly in the provinces of Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The advisory emphasized that terrorists may strike with little or no warning, targeting various locations such as transportation hubs, shopping malls, military installations, airports, universities, and places of worship.

The advisory further stated that US government personnel assigned to Pakistan are prohibited from attending most large gatherings due to the heightened risks.

While noting that major cities like Islamabad have more robust security infrastructure, the advisory cautioned that Pakistan's security situation remains fluid, with conditions potentially changing rapidly.

The warning comes amid ongoing discussions in the US about potential travel restrictions.

Sources revealed to Reuters that a new travel ban under review by the Trump administration could soon prevent individuals from Pakistan and Afghanistan from entering the US. This follows a broader assessment of countries' security and vetting procedures.

In addition, around 200,000 Afghans, approved for US resettlement or with pending visa applications, face uncertainty. Many are stranded in Pakistan, alongside refugees from 90 other countries, after President Trump's January 20th order instituting a 90-day freeze on refugee admissions and foreign aid that funds their transportation.

Source: The Express Tribune
 
The current government and establishment are bootlicking the Yanks so they dont criticise them and ensure IK is kept behind bars. They are capturing some randoms and sending to US claiming they were behind the attacks on Americans in Afghanistan. Asking the Yanks to get their weapons , given them help etc, which wont happen but their tongues are so down the boots of the Americans it must be painful.
 

US issues new travel advisory for Pakistan, urges citizens to reconsider travel​

The United States has issued a new travel advisory for Pakistan, urging American citizens to reconsider travel to the country due to ongoing security risks, including terrorism and the potential for armed conflict.

In a statement, the US State Department warned that violent extremist groups are continuing to plan attacks, particularly in the provinces of Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

The advisory emphasized that terrorists may strike with little or no warning, targeting various locations such as transportation hubs, shopping malls, military installations, airports, universities, and places of worship.

The advisory further stated that US government personnel assigned to Pakistan are prohibited from attending most large gatherings due to the heightened risks.

While noting that major cities like Islamabad have more robust security infrastructure, the advisory cautioned that Pakistan's security situation remains fluid, with conditions potentially changing rapidly.

The warning comes amid ongoing discussions in the US about potential travel restrictions.

Sources revealed to Reuters that a new travel ban under review by the Trump administration could soon prevent individuals from Pakistan and Afghanistan from entering the US. This follows a broader assessment of countries' security and vetting procedures.

In addition, around 200,000 Afghans, approved for US resettlement or with pending visa applications, face uncertainty. Many are stranded in Pakistan, alongside refugees from 90 other countries, after President Trump's January 20th order instituting a 90-day freeze on refugee admissions and foreign aid that funds their transportation.

Source: The Express Tribune
This news deserves a separate thread honestly. If we can have threads about glorifying Delhi Sultanates, the news about Trump planning travel ban on Pakistanis and Afghans totally deserve own thread. I posted this yesterday but somehow got binned.

Here is the news from Reuters

New Trump travel ban could bar Afghans, Pakistanis soon, sources say​


A new travel ban by President Donald Trump could bar people from Afghanistan and Pakistan from entering the U.S. as soon as next week based on a government review of countries' security and vetting risks, three sources familiar with the matter said.
The three sources, who requested anonymity, said other countries could also be on the list but did not know which ones.
The move harkens back to the Republican president's first term ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.


:kp
 
This news deserves a separate thread honestly. If we can have threads about glorifying Delhi Sultanates, the news about Trump planning travel ban on Pakistanis and Afghans totally deserve own thread. I posted this yesterday but somehow got binned.

Here is the news from Reuters

New Trump travel ban could bar Afghans, Pakistanis soon, sources say​


A new travel ban by President Donald Trump could bar people from Afghanistan and Pakistan from entering the U.S. as soon as next week based on a government review of countries' security and vetting risks, three sources familiar with the matter said.
The three sources, who requested anonymity, said other countries could also be on the list but did not know which ones.
The move harkens back to the Republican president's first term ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, a policy that went through several iterations before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.


:kp
Your news has already been covered earlier check above.
 
Pakistan’s Ambassador to Turkmenistan, KK Wagan, was denied entry into the United States and subsequently deported from Los Angeles, according to a report by The News, a Pakistani newspaper, citing diplomatic sources, news agency PTI reported.

Despite holding a valid US visa and necessary travel documents, Wagan was stopped by immigration authorities upon arrival at Los Angeles International Airport, PTI reported, adding that a senior official from Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed the deportation, attributing it to an unspecified immigration-related objection.

“The ambassador faced an immigration issue that led to his deportation,” the PTI reported the official saying. US authorities reportedly forced Wagan to return to his last port of departure, raising concerns over diplomatic protocol and the reasoning behind the decision.

Wagan is a veteran diplomat with extensive experience in Pakistan’s foreign service. Over the years, he has served in key diplomatic roles, including postings in Kathmandu, Los Angeles, Muscat, and Niamey, as well as senior positions within Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the PTI reported.

 
Back
Top