More than any other team, Pakistan has a past track record of radically changes to its playing and supporting staff after each and every WC. These changes have resulted in extended periods of uncertainty and lack of progress. And they have never delivered any long term benefits.
In comparison, other teams tend to use this period to review, analyse and evaluate their successes and failures and only make changes where deemed absolutely necessary.
In an emotionally and politically charged environment, like the Pak cricket team, radical change is a recipe for disaster. This results from lack continuity of strategy, fear of failure, political manoeuvring, fragmenting of agenda and a tone from the top that says - we rather replace than to help in achieving our objectives.
Pakistan does not need change at the moment, it needs continuity and stability.
In comparison, other teams tend to use this period to review, analyse and evaluate their successes and failures and only make changes where deemed absolutely necessary.
In an emotionally and politically charged environment, like the Pak cricket team, radical change is a recipe for disaster. This results from lack continuity of strategy, fear of failure, political manoeuvring, fragmenting of agenda and a tone from the top that says - we rather replace than to help in achieving our objectives.
Pakistan does not need change at the moment, it needs continuity and stability.