Said it after the Kohli (Perth) decision and saying it now. In Adelaide test the umpires missed a couple of dozen or so no balls despite standing a few feet away from the crease. If their eyes can't follow objects so close (that too with a well demarcated line as reference) how will they ever be able to decide these kind of catches on field? Are they blessed with eagle's eyes the moment the ball goes to the catchers? What weight should soft signal carry? Whatever I have seen their soft signal depends a lot on batsman/catcher/bowler's reaction or the team/players involved, maybe their mood and other external factors too play a role. And why is the ruling body not waking up to this joke decision making process? Gosh is cricket complicated !!!!