jeeteshssaxena
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2017
- Runs
- 5,890
Also how is it that Laxman was so inconsistent but still somehow averaged more than both Warner and Head.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Steve is considered as one of the ATG in India too. We Indians consider him better than Kohli in tests. We give the credit where it is due. And what's your point of overhyping players? Which player did we overhype? Laxman deserve all the praise for his many match winning knocks and his legendary performances against ATG Aussie side against whom many so called greats pissed in pants.Steve smith is 1000x the test batter laxman is and has made such clutch impossible innings the norm in his prime, yet he won't ever get the same media attention simply because he isn't an Indian.
Right right a guy with a 44 avg and 70 SR in test, followed by 26 centuries including a triple centuryTravis Head is already ahead of Laxman ?
Just because you worship him doesn’t mean the world does, as of now there is no comparison, Laxman is miles agead of Head, lol.
Warner vs Laxman again hoes to Laxman because Warner was a sitting duck in swing friendly conditions and has below average away performances.
Spouting out nonsense and calling it fact won’t help you here.
Laxman averages a little more then Warner only in test.Also how is it that Laxman was so inconsistent but still somehow averaged more than both Warner and Head.
I created this thread. And i clearly mention that this thread is about test matches. Why are you bringing other formats in discussion?Laxman averages a little more then Warner only in test.
In odi their not a competition. Or are you going to compare the 2 only in test cricket because typical Indians need to find calculus level excuses for other formats?
Khair 45 avg and 51 sr over 44 avg and 71 sr followed by 26 centuries related to 17 centuries .
Anyone with a straight brain can tell Warner was superior to Laxman in every facet of the game.
Laxman literally has nothing over Warner in any format.
I asked @Devadwal on who's better in test smith or kohli.Steve is considered as one of the ATG in India too. We Indians consider him better than Kohli in tests. We give the credit where it is due. And what's your point of overhyping players? Which player did we overhype? Laxman deserve all the praise for his many match winning knocks and his legendary performances against ATG Aussie side against whom many so called greats pissed in pants.
If praising players for their great achievements is overhyping, then yes we do overhype and we will continue overhyping them.
Yet laxman the basic test player felt the need to play in odi and play 86 games rather then retiring and never playing odi again@mominsaigol I am not talking about odis lol, Laxman was basically just a test player.
No reason to bring one days.
We celebrate our players, give credit to them, and sometimes some fans hype them too. So what?I asked @Devadwal on who's better in test smith or kohli
Sohaib Akhtar is a clown when it comes to Media propaganda. The only reason I liked him was because he was the only one willing to scream at rizwan and thanks to him rizzu got rightfully dropped agaonat MZ before botching another test that sarfi had to save.Thats what happens in movies and even biographies.
Haven’t you seen how cricketers put in some controversial false stuff in their biographies just to get more attention ex Akhtar.
So u compare Wanner centuries to laxmans when one is an opener,htb,ftb and other Is a 4th down mostly in a power packed batting line up.Laxman averages a little more then Warner only in test.
Khair 45 avg and 51 sr over 44 avg and 71 sr followed by 26 centuries related to 17 centuries .
Anyone with a straight brain can tell Warner was superior to Laxman in every facet of the game.
Laxman literally has nothing over Warner in any format.
Who's stopping Laxman from opening? When he's clearly opened 25x in his career and totally flopped? India went life and limb to get him to work because this moron kept botching it at the top.So u compare Wanner centuries to laxmans when one is an opener,htb,ftb and other Is a 4th down mostly in a power packed batting line up.
Warner is not for tough situations or outside of aus flat tracks .he went missing in india,eng, south africa, new Zealand regularly when ever there is a tough pitch.his avg in eng,India,nz.p,lanka,wi are abysmal.he made his career out by bashing weak team on his flat grounds.he is ftb,htb at best that to prior sand gate.he did nothing after that.u can mention his batting stats in tough situations. He is the the first one missing in action always.
Am asking the tough situations where Warner bailed out his teamWho's stopping Laxman from opening? When he's clearly opened 25x in his career and totally flopped? India went life and limb to get him to work because this moron kept botching it at the top.
Seriously what issue did he have opening and cementing his spot when the likes of rohit had no issue making that position their own?
1 questions.Am asking the tough situations where Warner bailed out his team
You have to be average to be a Test specialist and still not average above 45. India with its 2 billion fan base drives all the narratives.Laxman is medicore player but in typical Indian fashion, marketing and PR states that he's somehow clutch and the stats don't reflect the magic amd all that bullcrap.
He's a medciore player with a few blinder knocks and was good and has an excellent avg in some countries.
Basically the same as Ijaz Ahmed who avg 50 in the first half of his career in aus, Wi and eng and maintained the 40 something avg in the 2nd half, but besides these 3 he was useless in test against other oppositions and in odi he was useless against every opposition but on occasion he'd play match winning blinders like his 140 of 87.
But unlike ijaz who's considered an inconsistent cricketer, Laxman who is virtually the same is somehow Warner, Travis or gilchrist level
However with that being said Laxman wipes the floor with Misbah in virtually every facet of the game excluding test Asian conditons.
Never understood how Indian fans can turn a decent cricketer like Laxman into some all clutch hero and how pakistani fans can turn Misbah an atrocious cricketer into some sort of hero.
Laxman is average with a memorable surprise knocks and solid in certain conditions. Misbah is a fraud, end of story
Babar wipes the floor with Laxman as an all format batsman.Lol says the man who rates Babar as a great batsman. Laxmans's fourth or fifth best innings was that one in Sydney. Babar would be lucky to play that level of cricket even once in his entire cricketing career.
I'm fully aware, that's how all Indian fans are.You have to be average to be a Test specialist and still not average above 45. India with its 2 billion fan base drives all the narratives.
An average player like Laxman got labeled as as a crisis man to cover uo his inconsistency. The reality is that Laxman is around the same level as someone like Azhar Ali.
Sure? I dont mind? I'll do it now@mominsaigol u can create a thread Warner vs laxman.there we can discuss
This is the reason I turned on these Indian fans. Someone have to rein them in and show them the mirror. They are getting too carried away with their arrogance especially after winning their first trophy in 10 years.I'm fully aware, that's how all Indian fans are.
Laxman is crises man
Dhoni is viv Richards chewing gum with his biopic
But Warner is somehow worse then these 2 lol.
I didn't turn on them, but they think I did even though I've always been consistent with what I claim.This is the reason I turned on these Indian fans. Someone have to rein them in and show them the mirror. They are getting too carried away with their arrogance especially after winning their first trophy in 10 years.
Not an excuse. You have no clue since you probably didn't watch ball by ball. We did watch. In certain areas i rate Laxman above even Sachin. THere was this Brett Lee debut series where he wsa too hot to handle. Laxman plundered 52 runs in 5 overs from Brett Lee when India was backs to the wall.That's just another excuse. He had set positions but he kept failing. However because he would occasionally produce blinders and clutch knocks, India knew they had to invest in him and just couldn't afford to drop him. Hence they did everything in his power to make him work until he actually did.
He'd be another Muhammad Rizwan in a sense. However the difference between those 2, is that while India did everything in their power to accommodate Laxman they had every right to.
Laxman while inconsistent was an X factor at the end of the day and hence couldn't be discarded and once India had succeeded in accommodating him, He gave clutch performances, While rizwan was accommodated simply because of Misbah nepotism in the same way Shan is accommodated and unlike Laxman, Rizzu even after being accommodated has been medicore while Laxman wasn't, He was a proper X factor.
Laxman is a good player, and I'm not denying he isn't. Infact this thread is a bloody joke since you're comparing a proper X factor to One of the worst(Misbah) odi batters of all time and the very definition of fraudulent batting in test(Misbah)
However none of this changes the fact that Indians always overglorify everyone on the planet.
I'm not saying Laxman = Ijaz Ahmed, that's a separate topic, But what I'm saying is both players have exactly the same career story and trajectory. However Ijaz Ahmed isn't born in India, if he was every Indian would be saying things like
You didn't see Axeman play, he's the one guy you can't showcase paper stats towards.
Laxman is a good player but Indians have overhyped him which is nothing new, they overhype all their players that one would think their a bit too obsessed with fantasy novels.
Steve smith is 1000x the test batter laxman is and has made such clutch impossible innings the norm in his prime, yet he won't ever get the same media attention simply because he isn't an Indian.
In certain areas I rate pointing > Sachin considering the fact Sachin collapsed his team in captaincy and many other factors such as their final.performance.Not an excuse. You have no clue since you probably didn't watch ball by ball. We did watch. In certain areas i rate Laxman above even Sachin. THere was this Brett Lee debut series where he wsa too hot to handle. Laxman plundered 52 runs in 5 overs from Brett Lee when India was backs to the wall.