What's new

Why India shuts down the internet more than any other democracy [BBC Report]

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,982
As protests over a controversial citizenship law rage across India, authorities resorted to shutting down the internet in cities where demonstrators flooded the streets. These are the latest shutdowns in a country which has seen the highest number of internet blocks in the world so far this year.

"I want to assure my brothers and sisters of Assam that they have nothing to worry after the passing of the Citizenship Amendment Bill. I want to assure them - no one can take away your rights, unique identity and beautiful culture. It will continue to flourish and grow," Prime Minister Narendra Modi tweeted on 12 December amid violent protests in the north-eastern state last week.

The only problem? There was no internet there on that day so it's unclear whether any of the thousands of people protesting against a controversial citizenship law were able to read his tweet.

The irony of the situation caused a lot of comment, especially as it came alongside news that India is the world leader in internet shutdowns.

The internet has been shut down 95 times in India so far this year, according to the Internet Shutdown Tracker, a portal which tracks such incidents across the country.

Authorities usually order internet providers to suspend services, citing public order reasons. Under Indian laws, the government can direct telecom companies to shut down services or take down sites, among other things.

The protests against the citizenship law saw the internet not only blocked in Assam, but also in some districts in West Bengal state as well as in the northern city of Aligarh in the last few weeks alone. On Thursday some parts of the capital Delhi joined the list.

With protests showing little signs of abating, there is every chance the number of shutdowns could increase before the end of the year.

But the shutdowns of the last few weeks have at least been temporary.

In Indian-administered Kashmir, broadband and mobile data services have been blocked for more than four months, with no signs of the situation changing.

Officials have said that it is necessary to "keep the peace" in the region, which was recently stripped of its semi-autonomous status, divided into two federally-governed territories and saw many of its political leaders detained.

Longer internet blackouts than this have occurred only in countries like China and Myanmar, not democracies like India.

But it's not just this year that India has led the way in blocking off access to the net.

It also saw the world's highest number of shutdowns in 2018 with 134 reported incidents. To put this in perspective, the second-highest country on the list was Pakistan - which saw 12 shutdowns last year.

Many Indians - who are part of one of the fastest growing internet markets in the world - have criticised what they perceive to be a clampdown on free speech and a "regressive" leadership whose knee-jerk reaction at the first sign of unrest is to suspend the internet.

Part of the criticism is sparked by the fact that Mr Modi made internet connectivity a major election plank before he won his first term as prime minister in 2014.

In fact, he championed a government initiative called Digital India, aimed at strengthening the country's digital infrastructure.

Mr Modi also said he wanted more than a billion Indians online and wanted to take cheap, high-speed broadband to rural areas to achieve this.

But the increasing number of shutdowns since he came to power in 2014 has prompted many to question whether this is what he means when he says he is "digitising India".

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-50819905
 
Modi must be congratulated for his sterling premiership thus far.

Not only has he revealed the sham that is secular India, not only has he educated the world of the largest fascist/terrorist ideology, but he has now confirmed democracy and freedom are mere myths in India.

Nazism is not dead, it's very much alive, just by a different name, Hindutva.

Heil Modi!
 
Instead of shutting down internet, india should link every social media account with adhaar card. so that every content can be traced back to the author and people can be held responsible for their online activity. I have faith in the govt that this power will be used for the benefit of the govt.
 
A few facts about India coming out in the news - looks pretty bleak to be honest.
 
Digital India, blah, blah, blah..Another of event manager's fekuisms....

Surely, this is the right way to go for India to be completely digital!
 
Instead of shutting down internet, india should link every social media account with adhaar card. so that every content can be traced back to the author and people can be held responsible for their online activity. I have faith in the govt that this power will be used for the benefit of the govt.

That will result in disappearance of trolls like yourself. (Assuming you are Indian of course).
 
Just so that we are clear, the name of the author is Shadab Azmi who is an ex alumni of Jamia Milia university, Delhi. Anti India piece coming from likes of him is totally expected.
 
Just so that we are clear, the name of the author is Shadab Azmi who is an ex alumni of Jamia Milia university, Delhi. Anti India piece coming from likes of him is totally expected.

Ex-alumni? So he is no longer an alumnus?
 
BBC, along with their brethren left-lib publications around the world, have been leveraging any anti-Modi and anti-BJP 'writer', who are just looking for any outlet to vent (read randi rona), they can find to do a systemic hit job.

They should probably have asked the NYT - those guys ran a piece on how WhatsApp is used to exponentially spread rumors in India and has triggered mobs on fake rumors about child kidnappers.

Given how quickly some of our people give in to rumors and start rioting/vandalizing, should the government not take any preemptive measures?

The BBC probably doesn't want it to, so those idiots can riot and vandalize, and when the police clamp down, then they can write about how Modi is being the favorite F word.
 
BBC, along with their brethren left-lib publications around the world, have been leveraging any anti-Modi and anti-BJP 'writer', who are just looking for any outlet to vent (read randi rona), they can find to do a systemic hit job.

They should probably have asked the NYT - those guys ran a piece on how WhatsApp is used to exponentially spread rumors in India and has triggered mobs on fake rumors about child kidnappers.

Given how quickly some of our people give in to rumors and start rioting/vandalizing, should the government not take any preemptive measures?

The BBC probably doesn't want it to, so those idiots can riot and vandalize, and when the police clamp down, then they can write about how Modi is being the favorite F word.

These days Rana Ayub has become the favourite.

Thing is people simply dont care what these left leaning media has to say. Their time has come and gone.

If Modi doesnt mess up the economy, he will get a third term. No Bbc,WaPo,NYT can stop them.
 
These days Rana Ayub has become the favourite.

Thing is people simply dont care what these left leaning media has to say. Their time has come and gone.

If Modi doesnt mess up the economy, he will get a third term. No Bbc,WaPo,NYT can stop them.

Agreed. The constant barrage from these publications has been relentless, but people don't really pay attention to these, barring those who are already anti-Modi and are just looking for another echo chamber to resonate their views in.

It's not just Modi - all these "media" companies stake out a position and work with an agenda. They tried that in 2015/2016 and yet Trump won. They have been at it throughout his presidency, and yet he may win again. Same goes for Erdogan.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Internet shutdowns are shutting down innovation in India. The economic losses are massive. Facts and figures. Thread. 1/n</p>— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) <a href="https://twitter.com/internetfreedom/status/1209707074105442304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“The Gujarat Chamber of Commerce last year estimated losses of thousands of crores..the banking sector faced disruptions in transactions amounting to Rs 1,500 crore daily.” Op-ed <a href="https://twitter.com/apar1984?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@apar1984</a> + <a href="https://twitter.com/tame_wildcard?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tame_wildcard</a> October 2016 <a href="https://t.co/QISsCPQajo">https://t.co/QISsCPQajo</a><br>2/n</p>— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) <a href="https://twitter.com/internetfreedom/status/1209707295237521409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“India this year joined the ranks of countries, including Uganda, Algeria, and Iraq, that have disrupted internet services in response to concerns over students cheating on exams...Economic losses include $968 million in India” Brookings, October 2016 <a href="https://t.co/Lz3EjXVwp3">https://t.co/Lz3EjXVwp3</a> 3/n <a href="https://t.co/qVh9p6lv3E">pic.twitter.com/qVh9p6lv3E</a></p>— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) <a href="https://twitter.com/internetfreedom/status/1209707568450260992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“Even in countries with lower connectivity, the Internet ecosystem enables a growing share of economic activity…” Global Network Initiative, October 2016 <a href="https://t.co/N3ldmH31rY">https://t.co/N3ldmH31rY</a> 4/n <a href="https://t.co/XiuLqehNAS">pic.twitter.com/XiuLqehNAS</a></p>— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) <a href="https://twitter.com/internetfreedom/status/1209707753494593537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“16315 hours of Internet shutdown in India cost the economy approximately $3.04 billion during the period 2012 to 2017…”Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, April 2018 <a href="https://t.co/ioq2tMK33o">https://t.co/ioq2tMK33o</a> 5/n <a href="https://t.co/9AyoXYQMxK">pic.twitter.com/9AyoXYQMxK</a></p>— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) <a href="https://twitter.com/internetfreedom/status/1209707962094088192?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“twelve thousand crore rupees and about a lakh jobs have been laid-off.” Sheikh Ashiq, Kashmir Chamber of Commerce and Industry, December 2019<a href="https://t.co/uqslM0c0tT">https://t.co/uqslM0c0tT</a><br><br>5/n</p>— Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) (@internetfreedom) <a href="https://twitter.com/internetfreedom/status/1209708038233321472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 25, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Indian government has resorted to shutting down the mobile internet in order to “maintain law and order” in the areas witnessing heavy protests against Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). India’s telcos has got a serious hit due to this blockade, further complicating things for the cash-strapped industry.

Rajan Mathews, the director general of Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), in an interview, confirmed that each telecom company is currently making a loss of at least INR 1.5 Cr daily per state.

A senior executive of a private telecom service told ET that when internet or network services are stalled, the customers delay their recharges and do not opt for the smaller top up, which has an effect on the revenue generated from prepaid customers. They also noted that 90% of the company’s customers are prepaid users.

COAI, which represents the Indian telecom industry including big players like Bharti Airtel, Vodafone and Reliance Jio, also noted that even the general population is widely affected by the internet shutdown as basic activities come to a halt.

Amidst the protests against CAA, the government has shut down mobile internet services in parts of Karnataka, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Meghalaya, West Bengal, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh and Assam. Some of these regions were also under internet black out for a few hours. In addition, the Indian government has also shut down internet services in certain regions of Jammu and Kashmir since August 5, 2019.

Along with telecom service providers, even the ecommerce segment has taken a hit with online food delivery businesses — Zomato, Swiggy and UberEats, among others — estimated to have lost around 25% to 30% of their business. At the same time, ecommerce services have witnessed a reduction of almost 3%-5%.

Just like telecom companies, even the ecommerce segment believes that the companies will incur more losses if the internet bans get prolonged. Alongside this, online grocery delivery platforms Grofers and BigBasket are not doing great either. The internet shutdown combined with roadblocks and protests has affected its hyperlocal businesses a lot.

A report by Software Freedom and Law Center (SFLC), released last week, states that the Indian government has snapped internet services 373 times since 2012.

This time, the government temporarily barred the internet services in order to control the agitation against CAA. Students from across the country are protesting against the Narendra Modi-led Indian government for diluting the “secular fabric” of India.

The CAA is a fast track citizenship mechanism that entitles non-Muslim minorities — Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians — of the neighbouring countries Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan to seek Indian citizenship as long as they have been residing in India for six years. The text of the law specifically omits Muslims and those from other religions from getting citizenship through the process, which is one of the major points of contention in the controversial act that has also seen investors question their future in India.

https://inc42.com/buzz/caa-protests-internet-ban-hits-telcos-the-hardest/
 
Guess in today's India not the people but the money that catches people's attention
 
But but but we are a secular nation and a democracy. Indians should download the dictionary app and make sure they understand the definition of these two words before claiming anything about their motherland
 
But but but we are a secular nation and a democracy. Indians should download the dictionary app and make sure they understand the definition of these two words before claiming anything about their motherland

Apparently shutting down Internet is ok until it hurts the pockets of the companies - then their CEOs will go running to Modi Sarkar for help.
 
Come to think of it, this might explain how latency on the SC subsea cable has dropped resulting in higher throughput for Pakistan!

Brilliant!
 
But but but we are a secular nation and a democracy. Indians should download the dictionary app and make sure they understand the definition of these two words before claiming anything about their motherland

Why dont you download the dictionary and find out the definition of these words.

Indians do not need permission of pakistan to claim anything.
 
Why dont you download the dictionary and find out the definition of these words.

Indians do not need permission of pakistan to claim anything.

Once again. When you have no reply you throw in this

Is there no desire to improve yourselves?
 
Why dont you download the dictionary and find out the definition of these words.

Indians do not need permission of pakistan to claim anything.

Lol same old rubbish being spouted. Surprise surprise.
 
Why dont you download the dictionary and find out the definition of these words.

Indians do not need permission of pakistan to claim anything.

Shutting down the internet and not allowing a medium for protest is the exact opposite of democracy
 
Shutting down the internet and not allowing a medium for protest is the exact opposite of democracy

Internet is shut down to prevent the proliferation of fake news and rumours. Given the options, this is the best the state can do. Anything which prevents loss of life and maintains peace. Although offices should be allowed internet access so that work is not hampered for the people who work. Fully support internet curfew where it is required.
 
Shutting down the internet will prevent fake news. L to the O to the L.

In the age of smartphones everyone is a reporter, and once internet access is permitted, the recorded videos and photos revealing the realities of the situation will be uploaded and shared worldwide.

The intellectual apple of RSS minions doesn't fall far from the tree of Hindutva terrorism.
 
The nonprofit that funds Wikipedia has said its model would be “severely disrupted” by the intermediary guidelines that India intends to institute by the middle of next month.

Automated filtering and quick takedown requirements would disrupt the volunteer model of real-time editing of information followed by the online encyclopaedia, the Wikimedia Foundation has said in a letter to Information Technology Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad.

Because the resource is curated by language and not geographic market, the rules would change the entire website, not just Indians’ access to the knowledge, the Foundation said.

The “collaborative system of people would be severely disrupted by obligatory filtering systems that monitor for and automatically remove illegal content across the website. Short response times for removals that would essentially require the use of automatic systems would interfere with people’s ability to collaborate in real time on Wiki, the collaborative, open editing model that has been crucial to Wikipedia’s growth,” the letter said.

“It is impossible to restrict changes inside a Wikipedia article from being visible in one country and not another. Fulfilling mandatory content removal requirements from one country would leave problematic gaps in Wikipedia for the whole world, break apart highly context-specific encyclopedic articles, and prevent people from accessing information that may be legal in their country.”

Wikipedia is very popular in India. Users in the country visited the encyclopedia 771 million times last month, the fifth highest in the world, the letter said. It urged the Minister to release the latest draft of the guidelines, and suggested a layered definition to social media intermediaries similar to The Personal Data Protection Bill, which was introduced in Lok Sabha earlier this month. The letter also expressed concern over the “unrealistic burden” on nonprofits, and said that traceability requirements were a “serious threat to freedom of expression”.

The Indian Express reported the proposed draft guidelines in December 2018. After the Ministry opened them up for public consultation, Wikipedia joined several stakeholders who took issue with a number of provisions: censorship concerns highlighted the rule that would require platforms to “proactively” eliminate “unlawful” content, while surveillance concerns focused on the proposed guideline that intermediaries must hand over certain information to the government.

When the draft law was released, WhatsApp had said that, if notified, they would require a complete re-design of the platform, threatening its signature encryption. An major concern for the company was the provision on supplying the government with the “originator of information”. In an ongoing case in the Supreme Court involving WhatsApp and Facebook, the IT Ministry has submitted that it will update these laws by January 15.

In November, the IT Ministry told Parliament: “Key features of proposed amendments in the due diligence to be followed by intermediaries are: (i) periodically informing the users for compliance of rules & regulations, users agreement & privacy policy, (ii) traceability of the originator of the information, (iii) significant intermediaries having more than 50 lakh users to have an office in India and to appoint a nodal officer for liaisoning with law enforcement agencies, (iv) removal of malicious content in 24 hours upon receiving a court order or when notified by appropriate government, (v) deployment of technology based automated tools or appropriate mechanisms for proactively identifying and removing or disabling public access to unlawful information or content, etc.”

https://indianexpress.com/article/i...-govt-guidelines-ravi-shankar-prasad-6190872/
 
Back
Top