What's new

[VIDEO/PICTURES] Rishabh Pant claims a catch off Will Pucovski in the 3rd Test vs Australia

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,133
<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 50%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/w4l62x" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>

_6220bf2e-50ca-11eb-8a3c-8a727805186f.jpg


Seems Pant made a mess of this but Umpires on to it.

==

The third umpire is looking for conclusive evidence to say the ball has bounced ... and in this particular case the fingers weren't underneath the ball from the keeper." - Simon Taufel
 
Last edited:
That's blatant cheating from Pant. He should be reprimanded for it.
He wants to cover his kepping inability by cheating.
 
Not a big deal he barely celebrated I would have given him props if he pulled it off in front of 40 cameras that takes some skill leave the fat kid alone
 
I don’t think it’s a big deal. I was making fun of it on the match thread but I suppose it’s difficult to judge through the gloves whether the ball has bounced or not.
 
If the umpires let it slide and we later found out that it wasn’t out, the umpires should’ve been the ones to be blamed.

Anyone who has played cricket for real will know in those micro seconds it’s very hard to discern at times, so it is understandable he went up and thought it was out. You can’t see yourself in a camera in slow mo to see it accurately when you are the one playing the game.
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.
 
Rishabh Pant is a very talented player but needs to learn a bit of professionalism as in Indian setup there is no place for these mistakes.

It might not be a cheating from his side as we all know he lacks match awareness but this is not accepted here.

He is one of those guys who may not be aware of what has happened even if someone steals his wife infront of him. So, he need to learn this thing a bit or else it can become a costly affair for him later on.
 
Last edited:
Rishabh Pant is a very talented player but needs to learn a bit of professionalism as in Indian setup there is no place for these mistakes.

It might not be a cheating from his side as we all know he lacks match awareness but this is not accepted here.

He is one of those guys who may not be aware of what has happened even if someone steals his wife infront of him. So, he need to learn this thing a bit or else it can become a costly affair for him later on.
Such an innocent player he is. :inti
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.
They debuted him on a road at home. Perfect place to do in my opinion. And that too out of necessity as their openers were failing continuously.
 
Not cheating but desperation to make himself relevant can also be damaging,
 
Its a non issue. When you dive to take a catch, sometime don't realize in real time if its clean or not. Pant didnt even celebrate and umpire soft signal was also out. So I am struggling to understand what wrong did he do?

And lol at people claiming it as blatant cheating. But kinda expected.
 
the standard SOP is to say i dont know so the 3rd umpire can check and confirm. as opposed to the alternative which is claiming the catch and then getting embarrassed on the big screen.
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.

It’s not fast tracking when you have 3 seasons of FC cricket under your belt which is the case with his kid.

Fast tracking is when you are brought into national team after playing half a season ala Naseem Shah
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.

hes coming of 2 double hundreds for shield I believe. so hes proven himself for test cricket infront of the selectors.
 
It’s not fast tracking when you have 3 seasons of FC cricket under your belt which is the case with his kid.

Fast tracking is when you are brought into national team after playing half a season ala Naseem Shah

Will Pucovski only had 8 FC matches under his belt when he got selected for the SL series in 2019. He was only 20 years of age.
 
Young Indian wicket-keeper batsman, Rishabh Pant, continues to endure a difficult time behind the stumps. Preferred over Wriddhiman Saha for the second match in a row, Pant did his reputation no good as he dropped Australian youngster Will Pucovski twice in a span of three overs.

The wicket-keeping position in the Indian Test team has been talked about a lot over the last year or so. While Saha remains the undisputed No. 1 for the role in the sub-continent, he is often shuffled with Pant overseas. After getting the nod in the Adelaide Test, Saha was dropped in favour of Pant for the second and the third Test.

Pant had a few hiccups behind the stumps in the Boxing Day Test, especially when keeping spinners Ravichandran Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja. Hoping to do better in the third Test, Pant incurred similar difficulties on Day 1 at Sydney as he dropped Pucovski twice, once off Ashwin and the second time on Mohammed Siraj's bowling,

The two dropped catches gave Pucovski two lifelines, which he later converted into a half-century, while leading to frustration for both the bowlers and the stand-in skipper Ajinkya Rahane at the same time.

Seeing Pucovski being dropped first on 26 and then 32, it didn't take long for fans to flood social media with their reactions. Pant's poor show behind the stumps irked Twitterati once again as fans vented out their anger on the stumper.

https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...i-twin-lifelines-faces-heat-on-twitter/704020
 
Young Indian wicket-keeper batsman, Rishabh Pant, continues to endure a difficult time behind the stumps. Preferred over Wriddhiman Saha for the second match in a row, Pant did his reputation no good as he dropped Australian youngster Will Pucovski twice in a span of three overs.

The wicket-keeping position in the Indian Test team has been talked about a lot over the last year or so. While Saha remains the undisputed No. 1 for the role in the sub-continent, he is often shuffled with Pant overseas. After getting the nod in the Adelaide Test, Saha was dropped in favour of Pant for the second and the third Test.

Pant had a few hiccups behind the stumps in the Boxing Day Test, especially when keeping spinners Ravichandran Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja. Hoping to do better in the third Test, Pant incurred similar difficulties on Day 1 at Sydney as he dropped Pucovski twice, once off Ashwin and the second time on Mohammed Siraj's bowling,

The two dropped catches gave Pucovski two lifelines, which he later converted into a half-century, while leading to frustration for both the bowlers and the stand-in skipper Ajinkya Rahane at the same time.

Seeing Pucovski being dropped first on 26 and then 32, it didn't take long for fans to flood social media with their reactions. Pant's poor show behind the stumps irked Twitterati once again as fans vented out their anger on the stumper.

https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...i-twin-lifelines-faces-heat-on-twitter/704020

How will he improve his keeping with this fitness? Some desperate fans keep comparing him with Dhoni. Dhoni is still fit to play for India whereas Pant looks like someone in his late 30s and waiting for his retirement. Look at Rizwan's fitness for example. Even when he is not keeping he catches and fields well. He looks super fit. :inti
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.

It's a home series to be fair, so he's already used to the conditions. And Australia has a pretty reliable FC system, so it's no surprise that they thought that he could be included in the squad given that their openers are in a mess at the moment.
 
how would he have known? i think he had less than 5% chance to know whether the ball had bounced

fair call to claim the catch
 
how would he have known? i think he had less than 5% chance to know whether the ball had bounced

fair call to claim the catch

Expectation from some is Indian players should not appeal or claim a wicket and just surrender every game. First time I am hearing claiming a catch is crime in cricket :))
 
Expectation from some is Indian players should not appeal or claim a wicket and just surrender every game. First time I am hearing claiming a catch is crime in cricket :))

Most of our fans were criticising Michael Clarke when he claimed Saurav Ganguly's catch in 2008. I wonder why? :inti
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.

He has been the best opener in Australia's FC. He earned his place.
Fast tracking would have been to pick an u19 guy and insert him as an opener.
 
In real time, it looks difficult to tell especially as he is lunging for it - so I will give benefit of doubt to Rishabh.
 
Most of our fans were criticising Michael Clarke when he claimed Saurav Ganguly's catch in 2008. I wonder why? :inti

Nope both situations are totally different. They didnt criticize Clarke for claiming the catch. As a cricketer he was well within his right to do so.

But people criticized when Ponting made himself judge jury and executioner, pointed out to Ganguly and Umpire Benson actually listened to Ponting and asked Ganguly to leave. A third umpire call could have saved Ganguly back then like it saved Pucovski today but Umpire went with the judgement of Ponting. That was cheating.
 
That was not cheating from Pant, far from it. However he should have caught that. On a flat deck, chances don't come easily. When they do, you got to pouch them.

Also, there is fair bit of difference between this instance and Ahmed Shehzad's instance.
 
Nope both situations are totally different. They didnt criticize Clarke for claiming the catch. As a cricketer he was well within his right to do so.

But people criticized when Ponting made himself judge jury and executioner, pointed out to Ganguly and Umpire Benson actually listened to Ponting and asked Ganguly to leave. A third umpire call could have saved Ganguly back then like it saved Pucovski today but Umpire went with the judgement of Ponting. That was cheating.
This.
 
Nope both situations are totally different. They didnt criticize Clarke for claiming the catch. As a cricketer he was well within his right to do so.

But people criticized when Ponting made himself judge jury and executioner, pointed out to Ganguly and Umpire Benson actually listened to Ponting and asked Ganguly to leave. A third umpire call could have saved Ganguly back then like it saved Pucovski today but Umpire went with the judgement of Ponting. That was cheating.

It was the square leg umpire that signaled to Benson that the catch had carried. There is a video somewhere on Ytube that you can watch to see.
 
As the commentators and Warne (almost fuming at the mouth) later pointed out his hands were over the ball on the ground before he claimed it so there was no way he could've caught it. He could've just said he doesn't know but he claimed it.

Cricket is a ruthless competition these days and most players if they could get away with it would take advantage of anything that would (fairly or unfairly) give them an upper hand but it was kind of a really dumb thing to do with 50 cameras pointed at you.

The funniest part was when they got an Indian commentator on later and then played the clip over and over demanding what he thought if it, to which he just gave one unrelated anecdote after another instead of actually answering the question after which they just gave up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
how would he have known? i think he had less than 5% chance to know whether the ball had bounced

fair call to claim the catch

His reaction told us all we needed to know. The commentators pointed that out straight away. He was the definition of sheepish but for some reason chose to go along with celebrations rather than suggest there was any doubt.
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.

Not to go off topic but wow, what an awful post.

You realise Pucovski has played 3 seasons of FC, has a 50+ average and is debuting at home? They are even playing him mid-series.

Instead of picking out this ONE example where Australia might have fast tracked a guy with obvious world class potential we need to learn something about how willing they are to let youngsters develop in FC before international cricket.
 
Not to go off topic but wow, what an awful post.

You realise Pucovski has played 3 seasons of FC, has a 50+ average and is debuting at home? They are even playing him mid-series.

Instead of picking out this ONE example where Australia might have fast tracked a guy with obvious world class potential we need to learn something about how willing they are to let youngsters develop in FC before international cricket.

I heard Gilchrist saying he was to debut a lot earlier but didn’t due to mental health issues?

Concerning. He looks very talented and was playing Bumrah at ease in his first spell of the day
 
I heard Gilchrist saying he was to debut a lot earlier but didn’t due to mental health issues?

Concerning. He looks very talented and was playing Bumrah at ease in his first spell of the day

With Pucovski, Green and Labuschange Australia's future is looking very bright. They only need few good back up fast bowlers and should be all set to dominate next decade of cricket.
 
For me, a more interesting fact is the “fast tracking” of this kid, Jan Pucovski.

Yes, it’s a home series but he has no ODI or T20 international experience.

They identified the talent and pulled him straight from domestic n List A games to face Bumrah in a Test match.


Fast tracking does seem to work as long as you have a high standard domestic level cricket, and you are able to identify the right talent and help him in the transition.

He has 23 FC matches under his belt so I dont think it counts as fast tracking. Yes if he would have played 3,4 domestic matches then the term fast tracking could have been applied.
 
He should not have claimed the catch at all. The replay i saw, you could clearly see it wasn't a catch and Pant was facing the ball.
 
It's a home series to be fair, so he's already used to the conditions. And Australia has a pretty reliable FC system, so it's no surprise that they thought that he could be included in the squad given that their openers are in a mess at the moment.

He has been the best opener in Australia's FC. He earned his place.
Fast tracking would have been to pick an u19 guy and insert him as an opener.

Not to go off topic but wow, what an awful post.

You realise Pucovski has played 3 seasons of FC, has a 50+ average and is debuting at home? They are even playing him mid-series.

Instead of picking out this ONE example where Australia might have fast tracked a guy with obvious world class potential we need to learn something about how willing they are to let youngsters develop in FC before international cricket.

He has 23 FC matches under his belt so I dont think it counts as fast tracking. Yes if he would have played 3,4 domestic matches then the term fast tracking could have been applied.


From our philosophies in Pakistan, a player should be introduced into T20 first, then into ODI so he gains a lot of experience, and only then introduced into Test against Zimbabwe or Sri Lanka type teams at home, no?
 
Will Pucovski only had 8 FC matches under his belt when he got selected for the SL series in 2019. He was only 20 years of age.

Being selected and playing are different things
 
He should not have claimed the catch at all. The replay i saw, you could clearly see it wasn't a catch and Pant was facing the ball.

Tbh I don’t think he was gonna claim but the teammates started patting him in the back and celebrating and it’s seems he just got caught it the excitement and played along lol.

Same thing literally happened with me in a cricket game once. It wasn’t a clean catch at all but the teammates started celebrating and the batsman also started walking back and I obviously went along with it haha because I guess it’s hard to go against the tide esp when batsman has walked back lol. Only difference was that there were no cameras to capture this LOL :))
 
With Pucovski, Green and Labuschange Australia's future is looking very bright. They only need few good back up fast bowlers and should be all set to dominate next decade of cricket.
Only Labushagne is proven somehwat from these. Rest have no pedigree.

That way Prithvi Shaw, Iyer and Gill are going to be significantly better
 
Okay, this is NOT one of the situations where the keeper cannot tell if the ball touched the ground or not. The guy clearly had his gloves OVER the ball which mean that he definitely felt the ball bounce back up from the ground into his gloves.

He wanted to get away with it largely because of his poor performance behind the stumps. Some might call it cheating, and it totally fair to do so as he's 100% aware of what he's doing, but I'd call that desperation.
 
Last edited:
From our philosophies in Pakistan, a player should be introduced into T20 first, then into ODI so he gains a lot of experience, and only then introduced into Test against Zimbabwe or Sri Lanka type teams at home, no?

Aus don't play Zim. Pucowski isn't even a suitable for LOIs.
He earned the spot the right way. No bias or shortcuts.
You can say Matt Renshaw was called in too early but not Will.
 
Being selected and playing are different things

He was going to play.

Two things happened at the time.

1. Kurtis Patterson out of nowhere hit two centuries (both not out) during a warmup match
2. Pucovski was noticeably struggling with mental health concerns (CA doctor stated Pucovski was having trouble)

He was 100% fast-tracked like Naseem, but life and health directed him towards an extended period of FC cricket. It was probably better for him in the long-term.
 
From our philosophies in Pakistan, a player should be introduced into T20 first, then into ODI so he gains a lot of experience, and only then introduced into Test against Zimbabwe or Sri Lanka type teams at home, no?

That's Pakistan logic.
 
He might have thought it's clean catch (but his reaction says otherwise), on a normal speed you also might thought it was a clean catch..
 
He might have thought it's clean catch (but his reaction says otherwise), on a normal speed you also might thought it was a clean catch..

_6220bf2e-50ca-11eb-8a3c-8a727805186f.jpg


Former captain Ricky Ponting raised questions about Rishabh Pant and his ability as a keeper after the 21-year-old was responsible for couple of lapses on Day 1 of the third Test between India and Australia at the Sydney Cricket Ground on Thursday. Pant fumbled not once, but twice, dropping young Australia opener Will Pucovski twice in three overs. Pucovski, making his debut was batting on 26 when in the Ashwin induced an edge but Pant dropped to hold on to the catch.

Three overs later, Mohammed Siraj sent down a bouncer and Pucovski tried the pull shot, but the ball clipped his glove and went up in the air. Pant ran backwards but failed to complete the catch. After juggling the ball the first time around, Pant managed to grab on to it on the second attempt but the ball had already hit the ground by then and Pucovski was declared not out. Judging by his glovework, Ponting, who worked closely with Pant at Delhi Capitals, reckons India are lucky to have gotten Pucovski out for 62 when he could have gotten a huge score.

“The one’s (dropped catches) today are two that should be taken, simple as that. It’s probably lucky for Rishabh that Pucovski didn’t go on and make a big hundred or a double hundred and looking at the wicket, it looks like an unbelievable surface,” Ponting told cricket.com.au.

In 14 Tests, Pant has affected 65 dismissals but at the same time his keeping is far from being a polished product. Even in the previous Test, Pant dropped Pat Cummins, also off the bowling of Ashwin. Ponting is confident that there’s a lot of work that needs to go into Pant’s keeping.

“I’m sure when Rishabh put those catches down, he would have thought the worst and ‘here we go, he’s really going to make me pay’ but (Pucovski) didn’t today,” Ponting added. “I’ve said it all along, the knock on Rishabh is always going to be on his keeping. Since his debut in Test cricket, he’s dropped more catches than any other keeper in the world. That highlights he has got some work to do with his keeping.”

Ponting had nothing but wonderful words for the promising Pucovski. The Australia opener scored 62 and added a century partnership with Marnus Labuschagne. That Australia ended the day on 166/2 and look set to score more than 200 for the first time in the series owes a lot Pucovski’s efforts at the top.

“The thing I liked most was his composure. He looked really composed, he didn’t look overawed at all. He looked like he trusted his game, trusted his defence early on against some good fast bowling and just before the tea break started to expand his game a little bit; (he played) some nice cut shots, back-foot punches and some nice pull shots,” Ponting said.

“It’s a great start. He’ll be disappointed, no doubt, that he didn’t really cash in and make a big score. But at the same time, I think he’ll be quite content knowing he’s got a game that can stand up at Test level. We’ll all keep our fingers crossed and hope that he stays fit and healthy because he could potentially be a 10- or 12-year player for Australia.”

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...ishabh-pant/story-PkOW2yIGyFco3Jgee6KCTP.html
 
From our philosophies in Pakistan, a player should be introduced into T20 first, then into ODI so he gains a lot of experience, and only then introduced into Test against Zimbabwe or Sri Lanka type teams at home, no?

That happens when a player is being transitioned into international cricket on the basis of T20 leagues.
 
How is that cheating, In real time you are just looking to catch the ball, as your eyes are glued to the ball, plus when he was landing on the floor to complete the catch, he lost the ball.

But he should have told umpires that he is not sure.
 
Tbh I don’t think he was gonna claim but the teammates started patting him in the back and celebrating and it’s seems he just got caught it the excitement and played along lol.

Same thing literally happened with me in a cricket game once. It wasn’t a clean catch at all but the teammates started celebrating and the batsman also started walking back and I obviously went along with it haha because I guess it’s hard to go against the tide esp when batsman has walked back lol. Only difference was that there were no cameras to capture this LOL :))


I think if he clearly said he doesn’t know if it’s clean, that would have been acceptable.
 
Back
Top