Which side has the best tailenders in ODIs at the moment?

[Sean143]

my order would be
1-England
2-Pakistan
3-South Africa
4-Australia
5-New Zealand
6-India
7-Windies
8-Sri Lanka
9-Afghanistan
10-Bangladesh
what would be your order?

 

[volcyz]

So no NZ

 

[Sean143]

So no NZ

Added NZ now must have missed by mistake.How can I forget Matt Henry and CO's charge against Pakistan

 

[Gilly]

Over the last year batting averages for batsmen 7-11

England
India
Australia
South Africa
New Zealand
Bangladesh
Pakistan
West Indies
Sri Lanka

 

[volcyz]

Added NZ now must have missed by mistake.How can I forget Matt Henry and CO's charge against Pakistan

Haha yep
was just being cheeky

 

[Hasan123]

England but most of the time they have bowling all rounders at the end of there order.

 

[UN talkz]

Pakistan

 

[Syed1]

7. Shadab
8. Fahim
9. Hasan
10. Amir



I'll wait for you to come up a better lower order.

 

[BunnyRabbit]

England
New Zealand

 

[hadi123]

England. Players who are in the team for their bowling such as Rashid, Plunkett all have at least 1 FC century.

 

[blue_champion]

Given Pakistan’s tail starts pretty early they probably have the strongest tail

 

[Syed1]

Given Pakistan’s tail starts pretty early they probably have the strongest tail

Our early tail was enough for you last time

 

[TeymurBlake]

England is definitely no.1 as most of there low order are considered allrounders. Moeen at No.7, Woakes No.8, Willey No.9, Plunkett No.10 and Rashid No.11. Thats pretty good. All the others are behind them. Pakistan have to ability to be really tailenders bar no.11 who could be Rumman Raees, Junaid Khan or Usman Khan.

 

[Buffet]

Over the last year batting averages for batsmen 7-11

England
India
Australia
South Africa
New Zealand
Bangladesh
Pakistan
West Indies
Sri Lanka

You listed actual performance. What about ranking based on talent and potential?

 

[rashmin]

Our early tail was enough for you last time

Of course, how to think beyond that match???

 

[Gilly]

You listed actual performance. What about ranking based on talent and potential?

Talent and potential is what delivers results from the actual performance.

 

[Gilly]

You listed actual performance. What about ranking based on talent and potential?

I'll give you a good reason why you cant rank players on talent and potential.

6 years ago Steve Smith was ranked on his potential and talent, how did that work out.

 

[Aman]

We have the best number 11 in world cricket.

 

[Buffet]

Talent and potential is what delivers results from the actual performance.

Many posters ignore facts and you listed facts. It was a tongue-in-cheek comment