What's new

What happens if/when Sharjeel Khan comes back?

Sports_Psychologist

Local Club Regular
Joined
May 11, 2016
Runs
1,539
Absolutely an amazing innings by Azhar Ali in the final, Fakhar was struggling to middle the ball and was under pressure, If Azhar Ali continued the way he had played in his career then Fakhar could've crumbled under score board pressure. But Azhar Ali started playing positively and took the pressure off and Fakhar played with ease.

That was an amazing partnership in the final!

Now there are news that Sharjeel might come back sooner than we expected. What happens now, will Pakistan afford to play with both Sharjeel and Fakhar ? just like England with Roy and Hales, or we'll continue with Azhar Ali?
 
Last edited:
Simple answer a opener will replace another opener.
Should replace Shehzad for sure and play ahead of Azhar in the final eleven. If selectors are brave they can invest on another power hitter youngster. But it won't happen
 
IF he comes back then Malik goes. Azhar to first drop.

Malik and Haffez are the two seniors in the team and will never be dropped.
Ideally I'd play Azhar Ali if the pitch might swing but on batting or spinning decks I'll go with both Sharjeel and Fakhar.
 
Don't need him.. once tainted always gona be tainted.. we have to make an example out of him.. so when others get the offer to fix, they think about the consequences!!
 
Don't need him.. once tainted always gona be tainted.. we have to make an example out of him.. so when others get the offer to fix, they think about the consequences!!

Back to Amir eh? But PCB failed to prove anything against Sharjeel so he might be released soon.
 
He comes in squad for Shahzad. Sharjeel, Fakhar and Azhar to play as openers as per the requirements and conditions.
 
He needs to get himself fit first . remember fitness is the first thing on the list these days. If he loses like 20 kgs then he could be brought back.
 
I would probably go with Fakhar to first drop, allow Sharjeel and Azhar to open - think Fakhar can continue to score quite freely after ten overs and generally runs quite well. Azhar can keep his place as he makes for a good anchor...

However, we'll see if Sharjeel does return and it would be interesting to compare and contrast Sharjeel and Fakhar - perhaps Fakhar needs to remain as an opener because his style disrupts bowlers' rhythms.
 
I would open with Sharjeel and Azhar and bring Fakhar at number 4.

so we finally have an opener who has taken the world by storm and you want to drop him to no.4?

I don't want 2 left handers opening for us. Sharjeel is a one trick pony anyway. Stick to a left right hand combo and find someone who can compliment Fakher.
 
so we finally have an opener who has taken the world by storm and you want to drop him to no.4?

I don't want 2 left handers opening for us. Sharjeel is a one trick pony anyway. Stick to a left right hand combo and find someone who can compliment Fakher.

Fakhar and Sharjeel can disturb the bowling because they can be as tricky as left right combo.
On fast bowling Fakhar has strong off side game on other hand Sharjeel has the leg side game.
 
Sharjeel should only be considered again if he can shed some weight.

Besides Sharjeel looks clueless against balls bowled outside his offstump

56f680d943b89.jpg
 
so we finally have an opener who has taken the world by storm and you want to drop him to no.4?

I don't want 2 left handers opening for us. Sharjeel is a one trick pony anyway. Stick to a left right hand combo and find someone who can compliment Fakher.

It's my opinion that Sharjeel is a better player of pace while Fakhar is very good against spin. Fakhar has been tremendous but will get bogged down by short pitched stuff. Once Sharjeel provides a start Fakhar will keep that momentum going. Even for Lahore Qalandars Fakhar did not open.

I'd drop Malik and play Sharjeel and make him open with Azhar Ali with Babar at 3 and Fakhar at 4. I know most people will think it's silly but it's just an opinion based on how well he plays in the middle overs and how good Sharjeel is against pace.
 
def need to get them both openin... azhar , how ever he played an xcellent innings, but he needs to go...

fakhar/sharjeel gives me the same shivers as hayden/gilly and anwar/sohail..... mouthwatering...
 
Is this a position based on principles or do you see long term promise in some other combo ?

principle. even if they dont have enough to ban him.
coincidentally, i think the future is somewhat rosy. you have sahibzada farhan to try out. maybe awais is not as hackey as everyone blvs. Apparently ppl are swooning over Umer Amin again (I am not convinced on that)
 
I can't wait for Fakhar and Sharjeel to open
forget 21st century
we will be in 22nd century
 
He failed to report bookie approaching him!! Like Mohd Irfan. So, he will minimum get one one year. I don't think he is coming back soon.

Shoib Malik has to go out and make space for Harris Sohail or Sharjeel. Fakhar can develop into 7th bowling option so we don't need Shoib for his batting skills (or lack of it). In T20, I would play with Fakhar & Sharjeel at the top but in ODI, I will play Fakhar one down. You need one solid guy who plays through the inning and Sharjeel who exploits the 1st power play.
 
principle. even if they dont have enough to ban him.
coincidentally, i think the future is somewhat rosy. you have sahibzada farhan to try out. maybe awais is not as hackey as everyone blvs. Apparently ppl are swooning over Umer Amin again (I am not convinced on that)

How is it a principled stance if sharjeel is declared innocent??
 
as Sharjeel khan is a good player of fast bowling and little weak in the spin bowling, Fakhar Zaman is opposite
of sharjeel , very good player of spin.

so open with Azhar Ali and sharjeel and one down Fakar Zaman, where he will face spiner or 1st, 2nd change bowler after few overs.
 
Even if he is allowed to return keep him back until he loses fat and gets fit/improves his fielding. He needs to put in work, this spot shouldn't be handed to him on a silver platter and we shouldn't reward these motapa pahars with opening bat positions.
 
If Sharjeel returns then he should replace Azhar as opener . Babar with Sharjeel to open and Zaman at number 3.
 
This is the easiest of all problems - drop Azhar. Not sure what posters saw in Azhar's innings on what was a batting belter. Zaman raced to 100+ SR by 80th ball, SK will start from there, while in one of his best days, it ended at 83 for Azhar after 70+ balls.

He is not an ODI batsman, which had been proved many many times - PAK won't bat first every time on a belter, neither bowlers will set target of 212 every time on another belter. There is only one spot left in top 4 for Azhar type player & Babar is some miles ahead of him in that regard. If Azhar is to play, he should replace Babar at 3. Ideas of playing him at 4/5 are not sane, considering his 0* (10~15) sort of starts.
 
I am sure Mickey will not want Sharjeel back.

He is the guy who goes to youngsters, and that is how he developed SA team where in his tenure he played Steyn, Morkels, Devilliers, Duminy, Hashim Amla, many others , and was against Smith's captaincy after 2009 CT loss, and wanted the reins go to younger player.
 
I would open with Sharjeel and Azhar and bring Fakhar at number 4.

Came here to write this, and the reason being that he is very good vs spin much better than Sharjeel and he is also a better Runner and also a good vs spin and as left hander will provide left right combo, so can be an ideal no. 4 where as sharjeel is way more equipped to face quality pacers and smash them upfront,
 
This is the easiest of all problems - drop Azhar. Not sure what posters saw in Azhar's innings on what was a batting belter. Zaman raced to 100+ SR by 80th ball, SK will start from there, while in one of his best days, it ended at 83 for Azhar after 70+ balls.

He is not an ODI batsman, which had been proved many many times - PAK won't bat first every time on a belter, neither bowlers will set target of 212 every time on another belter. There is only one spot left in top 4 for Azhar type player & Babar is some miles ahead of him in that regard. If Azhar is to play, he should replace Babar at 3. Ideas of playing him at 4/5 are not sane, considering his 0* (10~15) sort of starts.

I can see where you are coming from, but this CT has made me change my mind a little and I guess azhar can be the stablizer and solid opener who can have 40 & 80 strike rate, along side an opener like fakhar or sharjeel 35 @ 115 he have a role, because fakhar sharjeel combo can be all or nothing type and too risky.
 
I can see where you are coming from, but this CT has made me change my mind a little and I guess azhar can be the stablizer and solid opener who can have 40 & 80 strike rate, along side an opener like fakhar or sharjeel 35 @ 115 he have a role, because fakhar sharjeel combo can be all or nothing type and too risky.

Had Bumrah stepped 3 inches behind, you would have seen the stabilization by Azhar. You are making the same mistake, which has resulted highest number of business failures in history - "Take a business decision as aftermath (result) of one incident, rather than looking from a strategic intent & long term sustainability".

Azhar isn't an ODI player - not because he doesn't have shots or can't rotate; rather because his core game isn't suited for ODI. It's the same thing I wrote several times - PAK under Misbah played a type of game that was against their core. Still they won - like a car running with burnt Mobil in it's piston.

This is a very good PAK side actually - Arthur/Sarfu has taken the out put to 90%+ level, hence going forward you'll see PAK winning many, many more matches as overall the team is good. But, it's those 10% close matches that are won by the extra edge, which 'll be missing with Azhar. Last thing PAK now should think about is stability & solidity - I thought 6 years of safety first strategy was enough. Attack is the best defense & that's what PAK team is good at - being positive & take the game to opponents. For last 2 matches, Azhar wasn't exposed, because Fakhar played a far better & impactful innings - recall the first 3 matches, when PAK was chasing, you should realize what'll happen the day Fakhar flops for a single digit score. It's not that after 20 years of cricket, at this mature age by some magic wand, Azhar has suddenly learned how to play ODI in a weeks period.

I explained it somewhere else (probably in some batting strategy) - the game that you are expecting from Azhar can suit IND, ENG, AUS or SAF, because they have explosive middle & late middle order. Amla or Rohit can take their time to reach 130/1 in 30 overs & then go at 10+ for last 20 - this is perfect for Azhar as well, he'll be happy to bat at 45/70 sort of stats, if you had Afridi, Razzak, Moin & Akram from 6 to 9. But, PAK team doesn't have that dynamic No. 3 to 6, neither explosive No. 7-9; therefore the strategy has to be on consistent scoring - something BD does, SRL does & PAK did exceptionally well in Final - that's maintain a RR around 5.5, till 35th over & then try to add 125 in last 15. For PAK, IT HAS TO BE top heavy scoring, so that middle & late order can build on that steadily.

Azhar can compete with only one spot - that's Babar. If he is better than Babar in that role, fair enough; otherwise he is at least 5th or 6th in my packing order as opener - definitely behind Fakhar, Sharjeel, Farhan, Amin, probably Sarfraz as well; could have been Umar too. In fact, if Shehzad finds his confidence back & ready to go after bowling without bothering for milestone, he'll do better than Azhar.
 
Can be, might be etc isnt good enough to ruin someone's career. Unless you know for sure that he is guilty from some secret sources :)

I like Sharjeel, but i honestly feel he did it and that a part of the PCB's mitigation strategy is to pin it all on Nasir and Khalid.

Not even the PCB is dumb to needlessly go after the guy who was probably the most popular pak player at the time.

True he may come out "innocent" but so was OJ.

We have to look at context

Personally i dont know what i want in regards to this situation.

One he is an exciting talent, on the other hand we possible have another Wasim situation here that in the long term has negative consequences
 
Replace Shahzad in the squad and push Sharjeel into Azhar's position.

Most quality ODI sides have guys who can take the game away at the top of the order.
 
principle. even if they dont have enough to ban him.
coincidentally, i think the future is somewhat rosy. you have sahibzada farhan to try out. maybe awais is not as hackey as everyone blvs. Apparently ppl are swooning over Umer Amin again (I am not convinced on that)

Moral aside, I have still not seen anybody in Pakistan (test/odi/psl/t20/fc what not) to pull and hook better than Sharjeel. That was his biggest advantage, he can pull wood/HW/Cumins at 150 clicks bumper for 4/6 on consistent basis. His one legged Carbean pull was not seen in Pakistan before, I don't remember when was the last time I saw Pakistani player pull like that... He scored in AUS for a reason. Fakhar was very good against spin and on the off against seamer, but ribcage was needs lot of work.

When you play pull and cut so well, then you get half volleys in deserts, that's why Sharjeel was so good in power play!! - He gives our batting a western touch. Even Indians or Lankans don't have player like him, who can whack seamers at will, ball one on consistent basis!!
 
Moral aside, I have still not seen anybody in Pakistan (test/odi/psl/t20/fc what not) to pull and hook better than Sharjeel. That was his biggest advantage, he can pull wood/HW/Cumins at 150 clicks bumper for 4/6 on consistent basis. His one legged Carbean pull was not seen in Pakistan before, I don't remember when was the last time I saw Pakistani player pull like that... He scored in AUS for a reason. Fakhar was very good against spin and on the off against seamer, but ribcage was needs lot of work.

When you play pull and cut so well, then you get half volleys in deserts, that's why Sharjeel was so good in power play!! - He gives our batting a western touch. Even Indians or Lankans don't have player like him, who can whack seamers at will, ball one on consistent basis!!

yeah i know. its painful, but the right would be to leave him out regardless of the outcome of the investigation.
 
all of a sudden it seems like pakistan have too many openers :P good headache to have, on a sidenote sharjeel will not be back.
 
Sharjeel to me knows how to play

With Fakhar your slightly scaired because the fast men can trouble him but sharjeel just plays like a legend and smashes everyone

TBH I would love both of them also they complement Babar superbly,Babar loves to bat with a leftie for some reason

Just imagine they would take us to 120/0 after 20 overs like its nothing to them then 300-340 totals are more easier and with our bowling,we are better then England in bowling it would become a killer team
 
Drop Azhar and Shehzad, bring in Farhan and Sharjeel (if he's fit). If he's still carrying lots of weight and isn't fit, then keep Azhar in the squad. Simple. Realistically we want our team to look something like this:

Fakhar
Sharjeel/Farhan
Babar
Haris
Talat
Sarfraz
Amir Yamin/Fahim Ashraf
Shadab
Amir
Hasan
Junaid/Bashir

Substitutes: Shoaib Malik, Fahim/Amir Yamin, Rumman, Imad, Azhar
 
What are the chances of him coming back? He has to come back! Pakistan's only chance of winning World Cup if we have the dream opening combo.
 
Anyone going to talk about how Shoaib malik needs to be offloaded? Hafeez can bat down the order from now on; like he did against india. As for Sharjeel, if he's proven innocent, throw shehzad out as he's totally useless. If Sharjeel is indeed banned, then find a new opener that can field well too because that's a must these days; everyone has to be able to move around the field well.
 
I think open with sharjeel and fakhar in t20s but not odis. In odis stick to azhar for the time being
 
Goof problem to have, 3 potential openers.

I dont see Malik staying for long, perhaps have Sharjeel come 1 down?
 
Had Bumrah stepped 3 inches behind, you would have seen the stabilization by Azhar. You are making the same mistake, which has resulted highest number of business failures in history - "Take a business decision as aftermath (result) of one incident, rather than looking from a strategic intent & long term sustainability".

Azhar isn't an ODI player - not because he doesn't have shots or can't rotate; rather because his core game isn't suited for ODI. It's the same thing I wrote several times - PAK under Misbah played a type of game that was against their core. Still they won - like a car running with burnt Mobil in it's piston.

This is a very good PAK side actually - Arthur/Sarfu has taken the out put to 90%+ level, hence going forward you'll see PAK winning many, many more matches as overall the team is good. But, it's those 10% close matches that are won by the extra edge, which 'll be missing with Azhar. Last thing PAK now should think about is stability & solidity - I thought 6 years of safety first strategy was enough. Attack is the best defense & that's what PAK team is good at - being positive & take the game to opponents. For last 2 matches, Azhar wasn't exposed, because Fakhar played a far better & impactful innings - recall the first 3 matches, when PAK was chasing, you should realize what'll happen the day Fakhar flops for a single digit score. It's not that after 20 years of cricket, at this mature age by some magic wand, Azhar has suddenly learned how to play ODI in a weeks period.

I explained it somewhere else (probably in some batting strategy) - the game that you are expecting from Azhar can suit IND, ENG, AUS or SAF, because they have explosive middle & late middle order. Amla or Rohit can take their time to reach 130/1 in 30 overs & then go at 10+ for last 20 - this is perfect for Azhar as well, he'll be happy to bat at 45/70 sort of stats, if you had Afridi, Razzak, Moin & Akram from 6 to 9. But, PAK team doesn't have that dynamic No. 3 to 6, neither explosive No. 7-9; therefore the strategy has to be on consistent scoring - something BD does, SRL does & PAK did exceptionally well in Final - that's maintain a RR around 5.5, till 35th over & then try to add 125 in last 15. For PAK, IT HAS TO BE top heavy scoring, so that middle & late order can build on that steadily.

Azhar can compete with only one spot - that's Babar. If he is better than Babar in that role, fair enough; otherwise he is at least 5th or 6th in my packing order as opener - definitely behind Fakhar, Sharjeel, Farhan, Amin, probably Sarfraz as well; could have been Umar too. In fact, if Shehzad finds his confidence back & ready to go after bowling without bothering for milestone, he'll do better than Azhar.

Pretty brilliant post.. I was kinda developing a soft spot for Azhar, but you're right- this CT was as good as well get from him. His core game just isn't suited for ODI
 
We don't need cheaters. If he's not guilty then I have no problems, but that's unlikely.

How is he a cheater even if found guilty?????

All he did was fail to report a bookie approaching him.

That's like a drug dealer coming to you and you failing to report him to the police.
 
It's my opinion that Sharjeel is a better player of pace while Fakhar is very good against spin. Fakhar has been tremendous but will get bogged down by short pitched stuff. Once Sharjeel provides a start Fakhar will keep that momentum going. Even for Lahore Qalandars Fakhar did not open.

I'd drop Malik and play Sharjeel and make him open with Azhar Ali with Babar at 3 and Fakhar at 4. I know most people will think it's silly but it's just an opinion based on how well he plays in the middle overs and how good Sharjeel is against pace.
Instead fakers try playing azhar in middle order to come the nerves down incase if top 3 fails. Get rid of hafeez and Malik, and give top 3 batsmen license to go.. just my thought
 
If he's cleared of any wrongdoing, I'd replace Azhar straight up. I would also add fawad/haris to the lineup and force malik and hafeez to retire if they don't do it by themselves. Hoping TTFs get moved out quicker now as Arthur will have more power to make bold decisions.
 
Two left handers opening? No chance.


Valid point, but there is a better solution in it. PAK's most effective opening pair were both lefti, but in current context, solution is even better.

What I have seen is that Zaman is very good against spinners & he can loft them at will. While, despite all his qualities, Babar isn't the best player of spin, and he can't butcher any bowling. Very much a touch player with very good all-round game, backed by timing, placement & shots on either feet.

This gives a perfect opportunity to put Babar as opener with SK, Zaman at 3, Sarfraz at 4. Ideally, Haris should bat at 5 & in 2 years time, PAK must find a hard hitting batsman at 6, who is very good runner between wicket as well. Ideal player was Umar, if he can make a genuine come back.

Number 7, should be an all-rounder - depending on wicket, should be a spin or pace all-rounder. Since next WC is in UK as well, it should be a race between Talat, Fahim, Aga Salman, Imad & Yamin (Or any better new kid). 8 to 11 is for specialist bowlers, regardless of their batting - fortunately for PAK, 3 of them can bat a bit - should improve further with a little more effort - Shadab, Amir, Hasan.

No. 11 should be Amir's partner - the 2nd best new ball bowler of the country,regardless of his batting capacity - at present JK is fine; may be in future Arthur will someone better.

2 Openers:
SK, Babar (Back - up: Farhan, Azhar)

3 Middle order:
Zaman, Sarf*+, Haris (Back-up: Amin)

1 Late Middle Order:
Umar (or new kid, like Saad Ali). Umar is preferable, because he can keep as emergency. It's a specialist position, therefore player at 6 shouldn't be picked on domestic stats built from batting at 3/4. MoHa/Malik can be an option, but doesn't look promising in 2 years time, in UK, when they'll reach 40+

1 All-rounder:
Talat, Fahim, Aga Salman, Yamin, Imad or any better new kid. Fahim bowls SLAO & probably a better turner than Imad, therefore, if it's a spin all-rounder, should be an offie, hence comes Aga Salman Ali.

3 Late Order (Bowling all-rounders)
Shadab, Amir, Hasan

1 Specialist bowler:
JK (Or any new kid)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ideal starting XI has, in batting:
- 5 lefti at 1, 3, 5, 7 & 9
- 2 explosive lefti in top 3, sandwiching the best batsman of the team with 50/90 sort of stats
- a very good accumulator, spin player & intelligent quick runner at 4
- 5-7 are solid all-round players of spin & pace, with hitting ability
- 8-10 are capable lower order player, with good hitting ability

in bowling:
- top quality new ball pair
- 3 very good exponents of old ball
- couple of good finisher
- variety in attack: right, left arm pacers, leggi, SLAO spinner & part-time offie

Also, just in case, a specialist batsman in playing XI, who can keep.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Absolute gun team - it'll take an upset to miss SF of 2019 at least, unless PCB decides to replace Arthur with a Deshi great & Captain Sarfu with a senior............

And, these players have to be polished under Arthur - leaving it for domestic (or other way, picking "seasoned & experienced" players from domestic style) will push it to again 8th/9th.
 
Zaman looks like a Better Player than Sharjeel. However there is a worrying lack of cricket in future since the Bangladesh tour got cancelled. More matches will allow us to get the right combination.
Same Question mark on Wahab's return, it looks like Junaid Khan is better than Wahab as he bowls both new & old ball, gets wickets and also contains. Amir and Hassan are now automatic selections.
 
Sharjeel and Fakhar will make neutrals tune in to watch Pakistan cricket. Remains to be seen if Sharjeel comes back, and if either can maintain their potential to justify that statement.

But man that is going to be arguably one of the most destructive opening pair going around. Surprised by Fakhar's assesment by fans here. He is a proper batsman with a proper temparament. Sharjeel will allow Fakhar to be as natural as he can be rather than the daredevil dasher we have seen this tournament.
 
He comes in for Azhar and in the playing 11.

Sharjeel and Fakhar will complement each other nicely because one is strong against pace, whilst the other is strong against spin.
 
Sharjeel and Babaar should open , I agree with [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION]

This is best interest for Pakistan.

I would really like to see Umar Amin in the mix as well , because he can be decent 4th seamer.
 
Had Bumrah stepped 3 inches behind, you would have seen the stabilization by Azhar. You are making the same mistake, which has resulted highest number of business failures in history - "Take a business decision as aftermath (result) of one incident, rather than looking from a strategic intent & long term sustainability".

Azhar isn't an ODI player - not because he doesn't have shots or can't rotate; rather because his core game isn't suited for ODI. It's the same thing I wrote several times - PAK under Misbah played a type of game that was against their core. Still they won - like a car running with burnt Mobil in it's piston.

This is a very good PAK side actually - Arthur/Sarfu has taken the out put to 90%+ level, hence going forward you'll see PAK winning many, many more matches as overall the team is good. But, it's those 10% close matches that are won by the extra edge, which 'll be missing with Azhar. Last thing PAK now should think about is stability & solidity - I thought 6 years of safety first strategy was enough. Attack is the best defense & that's what PAK team is good at - being positive & take the game to opponents. For last 2 matches, Azhar wasn't exposed, because Fakhar played a far better & impactful innings - recall the first 3 matches, when PAK was chasing, you should realize what'll happen the day Fakhar flops for a single digit score. It's not that after 20 years of cricket, at this mature age by some magic wand, Azhar has suddenly learned how to play ODI in a weeks period.

I explained it somewhere else (probably in some batting strategy) - the game that you are expecting from Azhar can suit IND, ENG, AUS or SAF, because they have explosive middle & late middle order. Amla or Rohit can take their time to reach 130/1 in 30 overs & then go at 10+ for last 20 - this is perfect for Azhar as well, he'll be happy to bat at 45/70 sort of stats, if you had Afridi, Razzak, Moin & Akram from 6 to 9. But, PAK team doesn't have that dynamic No. 3 to 6, neither explosive No. 7-9; therefore the strategy has to be on consistent scoring - something BD does, SRL does & PAK did exceptionally well in Final - that's maintain a RR around 5.5, till 35th over & then try to add 125 in last 15. For PAK, IT HAS TO BE top heavy scoring, so that middle & late order can build on that steadily.

Azhar can compete with only one spot - that's Babar. If he is better than Babar in that role, fair enough; otherwise he is at least 5th or 6th in my packing order as opener - definitely behind Fakhar, Sharjeel, Farhan, Amin, probably Sarfraz as well; could have been Umar too. In fact, if Shehzad finds his confidence back & ready to go after bowling without bothering for milestone, he'll do better than Azhar.

Post of the week.
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION]
 
It won't be easy for him to come back. The fact is even though PCB can't prove anything against him something fishy did happen, maybe he did spot fixing or maybe he just met the bookie.

However, a couple of players came forward (Irfan, Nawaz etc) who admitted meeting the bookie but not disclosing the info in time and hence got short bans. If they were to bring Sharjeel back immediately, who was the prime suspect of fixing it would send a horrible message to all those who came forward.

PCB will want to set an example this time around.
 
I don't like Azhar Ali in ODIs. However, if Sharjeel comes back to the side I would be alright with having Azhar Ali come in at number 3 while we open with Fakhar and Sharjeel.
 
When Sharjeel returns, he'll open with Fakhar. Simple as that.

Azhar is not needed in the team. We have to build a dynamic batting unit and Azhar does not fit into that long term.

Inzi/Arthur/Sarf should see if Sahibzada Farhan's game is versatile enough so that he can bat at 4. That would give us a helluva a top 4 for ODIs:

Sharjeel, Fakhar, Babar, Farhan ... all 4 guys can play fast bowlers with ease.
 
basically post CT this should be the ideal XI for ODIs:

Sharjeel
Fakhar
Babar
Farhan
Sarf
Imad
Faheem
Shadab
Amir
Hasan
Junaid

Reserves: Rumman, Haris, Amir Yamin, 2 more prospects.
 
Had Bumrah stepped 3 inches behind, you would have seen the stabilization by Azhar. You are making the same mistake, which has resulted highest number of business failures in history - "Take a business decision as aftermath (result) of one incident, rather than looking from a strategic intent & long term sustainability".

Azhar isn't an ODI player - not because he doesn't have shots or can't rotate; rather because his core game isn't suited for ODI. It's the same thing I wrote several times - PAK under Misbah played a type of game that was against their core. Still they won - like a car running with burnt Mobil in it's piston.

This is a very good PAK side actually - Arthur/Sarfu has taken the out put to 90%+ level, hence going forward you'll see PAK winning many, many more matches as overall the team is good. But, it's those 10% close matches that are won by the extra edge, which 'll be missing with Azhar. Last thing PAK now should think about is stability & solidity - I thought 6 years of safety first strategy was enough. Attack is the best defense & that's what PAK team is good at - being positive & take the game to opponents. For last 2 matches, Azhar wasn't exposed, because Fakhar played a far better & impactful innings - recall the first 3 matches, when PAK was chasing, you should realize what'll happen the day Fakhar flops for a single digit score. It's not that after 20 years of cricket, at this mature age by some magic wand, Azhar has suddenly learned how to play ODI in a weeks period.

I explained it somewhere else (probably in some batting strategy) - the game that you are expecting from Azhar can suit IND, ENG, AUS or SAF, because they have explosive middle & late middle order. Amla or Rohit can take their time to reach 130/1 in 30 overs & then go at 10+ for last 20 - this is perfect for Azhar as well, he'll be happy to bat at 45/70 sort of stats, if you had Afridi, Razzak, Moin & Akram from 6 to 9. But, PAK team doesn't have that dynamic No. 3 to 6, neither explosive No. 7-9; therefore the strategy has to be on consistent scoring - something BD does, SRL does & PAK did exceptionally well in Final - that's maintain a RR around 5.5, till 35th over & then try to add 125 in last 15. For PAK, IT HAS TO BE top heavy scoring, so that middle & late order can build on that steadily.

Azhar can compete with only one spot - that's Babar. If he is better than Babar in that role, fair enough; otherwise he is at least 5th or 6th in my packing order as opener - definitely behind Fakhar, Sharjeel, Farhan, Amin, probably Sarfraz as well; could have been Umar too. In fact, if Shehzad finds his confidence back & ready to go after bowling without bothering for milestone, he'll do better than Azhar.

Hit the nail on its head, spot on !!
 
Sharjeel (Most fit cricketer in the world)
Fakhar (Most experienced cricketer in the world)
Babar (Most consistent cricketer in the world)
Sahibzada (?)
Sarfraz (Most smartest cricketer in the world)
Open Slot (?)
Faheem (Most aggressive cricketer in the world)
Shadab (Most talented cricketer in the world)
Aamer (Most honest cricketer in the world)
Hasan (Most passionate cricketer in the world)
Open Slot (Junaid/Rumman/Shinwari)
 
Instead fakers try playing azhar in middle order to come the nerves down incase if top 3 fails. Get rid of hafeez and Malik, and give top 3 batsmen license to go.. just my thought

Azhar is not that good a player of spin and will just slow the momentum which could have been built up by Fakhar and Sharjeel if they are opening. The whole idea and thought process is that Azhar up the order plays the sedate role and Sharjeel on the other hand goes after the pace bowlers. In case he gets out, Babar Azam and Azhar can consolidate before Fakhar comes in at 4. In PSL Fakhar did not open and did a very good job in the middle order as well.
 
Had Bumrah stepped 3 inches behind, you would have seen the stabilization by Azhar. You are making the same mistake, which has resulted highest number of business failures in history - "Take a business decision as aftermath (result) of one incident, rather than looking from a strategic intent & long term sustainability".

Azhar isn't an ODI player - not because he doesn't have shots or can't rotate; rather because his core game isn't suited for ODI. It's the same thing I wrote several times - PAK under Misbah played a type of game that was against their core. Still they won - like a car running with burnt Mobil in it's piston.

This is a very good PAK side actually - Arthur/Sarfu has taken the out put to 90%+ level, hence going forward you'll see PAK winning many, many more matches as overall the team is good. But, it's those 10% close matches that are won by the extra edge, which 'll be missing with Azhar. Last thing PAK now should think about is stability & solidity - I thought 6 years of safety first strategy was enough. Attack is the best defense & that's what PAK team is good at - being positive & take the game to opponents. For last 2 matches, Azhar wasn't exposed, because Fakhar played a far better & impactful innings - recall the first 3 matches, when PAK was chasing, you should realize what'll happen the day Fakhar flops for a single digit score. It's not that after 20 years of cricket, at this mature age by some magic wand, Azhar has suddenly learned how to play ODI in a weeks period.

I explained it somewhere else (probably in some batting strategy) - the game that you are expecting from Azhar can suit IND, ENG, AUS or SAF, because they have explosive middle & late middle order. Amla or Rohit can take their time to reach 130/1 in 30 overs & then go at 10+ for last 20 - this is perfect for Azhar as well, he'll be happy to bat at 45/70 sort of stats, if you had Afridi, Razzak, Moin & Akram from 6 to 9. But, PAK team doesn't have that dynamic No. 3 to 6, neither explosive No. 7-9; therefore the strategy has to be on consistent scoring - something BD does, SRL does & PAK did exceptionally well in Final - that's maintain a RR around 5.5, till 35th over & then try to add 125 in last 15. For PAK, IT HAS TO BE top heavy scoring, so that middle & late order can build on that steadily.

Azhar can compete with only one spot - that's Babar. If he is better than Babar in that role, fair enough; otherwise he is at least 5th or 6th in my packing order as opener - definitely behind Fakhar, Sharjeel, Farhan, Amin, probably Sarfraz as well; could have been Umar too. In fact, if Shehzad finds his confidence back & ready to go after bowling without bothering for milestone, he'll do better than Azhar.

I agree with what you are saying but sometimes you have to know what the outcome of the future is and prepare for that and deal with it in the best possible way. Fact is Azhar won't be dropped after the Champions Trophy. He will have to have some bad games before he is considered being dropped and it is something I am sure of.
 
Sharjeel is still the find of the last 5 years for us. Seems like he's dealt with his case better than most of our players..hoping he returns.
 
If Sharjeel returns to the team, I hope he has to conform to the fitness guidelines.

[When were they instituted? And were they just not enforced for him? Looks can be deceiving, but Umar Akmal looks in significantly better shape].

Looking at him, he needs to lose 30-40 Kilos and maybe train to retain power hitting strength to at least look like someone who plays professional sport for a living.
 
Back
Top