What's new

"We have to attack India tomorrow, we cannot sit back" : Mickey Arthur

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mickey Arthur "if you are good enough, you are old enough and Shadab Khan is good enough" <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IndvPak?src=hash">#IndvPak</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a> <a href="https://t.co/vvYZDmiH18">pic.twitter.com/vvYZDmiH18</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/870966959881547776">June 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Junaid, Fakhar and Haris Sohail not playing tomorrow <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/INDvPAK?src=hash">#INDvPAK</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/870965812114403329">June 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="in" dir="ltr">12 man Pakistan squad for tomorrow - Azhar Ahmed Babar Hafeez Malik Sarfaraz Imad Amir Shadab Wahab Fahim and Hasan <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/IndvPak?src=hash">#IndvPak</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/870967744614760448">June 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mickey Arthur "we have to attack India tomorrow. We cannot sit back" <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/INDvPAK?src=hash">#INDvPAK</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CT17?src=hash">#CT17</a> <a href="https://t.co/McrCSt5l5H">pic.twitter.com/McrCSt5l5H</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/870969455949565952">June 3, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Full Transcript:

Q. Mickey, noticed quite a bit of focus on Junaid Khan in nets this morning. Are we expecting him to play a key role tomorrow?

MICKEY ARTHUR: No. To be brutally honest, we picked a squad of 12. We'll make a decision on our final combination tomorrow morning.

Q. You just said that you've finalized a squad of 12, so who are the three unlucky guys?

MICKEY ARTHUR: The three are Junaid Khan, Haris Sohail and Fakhar Zaman.

Q. Might be something going on between Anil Kumble and Virat Kohli. Is everything right with you and the captain? (Laughter) And do you think that he'll get any advantage between the scuffle between the captains?

MICKEY ARTHUR: To be honest, we don't know what's going on. That's India's problem, to be honest. All I know is that the captain/coach relationship is almost like a marriage. You've got to be on the same page all the time. And if you're on the same page you get correct decisions and you give clarity to your team. And that's certainly where Saf and myself find ourselves very much on the same page.

As I've said, I've had the privilege of working with so many captains and Saffy is right up there as one I'm really going to enjoy working with, in terms of our relationship going forward.

Q. Mickey, you have experienced what it means when you saw Australian play England. Do you understand now what it means when you coach Pakistan and play India?

MICKEY ARTHUR: Yeah, I'm certainly finding that out. The passion, the excitement, the expectation. Those are all words that come to mind, and it's fantastic. I just can't wait for tomorrow. The team can't wait for tomorrow.

We've been here for 12 days now. We came out of a pretty successful tour of the West Indies. Players have got clear role clarity. Everybody knows how they fit in. Everybody knows what the expectations are and what's required. We're excited. We just can't wait to get out there. And the occasion is going to be massive, and I'm really looking forward to be part of it.

Q. What's different from The Ashes?

MICKEY ARTHUR: To be honest, I got sacked just before The Ashes. So I never ever experienced that. (Laughter) I experienced the planning. I didn't experience the actual -- but I did experience playing against England as the Australian coach.

But more to the point in terms of the rivalry I've had it's been South Africa, Australia. And that is always -- that was always a massive series for myself and the team when I was the South African coach because that was the team we always liked to beat.

So that was the closest I've probably come to this rivalry. But I think this rivalry is certainly bigger than most and again just so excited to be part of it.

Q. 18-year-old Shadab Khan, do you think he's ready for such a big occasion, ready for such a big match?

MICKEY ARTHUR: If you're good enough, you're old enough. That's what I always say. And I think Shadab Khan is certainly good enough. How we go about our combination tomorrow, I'm not sure. That's something we'll work out.

He's good enough. He's ready. If he gets the opportunity, I'm particularly confident in his ability to produce for us.

And he's a match-winner. He really is a match-winner. I just think it's so exciting. It's another young Pakistan cricketer on the big stage and that's really great. It's really good for the country and it's really good for cricket.

Q. You know more than most, better than most about security issues and teams not coming to Pakistan. With a big high profile game like this, can you tell us were events in England dealt with differently? Was there concern in your camp about the situation over here at the moment?

MICKEY ARTHUR: To be honest, we didn't fuss with that. As cricket staff and cricket coaches and players, we left it in the capable hands of our staff to sort out. And our security staff were confident. They put some things in place, I think, in the hotel and it was all good.

So we didn't -- certainly didn't clammer our minds with the security issue. We were pretty confident it would be dealt with in an appropriate way.

Q. South Africa said that there was some uneasiness in their squad about the trouble over here. You didn't notice anything amongst your players any concern at all?

MICKEY ARTHUR: No, our players were good. They got on with what they had to do. The players have been fantastic. They've trained the house down. They've been great and they haven't worried about anything outside the cricket. So they've been really, really good.

Q. 300 teams of the past go here and (indiscernible) Pakistan's opening batsmen is on the lower side. Do you think that the focus of Imad could have created a difference? But he's been left out of the 12?

MICKEY ARTHUR: Yeah, he could have. The two guys that we've been working with have done exceptionally -- we've worked massively on our ball rotation, on our strike rates.

That's something that we've prioritized in terms of our preparation. We knew that we needed to play a different brand of cricket, and we're working on it. It's a work in progress.

We've got to play with what our best combinations are, and we feel that the team that we put on the ground tomorrow is going to be a team that we feel can beat India.

You pick your team based on conditions, and you pick a team based on your opposition.

We feel that we've covered all bases with the 12 that we have. And we'll make that final decision tomorrow. But we've got a lot of faith and a lot of confidence in our opening pair.

Q. Last year, when you came to Australia, you said that Babar Azam reminded you of Rohit Kohli a fair bit. Coming into this game, do you have to give him any special instructions given it's against India he's playing against? As a coach, what do you say to him?

MICKEY ARTHUR: Babar has had an unbelievable year. His year has been fantastic in One-Day cricket and across all formats. It's been a learning year for him. Test cricket, he's ridden the rough with the smooth a little bit.

One-Day cricket, he's been phenomenal. His strike rate has been great. His technique is very, very good. He scores well. He runs well between wickets. There's a lot of expectation on Babar's shoulders now.

He's only 23, but he's an integral part of our batting lineup. He knows that. He's worked hard. He's prepared well. There's certainly no special message for him. It's just more of the same, because his record at the moment in One-Day cricket is particularly good.

Q. Ever since you took over, you've been speaking about the old style of ODI cricket Pakistan play. Has it changed or is it changing?

MICKEY ARTHUR: It's changing. It's changing. Certainly in terms of awareness. Certainly in terms of brand of cricket. It is changing.

I'm comfortable where we're at. I thought the last two ODIs in the West Indies we were very, very good. And it's been well-documented. But in the first ODI, I thought we could have got another 20 runs in that one.

Saying that, we still got 306. And I think that's -- I think that's testimony to the change that the guys have made in terms of their mindset.

It was very interesting to read the other day -- I go through the stats quite regularly -- was that in the last year we've scored the third-most amount of 300s. England are way, way ahead, but Pakistan is number three on that list. And I think that's testimony to the brand of cricket that we are starting to play.

Q. You touched on this earlier. But as an overseas coach, is it an advantage that you have in this match that you were able to sort of draw the heat out of the India/Pakistan rivalry? Are you able to sort of calm things down in your own dressing room, or actually are you looking to sort of rev the players up and get them to buy into the sort of the derby mentality?

MICKEY ARTHUR: To be honest, we don't have to do anything. The players have been outstanding. The way they've approached -- I've said in the dressing room, it's the most mature I've seen them around the day before training session.

What we do is our training session is particularly structured leading up until the game. The day before the game is totally up to the players what they want.

And when we started this, the players would go and hit balls and hit balls and wouldn't really know when to stop. Today, we were short. We were sharp. People got exactly what they wanted out of the training nets.

They have topped their skills up, and they're ready for a big game. Our changing room was completely calm. It's amazing.

It's just the outside -- it's the outside noise that there is. Within the dressing room, it is unbelievably calm, unbelievably focused and very, very excited for the challenge that presents itself tomorrow.

Q. So as far as you're concerned, the players are just treating this like just another game, even though it's an India/Pakistan match?

MICKEY ARTHUR: Yeah, we know for us to progress in this tournament, we've got to hit the ground running. So whether it was against South Africa, whether it was against Sri Lanka, the intensity and the expectation, certainly from myself as coach and I'm sure from the captain, would have been exactly the same.

It's just a different opposition, and there's a little bit of hype. And it's a massive game. But every game for us in this competition is massive.

We can't take our foot off the pedal in any game, and we can't think, ah, it's India, we have to just lift ourselves, because that would be very unprofessional.

We lift ourselves for every game. We prepare the same for every game. And the expectation on the intensity and skill levels that we display is exactly the same for any opposition.

Q. You just said that your players are -- you've seen a lot of maturity in the dressing room. You've said they're calm and prepared. A handful of players will be playing for the first time, most likely. How do you kind of, on a day of a match like tomorrow, you said it's the biggest rivalry -- you're calm. What do you tell them?

MICKEY ARTHUR: They can only control it themselves. And the only way you control that nervous tension is in your preparation.

So it's always -- we always talk about it's like the exam. If you've crammed for an exam and you go in and write it, you're always on edge. You're always nervous. You always show a lot of tension because you know you haven't done the work.

But if you prepared properly, you'll be nervous but it will be an excited nervousness because you know you're ready. You know you've prepared. There's nothing more you could have done and then you just gotta go out and execute.

That's where we find ourselves as a team at the moment: Extremely well prepared and ready to go.

Q. I assume that you watched the match yesterday. Just obviously despite -- ignoring the rain that was about, what did you make of the conditions? There wasn't much swing. And the two teams took a very different amount of time, I guess, to adjust their bowling plans when they found that. Does that change your approach or affect it?

MICKEY ARTHUR: A little bit, to be honest. It was interesting to see, and I think the wicket is probably, according to the groundsmen, going to be just a little bit quicker tomorrow.

Yeah, I thought Australia probably adjusted a little bit too late. We eventually saw a lot of cross-seam deliveries. We saw a lot of change of pace. And I think that's how we've got to go.

So when Saf and I sit down tomorrow and have a look at the unit we want to take out, we've got to offer ourselves options. And that's what we've tried to do with our attack, is offer ourselves options.

I think the team that's going to win this competition is the team that can strike. Gone are the days of just containing through the middle. Gone are the days of just soaking up pressure. And if you can go at five and a halves or whatever you're doing a good job, those days are gone.

You've got to be able to take wickets. We always say you pick an attack to take wickets, and that's what we're trying to do tomorrow. Every one of our attack that we put out in the park tomorrow is going to be able to do something different and offer Saf something different.

If you look, we've got a left-arm swinger, could have left-arm pace. We've got the swing and hustle and end swing of Hassan.

We've got a left-arm spinner. We could have a leg spinner. We've got an off spinner. We've got everything at our disposal tomorrow to allow Saf to pull the strings to make sure we can try to bowl India out. Because that's got to be priority number one. We can't just sit back and let them score. We've got to attack them and we've got to look to bowl them out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lo jee that means Wahab is confirmed. Stupid from team management.
 
Yeah! Wahab bro is playing.He is gonna be all pumped and inspired.Looking forward to see him.Thank god that trundler junaid is not playing.
 
Feel bad for Junaid. One of the few games the opposition is scared of him and he is not even selected in the 12 man squad but hopefully Wahab will be fired up for tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
My lineup
Shehzad
Azhar
Babar
Sarfaraz
Malik
Hafeez
Imad
Fahim
Shadab
Hasan
Aamir
 
Lo jee that means Wahab is confirmed. Stupid from team management.

There is a slight hope of Imad, Shadab, Fahim, Hassan and Amir playing and Wahab remains a 12th man but that hope is 5%. :P
 
So 12th man will be either Imad/Fahim. Understandable omissions, although would have loved to see Haris.
 
There is a slight hope of Imad, Shadab, Fahim, Hassan and Amir playing and Wahab remains a 12th man but that hope is 5%. :P
I dont understand it... So in the one warmup we had Junaid picked up 4 wickets and went for lesser runs than Wahab who also happened to pick up zero wickets yet the management went with the latter. What is this logic?
 
I dont understand it... So in the one warmup we had Junaid picked up 4 wickets and went for lesser runs than Wahab who also happened to pick up zero wickets yet the management went with the latter. What is this logic?

Team management and fans are obsessed with pace but the real issue is pace without accuracy has a history of converting into a major liability.
 
Glad Shadab is playing.

Why was second warmup washed :( We'll have to endure Azhar Ali :facepalm:
 
I dont understand it... So in the one warmup we had Junaid picked up 4 wickets and went for lesser runs than Wahab who also happened to pick up zero wickets yet the management went with the latter. What is this logic?

Wahab went for 69 and Junaid went for 72 and Junaid has been poor in every official match he has played for a while
 
Wahab went for 69 and Junaid went for 72 and Junaid has been poor in every official match he has played for a while

Ok I got the runs part wrong but Junaid has consistently outperformed Wahab in the last few series. In Australia, in Windies in the warmup. Yet we go with shupper phasst Wahab.
 
Bowling scorecard of Pakistan might look like this:

Wahab - 100 runs
Fahim - 70 runs (6 overs)
Hassan - 55 runs
Amir - 45 runs
Imad - 50 runs (6 overs)
Hafeez - 30 runs (4 overs)
Malik - 30 runs (4 overs)

Total: 380 + extras

:P
 
Why wahab?Junaid would have been better than him.

Also,I don't agree with revealing the 12 man squad a day before the game.Is it an ICC policy?
 
Conceievably we have the bowlers to try to attack, we just don't have the batsmen
 
Mickey Arthur "we have to attack India tomorrow"
Yes by mouth and India will attack us back with bat and ball. At the end we will loose by huge margin. All talk about revolution and young players and at the end of the day select same garbage.
Why waste money on these clown of selectors and Coaches? We can still score 150-200 without them
 
Mickey Arthur "we have to attack India tomorrow"
Yes by mouth and India will attack us back with bat and ball. At the end we will loose by huge margin. All talk about revolution and young players and at the end of the day select same garbage.
Why waste money on these clown of selectors and Coaches? We can still score 150-200 without them

Exactly all lip service of playing youngsters yet they select 33 year old too-slow-for-tests Azhar Ali, 35 year old useless Hafeez, 35 year old minnow basher Malik, 32 year old phasst Wahab. Mashallah

No wonder Mickey took the job of Pakistani coach he is like a Pakistani politician himself. Say something infront to camera and do something completely opposite.

:salute
 
I liked his last answer particularly. Thinking of taking all wickets of Indian team is the right attitude to go about.

So cross-seamers are going to be on display, as well
 
Right we gonna hustle these lot 2maw.
great words from Mickey.
Will he great opportunity to see how hasan babar shadab will handle this.
 
Tommorow we wil attack with azhar ali & wahab.
Azhar will score 50 for 25. ( 50 dot balls for 25 runs)
Wahab will bowl at 90. (90 runs in 10 overs)

Brainless selection.
 
Thinking if mickey is playing a mind game by saying junaid will not play. Very unlikely to give a wrong pic now and then unleash the threat.

Looks like Sarfraz friends 11 will face India tmw.
 
Exactly all lip service of playing youngsters yet they select 33 year old too-slow-for-tests Azhar Ali, 35 year old useless Hafeez, 35 year old minnow basher Malik, 32 year old phasst Wahab. Mashallah

No wonder Mickey took the job of Pakistani coach he is like a Pakistani politician himself. Say something infront to camera and do something completely opposite.

:salute

Quick learner isn't it.
 
Basically he's admitting that our only hope is to take wickets, that too with an attack that is far from exceptional. As for attacking with the bat...good luck with that when you are opening with Azhar and Shehzad.
 
Bowling scorecard of Pakistan might look like this:

Wahab - 100 runs
Fahim - 70 runs (6 overs)
Hassan - 55 runs
Amir - 45 runs
Imad - 50 runs (6 overs)
Hafeez - 30 runs (4 overs)
Malik - 30 runs (4 overs)

Total: 380 + extras

:P

Unless we bat first and score 220/8 in 50 overs :P

Wahab will not be able to score a century then :D
 
The Indians have a better bowling squad than their usual .... so if we bat first, the butterflies will surely slow us down. Really nervous about this game as the day gets closer to actual playing them. Also, the Indians are strangely very quiet, is this normal for them ????
 
Wahab went for 69 and Junaid went for 72 and Junaid has been poor in every official match he has played for a while

Yes Junaid conceded 24 off one over from Tamim, however he came back well picked up 4 wickets...

Wahab did nothing
 
If the pitch has more pace, then it makes sense to play Wahab over Junaid... however Wahab himself is a double edged swored so we don't know which Wahab will turn up tomorrow...
 
I've heard all of this "attack" and "positive" bs before. I think we all have.
 
The Indians have a better bowling squad than their usual .... so if we bat first, the butterflies will surely slow us down. Really nervous about this game as the day gets closer to actual playing them. Also, the Indians are strangely very quiet, is this normal for them ????

We are always pretty calm when it comes to facing your team in ICC tourneys and hence we handle those pressure situations better.

Plus we have been winning against your team regularly in LOIs and hence there us an underlying confidence we have in our team.
Hoping this doesn't come back to bite me. ;)
 
If the pitch has more pace, then it makes sense to play Wahab over Junaid... however Wahab himself is a double edged swored so we don't know which Wahab will turn up tomorrow...
If pitch has grass or the conditions are overcast, it would be a blunder to play no swing no seam wahab. Wahab should only be played if the pitch is bouncy or completely flat.
 
Was there a need to announce the playing 11 in advance? What happened to the element of surprise?
 
Wahab took 5 wickets against India in Mohali, this should give him confidence. I think we will see a fired up Wahab with a few shorts balls which seem to be a good tactic so far in this tounament. Hope he does well.

Pakistan just need to go out there with a good plan and some serious aggression in the field. I just hope we can put enough runs on the board if batting first to give our bowlers a chance.
 
We are always pretty calm when it comes to facing your team in ICC tourneys and hence we handle those pressure situations better.

Plus we have been winning against your team regularly in LOIs and hence there us an underlying confidence we have in our team.
Hoping this doesn't come back to bite me. ;)

Which LOIs? The ones under the MOU you never played? Pakistan and India are only playing in ICC tournaments. Last time we came to India we smashed you all.
 
Wahab took 5 wickets against India in Mohali, this should give him confidence. I think we will see a fired up Wahab with a few shorts balls which seem to be a good tactic so far in this tounament. Hope he does well.

Pakistan just need to go out there with a good plan and some serious aggression in the field. I just hope we can put enough runs on the board if batting first to give our bowlers a chance.

An overaggressive approach can make the bowler look the way Umar Gul looked after he was taken apart by Sehwag in the 2011 World Cup...
 
An overaggressive approach can make the bowler look the way Umar Gul looked after he was taken apart by Sehwag in the 2011 World Cup...

The Guldozer was spraying it all over the place. Yes I agree overagression can backfire but I would like to see us get into the Indian bastmen, under their skin a little so they stop being calm and do something stupid. In the past Pakistan quicks have had real success against Indian batsmen with this tactic, sure different players now but still a good tactic imo.
 
A lot of confidence being put in Shehzad & Azhar - hope they contribute for Pakistan's sake.

Sad to see Junaid being left out, but I really hope Wahab is fired up like never before.

Hope Shadab plays at all costs.
 
The Guldozer was spraying it all over the place. Yes I agree overagression can backfire but I would like to see us get into the Indian bastmen, under their skin a little so they stop being calm and do something stupid. In the past Pakistan quicks have had real success against Indian batsmen with this tactic, sure different players now but still a good tactic imo.
Very well writen
 
Pakistan should try to do something different. I'd have played both Fahim Ashraf and Shadab Khan as both are unknown commodities for Indians, dropped Azhar Ali and opened with Sarfraz to accomodate both of them and yes, Junaid is an obvious better choice over Wahab.

Playing Haris over Hafeez was also a good option but as of now Sohail is probably a little undercooked, so for now Hafeez is OK.
 
If we bat First ..... we must bat, at all the cost, all 50 overs. If we loose wickets along the way, we may have to resort to the Tuk Tuk mode, but batting all the 50 overs is an absolute Must !!!
 
Attack? Indians are salivating to attack after they saw the name of Wahab in 12.
 
Attack? Indians are salivating to attack after they saw the name of Wahab in 12.

The logic is that Indians don't play the short ball well and Wahab with his pace and some chin music could send the cat amongst the pigeons.
 
To be honest, I have almost lost half of the optimism after seeing Wahab being preferred over Junaid. On top of that, we are opening with Azhar and Shahzad, Fakhar ignored, God help us !!!
 
A playing XI with Azhar, Shehzad, Hafeez, and Wahab does not deserve to win anything.

It is unbelievable that Fakhar will have to sit out for both Azhar and Shehzad despite being in better form and after having a very good Pakistan cup.
 
Feel bad for Junaid. One of the few games the opposition is scared of him and he is not even selected in the 12 man squad but hopefully Wahab will be fired up for tomorrow.

What? Opposition is scared of this trundler? Even I myself would be happy to face this trundler. Btw this is not 2012.. It's 2017. Even those days he was nothing spectacular.
 
Here's the thing with wahab. Even if takes a 5'fer tomorrow, he is just liable to go for a 100 against South Africa
 
If we bat First ..... we must bat, at all the cost, all 50 overs. If we loose wickets along the way, we may have to resort to the Tuk Tuk mode, but batting all the 50 overs is an absolute Must !!!

wah wah..kaya logic hai bhai kee. abay, every team wants to bat 50 overs at any cost. oh bhai that is given. koi aur strategy batao.
 
Again i repeat, was there a need to announce the playing 11 in advance? This is highly unprofessional and Arthur should be sacked for this.
 
Again i repeat, was there a need to announce the playing 11 in advance? This is highly unprofessional and Arthur should be sacked for this.

No its not, the players need to prepare for the game not worry about being picked. They will all go sleep knowing they are in the game.
 
By unleashing Azhar and Shehzad on India...

Its a double bluff, Indians will get themselves out thinking they need 350+ this time and in the process giving their wkts away being all out under 230.

Pakistan will then romp to victory in the 50th over.

It's a master plan of such cunning proportions that even Baldrick would be proud off!
 
No its not, the players need to prepare for the game not worry about being picked. They will all go sleep knowing they are in the game.

That is illogical, he could have told the team in private, there was no need to reveal the playing 11 in public and give India ample time to play for the playing 11 of the opposition
 
Again i repeat, was there a need to announce the playing 11 in advance? This is highly unprofessional and Arthur should be sacked for this.

Highly unprofessional? This is the thing that the most professional teams of the world do before every game. Aus and Eng announce their playing XIs before every game.
 
Give Shehzad licence to thrill, Azhar plays the anchor role at 80+ strike rate.

If we get a decent start, use Faheem Ashraf as a pinch hitter at 3 (that would be out of the box thinking) otherwise Babar can try to steady the ship.
 
With this team, the best approach would be to attack by getting the opportunity to bowl first.
 
Give Shehzad licence to thrill, Azhar plays the anchor role at 80+ strike rate.

If we get a decent start, use Faheem Ashraf as a pinch hitter at 3 (that would be out of the box thinking) otherwise Babar can try to steady the ship.

Problem with this is that Shehzad will end up throwing his wicket. He is a better striker after he has accumulated 20 odd runs under his bealt.
 
Give Shehzad licence to thrill, Azhar plays the anchor role at 80+ strike rate.

If we get a decent start, use Faheem Ashraf as a pinch hitter at 3 (that would be out of the box thinking) otherwise Babar can try to steady the ship.

Haha. For our superstars, "licence to thrill" MEANS striking at >=80. The "anchor role" is generally played at a strike rate ranging between 45 and 70.
 
Haha. For our superstars, "licence to thrill" MEANS striking at >=80. The "anchor role" is generally played at a strike rate ranging between 45 and 70.

If an anchor bats majority of the inns, i am sure an SR of 80+ is easily achievable.
 
If an anchor bats majority of the inns, i am sure an SR of 80+ is easily achievable.

A Pakistani "anchor" would probably end up achieving that SR towards the end of his knock, long after the inevitable demise of the incompetent blokes with the "licence to thrill". Team total would probably be a typical 236 (49.2).
Apologies if I appear a tad pessimistic. :hafeez :shezzy :azhar2
 
Well Micky says everyone knows their precise roles in the team, he's trying to give the team some structure and they realise the need and are commmitted to embrace the modern approach. Fittness and the fielding has improved definitely already.

Lets see how they evolve in the next 12 months or so. There are some guys like Hassan Ali/Imad/Sarfaraz who have a bit of aggression in them, Amir is pretty decent and Shadab could be special. One last throw of the dice for players like Hafeez/Shehzad/Wahab etc and then replacements can come in for them.
 
All talk, no action to back it up. If he really wanted to attack India, he'd take a gamble and play Fakhar and Sarfraz to open the "attack" when batting. That way, we'd rotate the strike and actually take advantage of the (assumably flat) pitch.
 
The logic is that Indians don't play the short ball well and Wahab with his pace and some chin music could send the cat amongst the pigeons.

This short ball staff is a myth now for the Indians.There was a time when like any subcontinent team ,India had weakness in dealing shortpitch bowling in bouncy conditions.They are now easily the best Asian side to travel to Australia and the only Asian side which can play hard competitive cricket there.Their domestic pitches are now tailor made to make them acclimatize in Australian and English conditions.But they had to sacrifice the art of playing spin.They are no longer the master of playing spinners.I am sure ,Saqlain and Mustaq would have run havoc in this Indian
line up.

Wahab's main problem is inconsistency.He very rarely bowls good bouncers.That spell to Watson remains to be his only lifetime achievement.Most of the time his bouncers result in short pitched easy hitting deliveries.He bowls at least two boundary deliveries an over.
 
Says something does something completely opposite
 
so we make a big deal about attacking with our bowlers, given that we picked defensive openers, then open with an arm bowler and give our main new ball pacer one slip. :14:
 
Lol opens the bowling with a darter even after seeing that first over by amir .
Doesnt even have two slips for amir when he is constantly angling the ball way from rohit
Horrible situational awareness from sarfraz .
Cant seem to find one sane captain *** .
 
Last edited:
Perhaps the break will help sarfaraz regain his composure
 
Back
Top