What's new

Would it be possible to attract rich foreigners to invest in, and own future PSL franchises?

Savak

World Star
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Runs
50,142
Post of the Week
3
I am surprised that the likes of Saddruddin Hashwani, Mian Mohammad Mansha Nat, Malik Riaz Khan, Shahid Khan (US) haven't shown interest in owning a PSL Franchise yet or Organizations like Engro haven't shown interest in owning a PSL Franchise either.

Can rich Arab investors in Saudia-Arabia, Qatar, UAE take an interest in owning a PSL Franchise? How about rich Indian investors?

Heck try and convince them to take ownership of the entire region?
 
It is a risky business because of our volatile security and political reasons.

And we should not be extending the teams at least for the next couple of years. With the available talent pool these teams are enough for a competitive cricket.
 
It is a risky business because of our volatile security and political reasons.

And we should not be extending the teams at least for the next couple of years. With the available talent pool these teams are enough for a competitive cricket.

The point was that the PSL has so much potential. It can be a comfortable number 2 to the IPL.

Security situation in Pakistan has always been dicy but this league will eventually become lucrative and that will invite investors from all over the world. Sure right now the goal should be to encourage, lobby with these high net worth Pakistani businessmen to take ownership of a PSL Franchise.
 
I feel Indian investors will be more than willing but there's a risk of Pakistani powers such as army or agencies rejecting that option. Too much politics, which is a pity.

This year has convinced me that PSL can actually be a very profitable investment for the long term investor.
 
For that to happen - PSL needs to move to Pakistan - have multiple stable fixing/security free tournaments and PCB needs to build or renovate world class stadiums with HD broadcasting. Crowd and pitches in UAE are dead.
 
From Punjab you can have a Lahore, Multan, Sialkot, Faislabad, Sarghodda team

From Sindh you can have Karachi, Hyderabad, Sakkar

From Balochistan you have Quetta, Gwadar

From KPK you have Peshawar, Abbotabad

From Kashmir you have a Muzzafarabad team

You already have an Islamabad team

Then you have a Gilgit

A Bahria Town team

Finally you have a FATA team

17 teams right there. So many high net worth Pakistani individuals like Mian Muhammad Mansha Natt, Saddruddin Hashwani, Deewan family, Arif Habib, Malik Riaz of Bahria Town, Engro Corporation, Sir Anwar Pervez in the UK, Shahid Khan in the US. These are just extremely rich Pakistani individuals whose own net worths touch $1 billion. The PCB should be going over drive in reaching out to these people and trying to convince them to take ownership of PSL teams, use the patriotism card. The PCB charged $5.2 million for selling the Multan team, they can charge more and more for every PSL Franchise going forward.

We are just talking about rich Pakistani investors here and haven't even talked about Arabs, Indians, Chinese yet.

To say the PSL cannot be number 2 is ill founded.
 
I feel Indian investors will be more than willing but there's a risk of Pakistani powers such as army or agencies rejecting that option. Too much politics, which is a pity.

This year has convinced me that PSL can actually be a very profitable investment for the long term investor.

Not at all, if anything the Pakistani army will not oppose any efforts to pump money into the economy
 
Not at all, if anything the Pakistani army will not oppose any efforts to pump money into the economy

Well, I am just a 'talker', ie internet 'expert', but it would be interesting to see if an Indian entity tries ti buy a PSL franchise.

Mind you, I still feel that- even of an offer is made- Pakistanis state institutions will disallow it from happening.

But if they (Pakistan and India authorities) allow it, boy, PSL values will go through the roof.
 
What is the value of owning a PSL franchise from an investment perspective? I'm seriously bemused, it's just a shiny toy that will bleed money for any discerning investor. You have to be an egotistical cricket nut or require ways to... ahem... justify the provenance of your wealth to even consider buying a team. Sports teams are rarely good investments.
 
What is the value of owning a PSL franchise from an investment perspective? I'm seriously bemused, it's just a shiny toy that will bleed money for any discerning investor. You have to be an egotistical cricket nut or require ways to... ahem... justify the provenance of your wealth to even consider buying a team. Sports teams are rarely good investments.

Same value as owning an IPL Franchise, how profitable your sports team turns out to be is dependent on the amount of time, energy, passion you put towards managing it.
 
From Punjab you can have a Lahore, Multan, Sialkot, Faislabad, Sarghodda team

From Sindh you can have Karachi, Hyderabad, Sakkar

From Balochistan you have Quetta, Gwadar

From KPK you have Peshawar, Abbotabad

From Kashmir you have a Muzzafarabad team

You already have an Islamabad team

Then you have a Gilgit

A Bahria Town team

Finally you have a FATA team

17 teams right there. So many high net worth Pakistani individuals like Mian Muhammad Mansha Natt, Saddruddin Hashwani, Deewan family, Arif Habib, Malik Riaz of Bahria Town, Engro Corporation, Sir Anwar Pervez in the UK, Shahid Khan in the US. These are just extremely rich Pakistani individuals whose own net worths touch $1 billion. The PCB should be going over drive in reaching out to these people and trying to convince them to take ownership of PSL teams, use the patriotism card. The PCB charged $5.2 million for selling the Multan team, they can charge more and more for every PSL Franchise going forward.

We are just talking about rich Pakistani investors here and haven't even talked about Arabs, Indians, Chinese yet.

To say the PSL cannot be number 2 is ill founded.

Except Shahid Khan who else is listed by a credible media house like forbes or bloomberg to be worth 1bn usd?

Pakistans economy is big enough to support such huge investment. Has pcb published the financials of PSL 2?
 
Same value as owning an IPL Franchise, how profitable your sports team turns out to be is dependent on the amount of time, energy, passion you put towards managing it.

Most IPL teams are owned by billionaires like Ambani Maran Wadias Burmans GM Reddys Murdochs or by companies like Diageo or India cements who have billions of dollars in revenue. They get to showcase themselves or their products to a billion people and to a 2.5tn economy. Pakistans economy isnt that big nor are there many billionaires willing to throw the money.
 
Most IPL teams are owned by billionaires like Ambani Maran Wadias Burmans GM Reddys Murdochs or by companies like Diageo or India cements who have billions of dollars in revenue. They get to showcase themselves or their products to a billion people and to a 2.5tn economy. Pakistans economy isnt that big nor are there many billionaires willing to throw the money.

Sure Pakistan's economy is not as big as India's but unlike India our private sector has massively under invested in Cricket. It took a visionary, gutsy, determined, entreprenuerial individual to get the PSL going and similarly the same kind of drive is needed to encourage the private sector to doll out the money. The current PSL Franchise owners are not anywhere near as rich as the likes of Shahid Khan, Sir Anwar Pervez, Mian Muhammad Mansha Nat, Arif Habib, Malik Riaz, Deewan Family, Engro Corporation e.t.c and look at what they have done. If these individuals get involved the PSL will only go places.
 
Except Shahid Khan who else is listed by a credible media house like forbes or bloomberg to be worth 1bn usd?

Pakistans economy is big enough to support such huge investment. Has pcb published the financials of PSL 2?

Pakistan's economy is big enough to support it yes. We have been massively under investing in Cricket.
 
My email to Najam Sethi

Dear Mr Najam Sethi

There are so many high net worth Pakistani business owners both in and outside Pakistan whose personal wealths are close to $1 billion. The names of the following come to mind

1) Saddrudun Hashwani
2) Mian Muhammad Mansha Natt
3) Deewan Group Family
4) Arif Habib
5) Engro Corporation
6) Sir Anwar Pervez (London)
7) Shahid Khan (USA)

It may also be possible to engage and attract foreign rich businessmen from India, Arab states like Saudia Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait and China to be PSL Franchise owners. These PSL Franchise Owners should ultimately be encouraged to buy out their respective regions, take complete ownership of the domestic regional teams and this way the goal of privitization of Pakistan Cricket at the grassroots can be achieved and the PCB can focus on just running the affairs of the PCB.

I believe the PSL can easily be number 2 and fingers crossed maybe even over take the IPL if we are very over optimistic. The goal should be a total of 16-18 teams and by selling those teams out at lucrative prices the PCB can get huge financial injections, cash flows where it will no longer be dependant on funds from the ICC, BCCI and this way we can take a strong stand when it comes to making foreign teams tour Pakistan with our held heads high

We can have the following teams from Punjab i.e. Lahore, Multan, Sialkot, Faislabad, Sarghodda

We can have the following teams from Sindh i.e. Karachi, Hyderabad, Sukkur

We can have the following teams from Balochistan i.e. Quetta, Gwadar

We can have the following teams from KPK i.e. Peshawar, Abbotabad, FATA

We can the Islamabad team

We can have a Bahria Town team

We can the following team from Kashmir i.e. Muzzafarabad

We can have a team from the Northern Areas like Gilgit, Baltistan

These are 18 PSL Franchises, the PCB can sell each Franchise at an astranomical higher price and can even rake in a total of $200 million from the sale of these teams. Even better for Pakistan Cricket is that this will allow more talent to be absorbed by the Franchises and more room for foreign players. The PCB will be able to create room for a PSL window in International Cricket just like the BCCI does with the IPL.

The PCB should definately keep these points in mind in the future

Regards

His response

Thank you. I have been trying to convince the Franchisees and Departments to take the Regional teams and develop a sound commercial regional structure. Similarly, the Elected Regional Associations refuse to allow anyone to take them over. The former want control and the latter refuse to yield it. Under the present PCB Constitution,
We are deadlocked.

But I am not giving up.


Sent from my iPhone
 
Sure Pakistan's economy is not as big as India's but unlike India our private sector has massively under invested in Cricket. It took a visionary, gutsy, determined, entreprenuerial individual to get the PSL going and similarly the same kind of drive is needed to encourage the private sector to doll out the money. The current PSL Franchise owners are not anywhere near as rich as the likes of Shahid Khan, Sir Anwar Pervez, Mian Muhammad Mansha Nat, Arif Habib, Malik Riaz, Deewan Family, Engro Corporation e.t.c and look at what they have done. If these individuals get involved the PSL will only go places.

Haier is a chinese global conglomorate and Qalco is a Qatari Oil and lubricant company they are very cash rich and most likely have more money than any Pakistan based businessman.

As i said on another thread, except Shahid Khan and Anwar Pervez no one else makes to any of the well known lists tracking the uber rich.

Mansha once made it to the forbes list in 2009.

They may be rich but $5-6mn a year is 50-60cr PKR and thats not a small amount for someone who will be based in Pakistan.

If these people had interest they would have bid earlier only.

In IPL there are more people interested than there are teams.
 
Pakistan's economy is big enough to support it yes. We have been massively under investing in Cricket.

No sir it is not. Pakistani economy is struggling and there arent people ready to invest, which is why a large amount of pcb revenues depended on India tour.
 
Haier is a chinese global conglomorate and Qalco is a Qatari Oil and lubricant company they are very cash rich and most likely have more money than any Pakistan based businessman.

As i said on another thread, except Shahid Khan and Anwar Pervez no one else makes to any of the well known lists tracking the uber rich.

Mansha once made it to the forbes list in 2009.

They may be rich but $5-6mn a year is 50-60cr PKR and thats not a small amount for someone who will be based in Pakistan.

If these people had interest they would have bid earlier only.

In IPL there are more people interested than there are teams.

Interest has to be roused. The individuals i have named have more than enough financial resources to comfortably buy out PSL teams. Javed Afridi and Fawad Rana bought out teams in the South Africa T20 League and these individuals are no where close to the top Pakistani businessmen i mentioned.
 
No sir it is not. Pakistani economy is struggling and there arent people ready to invest, which is why a large amount of pcb revenues depended on India tour.

That is true for all nations. All cricket boards depend on playing against India for bulk of their revenue. Doesn't mean every country's economy is struggling.
 
No sir it is not. Pakistani economy is struggling and there arent people ready to invest, which is why a large amount of pcb revenues depended on India tour.

Our economy is struggling yes, people were reluctant to invest in the PSL in 2015 but we have had 3 seasons now. A lot of people mocked and criticized Imran Khan when he was aiming to build the first cancer hospital in Pakistan in the 80's that it is too expensive, too impractical, cannot be done as Pakistan does not have the doctors, equipment but he kept at it and did and now we are going to have a 3rd one soon.

PCB's revenue's have been hit badly because of no international cricket in Pakistan for the last 10 plus years and for BCCI's abandonment of numerous Pakistani home series in Pakistan and on neutral venue.
 
That is true for all nations. All cricket boards depend on playing against India for bulk of their revenue. Doesn't mean every country's economy is struggling.

The PCB is responsible for generating its own revenue, it has never accepted any money from the govt. In fact the govt of Pakistan once directed the PCB to direct a certain percentage of its revenues to the Pakistani Hockey, Squash federations who were totally struggling and the PCB complained about this being unfair because one those sports bodies were responsible for generating their own revenues, secondly it should have been the govt's responsibility to bail them out.
 
Interest has to be roused. The individuals i have named have more than enough financial resources to comfortably buy out PSL teams. Javed Afridi and Fawad Rana bought out teams in the South Africa T20 League and these individuals are no where close to the top Pakistani businessmen i mentioned.

Javed Afridi is a employee of a Chinese Global conglomerate called Haier. Its way way way bigger than any Pakistani company. Its revenue in 2016 was close to $30bn. Javed Afridi is just the CEO of the Pakistani subsidary of Haier. Haier owns the teams.

Fawad Rana again is a employee of QALCO a Qatari lubricant and oil company so again the money comes from there.
 
No sir it is not. Pakistani economy is struggling and there arent people ready to invest, which is why a large amount of pcb revenues depended on India tour.

That is true for all nations. All cricket boards depend on playing against India for bulk of their revenue. Doesn't mean every country's economy is struggling.

Our economy is struggling yes, people were reluctant to invest in the PSL in 2015 but we have had 3 seasons now. A lot of people mocked and criticized Imran Khan when he was aiming to build the first cancer hospital in Pakistan in the 80's that it is too expensive, too impractical, cannot be done as Pakistan does not have the doctors, equipment but he kept at it and did and now we are going to have a 3rd one soon.

PCB's revenue's have been hit badly because of no international cricket in Pakistan for the last 10 plus years and for BCCI's abandonment of numerous Pakistani home series in Pakistan and on neutral venue.

What I don't understand is, why is the PCB revenue still dependent on India and not the Pakistan fans. Pakistan is the second largest market in cricket. It should be self sufficient and generating revenues based on it's own fans rather than an India tour.

I do not buy the, there are no home games excuse. The real money is made from TV and digital platform revenues. The gate receipts are chump change. Sure, the lack of local atmosphere will contribute to some eyeball loss. I also give room for high operating costs. But on the whole fans will/should watch. So there are high revenues to be made, that should make the higher operating costs a non issue. So not sure why the TV, digital platform deals are not going through the roof.
 
That is true for all nations. All cricket boards depend on playing against India for bulk of their revenue. Doesn't mean every country's economy is struggling.

PCBs broadcast rights agreement says almost 60% of the money will depend on India touring. Is there another board that allows such country specific agreement?
 
What I don't understand is, why is the PCB revenue still dependent on India and not the Pakistan fans. Pakistan is the second largest market in cricket. It should be self sufficient and generating revenues based on it's own fans rather than an India tour.

I do not buy the, there are no home games excuse. The real money is made from TV and digital platform revenues. The gate receipts are chump change. Sure, the lack of local atmosphere will contribute to some eyeball loss. I also give room for high operating costs. But on the whole fans will/should watch. So there are high revenues to be made, that should make the higher operating costs a non issue. So not sure why the TV, digital platform deals are not going through the roof.

Why do you think Pakistan is the 2nd largest market? The number of people alone wont decide the size of the marketm
 
PCBs broadcast rights agreement says almost 60% of the money will depend on India touring. Is there another board that allows such country specific agreement?

That's due to the fact that the indo-pak rivalry is bigger than any other pak-(insert country) rivalry. The high percentage doesn't have to do with the economy but rather the interest generated in Pak when an indo-pak series takes place. So logically, Pakistan are to lose more money if India doesn't play against them as compared to another country that India refuses to play against, but money will be lost whenever India doesn't play against a team.
 
Why do you think Pakistan is the 2nd largest market? The number of people alone wont decide the size of the marketm

If you are saying that the Pakistan economy is not large enough. Or that the Pakistan fans do not have the disposable income to support (at least enough of them). Then this whole thread is moot.

I have no clue whether or not Pakistan fans spend $$ (enough of it) in consuming cricket. And how much $$ they are willing to spend or their disposable income. My points are of course based on this key factor - $$ spent by the Pakistan fan.
 
Suroosh Alvi, co-founder and owner of Vice Media - one of the most popular online news sites is worth almost half a billion dollars and he's Pakistani-Canadian plus he coowns a major emerging news network. They could get him to invest and even get in him charge of marketing the PSL globally.
 
That's due to the fact that the indo-pak rivalry is bigger than any other pak-(insert country) rivalry. The high percentage doesn't have to do with the economy but rather the interest generated in Pak when an indo-pak series takes place. So logically, Pakistan are to lose more money if India doesn't play against them as compared to another country that India refuses to play against, but money will be lost whenever India doesn't play against a team.

Same does not seem to be true of India. They seem to have moved on and tapped their own market for revenues through new avenues like IPL. Why has the PCB not done that?
 
Same does not seem to be true of India. They seem to have moved on and tapped their own market for revenues through new avenues like IPL. Why has the PCB not done that?
That doesn't mean they won't be taking a financial hit if they don't play against Pakistan. Both countries will take a hit. India has set up an alternate source of income but that doesn't mean they wouldn't like the millions of rupees up for grabs that come with an Indo-pak series. PCB has followed the same route with the PSL. Only a matter of time till huge percentages of profits churn out from the PSL.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
 
Suroosh Alvi, co-founder and owner of Vice Media - one of the most popular online news sites is worth almost half a billion dollars and he's Pakistani-Canadian plus he coowns a major emerging news network. They could get him to invest and even get in him charge of marketing the PSL globally.

Another person whose details need to be forwarded to the PCB
 
Najam Sethi revealed recently that when the PCB first reached out to potential bidders to buy the PSL Franchises in 2015, they expected atleast 15 bidders but only 6-7 bidders came and then 2 dropped out midway. The PCB was left with no choice but to take whatever the Franchise owners were offering.

The highest bid received was $2 million and the lowest was $500,000. He made personal pleas to the Franchise owners whom he knew had deep pockets that they should be patriotic, that this country badly needed an international profile league and needed to keep up with the times and that the PCB needed this money to host the league. There was no guarantee of success at all, extremely risky venture and Zaka Ashraf had already wasted so much money in 2012 but failed to pull it off.

Its all about having balls and taking the risk and that is the difference between Sethi and Zaka who i am glad was shown the door.
 
If you are saying that the Pakistan economy is not large enough. Or that the Pakistan fans do not have the disposable income to support (at least enough of them). Then this whole thread is moot.

I have no clue whether or not Pakistan fans spend $$ (enough of it) in consuming cricket. And how much $$ they are willing to spend or their disposable income. My points are of course based on this key factor - $$ spent by the Pakistan fan.

Size of the money market is the most important point. Thats what will attract sponsors.

Why do you think the value of the Broadcast rights of the IPL for 5 years is more than the entire 8yr revenue of ICC?
 
That doesn't mean they won't be taking a financial hit if they don't play against Pakistan. Both countries will take a hit. India has set up an alternate source of income but that doesn't mean they wouldn't like the millions of rupees up for grabs that come with an Indo-pak series. PCB has followed the same route with the PSL. Only a matter of time till huge percentages of profits churn out from the PSL.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Bcci gets paid on per match basis. Its 43cr inr or almost $7mn per match for any international match in India. Pakistan no Pakistan is of no consequence. As long as bcci arranges majority of its matches againist non minnows they will get the money. So it can be any team the payment is same, bcci has no incentive to play againist Pakistan.
 
Najam Sethi revealed recently that when the PCB first reached out to potential bidders to buy the PSL Franchises in 2015, they expected atleast 15 bidders but only 6-7 bidders came and then 2 dropped out midway. The PCB was left with no choice but to take whatever the Franchise owners were offering.

The highest bid received was $2 million and the lowest was $500,000. He made personal pleas to the Franchise owners whom he knew had deep pockets that they should be patriotic, that this country badly needed an international profile league and needed to keep up with the times and that the PCB needed this money to host the league. There was no guarantee of success at all, extremely risky venture and Zaka Ashraf had already wasted so much money in 2012 but failed to pull it off.

Its all about having balls and taking the risk and that is the difference between Sethi and Zaka who i am glad was shown the door.

So you see there is a lack of interest, because returns are not there. Does pcb has a long term tv rights deal for psl? Like ipl bbl etc have?
 
Bcci gets paid on per match basis. Its 43cr inr or almost $7mn per match for any international match in India. Pakistan no Pakistan is of no consequence. As long as bcci arranges majority of its matches againist non minnows they will get the money. So it can be any team the payment is same, bcci has no incentive to play againist Pakistan.

Which is why the compensation lawsuit has to go through given that the BCCI is deliberately avoiding to play Pakistan as they want Pakistani Cricket to be in maximum recession for as long as possible.
 
So you see there is a lack of interest, because returns are not there. Does pcb has a long term tv rights deal for psl? Like ipl bbl etc have?

I can assure you there is no lack of interest in Cricket in Pakistan, sure vast majority of people are risk averse and that is what separates a very average person from an extraordinary successful person. Whether the returns are there or not, the key thing is your projection, sales, marketing, pitching an idea, dream and this is what the PCB needs to be doing to so many rich Pakistani's in Pakistan and not be giving up, putting their hands up at the first "No".
 
Same value as owning an IPL Franchise, how profitable your sports team turns out to be is dependent on the amount of time, energy, passion you put towards managing it.

As I said, it's too little reward for a lot of effort. You have to be passionate about cricket for a start, and the individuals you name haven't got the time to put in all the work required to make their franchise a success. The broadcast rights are paltry compared to the amounts that tv companies in India, England and Australia can offer, because as other posters have pointed out our economy is relatively small fry in comparison. We may have the numbers but we definitely don't have the institutional structures to monetize the market effectively.
 
Which is why the compensation lawsuit has to go through given that the BCCI is deliberately avoiding to play Pakistan as they want Pakistani Cricket to be in maximum recession for as long as possible.

Once again you seem to suggest that it's India or bust for PCB revenues. There is a whole world of possibilities that the PCB can pursue, and where the time and energy should be invested in.

I think it is a total waste of time, energy and more importantly money to pursue the $70 million issue. Not going anywhere, neither is the PCB getting even a dime.
 
As I said, it's too little reward for a lot of effort. You have to be passionate about cricket for a start, and the individuals you name haven't got the time to put in all the work required to make their franchise a success. The broadcast rights are paltry compared to the amounts that tv companies in India, England and Australia can offer, because as other posters have pointed out our economy is relatively small fry in comparison. We may have the numbers but we definitely don't have the institutional structures to monetize the market effectively.

Good points. I think this is the key in lack of investment, risk taking and the over all $$ pot.
 
As I said, it's too little reward for a lot of effort. You have to be passionate about cricket for a start, and the individuals you name haven't got the time to put in all the work required to make their franchise a success. The broadcast rights are paltry compared to the amounts that tv companies in India, England and Australia can offer, because as other posters have pointed out our economy is relatively small fry in comparison. We may have the numbers but we definitely don't have the institutional structures to monetize the market effectively.

Those individuals can appoint people to do the work for them. You think the likes of Salman Iqbal, Javed Afridi, Nadeem Umar have got plenty of time? Like i said people never felt the PSL could ever be held at all let alone for 3 seasons. People made fun of IK's dream of establishing a cancer hospital in Pakistan offering free treatment to people and the entire country said he was mad, unrealistic and now today he is on the verge of making the 3rd one in Karachi. It's all about who has the balls to take risks in the face of uncertainties.
 
My email to Najam Sethi



His response


Very insightful post. I am surprised he replied to your email, but it's good to hear he is aware of the benefits of privatising the regions.
 
Those individuals can appoint people to do the work for them. You think the likes of Salman Iqbal, Javed Afridi, Nadeem Umar have got plenty of time? Like i said people never felt the PSL could ever be held at all let alone for 3 seasons. People made fun of IK's dream of establishing a cancer hospital in Pakistan offering free treatment to people and the entire country said he was mad, unrealistic and now today he is on the verge of making the 3rd one in Karachi. It's all about who has the balls to take risks in the face of uncertainties.

But you still haven't told me why they would want to put in that money and effort? Shahid Khan perhaps as he has a history of investing in sports teams, but the others would need to have a demonstrable business case for even thinking of investing. For example, Mansha is notoriously hands on in his businesses, especially at his bank, and struggles to delegate. He is also immensely conservative, he won't even think of buying a franchise without being convinced of the possibility of the investment being a low-hanging fruit.
 
But you still haven't told me why they would want to put in that money and effort? Shahid Khan perhaps as he has a history of investing in sports teams, but the others would need to have a demonstrable business case for even thinking of investing. For example, Mansha is notoriously hands on in his businesses, especially at his bank, and struggles to delegate. He is also immensely conservative, he won't even think of buying a franchise without being convinced of the possibility of the investment being a low-hanging fruit.

It is the PCB's job to reach out to him and convince him. All IPL teams are making losses, what business case do they have for continuing to invest in the IPL teams? Or maybe they are doing it for patriotic reasons and for other persuits?
 
What reasons did Salman Iqbal, Fawad Rana, Javed Afridi have for investing in a PSL Franchise? How come the PCB managed to sell the 6th PSL Franchise in 2017 for $5.2 million when the highest bid they received in 2015 was $2.5 million? What is to prevent the PCB from preventing to sell the 7th and 8th PSL teams for amounts far greater than $5.2 million?
 
Bcci gets paid on per match basis. Its 43cr inr or almost $7mn per match for any international match in India. Pakistan no Pakistan is of no consequence. As long as bcci arranges majority of its matches againist non minnows they will get the money. So it can be any team the payment is same, bcci has no incentive to play againist Pakistan.

I refuse to believe that a South africa vs India series would be as lucrative for BCCI as a Pakistan vs India series. Selling more merchandise, seling more tickets, broadcast deals, ad revenue, sponsorship opportunities, TV ratings would all help in increasing the turnover for BCCI and for sponsors and all relevant parties. Nothing but money in for them and I'm sure they would love to get their hands on it.

If what you said about per match basis is true, then it shouldn't matter if the team is a minnow as you claim that BCCI get a fixed cut of the money. You are contradicting yourself.
 
Last edited:
So you see there is a lack of interest, because returns are not there. Does pcb has a long term tv rights deal for psl? Like ipl bbl etc have?

PSL is in its infancy unlike other T20 leagues. No TV broadcaster would buy TV rights for an unproven league for long periods of time.
 
PSL is in its infancy unlike other T20 leagues. No TV broadcaster would buy TV rights for an unproven league for long periods of time.

I believe the TV rights are up for renewal next year. The 3 year $15 million deal is done with the ongoing edition of PSL. Would be interesting to see what the bids are and for how many years.
 
From Punjab you can have a Lahore, Multan, Sialkot, Faislabad, Sarghodda team

From Sindh you can have Karachi, Hyderabad, Sakkar

From Balochistan you have Quetta, Gwadar

From KPK you have Peshawar, Abbotabad

From Kashmir you have a Muzzafarabad team

You already have an Islamabad team

Then you have a Gilgit

A Bahria Town team

Finally you have a FATA team

17 teams right there. So many high net worth Pakistani individuals like Mian Muhammad Mansha Natt, Saddruddin Hashwani, Deewan family, Arif Habib, Malik Riaz of Bahria Town, Engro Corporation, Sir Anwar Pervez in the UK, Shahid Khan in the US. These are just extremely rich Pakistani individuals whose own net worths touch $1 billion. The PCB should be going over drive in reaching out to these people and trying to convince them to take ownership of PSL teams, use the patriotism card. The PCB charged $5.2 million for selling the Multan team, they can charge more and more for every PSL Franchise going forward.

We are just talking about rich Pakistani investors here and haven't even talked about Arabs, Indians, Chinese yet.

To say the PSL cannot be number 2 is ill founded.

How about even adding a couple of franchises based on international cities i.e. Sharjah Hawks, Dubai Dinos etc etc. Something along these lines would give PSL a greater international profile thus becoming more attractive to foreign investors. Would also help in drawing a more diverse audience
 
Isn't Mian Mansha already involved with HBL being the main sponsor of the PSL? He will not be able to do that if he takes up a franchise.

A lot of companies are already involved by just sponsoring the league and getting their name everywhere incl shirts
 
We are barely able to fill the quotas with quality players for these 6 teams, never mind 18. Quantity isn't always quality.
 
Wait, what?

Najam Sethi is free to reach on his email, and he'll reply through his phone?
 
Which is why the compensation lawsuit has to go through given that the BCCI is deliberately avoiding to play Pakistan as they want Pakistani Cricket to be in maximum recession for as long as possible.

How many times it needs to be said that the BCCI cannot overrule a policy decision of the GOI.?
 
From Punjab you can have a Lahore, Multan, Sialkot, Faislabad, Sarghodda team

From Sindh you can have Karachi, Hyderabad, Sakkar

From Balochistan you have Quetta, Gwadar

From KPK you have Peshawar, Abbotabad

From Kashmir you have a Muzzafarabad team

You already have an Islamabad team

Then you have a Gilgit

A Bahria Town team

Finally you have a FATA team

17 teams right there. So many high net worth Pakistani individuals like Mian Muhammad Mansha Natt, Saddruddin Hashwani, Deewan family, Arif Habib, Malik Riaz of Bahria Town, Engro Corporation, Sir Anwar Pervez in the UK, Shahid Khan in the US. These are just extremely rich Pakistani individuals whose own net worths touch $1 billion. The PCB should be going over drive in reaching out to these people and trying to convince them to take ownership of PSL teams, use the patriotism card. The PCB charged $5.2 million for selling the Multan team, they can charge more and more for every PSL Franchise going forward.

We are just talking about rich Pakistani investors here and haven't even talked about Arabs, Indians, Chinese yet.

To say the PSL cannot be number 2 is ill founded.

Patriotism card doesn't work with money, it was only for poor fools to go for partition and then to die fighting 'enemies'.
 
Patriotism card doesn't work with money, it was only for poor fools to go for partition and then to die fighting 'enemies'.

Worked with Javed Afridi, Nadeem Omar, Salman Iqbal, Fawad Rana and co. Can work with others as well if you sell properly
 
First , tell me what the PSL 2018 is about??

Is it about giving another 2364753905809688th chance for TTF or to promote young players?

So far, my impression of 2018 PSL is we are giving enough chances to TTFs so that they can make their return to national side. Take an example of IPL.

They also gave chances to their TTF, but only for 2008 season. No TTF selected later on. Examples : Sunil Joshi, Akash Chopra, Sanjay Bangar, Wasim Jaffer,etc. They were all their all-time TTF (like ours Akmals, Hafeez,etc).

Watching PSL is like? Watching Pak domestic season in UAE, with few foreign players in the mix.
 
The PSL is financed by the money that the Franchises have to pay the PCB every year, each Franchise provided the PCB with a bank guarantee where if the Franchise doesn't pay up then the Bank will.

Karachi Kings has to pay an annual fee of $2.6 million to the PCB

Lahore Qalandars has to pay an annual fee of $2.5 million

Peshawar Zalmi has to pay an annual fee of $1.6 million

Islamabad United has to pay an annual fee of $1.5 million

Quetta Gladiators has to pay an annual fee of $1.1 million

Multan Sultans has to pay an annual fee of $5.2 million

In the first PSL, only 7 interested companies came to bid for ownership of the PSL Franchises at much lower prices but the PCB implored them to increase the amounts in national interest

For the 7th team Multan Sultans, 30 interested companies came to bid for ownership of the 7th team and was ready to pay $5.2 million per year for 8 years to the PCB.

Overall the PCB has $15 million per year to run the PSL and to invest whatever is remaining for the betterment of Pakistan Cricket.

Surely the likes of the following below can pump in way more money than the current PSL owners who are nowhere near the financial muscle of the following

1) Mian Muhammad Mansha Nat
2) Sadruddin Hashwani
3) Malik Riaz
4) Engro Corporation
5) Shahid Khan (USA)
6) Sir Anwar Pervez (UK)
7) Aqeel Karim Dedhi

e.t.c.

Heck even the Pakistan army can buy out a team.
 
My email to Najam Sethi



His response

This will be a very long post so will include a TL;DR for those who don't want to read it but to understand my full idea it is best to read to whole thing.

It is impressive that he replied to your email, his inbox must quite bare to reply to a random email but it is good to see his commitment to making sure PSL is a success. There are two risks for potential investors. Pakistan has had a problem with terrorism affecting cricket with the Sri Lanka team attack making our home in UAE for 10 years but with hard work, cricket is slowing returning to Pakistan. Potential investors will want to see at least a full season in Pakistan and stability until they would want to invest.

I've seen people on this thread talk about the Pakistan market perhaps not being good enough for potential investors but it the problem does not lie with the market itself but the marketability of teams and the league which links to the first point.

Firstly, the tournament is held in UAE and crowds are dead there so the cost of playing in UAE and ticket receipts are not good enough and the poor crowds may cause the impression that there is not much interest in the league. If you were a Pakistani businessman with millions and you don't really keep up with the cricket and you turn on the TV and watch today's matches, you'd think there is no interest looking at the crowds. Only when the PSL is moved to Pakistan will crowds improve and the profitability would increase.

Secondly, the quality of international players at the PSL since it is mainly T20 globetrotters like Baz, Sanga and Pollard. They are amazing players but they're not current in cricket so won't appeal to international viewers. Imagine the interest from English media if Root or Stokes was involved or in Aus if a Warner or Smith played. The Indian market is obviously the biggest market and the PSL will not break into that market without the inclusion of Indian players. It is an unwritten rule in both leagues not to allow players from either country but if PCB swallow their pride and perhaps say to BCCI or Indian players they can be involved, it will improve ties between the two boards and will create Indian interest as it would be unusual to see. I think there are a few senior Indian players who might be interested in playing PSL just to help improve ties and if PCB perhaps put out a media release stating this, BCCI may be open to issue NOCs or Indian players could taken the matter into their own hands and try and enter their name into the draft before consulting BCCI in hope BCCI allows them to play and issue them an NOC as it would be embarrassing to BCCI if Indian players publicly put their name forward and then the players are withdrawn. There definitely some players BCCI can't say no to. Imagine the scenes if Yuvi came in for Lynn for Lahore if that was possible and him being open to playing in Pakistan. Not only would it increase marketability but we could see Pakistan players go into IPL and talks begin between the two boards to improve relations which is good for cricket in general.

Finally, I think that there needs to be a few more teams with an AK team being a priority like a Mirpuri team. I'm not entirely informed on the status of PSL in Pakistan and how popular it is with people outside of the cities that have teams so they need to create fan bases for the teams as it seems like it is a friendly tournament with the crowd just supporting Pakistan by making people feel a sense of attachment to their teams. Of course this can only happen with all of the points above as they need good enough Intl. talent to supply more teams and they can only do that by proving Pakistan is safe and they need to bring cricket to Pakistani stadiums so there is a more home/away atmosphere. This is the way to create passionate fans and it will inspire the players more as they will see the reactions of the people they are representing.

One advantage IPL had was Bollywood and the glitz and the glamour associated with the league so celebs were heavily involved with ownerships but that was more to get the interest of the general media and home market. PSL franchises have tried to do the same with ambassadors but I don't think it has had much effect. I was watching the Death of a Gentlemen (about the death of test cricket) and someone said 3 things sell in India, Cricket, Bollywood and Religion and IPL has combined two of the three so IPL has become a strong brand on the back of this along with other reasons.

These things would maximise marketability of owning a team and make it more financially viable to invest in a PSL team and that is what would attract the interest of rich businessmen like the ones you have mentioned. At this current stage, I believe big name investors are not ready to invest into a risky venture that may not guarantee big returns.

If you have read the whole thing then thank you for reading, if not here is a TL;DR

1) Prove Pakistan is safe and able to hold cricket consistently
2) Marketability of PSL is unproven and risky so to improve/show marketability of the league by:
- Moving from UAE to Pakistan -> currently looks like there is no interest with dead crowds
- Improve quality of Intl. players e.g. Stokes, Warner -> Opens up international market -> PCB should swallow pride and break unwritten rule and inform BCCI and Indian players they can join despite what they may think -> Imagine Indian market if Yuvi replaces Lynn for Lahore this PSL (Unrealistic but cool idea) -> create positive communications between PCB and BCCI
- More teams so more Pakistani cities are interested and more fans support home team -> Large populations to be able to sell to
- Create passionate fanbase -> Shirt sales -> Currently seems like crowd is supporting Pakistan not teams -> Imagine the noise/silence depending on result for Qalandars vs. Kings in Karachi or Lahore
 
The PCB has said publicly that Indian players are most welcome to play in the PSL
 
The PCB has said publicly that Indian players are most welcome to play in the PSL

Really? Where? Maybe owners like Javed Afridi could perhaps approach Indian players or Shahid Afridi could help with that as it seems he is good friends with some Indian players. I think we need to actively get Indian players rather than half-hearted statements to open up the market and increase interest because as much as I don't really want to say it because the Indian market is a huge market and it makes sense from a financial viewpoint. Of course we can't get Indian players to come if BCCI or they say no but if we try, it would be great.
 
Really? Where? Maybe owners like Javed Afridi could perhaps approach Indian players or Shahid Afridi could help with that as it seems he is good friends with some Indian players. I think we need to actively get Indian players rather than half-hearted statements to open up the market and increase interest because as much as I don't really want to say it because the Indian market is a huge market and it makes sense from a financial viewpoint. Of course we can't get Indian players to come if BCCI or they say no but if we try, it would be great.

BCCI has an official policy that Indian players will only play the IPL and nothing else. The Indian players are most lucratively paid verses the foreigners and therefore don't have the need to play in other leagues.
 
IPL was the 1st league and still sold its TV rights even before season 1 in excess of 1bn usd.

Firstly it was 918 million dollar. Close to a billion, but certainly not in excess.

Secondly, comparing PSL and IPL is like comparing Apples to Oranges. The market for cricket is much bigger in India, so broadcasters are likely to have seen the IPL as a good investment in the long run. PSL is being staged in UAE for the majority of the tournament. Had all the games been staged in Pak then I'm sure broadcasters and sponsors would have even more faith in the tournament. We will see broadcast rights sell for more in the upcoming years when the PSL fully shifts to pakistan. At this stage it's a vastly under-valued tournament solely because its being hosted overseas.
 
It is the PCB's job to reach out to him and convince him. All IPL teams are making losses, what business case do they have for continuing to invest in the IPL teams? Or maybe they are doing it for patriotic reasons and for other persuits?

You’re mistaken if you think franchises are still making loses. Even for a moment we assume they haven’t reached break even point, they are still massively profitable. For instance, Mumbai Indians franchise was bought for over $300M in 2008, but if they decide to sale it, would fetch closed to a $1B dollars. IPL brand have been booming ever since it came into existence, and now their value is more than $4B.

Every year from 2018 every franchise would get around $30-35M from IPL deal, plus individual sponsors and gate money(peanuts). I think in coming years, if IPL do decide to add more teams, it would fetch close to Billion dollars each if not more.
 
I refuse to believe that a South africa vs India series would be as lucrative for BCCI as a Pakistan vs India series. Selling more merchandise, seling more tickets, broadcast deals, ad revenue, sponsorship opportunities, TV ratings would all help in increasing the turnover for BCCI and for sponsors and all relevant parties. Nothing but money in for them and I'm sure they would love to get their hands on it.

If what you said about per match basis is true, then it shouldn't matter if the team is a minnow as you claim that BCCI get a fixed cut of the money. You are contradicting yourself.

It would be more lucrative for Broadcasters as the cost of Ad slot would go for much higher rates. For BCCI, they would get the money as per the presigned contract. If they had clause of Indo-Pak series should get more per match then Id agree with your theory, but they do not have such clause. So, under on what basis would BCCI charge STAR network more money? If BCCI does indeed ask more money then they will end up in court and lose.

So, your point hold true for broadcasters who will milk the companies wanting to purchase time slot.

As of now India gets same rate for Top 8 teams (Windies included, BD not) regardless of who it is, and whether that series garner interest or not. Yes if India is hosting SL, then broadcaster would make less money off the ad slot compared to say if it was Pakistan, but makes no difference to BCCI.
 
Really? Where? Maybe owners like Javed Afridi could perhaps approach Indian players or Shahid Afridi could help with that as it seems he is good friends with some Indian players. I think we need to actively get Indian players rather than half-hearted statements to open up the market and increase interest because as much as I don't really want to say it because the Indian market is a huge market and it makes sense from a financial viewpoint. Of course we can't get Indian players to come if BCCI or they say no but if we try, it would be great.

BCCI have a deal with its players that they will not be allowed to play any other leagues. Allowing Indian players in other league would dilute the brand of IPL which is what BCCI are protecting. I do not see Indian players playing any league including PSL, and I also dont see Pakistani players in IPL for at least next 5 years.
 
Firstly it was 918 million dollar. Close to a billion, but certainly not in excess.

Secondly, comparing PSL and IPL is like comparing Apples to Oranges. The market for cricket is much bigger in India, so broadcasters are likely to have seen the IPL as a good investment in the long run. PSL is being staged in UAE for the majority of the tournament. Had all the games been staged in Pak then I'm sure broadcasters and sponsors would have even more faith in the tournament. We will see broadcast rights sell for more in the upcoming years when the PSL fully shifts to pakistan. At this stage it's a vastly under-valued tournament solely because its being hosted overseas.

People are really overstating population thing. Yes, bigger population means more viewers, but those viewers also need to have disposable income that big companies are trying to market their brand/products.

Which market is more appealing to companies
A) 1000 people with avg disposable income of $50K
Or
B) 10000 people with avg disposable income of $1K

Having big population is always a plus but they should also have disposable income to make them attractive for investors. Indian market wasn’t that good in 80s and 90s, as it is now. More and more people have extra income to spend and thus big companies are trying for that ‘Extra income’. Pakistan’s market will be more lucrative when they get stable economy, and improve security. Until then its high risk market.
 
It’s posible Pakistan’s main problem is terrorism.. In an ideal world without any terrorism Pakistan would have been playing at home with a good IT sector and a vibrant and growing middle class.. Foreign companies would be investing heavily to capture the Pakistani market like we see in India and PCB would have been 2nd richest board..

People here will blame America maybe they are right but Pakistani army/government of past are equally to blame.. They have caused irreparable damage to Pakistan as a nation.. Sad to think of what could have been..
 
People are really overstating population thing. Yes, bigger population means more viewers, but those viewers also need to have disposable income that big companies are trying to market their brand/products.

Which market is more appealing to companies
A) 1000 people with avg disposable income of $50K
Or
B) 10000 people with avg disposable income of $1K

Having big population is always a plus but they should also have disposable income to make them attractive for investors. Indian market wasn’t that good in 80s and 90s, as it is now. More and more people have extra income to spend and thus big companies are trying for that ‘Extra income’. Pakistan’s market will be more lucrative when they get stable economy, and improve security. Until then its high risk market.



Exactly, Pakistan messed up their nation when they signed for war against terrorism.. I suppose they might not have had much of a choice saying no to America but if there was no terrorism in Pakistan there is a strong possibility they would have been a very very good market..
 
Pakistan should have nothing to do with frikkin' Saudi Arabia/Qatar/UAE and here we have threads calling for them to invest in domestic T20 teams. :facepalm:

I'm sure Pakistan has its own share of businessmen who can foot the bill.
 
People are really overstating population thing. Yes, bigger population means more viewers, but those viewers also need to have disposable income that big companies are trying to market their brand/products.

Which market is more appealing to companies
A) 1000 people with avg disposable income of $50K
Or
B) 10000 people with avg disposable income of $1K

Having big population is always a plus but they should also have disposable income to make them attractive for investors. Indian market wasn’t that good in 80s and 90s, as it is now. More and more people have extra income to spend and thus big companies are trying for that ‘Extra income’. Pakistan’s market will be more lucrative when they get stable economy, and improve security. Until then its high risk market.

Disposable income is a factor but the average middle-class pakistani aren't in such dire states that they can't afford to go to cricket games a couple of times in a month. People are interested and willing to go to cricket games in Pakistan as seen whenever international teams come to visit us. PCB and the organisers obviously have to price tickets, merchandise and whatnot appropriately to attract people, but there is no reason to say that the financial state of fans could be a major hurdle when it comes to making PSL extremely lucrative in the future. The number of fans arguement holds true because of the extra billion people that India houses and how BCCI has been able to tap into alot of those people. Don't get me wrong, when it comes to financial status, they will vary alot. Some will be in the upper middle class and ALOT will be below the poverty line, but it is a huge opportunity for BCCI that they have cashed in on.
 
Last edited:
Firstly it was 918 million dollar. Close to a billion, but certainly not in excess.

Secondly, comparing PSL and IPL is like comparing Apples to Oranges. The market for cricket is much bigger in India, so broadcasters are likely to have seen the IPL as a good investment in the long run. PSL is being staged in UAE for the majority of the tournament. Had all the games been staged in Pak then I'm sure broadcasters and sponsors would have even more faith in the tournament. We will see broadcast rights sell for more in the upcoming years when the PSL fully shifts to pakistan. At this stage it's a vastly under-valued tournament solely because its being hosted overseas.


Sir total value of rights was in excess of 1bn usd as the winning bidder also committed to a extra 108mn for marketing and promoting ipl.

Infact, within a year they were able to renegotiate that deal to close to $1.6bn(usd to dollar rate in 2009)


Why will the tv broadcast rights be affected by where the tournament is held? Are uae timings difficult to follw in Pakistan?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Disposable income is a factor but the average middle-class pakistani aren't in such dire states that they can't afford to go to cricket games a couple of times in a month. People are interested and willing to go to cricket games in Pakistan as seen whenever international teams come to visit us. PCB and the organisers obviously have to price tickets, merchandise and whatnot appropriately to attract people, but there is no reason to say that the financial state of fans could be a major hurdle when it comes to making PSL extremely lucrative in the future. The number of fans arguement holds true because of the extra billion people that India houses and how BCCI has been able to tap into alot of those people. Don't get me wrong, when it comes to financial status, they will vary alot. Some will be in the upper middle class and ALOT will be below the poverty line, but it is a huge opportunity for BCCI that they have cashed in on.

I currently do not know much about Pakistan’s economy and its middle class, but my original point was not related to whether they could go watch a game or two. Ofcourse with millions of people there will never be a shortage of fans wanting to watch a game at the stands. However, my original point was out of those millions of fans how many are say willing to shred Rs. 5000 or US $100 on purchasing original merchandise? Again, what im trying to explain is that for a country to be considered lucrative market there are lot of factors one must consider, such as security (both on personal level, and also for financial security), law and order, GDP, growth rate, population, poverty etc. Lets say, if out of 200M population if say 10% off them have extra disposable income that can afford to buy branded outfits and products, then for a marketers Pakistan is market of 20M and not 200M, as remaining 90% wouldn’t able to afford it. Now with India, lets say even 15% of people can afford to buy branded goods, that gives the market of 150-180M people. Thats almost the size of Pakistan’s population.

Bottom line is, in order for country to be lucrative they need to bring more and more people in middle and upper middle class where they could spend an extra income on branded items.
The reason why India can attract multi billion dollar deal with IPL is because of the sheer number of middle class people who could afford to spend extra income. PSL and Pakistan too will attarct similar deal when and If they too have a market with high number of middle class people.
 
I refuse to believe that a South africa vs India series would be as lucrative for BCCI as a Pakistan vs India series. Selling more merchandise, seling more tickets, broadcast deals, ad revenue, sponsorship opportunities, TV ratings would all help in increasing the turnover for BCCI and for sponsors and all relevant parties. Nothing but money in for them and I'm sure they would love to get their hands on it.

If what you said about per match basis is true, then it shouldn't matter if the team is a minnow as you claim that BCCI get a fixed cut of the money. You are contradicting yourself.

Bcci guarantees certain number of matches and series when it gives out its Tv rights. Last time the guarantee was for 96 matches over 6 years. All bcci broadcast and sponsorship deals are signed for long terms. Its not like its on a series to series basis.

So not hosting Pakistan is of little financial worry for India.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sir total value of rights was in excess of 1bn usd as the winning bidder also committed to a extra 108mn for marketing and promoting ipl.

Didn't know they gave extra 108 million. If we are going to split hairs here, then I'll point out that the 108 million was for marketing and promotional purposes, and not part of the TV rights deal exactly. But nevertheless a huge sum.


Why will the tv broadcast rights be affected by where the tournament is held? Are uae timings difficult to follw in Pakistan?

Well, no. If the PSL was hosted at home, more fans will be able to attend matches, buy merchandise to wear at the matches, meet their cricketing heroe etc. All these factors create media hype, which means PCB wins in the end and gets money thrown on their faces.

All these factors must've been taken into account by the TV rights bidders when they decided to make the bids to gauge how lucrative the league will be for everyone. These factors go a long way to decide the financial sustainability of a sports tournament and what the associated parties think of such an initiative for a tournament.

The PSL took so long to get started and kept being delayed again and again because of the fact that PCB wasnt hosting international cricket at home. PCB took huge financial hits because of this which ensured they would not sell TV rights at high prices, as they weren't in a position of power and couldn't bargain. The TV rights bidders took advantage of that and were able to buy the rights at lower prices.

Ten years down the line, if all PSL matches are hosted at home, I'm sure TV rights bids will be much higher.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They will come in eventually if teams are expanded.

Initially nobody new about sports management and stuff and also that PSL will become such a huge success. In terms of money it is just pennys for the richest 20-50 or so persons in Pakistan.

But now for Multan Sultans team which went for double the price in comparison to Karachi and Lahore had more than 32 bids which is a big number.

Now even if you see sponsors they are much bigger the before i.e Engro, Mcdonalds, BOP etc

I am sure when there will be a 7th team we might see much higher franchise price and more bids.
 
Last edited:
No need of foreigners as I have stated in earlier post buying a team is like a peanuts for top 50 or so Pakistani industrilists.

MS went for double the price then Khi and Lhr, 7th one will be more than double the price than MS.
First year was the riskiest as it was a new product so the richest Pakistanis were apprehensive. As now they have seen the success they wont shy away if got the oppurtunity. Engro is trying to be part of this by sponsoring QG.
 
Back
Top