gazza619
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2012
- Runs
- 14,237
Dont think it is fair to compare Sharjeel with Awais Zia or Sohail Akhtar. I wont mention Umar Akmal as he has a dozen threads on him already.Sharjeel has failed in international cricket since 2013. He averages in the early 20s against the top attacks.
He is a hack but I don’t see any quality in there. I mean you are really bad when all you have to show for in 5 years of international cricket (2013-17) is three inconsequential half-centuries against Australia on pitches where they piled up 370+.
So yes, if he blazes a 100 against a quality attack it has to be a fluke, because he clearly does not have the skill or the IQ to excel against quality bowling.
He hits the ball harder than Rizwan and Babar but both would score far more runs than him and prove to be more effective against any bowling attack over a certain number of games.
Sharjeel, with all the baggage that he carries, literally and figuratively, is not worth the investment just because he might fluke a trailblazing innings once in a blue moon.
You can get that type of return from any hack who can hit a long ball, and not all of them eat like sumo wrestlers and will not prove to be a liability in the field.
You pick Awais Zia or Sohail Akhtar or even Umar Akmal today and you are roughly looking at the same type of output that you will get from Sharjeel over 15-20 games.
In fact, you can even bring Shahid Afridi back and play him as an opener - both would score about the same number of runs against top attacks.
One thing that separates Sharjeel from the rest of the hacks in Pakistan circuit is that he can cut and pull with absolute brutal force against top pace. He also has a decent footwork to murder quality wrist and finger spin. You just wait till he proves you wrong.
Last edited by a moderator:
it's the same type of energy