What's new

Which is the best overall Test match bowling effort by an overseas pace bowler in Australia?

Harsh Thakor

First Class Star
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Runs
3,519
Post of the Week
2
In order of merit this is my pick of the best test match bowling performances counting both the innings in a test match in Australia by an overseas pace bowler.It has excluded only one sensational spell and only counted performances of great spells in both innings.Only included 10 wicket hauls and basically 5 wicket hauls in both innings of a single test match.Excluded best spells of Ambrose and Sarafraz Nawaz as they were outstanding in only one innings.



1.Richard Hadlee's 9-52 and 6-71at Brisbane in 1985-86

Displayed control at it's supreme zenith bewildering opponents with sideways movement.




2.Imran Khan's -6-63 and 6-102 at Sydney in 1976-77

One of the greatest marathon spells of pace bowling ever displaying the heart of a lion .Above all created history for Pakistan who won their 1st test ever on Australian soil and drew a rubber there for the 1st time.



3.Malcolm Marshall's 5-69 and 5-38 at Adelaide in 1984-85

Exhibition of pace bowing at it's epitome of perfection be it bounce,pace ,swing or cut.Dismissed the likes of David Boon , Keppler Wesels and Alan Border with deliveries that could be preserved in a museum creating unplayable skidding bounce.On a flat track the exhibition of a genius.




4.Wasim Akram's 6-62 and 5-98 at Melbourne in 1989090

For sheer prowess the best bowling I have ever sen by a paceman,taking the art of fast bowling to it's highest zenith.Never in Australia did a pace bower display as much variety or as much mastery of the art of reverse swing .Wasim's bowling posessed every ingredient of a perfect fast bower be it speed,bounce.control,accuracy,movement or variations.Displayed skill of a magician when trapping David Boon,and getting Steve Waugh caught behind.Also dismised Mark Taylor and Alan Border with gems.Placed below Marshall's and Imran's hauls because Pakistan lost the test.



5.Michael Holding's 6-62 and 5-45 at Melbourne in 1981-82


Never in Australia has a paceman blended speed through the air with accuracy and movement or grace as Holding did here.For sheer artistry should have been preserved in a museum.The ball came slithering through at a blistering speed inspite of an absolutely effortless action reminiscent of a swan swimming.


6.Curtly Ambrose's 6-74 and 4-46 in 1992-93 at Adelaide

Lethal combination of pace ,bounce and accuracy .Created a sensational twist to the tale.



7.Ian Botham's 6-78 and 5-98 at Perth in 1979-80

England lost but Botham displayed mastery in foxing batsmen with his intelligent swing and changes of pace.
 
Difficult to go past Hadlee

Won the series singlehanded
 
I'll give it to Hadlee.

He was immense on that 85-86 tour. Took 33 wickets at an average of 12 - and that was just a 3 Test series !
 
I'll give it to Hadlee.

He was immense on that 85-86 tour. Took 33 wickets at an average of 12 - and that was just a 3 Test series !
You also have to consider the strength of the Aussie sides though

The 85-86 side was arguably one of the weakest Aussie sides in last 30 years

Others did it against much better sides
 
People talk about Ishant Sharma's spell and how he ended Ricky Ponting's career, why isn't Lord Ishant Sharma mentioned here?
 
Not the best spell but deserves a mention. Ajit Agarkar in 2003/2004 tour. He took a 6-fer in the second inning and india won that match.
 
Not the best spell but deserves a mention. Ajit Agarkar in 2003/2004 tour. He took a 6-fer in the second inning and india won that match.

If any fast bowler ever stepped up for India when actually needed , it was ajit in that spell. One of the best fast bowling display by an Indian and one of the biggest contribution by any Indian fast bowler in Australia.
 
Based on the quality of the Aussie team, their dominance over the opposition (Pak in this case), first ever test win on Aussie soil, career defining moment for the bowler, scary as heck fast bowling display etc. it is hard to look beyond Imrtan's 6 wickets each in Sydney 1976.

Several Aussie players were quoted as saying he bowled faster than anyone they had seen and this for a team with Lillee in it and Thompson (who didn't play in this test due to injury in last test I think) means a lot:

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/63181.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Probably our first drawn series there,not much talked about series i wud say.

That's because not many "Shinning star" in that Generation - Cricket media in India still didn't know how to milk mass peoples' emotion with "Icons".

In that Test, a certain VR Vishi scored 114 on Day 1 of a MCG Test, which is still among top 4/5 away innings played by any Indian ever in Test matches in terms of quality of defense & shot selection, which I am sure 90% posters here don't even know.
 
That's because not many "Shinning star" in that Generation - Cricket media in India still didn't know how to milk mass peoples' emotion with "Icons".

In that Test, a certain VR Vishi scored 114 on Day 1 of a MCG Test, which is still among top 4/5 away innings played by any Indian ever in Test matches in terms of quality of defense & shot selection, which I am sure 90% posters here don't even know.

Yup I guess everyone just remembers the Gavaskar drama,tbf though he did say some years ago that he regrets it.

Vishi,Jimmi are not even known among young Indian cricket fans today.
 
Yup I guess everyone just remembers the Gavaskar drama,tbf though he did say some years ago that he regrets it.

Vishi,Jimmi are not even known among young Indian cricket fans today.

Who is Gunddappa Vishwanath? Even Nair has a triple in Test ............
 
That's because not many "Shinning star" in that Generation - Cricket media in India still didn't know how to milk mass peoples' emotion with "Icons".

In that Test, a certain VR Vishi scored 114 on Day 1 of a MCG Test, which is still among top 4/5 away innings played by any Indian ever in Test matches in terms of quality of defense & shot selection, which I am sure 90% posters here don't even know.

Sir how much do you know about Indian sports that you pass such comments?Before 1983 Hockey was the pre eminent sports in India,it was because cricket hadnt achieved much in India.It was only after Indian won the WC that cricket rose in popularity.

Milking people's emotion with ICONS and whatever rubbish you wrote.
 
Sir how much do you know about Indian sports that you pass such comments?Before 1983 Hockey was the pre eminent sports in India,it was because cricket hadnt achieved much in India.It was only after Indian won the WC that cricket rose in popularity.

Milking people's emotion with ICONS and whatever rubbish you wrote.

Lala Amarnath was the biggest star even in 1930s when there was Captain Dhyan Chand & check your self where was Vinnu Mankad in 1950s, when PK Banarjee was awarded Asian footballer of Asiad. Then comes Tiger Pataudi in 60s & Gavaskar in 70s - compare them with Indian hockey stars in 1960s & 1970s.

Any way, I guess you have a PHd on Indian sports history - post 8 names of Indian Hockey Team that won Olympic Gold in 1980 or WC Hockey in 1975, and I am not going even in 1920s, 1930s, 1950s & 1960s. I trust your integrity that you'll respond without Googling it :(
 
Lala Amarnath was the biggest star even in 1930s when there was Captain Dhyan Chand & check your self where was Vinnu Mankad in 1950s, when PK Banarjee was awarded Asian footballer of Asiad. Then comes Tiger Pataudi in 60s & Gavaskar in 70s - compare them with Indian hockey stars in 1960s & 1970s.

Any way, I guess you have a PHd on Indian sports history - post 8 names of Indian Hockey Team that won Olympic Gold in 1980 or WC Hockey in 1975, and I am not going even in 1920s, 1930s, 1950s & 1960s. I trust your integrity that you'll respond without Googling it :(

Lala Saheb wasnt the biggest star,it was Dhyanchand.He had similar status like Tendulkar,no one was even close. PK Bannerjee did a lot for football in India and he was the best striker of his times in Asia,with all due respect to Vinoo Mankad he wasnt that good. Gavaskar was the first real star of Indian cricket,even though we had world class spin quatret playing before him.

I dont have a Phd in Indian Hockey,but anyone who grew up in 80s will tell you that it was the most popular sport.Far more Popular than Cricket.Infact in my city,a East Bengal club vs Mohan Bagan club derby will have more people than a Indian test match.

Regarding the players of the Hockey teams in 1980 Olympics i can name V Baskaran,Mohammaed Shahid,Zafar Iqbal and Krishan Kumar.I am not sure whether Gurmail singh was part of the team or not.
 
Mohammad Amir at the Gabba and MCG in 2016, but luck was not on his side.
 
Lala Saheb wasnt the biggest star,it was Dhyanchand.He had similar status like Tendulkar,no one was even close. PK Bannerjee did a lot for football in India and he was the best striker of his times in Asia,with all due respect to Vinoo Mankad he wasnt that good. Gavaskar was the first real star of Indian cricket,even though we had world class spin quatret playing before him.

I dont have a Phd in Indian Hockey,but anyone who grew up in 80s will tell you that it was the most popular sport.Far more Popular than Cricket.Infact in my city,a East Bengal club vs Mohan Bagan club derby will have more people than a Indian test match.

Regarding the players of the Hockey teams in 1980 Olympics i can name V Baskaran,Mohammaed Shahid,Zafar Iqbal and Krishan Kumar.I am not sure whether Gurmail singh was part of the team or not.

Good, this is proper way to response.

Seems like, you are from Calcutta (Now Kolkata), which had been traditionally a great Soccer City. One reason for that is British first introduced Soccer in wet part of South Asia & Cricket in drier part - which eventually spread out every where. Still, Soccer is most popular in Kerala, Assam & Eastern States; even in Bengal it's extremely popular. East Bengal vs Mohan Baghan (& Mohammedan as well) derby had different perspective - for a multi racial Mega City like Calcutta, there were 4 different sections of Soccer Society - Bengali Hindu community established Mohanbaghan AC, probably in 1888; British & Firingi community had Arian (& Toly Ganj as well), while Muslims established Mohammedan sometimes in early 1900s. Then, 1905 incident resulted mass migration in Bengal - lots of East Bengal Hindu family (called Bangal) migrated to west side & same for Bengali speaking Muslim families to east. Those migrated East Bengal people formed their own Club with Hilsha fish as Club mascot, sometimes in 1920s. Since then, more than soccer, it had few other rivalry as well.

Coming to cricket popularity in Kolkatta, I won't agree with you, but won't argue with someone living in that City. But, I can tell 3 facts of Calcutta - sometimes in 1970s, 60K+ paid crowd turned on Day 5, to watch India scoring about 15 runs to win a Test against England. CP (Then Calcutta Police) was called to manage crowd when Imran landed there with Asif Iqbal's team in 1979. In 50s, Calcutta's biggest sports icon wasn't the footballers - it was Pankj Roy. I am not sure, if you are aware of who was Joidip Mukherjee....

Coming to cricket - it had always been the glamour sports in India. The biggest difference is, Cricket, at least before 70s, was mostly a Metro sports, which is actually common in every South Asian County - Karachi, Lahore, Colombo, Dhaka ... out side that, it wasn't that much for the complexity of the game & cost of gears. I have written several times that BCB's biggest success in last 10-15 years is to expand the game to remote corners from the confined Metro areas of Dhaka/Chittagong.

When Lala scored his hundred in 1934 Bombay Test ... I can write lot on that, but you can also google it, not much value addition from me. Compared to the achievement of Dhayan Chand to any other sportsman - the gap between his & Lala, Merchant or CK Naydu's status only proves how much cricket stars were pampered. It's like Messi vs Manu Ginobli or Scola - then check their respective popularity in Argentina. I reserve my comments on AV Mankad, as I can see what you have done here - clicked Vinnu Mankad's CricInfo profile:) Cricket was the esteem sports even 100+ years back - undivided India's first sports icon was KS Ranji, after that Prof. Deodhar. Regarding the status of top cricketers in India, before Gavaskar, may be Anju Mahendra, Sharmila Tagore or Zinat Aman would disagree with you.

Anyway, in recent times, particularly after hammering Poms, & Aussies waiting for their share - I can see lots of bullish words for young generation on Indian cricket fans - particularly when it comes to India's poor performance in earlier days, Head to heads & domination of current team, compared to olden generation. I can list few -
1. Now 25% people play cricket in India, previously 5% - so it justifies 7th position in W/L, which is improving - going forward, it's going to dominate, because of the extra talent, rather than the reality is Cricket is a dying sports in previous dominant countries
2. Cricket became popular after 1983 WC, though India started Test cricket in 1933, & WC started in 1975
3. It's only in last 30-35 years Cricket has become the crowd puller India, before then, it was a side game
4. Current generation is the aggressive shers, who has the nails & fangs to bite back, previous generation was ...

Well, I have enough patience - studying this game for almost 3 decades now; easily can wait for couple of years - after Kohli's team finishes their SAF, ENG, AUS & NZ tours - may be we'll have a change of mind again after that.

Thanks, never mind, if I have hurt you.
 
Good, this is proper way to response.

Seems like, you are from Calcutta (Now Kolkata), which had been traditionally a great Soccer City. One reason for that is British first introduced Soccer in wet part of South Asia & Cricket in drier part - which eventually spread out every where. Still, Soccer is most popular in Kerala, Assam & Eastern States; even in Bengal it's extremely popular. East Bengal vs Mohan Baghan (& Mohammedan as well) derby had different perspective - for a multi racial Mega City like Calcutta, there were 4 different sections of Soccer Society - Bengali Hindu community established Mohanbaghan AC, probably in 1888; British & Firingi community had Arian (& Toly Ganj as well), while Muslims established Mohammedan sometimes in early 1900s. Then, 1905 incident resulted mass migration in Bengal - lots of East Bengal Hindu family (called Bangal) migrated to west side & same for Bengali speaking Muslim families to east. Those migrated East Bengal people formed their own Club with Hilsha fish as Club mascot, sometimes in 1920s. Since then, more than soccer, it had few other rivalry as well.

Coming to cricket popularity in Kolkatta, I won't agree with you, but won't argue with someone living in that City. But, I can tell 3 facts of Calcutta - sometimes in 1970s, 60K+ paid crowd turned on Day 5, to watch India scoring about 15 runs to win a Test against England. CP (Then Calcutta Police) was called to manage crowd when Imran landed there with Asif Iqbal's team in 1979. In 50s, Calcutta's biggest sports icon wasn't the footballers - it was Pankj Roy. I am not sure, if you are aware of who was Joidip Mukherjee....

Coming to cricket - it had always been the glamour sports in India. The biggest difference is, Cricket, at least before 70s, was mostly a Metro sports, which is actually common in every South Asian County - Karachi, Lahore, Colombo, Dhaka ... out side that, it wasn't that much for the complexity of the game & cost of gears. I have written several times that BCB's biggest success in last 10-15 years is to expand the game to remote corners from the confined Metro areas of Dhaka/Chittagong.

When Lala scored his hundred in 1934 Bombay Test ... I can write lot on that, but you can also google it, not much value addition from me. Compared to the achievement of Dhayan Chand to any other sportsman - the gap between his & Lala, Merchant or CK Naydu's status only proves how much cricket stars were pampered. It's like Messi vs Manu Ginobli or Scola - then check their respective popularity in Argentina. I reserve my comments on AV Mankad, as I can see what you have done here - clicked Vinnu Mankad's CricInfo profile:) Cricket was the esteem sports even 100+ years back - undivided India's first sports icon was KS Ranji, after that Prof. Deodhar. Regarding the status of top cricketers in India, before Gavaskar, may be Anju Mahendra, Sharmila Tagore or Zinat Aman would disagree with you.

Anyway, in recent times, particularly after hammering Poms, & Aussies waiting for their share - I can see lots of bullish words for young generation on Indian cricket fans - particularly when it comes to India's poor performance in earlier days, Head to heads & domination of current team, compared to olden generation. I can list few -
1. Now 25% people play cricket in India, previously 5% - so it justifies 7th position in W/L, which is improving - going forward, it's going to dominate, because of the extra talent, rather than the reality is Cricket is a dying sports in previous dominant countries
2. Cricket became popular after 1983 WC, though India started Test cricket in 1933, & WC started in 1975
3. It's only in last 30-35 years Cricket has become the crowd puller India, before then, it was a side game
4. Current generation is the aggressive shers, who has the nails & fangs to bite back, previous generation was ...

Well, I have enough patience - studying this game for almost 3 decades now; easily can wait for couple of years - after Kohli's team finishes their SAF, ENG, AUS & NZ tours - may be we'll have a change of mind again after that.

Thanks, never mind, if I have hurt you.

as far as kolkata is concerned football is possibly even now more popular sport.if you have the chance to meet guys from our age-group, you will see that messi vs ronaldo is a much bigger debate than root vs kohli or sachin vs lara. and till 90's there was no contest between football and cricket in the 97 or 98 shield final there were at least 100000 people in the stadium. no cricket match have ever recorded this kind of audience in kolkata. even now there are reports of fans demising due to their clubs losing.cricket has never given rise to this kind of emotions. dada did popularize cricket in his playing days, butthat was more love for dada than indian cricket team. we even booed the indian team and supported the opposition in the chappell era
 
as far as kolkata is concerned football is possibly even now more popular sport.if you have the chance to meet guys from our age-group, you will see that messi vs ronaldo is a much bigger debate than root vs kohli or sachin vs lara. and till 90's there was no contest between football and cricket in the 97 or 98 shield final there were at least 100000 people in the stadium. no cricket match have ever recorded this kind of audience in kolkata. even now there are reports of fans demising due to their clubs losing.cricket has never given rise to this kind of emotions. dada did popularize cricket in his playing days, butthat was more love for dada than indian cricket team. we even booed the indian team and supported the opposition in the chappell era

I know a bit, had been in Kolkata several times - in fact, I watched a derby at Salt Lake, when Bichung returned to EB from MB. I think, now, Metro Koltata has almost 35-40% non Bengali people - from Punjab, Gujrat, Bihar & UP; which has balanced it in favor of Cricket.
 
How about Ambrose taking 7 wickets for 1 run in 32 balls ? :AAG

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63594.html


I agree Ambrose's Perth effort was the best ever single innings spell possibly but not overall in test match.I have considered both the innings of a test match.Ambrose took 9 wickets overall in the game and like Sarfraz Nawaz at MCG in 1978-79 was not outstanding in the other innings.
 
I agree Ambrose's Perth effort was the best ever single innings spell possibly but not overall in test match.I have considered both the innings of a test match.Ambrose took 9 wickets overall in the game and like Sarfraz Nawaz at MCG in 1978-79 was not outstanding in the other innings.

Sarfraz also took 7 for 1, but yes, neither these two matches should be considered in top 10.

I am stuck between Hadlee, Imran & Wasim - probably will go for Imran, as it won a Test to tie the Series against the best side that time.

I think, what you have done is to avoid any match before 1970s, which is fair enough - we haven't seen much. Not going beyond WW2, but what about Tyson in 1954?
 
Daniyals performance against C5! Absolute joy to watch the youngster get such bounce on a dead wicket. He will be the next Malcolm Marshall!
 
AJITH AGARKAR 6 for and India WON the match:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4y7v_jJCrSA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Back
Top