- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 218,128
In a sense he had it coming to him but did the PCB go overboard or was the punishment right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
3 years looks like a lifetime but should it have been life?
My initial response is visible in the original thread: "he deserves this, he has nobody to blame but himself, he must have done something really bad rather than just not report an approach (for which I would have given him 12 months)".
The thing is, when you read the appalling PCB comments you realise "oh no, he's actually been stitched up".
Umar Akmal is the Donald Trump of Pakistan cricket. He is actually a gifted batsman who could be an exceptional one.
But he overestimates his ability, he fails to prepare hard enough and he turns up unfit and unready to perform.
In the case of this hearing, rather like the President at his briefings about Coronavirus, he assumes that he doesn't need to be properly briefed before a public hearing and he turns up and says dumb things that he thinks are smart.
As a result he has had the book thrown at him for pleading guilty but then trying to explain why he did what he did. It is his own fault, but does it merit this level of ban? In effect, an uneducated fool has received a harsher ban than he would have not because his offence was particularly bad but because like Trump he turned up unprepared and riffed off the top of his head at his tribunal and said dumb and uneducated things.
He'd have received a smaller ban if he had proper legal representation. By representing himself in court he walked into the lions den and messed up in front of the judge.
How he can be so foolish when his career is at stake is unbelievable. It also shows that nobody can control what Umar Akmal does. There isn't a sane person in his circle who could have recommended him to go and represent himself in court.
This guy needs to be accessing mental health support ASAP.
My initial response is visible in the original thread: "he deserves this, he has nobody to blame but himself, he must have done something really bad rather than just not report an approach (for which I would have given him 12 months)".
The thing is, when you read the appalling PCB comments you realise "oh no, he's actually been stitched up".
Umar Akmal is the Donald Trump of Pakistan cricket. He is actually a gifted batsman who could be an exceptional one.
But he overestimates his ability, he fails to prepare hard enough and he turns up unfit and unready to perform.
In the case of this hearing, rather like the President at his briefings about Coronavirus, he assumes that he doesn't need to be properly briefed before a public hearing and he turns up and says dumb things that he thinks are smart.
As a result he has had the book thrown at him for pleading guilty but then trying to explain why he did what he did. It is his own fault, but does it merit this level of ban? In effect, an uneducated fool has received a harsher ban than he would have not because his offence was particularly bad but because like Trump he turned up unprepared and riffed off the top of his head at his tribunal and said dumb and uneducated things.
Life sentence for a failure to report an approach?
Are you serious?
He'd have received a smaller ban if he had proper legal representation. By representing himself in court he walked into the lions den and messed up in front of the judge.
How he can be so foolish when his career is at stake is unbelievable. It also shows that nobody can control what Umar Akmal does. There isn't a sane person in his circle who could have recommended him to go and represent himself in court.
This guy needs to be accessing mental health support ASAP.
Why do you guys keep saying an approach when its clear it was multiple approaches over periods of time? I mean all reports mention MULTIPLE approaches and he has been charged under multiple sections
Lost cause Umar Akmal? Mickey Arthur thinks so
PakPassion.net: Umar Akmal has been a thorn in the side of many coaches. What are your thoughts on him?
Mickey Arthur: It’s definitely too late for him now. It’s sad because he is a likable enough bloke but what he needed was a real firm hand at the start of his career to guide him properly. I don’t think he got the right messages earlier in his career because if he had, he wouldn’t have gone down the route he has chosen to. He was frustrating to work with. He has all the talent in the world but has wasted it and unfortunately, he will now go down in history as one Pakistan player who has underachieved.
I don’t think he has underachieved, our expectations from him were far too much.
At most, he should have been a decent keeper who can score handy runs with the bat at number 6-7. Or open the batting as a keeper. His average of 30-35 and his strike rate of 90 would look so much more useful in this scenario.
Pakistan took the wrong route with playing him at 4-5, expecting him to emulate middle order stalwarts like Inzimam, Mohammad Yousuf, Miandad and dare I say Salim Malik (plus Younis Khan in Tests).
However what he doesn't deserve is to hold up a place of a more deserving youngster in the Central Punjab domestic side.

I think it is way too much...and if this is the precedence, then do all players who do not report a booky approaching them also receive a minimum of 3 years?
Forget the past. In the future, yes ideally. There is no excuse for not reporting an approach given how much education there is on this now
The past? I am talking about the future. I think a 3 year ban from cricket is too much, match fixers have not received that....however, if this is the case from now on then the PCB will have to be very consistent with it.
Hadn’t even thought about this. Can we potentially see Abdullah Shafique get a chance next season? [MENTION=56866]Bullet Drive[/MENTION] you must be ecstatic![]()
but Abdullah is an opener.
Ali Zaryab should play!
)Play him out of position, but I want him to play)
Have you seen him bat?