What's new

Who was the better cricketer overall? Wasim Akram or Richard Hadlee?

Harsh Thakor

First Class Star
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Runs
3,519
Post of the Week
2
Wasim Akram and Richard Hadlee were both cricketing geniuses similar in some ways different in others.

Both were attacking batsmen with ability to score fifties and centuries at their best.Often they were effective in ODI's as batsmen with their hitting prowess.Both were best at fast -medium and captured over 400 scalps.

Hadlee had more control,accuracy and consistency.To put the ball in the spot Richard was the ultimate master.However Wasim had more subtle variations,greater mastery of reverse swing and thus overall more versatile.Richard would win on a green top by a margin but on flat deck Wasim was the more capable.Hadlee could outthink a great batsmen more like a computer programmed while Wasim could overpower a great oponent playing the tricks of a magician.Hadlee was a technician,Wasim was a wizard.


Statistically in test cricket Hadlee was significantly better taking 432 scalps in 86 games at an average of 22.29 with seven 10 wicket hauls and 36 five wicket hauls .Wasim had 414 scalps in 105 tests at an average of 23.62 with 25 five wicket hauls.Hadlee also had better figures in his peak period from 1978-88 than Wasim did in his peak era from 1990-98.However Wasim played more than half his tests on flat sub-continent tracks while the majority of Hadlee's scalps were on green tops in New Zealand and Australia.Hadlee also bore the brunt of a very weak bowling attack while Wasim bowled alongside great bowlers like Waqar,Saqlain.Imran etc.Neverthless statistically Hadlee won the battle with Wasim as a test bowler.

In ODI's Wasim is a clear winner but Hadlee hardly played ODI cricket as much.Still Richard was the more economical.

Great batsmen found Wasim more challenging or daunting with his incredible repertoire be it Viv Richards,Sunil Gavaskar or Brian Lara.In his era great batsmen found iit more challenging to face Lillee or Marshall or even Roberts than Hadlee.


As a batsmen Hadlee was the more consistent or durable although Wasim was the more talented.At his best i would prefer Wasim to Richard as a pure batsmen.

Wasim ,unlike Hadlee was the captain of his team and a relatively successful one.Led his team to claim runner up berth in 1999 world cup and win test series v West Indies at home and England on their home soil.

In the final analysis by a margin less than a whisker I would choose Wasim Akram.Even not combining ODI's I feel it is Wasim who would be more impactful ,particularly on sub-continent flat decks.Hadlee would win it in test cricket on stats but they do not always convey the true story.Combining ODI'S Wasim would win by a slender margin taking into consideration his contribution in world cups and staggering stats.

STATISTICS FROM S.RAJESH OF CRICINFO


WASIM AKRAM

With 326 ODI wickets in wins, Akram is next only to Muralitharan in this regard. He's clearly one of the greatest matchwinners in ODIs, averaging less than 19 at a run rate of 3.70. Among bowlers with at least 150 wickets in wins, only four bowlers have a better average.

Akram's ODI career Period Matches Wickets Average Econ rate 4+ wkts
Till Dec 1991 107 143 23.97 3.84 5
Jan 1992 - Dec 1997 131 198 21.86 3.76 14
Jan 1998 onwards 118 161 25.17 4.09 4
Career 356 502 23.52 3.89 23

Best bowling averages in wins in ODIs (Qual: 150 wickets) Bowler ODIs Wickets Average Econ rate 4+ wkts
Saqlain Mushtaq 93 188 15.84 3.78 11
Glenn McGrath 171 301 17.94 3.65 15
Muttiah Muralitharan 191 347 18.08 3.63 21
Waqar Younis 149 278 18.76 4.33 21
Wasim Akram 199 326 18.86 3.70 18
Allan Donald 108 195 19.05 3.96 10

During that eight-year period from 1990 to 1997, Akram had the best figures in Test cricket, barring none. There were several legendary bowlers who were at the height of their craft during an era which we now look back on as a golden one for bowlers, especially the fast ones - Curtly Ambrose, Allan Donald, Waqar Younis and Glenn McGrath were all around, but Akram's stats stood out even among them. His average of 20.05 was better than anyone else's during this period (with a cut-off of 150 wickets); in terms of strike rate, only Waqar was ahead.

During these eight years, Akram was Man of the Match in 12 of the 48 Tests he played, an incredible average of one every four games. Eight of these were in overseas Tests, including the game in Melbourne and the next one in Adelaide, when he turned in an outstanding all-round performance, taking six wickets and scoring 52 and 123. At the time it was only the 12th instance of a player scoring 150 or more and taking six or more wickets in a Test.

Best Test bowlers between Jan 1990 and Dec 1997 (Qual: 150 wickets) Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Wasim Akram 48 240 20.05 46.4 16/ 3
Curtly Ambrose 57 247 20.50 52.8 17/ 3
Waqar Younis 46 232 21.23 40.1 19/ 4
Allan Donald 36 171 23.27 48.8 9/ 2

Akram's genius and his ability to burst through batting line-ups is obvious from the fact that he has taken two hat-tricks in Tests and ODIs, the only bowler to do so. He finished with 22 Man-of-the-Match awards in ODIs, which isn't anywhere near Sachin Tendulkar's 61, but it's a significant number considering the fact that ODIs are usually dominated by batsmen. In fact, Akram and Shaun Pollock (who also has 22) have the highest number of awards among players whose major suit isn't batting.

Overall, he won 17 Man-of-the-Match and seven Man-of-the-Series awards, both of which are among the highest. Even better, his rate of winning these awards, one every six Tests, is the best among those who've won at least ten such prizes.

Highest frequency of MoM awards in Tests (Qual: 10 awards) Player Tests MoM awards Tests per award
Wasim Akram 104 17 6.12
Jacques Kallis 137 20 6.85
Muttiah Muralitharan 132 19 6.95
Curtly Ambrose 98 14 7.00
Imran Khan 88 11 8.00
Malcolm Marshall 81 10 8.10

Like most fast bowlers from Pakistan, Akram too mastered the art of bowling grassless pitches, where reverse swing becomes a most potent weapon. He is one of only four bowlers to take more than 150 wickets in Pakistan, while in the three major subcontinent countries, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, his average was marginally better than his overall career average.

Best Test fast bowlers in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka (Qual: 100 wkts) Bowler Tests Wkts Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Imran Khan 51 205 20.28 48.8 12/ 3
Waqar Younis 41 191 21.07 39.2 13/ 4
Wasim Akram 57 211 22.67 52.9 11/ 1
Shoaib Akhtar 26 108 24.87 45.2 6/ 1



RICHARD HADLEE

There were several outstanding bowlers who were at the peak of their powers in the 1980s, but even among them Hadlee stood out. In the 11-year period between 1978 and 1988, his average of 19.57 was bettered only by Imran. Malcolm Marshall and Joel Garner had a slightly higher average, while Kapil and Botham find themselves at the bottom of the table below, with their averages almost 10 higher than Hadlee's.

Best Test bowlers between Jan 1978 and Dec 1988 (Qual: 150 wickets) Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Imran Khan 58 272 19.39 47.8 19/ 5
Richard Hadlee 60 330 19.57 48.4 32/ 8
Joel Garner 53 234 20.27 50.6 7/ 0
Malcolm Marshall 61 300 20.88 45.8 18/ 3
Michael Holding 47 192 23.69 50.8 9/ 1
Dennis Lillee 38 184 24.32 52.6 11/ 3


Best averages in Test wins (Qual: 150 wickets) Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Richard Hadlee 22 173 13.06 33.5 17/ 8
Imran Khan 26 155 14.50 38.3 11/ 6
Muttiah Muralitharan 53 430 16.03 42.6 40/ 18
Malcolm Marshall 43 254 16.78 38.1 17/ 4
Allan Donald 33 187 16.79 35.5 14/ 3
Curtly Ambrose 44 229 16.86 44.4 13/ 3

Best overseas fast bowlers in Tests in Asia since 1970 (Qual: 50 wickets) Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Courtney Walsh 17 77 20.53 45.2 5/ 0
Dale Steyn 11 57 21.33 34.7 4/ 1
Richard Hadlee 13 68 21.58 42.7 5/ 2
Glenn McGrath 19 72 23.02 54.8 1/ 0

Bowling was clearly his best suit, but Hadlee was a pretty handy batsman as well, especially during the second half of his career. In his last 46 Tests he averaged an impressive 33.16, which was an improvement of more than 50% over his average in his first 40 Tests. His only Test century came during this period too, when he scored an unbeaten 151 against Sri Lanka in Colombo in 1987.

Richard Hadlee's batting career in Tests Period Runs Average 100s/ 50s
First 40 Tests 1300 21.66 1/ 5
Last 46 Tests 1824 33.16 1/ 10
Career 3124 27.16 2/ 15

Test cricket was the arena where Hadlee was at his fiercest, but he was more than a handful as a one-day player too. He played only 115 matches over 17 years - an indication of how frequently, or not, ODIs were played in his day - but finished with 158 wickets at an excellent average and economy rate. The strike rate improved tremendously during his last eight years, with his wickets-per-match figure going up to 1.5.

Richard Hadlee as an ODI bowler Period ODIs Wickets Average Econ rate Strike rate
Till Dec 1981 34 38 27.89 3.31 50.5
Jan 1982 onwards 81 120 19.55 3.30 35.5
Career 115 158 21.56 3.30 39.1

Among bowlers who took at least 100 ODI wickets till 1990, Hadlee averaged fourth, with only Joel Garner, Dennis Lillee and Michael Holding doing better. The last World Cup he played was in 1983, and he finished with an exceptional record in the tournament, conceding only 2.88 runs per over in 13 matches.

Lowest bowling averages among ODI bowlers till 1990 (Qual: 100 wickets) Bowler ODIs Wickets Average Econ rate Strike rate
Joel Garner 98 146 18.84 3.09 36.5
Dennis Lillee 63 103 20.82 3.58 34.8
Michael Holding 102 142 21.36 3.32 38.5
Richard Hadlee 115 158 21.56 3.30 39.1
Wasim Akram 99 133 23.45 3.78 37.1
Imran Khan 154 167 25.19 3.85 39.2
 
In tests, Hadlee is on par with Akram as a bowler and on par as a batsmen as well. So, clearly Hadlee takes it as a cricketer.

It was close between Hadlee and McGrath in test as an overall cricketer but Hadlee takes it even there because he was a no.8 as a batsmen while McGrath was a pukka 11 but McGrath was on par as a bowler. Wasim is a no.9 as a batsmen but an inferior test bowler to both Hadlee and McGrath.

Overall, as a test package:-

Hadlee
McGrath
Wasim

Lower order runs play pivotal role in test cricket and that simply cant be ignored.
 
In ODIs though, it is opposite:-

Wasim
McGrath
Hadlee

Wasim is arguably the greatest ODI cricketer of all-time.
 
Good comparison to draw.

Not much between them as bowlers.

I would choose Hadlee because he got more runs down the order. Fifteen test fifties is significant.
 
Wasim. Wasim was the greater bowler i think. Also was good in both formats. Not too sure about Hadlee
 
Wasim. Wasim was the greater bowler i think. Also was good in both formats. Not too sure about Hadlee

Were not Hadlee's statistics phenomenal-arguably best ever in tests ?Single- handedly bore brunt of weak attack?
 
Handlee was a better test bowler than Wasim and in ODI, he was not much behind. Over all, Hadlee because he will also add more runs.
 
Wasim had more natural talent and flair then Hadlee. We do have to remember that Hadlee carried NZ on his own for many years where as Wasim first had Imran and later Waqar to help him out. Hadlee was easily the better batsman of the two but I am going with Wasim for his natural ability to turn a match around with a few overs. Hadlee was awesome as well.
 
I'd pick the cricketer I'd pay good money at the turnstiles to watch. So yeah, Wasim. Don't care about statistics here.
 
Wasim edges out Hadlee overall purely on his ODI accomplishments. Wasim still is the greatest ODI pacer ever.

In tests, there's nothing that seperates them.

As an all-arounder, Hadlee was superior.
 
Hadlee and spiritual successor McGrath were more effective bowlers than Wasim. They had skill and patience. Wasim on the other hand would make the ball talk. Unlike above 2 he was pleasure to watch.
 
A very random comparison.

I have to say Wasim Akram. He performed in a World Cup final (1992 final) along with having 500+ ODI wickets and 400+ Test wickets. He was also no mug with the bat.

Hadlee didn't win any major trophy.
 
Not an apt comparison when you compare “a better cricketer”. Akram was a bowler and Hadlee was an allrounder.
If you compared who was a better bowler, I’d pick Akram.
 
i will give wasim a batting edge as he was a better all rounder
Akram was a better all rounder? How?

Hadlee scored 3124 runs in 134 Test innings with 2 centuries at an average of 27.16

Akram scored 2898 runs in 147 Test innings with 3 centuries at an average of 22.64
 
A very random comparison.

I have to say Wasim Akram. He performed in a World Cup final (1992 final) along with having 500+ ODI wickets and 400+ Test wickets. He was also no mug with the bat.

Hadlee didn't win any major trophy.
Neither did Malcolm Marshall. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Wasim Akram is the most complete fast bowler ever. I am a huge Richard Hadlee fan and I acknowledge that his bowling record is right up there at the top and you can put him up against any bowler in the world and he will hold his own. Beautiful action, good speed, tall lad, extreme ball control, phenomenal swing bowling. But Wasim Akram bro? That guy probably had 3 variations each for an inswinger/outswinger/yorker/bouncer in his mind.

When you watch most great fast bowlers, you already know their finisher and you wait for it. With Wasim bhai, you were standing on your toes in anticipation what he’s up to next.

You have got to put the stats aside sometimes and look at cricket as a kid seeking joy from the game. Wasim brought joy to the game through his mastery bro, he’s the best ever in that sense. That man wired different bro. He looked at them round things and wondered all the fascinating things he could do with them.
 
Hadlee,Pollock,Imran are officially bowling all rounders.Akram like Sachin and Waugh with ball can bat well but is not good enough to be called bowling all rounder
 
Wasim Akram is superior cricketer.

If Akram had played on those Kiwi surfaces , he would have taken 700 test wickets.
 
You mean Akram was a bowler who can bat ?
Better than most bowlers.Bowlers in the 80s and 90s didn't contributed much with the bat.Akram was good enough to be Lara of the bowlers but not enough to be an all rounder
 
In test format, Hadlee as bowler was 1-2 tiers above Wasim. Hadlee was more handy with batting in tests as well.

In ODI, games were not played that many during Hadlees times, but his record in WC is good.

1739145900690.png

Wasim has advantage over Hadlee in ODI due to volume. Hadlee in 90s would have been more than handful, but we can't give points based on assumptions. In ODI, it's Wasim.

Over all as cricketer combining both formats, Hadlee for me.
 
Richards Hadlee is a better cricketer.

A better test bowler and a better test batter. He is only behind Marshall and McGrath in Tests as a bowler.

Wasim is a better ODI bowler while there is not much to choose in ODI batting between the two.

Wasim in ODIs, Hadlee in Tests. Overall, Hadlee because as a complete package, he is better.

Also, folks like to get confused with home pitches and bring Kiwi and Pakistani pitches as argument to favour Wasim but forget that Wasim has better home record than away while for Hadlee, his away record is even better than home record which itself is exceptional.
 
275/414 wickets of Wasim came from 1-7th batsman but for Hadlee 302/431 came from 1-7th batsman.Hadlee was better bowler since he has to take top batsman wickets since NZ lack bowling depth unlike Pak
 
his away record is even better than home record which itself is exceptional
Before 1985 home umpire did home unpiring.As a result early Hadlee would have gotten more wickets if bias umpire didn't play
 
Back
Top