What's new

What are the chances that some of the world leaders are psychopaths?

Madplayer

Senior Test Player
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Runs
28,686
Post of the Week
1
The question is simple but very interesting. As we know that Psycopaths are sick yet less impulsive compared to other mentally unstable people (say sociopaths). They can act like normal people and are able to hide their evil intentions quite effectively.

What are the chances that some of our world leaders and politicians are/were psycopaths who kill people for their sadistic pleasure?

Will we ever know?
 
Some leaders have already been involved in major controversies but psychopathy is very different.
 
Pshycopath is the wrong word to use here...the word you are looking for is “sociopaths”.

Yes,most world leaders are Sociopaths
 
One can be a psychopath without being violent. I would imagine that most business leaders are psychopaths. That is how they are able to lay off staff and put competitors out of business.
 
One can be a psychopath without being violent. I would imagine that most business leaders are psychopaths. That is how they are able to lay off staff and put competitors out of business.

True they don't have a soul lol but that's what it takes in those positions
 
Pshycopath is the wrong word to use here...the word you are looking for is “sociopaths”.

Yes,most world leaders are Sociopaths

I was confused between the terms psycopaths and sociopaths. I wanted to use the ones who are more calculative and less impulsive. I did a google search and read an article and it showed that sociopaths are more impulsive. Sociopaths cant control themselves and act on instinct and hence make more mistakes.

While Psycopaths are calculative, they think before they act and are less impulsive. Hence i used the term Psycopaths.
 
One can be a psychopath without being violent. I would imagine that most business leaders are psychopaths. That is how they are able to lay off staff and put competitors out of business.

How about leaders like hitler, mussolini etc. Could they have been psycopaths?

or even some of the modern day leaders.
 
Most are deranged. They want endless war to please the military. After all, war is the number one business in the world.
 
Most are deranged. They want endless war to please the military. After all, war is the number one business in the world.

Pyscopaths have no conscious. They are intelligent and calculative. I think its highly possible that they could get into positions of power and device strategies to kill people for their pleasure using resources of the state. I mean seriously speaking , why can't it be possible? Is there any mechanism to prevent it from happening? I dont think so.
 
As far as recent Presidents of the US go, Bush was responsible for starting the Iraq War under false pretenses (while there was justification for the Afghan War), and Obama was complicit in starting the Ukraine, Syria and Libya Wars (in which about half a million people have died).

Trump hasn't started any wars in his first year, and let's hope it stays that way.
 
As far as recent Presidents of the US go, Bush was responsible for starting the Iraq War under false pretenses (while there was justification for the Afghan War), and Obama was complicit in starting the Ukraine, Syria and Libya Wars (in which about half a million people have died).

Trump hasn't started any wars in his first year, and let's hope it stays that way.

Now that I think about it. It'd a big PLUS for DJ Trump if he doesn't start a war during his presidency.

To OP: Most politicians are sociopaths. A normal 'sane' person can't last in their world.
 
Now that I think about it. It'd a big PLUS for DJ Trump if he doesn't start a war during his presidency.

To OP: Most politicians are sociopaths. A normal 'sane' person can't last in their world.

Are they inherently like that or does this condition develop once they step into politics?

If the phenomenon called politics is the cause, then its interesting to think how politicians in the history of human kind had to sacrifice a part of their sanity in quest of power.
 
Are they inherently like that or does this condition develop once they step into politics?

If the phenomenon called politics is the cause, then its interesting to think how politicians in the history of human kind had to sacrifice a part of their sanity in quest of power.

They are inherently like that. I believe they're like that since infancy.

Wikipedia:
The term sociopathy may have been first introduced in 1909 in Germany by biological psychiatrist Karl Birnbaum and in 1930 in the US by educational psychologist George E. Partridge, as an alternative to the concept of psychopathy. It was used to indicate that the defining feature is violation of social norms, or antisocial behavior, and has often also been associated with postulating social as well as biological causation.

There are mythical/religious/historical examples of typical 'evil' person who goes through a village and poisons local wells, kills animals or burns something just because someone treated him bad.

Here are their traits:

• Lack of empathy – Inability to feel sympathy for others or to understand the emotional consequences of their actions

• Cold, calculating nature – The ability and willingness to use others around them to personal gain

• Shallow emotions – Lack of real emotion in response to events, limited capacity to feel love

• Narcissism – A personality disorder in itself in which the individual feels strong love and admiration toward themselves (often a defense mechanism against deep seated low esteem)

• Grandiose self image – They might see themselves as someone who is superior to others and sometimes even experiences delusions. A sociopath might see themselves as a fitting ruler of a country or even the world, but might also have delusional beliefs such as seeing themselves as a God or having super powers

• Charming – While the sociopath is unable to fully understand the emotions of others, they are capable but rather highly adept at mimicking them and might appear to be charming and normal at first

• High IQ – Often sociopaths will exhibit a high IQ which they can use to manipulate and plan

• Manipulative – Sociopaths use their superficial charm and high IQ to manipulate others to get their ends, and their lack of empathy allows them to do this with no sense of guilt or remorse

• Secretive – Has little need for others and is highly secretive in their actions meaning

• Sexually deviant – The lack of remorse, guilt or emotional attachments means that the sociopath is happy to have affairs and to engage in questionable sexual activity without questioning their desires

• Sensitive to criticism – That said, like all narcissists, the sociopath will desire the approval of others and will be highly sensitive to criticisms. They often feel they deserve adulation and admiration of the world and might feel victimized

• Paranoid – Often their lack of understanding of emotion along with their incongruous self view means that they feel a lack of trust and paranoia

• Despotic/Authoritarian – Often the sociopath will see themselves as a necessary authority and will be in favor or totalitarian rule

• Lawfulness – Despite popular belief, a sociopath is not likely to be a problem to the law in later life, but rather will seek to find loopholes, to rise to a position of power, or to move to another area so that their behavior is tolerated

• Low tolerance for boredom – Sociopaths require constant stimulation and get quickly bored

• Impulsive behavior – A lack of regret and empathy means makes sociopaths more likely to make sudden rash decisions based on the current facts

• Compulsive lying – As part of their facade, and as a means to an end, sociopaths are compulsive liars and will rarely speak truthfully making them hard to pin down

• The MacDonald Triad – In childhood sociopaths will likely have demonstrated the 'MacDonald Triad' also known as the 'Triad of Sociopathy', traits that often are demonstrated in sociopaths from a young age. These include animal cruelty (pulling the wings off of flies etc, bed wetting, and pyromania (an obsession with fire setting)).

http://www.healthguidance.org/entry/15850/1/Characteristics-of-a-Sociopath.html

I know some people who have few of these qualities. They're hard to detect but are detectable if you know them personally.
 
They are inherently like that. I believe they're like that since infancy.

Wikipedia:


There are mythical/religious/historical examples of typical 'evil' person who goes through a village and poisons local wells, kills animals or burns something just because someone treated him bad.

Here are their traits:



I know some people who have few of these qualities. They're hard to detect but are detectable if you know them personally.

Amazing but according to this article, its the pyscopath who has these qualities while the sociopath is said to have remorse and is erratic and not as intelligent as the pysopath

Psychopaths and sociopaths share a number of characteristics, including a lack of remorse or empathy for others, a lack of guilt or ability to take responsibility for their actions, a disregard for laws or social conventions, and an inclination to violence. A core feature of both is a deceitful and manipulative nature. But how can we tell them apart?

Sociopaths are normally less emotionally stable and highly impulsive – their behaviour tends to be more erratic than psychopaths. When committing crimes – either violent or non-violent – sociopaths will act more on compulsion. And they will lack patience, giving in much more easily to impulsiveness and lacking detailed planning.

Psychopaths, on the other hand, will plan their crimes down to the smallest detail, taking calculated risks to avoid detection. The smart ones will leave few clues that may lead to being caught. Psychopaths don’t get carried away in the moment and make fewer mistakes as a result.

Source : http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/psychopaths-versus-sociopaths-what-difference/
 
Amazing but according to this article, its the pyscopath who has these qualities while the sociopath is said to have remorse and is erratic and not as intelligent as the pysopath



Source : http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/psychopaths-versus-sociopaths-what-difference/

Woah. This article is scary.

Psychopaths are born and sociopaths are made. In essence, their difference reflects the nature versus nurture debate.
Interesting point.

Human brain is so complex and unexplored by modern science that it is hard to conclude.
 
[MENTION=131678]Madplayer[/MENTION] Check this series: Mindhunter

It explores how the way certain psychos are made.
 
As far as recent Presidents of the US go, Bush was responsible for starting the Iraq War under false pretenses (while there was justification for the Afghan War), and Obama was complicit in starting the Ukraine, Syria and Libya Wars (in which about half a million people have died).

Trump hasn't started any wars in his first year, and let's hope it stays that way.

And still Obama is hailed as a person who is a saint...
 
[MENTION=131678]Madplayer[/MENTION] Check this series: Mindhunter

It explores how the way certain psychos are made.

Would definitely check it out.

And yes, its really hard to conclude anything from the limited research which has been done.

Its almost impossible to tell that a person can have such problems but my big fear is the fact that these people can get into positions of power and use intelligent strategies to fulfill their sadistic desires. Its crazy.
 
very disturbing!

Hope Nawaz Sharif isnt one of them!

If we closely watch his actions and draw a parallel line between of a sociopath...

Each and every one can draw their own conclusion.

The way Shareefs (no pun intended :yk) lie so blatantly and then repeat them even when caught, is something which is extremely impressive (in a negative way).
 
And still Obama is hailed as a person who is a saint...

Only by those who get their information of the world from biased sources like CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, the Nobel Peace Prize Committee etc.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top