What's new

Would the removal of the coin toss in Tests make the five-day game more interesting?

Will the removal of the coin toss in Tests make the 5-Day game more interesting?


  • Total voters
    54

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,133
https://www.samaa.tv/sports/2018/05/icc-may-scrap-coin-toss-in-test-cricket/

A meeting of the sport’s governing body will be held at the end of June in Mumbai in which the matter will be addressed.

The decision of batting or bowling first will be taken by the captain of the visiting team if the coin toss is scrapped.

The ICC Test Championship is schedule to take place from 2019 to 2021 and nine teams have qualified for the tournament.

Twenty-seven bilateral series will be played between nine teams and the final is expected to be played from June 10 to June June 14, 2021 between the two top teams.

==============

The beauty of the game under threat?
 
Plans to remove the coin toss in Test cricket have been backed by the England and Wales Cricket Board.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) will discuss the idea later this month as it considers ways to reduce home advantage.

It could introduce the change for the new World Test Championship, which starts with next summer's Ashes series between England and Australia.

The ECB scrapped the mandatory toss in the County Championship from 2016.

In domestic four-day matches, the visiting captain is given the option of bowling first or having the toss as normal to decide which side bats first.

The ICC could adopt that approach, with the other option being to give the visiting captain the outright choice of batting or bowling first.

The ECB brought in the change to encourage better pitches, whereas the ICC proposal is thought to be about diminishing home advantage.

In 150 Tests since the start of 2015, the away side has won only 45 matches, with 80 defeats and 25 draws (when taking the United Arab Emirates as the home venue for Pakistan).

The world governing body's cricket committee is set to discuss scrapping the toss and other issues at a meeting in Mumbai at the end of May.

A start date for any new rule about the toss is still up for discussion but a logical time to introduce it would be with the inaugural ICC World Test Championship.

The 2019 Ashes, in which England will attempt to regain the urn after a 4-0 defeat last winter, is the first event of the new competition in which nine teams will play six series of Test matches over a two-year period - three at home and three away.

There will be a minimum of two matches in each series - all of which will be scheduled to last five days - but can be expanded to five for series such as the Ashes.

The two teams with the most points will contest the final in England in June 2021.

The competition is designed to increase interest in the longer form of the game and avoid one-sided affairs.

Removing the toss in the County Championship increased the number of games lasting until the fourth day, with 85% going the distance in 2016 compared to 74% in 2015.

However, it has not led to a rise in away wins. In 2015, before the toss was scrapped, the away side won 45 matches, compared to 33 in 2016 and 36 in 2017.

https://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/44176355
 
Last edited:
I think it is one of the better proposals for reforming the game. The home tem has too much of an advantage these days.
 
Very good move , teams cannot prepare bad pitches easily now. Very Interesting move
 
No! Toss is a part of traditional cricket!

If they can’t play properly in foreign conditions, then it’s their fault.
 
Very poor decision.

Home teams will start preparing flat pitches to deny any advantage to the touring teams. Green tops and rank turners would go extinct.
 
The FUN of Test cricket is about seeing foreign teams trying to perform on challenging green tops and rack turners. When a visiting team is won a Test match overseas, it is seen as a HUGE victory. Having flat pitches and no coin tosses will make Test cricket less important.
 
The counter argument can be made that home teams will make super flat roads, to nullify any advantage to visiting team, which mean runs fest and boring draws, for example every visiting team in India will always choose to Bat 1st to avoid batting in 4th inning, so India will always have to bat 2nd and 4th, after some time it will get boring and mundane seeing same script over and over again, and if home teams prepare bowling friendly pitch they will always be put in to bat 1st, is this even playing field? Toss brings a lot of permutations and situations to test cricket,,, But if you really have to get rid of toss, than need to introduce some more just alternative.
 
Get rid of toss. Let the visiting teams decide the pitch condition as well to create a balance. Hopefully Asian teams can win/draw a test match or two in Australia and South Africa then.
 
The counter argument can be made that home teams will make super flat roads, to nullify any advantage to visiting team, which mean runs fest and boring draws, for example every visiting team in India will always choose to Bat 1st to avoid batting in 4th inning, so India will always have to bat 2nd and 4th, after some time it will get boring and mundane seeing same script over and over again, and if home teams prepare bowling friendly pitch they will always be put in to bat 1st, is this even playing field? Toss brings a lot of permutations and situations to test cricket,,, But if you really have to get rid of toss, than need to introduce some more just alternative.

Yup that means on the Fifth day, India will be always batting on a rack turner. ICC comes up with the most stupidest of ideas. I thought they were supposed to be cricket professionals.
 
I don't see why the home team would start preparing flat pitches. That would only result in a drawn series, which is basically a good result for the visiting team.
 
Pink ball 4-day/night test where opposition decides to bat/ball first and also the playing conditions. 12 member teams with option of substituting a player every inning. Increase bending angle for spinners to 30 degree for effort ball.

Coz the current form of test cricket cannot survive.
 
The only reason ecb backs this is because of the way they get bashed in UAE and India.

Toss should stay. Teams should improve themselves and not find easy ways to make the game easier for them
 
Great decision! Always thought the visiting teams are at a disadvanatage. Atleast the toss somewhat levels the playing field, a little bit.
 
Just one caveat, which is that the subcontinent teams are going to be the ones most prejudiced by this. The toss does not play a huge role in places like Australia, NZ, SA or England. But I suppose that the whole idea of this is to level the playing field in all conditions.
 
Bad bad decision! With this, the visiting team to India will always FORCE the hosts to bat in the fourth innings. It will bring an end to many dynamics and possibilities of Test cricket. It will make Test matches very repetitive and boring. After the first innings, you will already know which team will win.
 
Another diabolical idea by the ECB just to make sure they don't get smashed in Asian conditions. They would rather play tame draws. And then some folks think it's the BCCI that's been ruining cricket over the years.
 
Another diabolical idea by the ECB just to make sure they don't get smashed in Asian conditions. They would rather play tame draws. And then some folks think it's the BCCI that's been ruining cricket over the years.

You realise the ECB brought this in at domestic level to discourage the development of medium pace dibbly dobbly bowlers...?
 
You realise the ECB brought this in at domestic level to discourage the development of medium pace dibbly dobbly bowlers...?

Then restrict it to just your domestic. No need to introduce another dumb reform in international cricket
 
They need to add 80 overs per innings limit with a new ball after 40 overs. It will force a result in 4 days.
 
The only reason ecb backs this is because of the way they get bashed in UAE and India.

Toss should stay. Teams should improve themselves and not find easy ways to make the game easier for them

Last tour to India, they won every toss.
 
Won't make a difference as regards to interest, doubt people will change their views on test cricket due to this. I hope we keep the toss though, it's traditional!
 
This would be a massive advantage to the non SC teams that's all it would be. Wouldn't have to deal with spinners on the last couple of days. There's nothing much it it for the SC sides.
 
LAHORE: While legendary batsman Javed Miandad has endorsed International Cricket Council’s proposal to abolish toss from the game, another former Test cricketer Salim Altaf says instead of doing away with the tradition, the game’s governing body should introduce international curators to produce standardised pitches.

The ICC’s cricket committee will debate removing the toss when it meets in Mumbai later this month.

The panel, which operates in an advisory role and can only make recommendations to the ICC chief executives’ committee, is due to consider whether the choice to bat or bowl first should be given to the visiting captain to encourage fairer pitches.

“There is no harm if the ICC tries to go with the new system of abolishing the toss. Ultimately, the move may force the home team to prepare pitches of good standard instead of focusing on preparing tracks that [completely] suit them,” Miandad said while talking to Dawn on Saturday.

“No doubt, toss is an integral part [of the game] but you have to experiment in order to achieve better results in the game; and this move [of abolishing toss system] may also prove helpful in introducing the tradition of producing good-standard pitches, as tracks giving unfair help to home teams has become a major hurdle in recent years for touring squads,” Miandad, a veteran of 124 Tests, added.

On the other hand, Salim insists that toss should remain part of the game.

“Toss is an integral and traditional part of cricket. Therefore, abolishing it does not make any sense. In fact, toss is also a source of judging the wisdom of a captain who is required to make a call in case he wins the toss. And his acumen is then proven right or wrong at the end of the match which may result in victory or loss for his team,” Salim told Dawn.

“As PCB’s chief operating officer, I have been attending ICC meetings during which there were discussions regarding introducing international curators to maintain the standard of pitches.

“I think having international curators with a set guideline to make sporting pitches would be a better option instead of ending the toss,” Salim reckoned.

“In India and Pakistan slow-and-low pitches are prepared which help home sides win matches rather easily as this region generally has [world’s] best spinners. However, when the same team [from sub-continent] tours England, Australia or New Zealand it fails to produce good performance mainly because pitches in these countries are in complete contrast to sub-continent tracks,” Salim elaborated.

“Every cricket board wants to prepare pitches [in home games] that suits its own team whereas an international curator will prepare pitches according to the standards set by the ICC, giving equal opportunities to both home and touring teams to excel with their available resources.

He added, “It is better for cricket that it should be played on sporting wickets, giving equal help to batsmen, spinners and seamers and that is a big challenge for the ICC.

“And to achieve this scenario [of sporting tracks], the ICC should come out with a comprehensive programme to install international curators having the ability to prepare sporting wickets all over the world,” he said.

“I remember in 1987, Pakistan leg-spinner Abdul Qadir had taken nine wickets on the first day of the first Test against England at the Gaddafi Stadium while other bowlers remained wicketless,” he recalled.

Asked if drop-in pitches could be the alternative of having equal standard pitches throughout the cricketing world, Salim did not agree. “It would create other problems; rather than drop-in pitches, expert curators can be a much better option.”

https://www.dawn.com/news/1408715/miandad-backs-abolishing-toss-from-cricket-salim-differs
 
I like the idea, as it takes away huge home advantages on pitches seen in India and Bang for example.
 
For those who think it should be removed, what would you have instead?

Offer the visiting team the chance to bowl first or something else? Perhaps a quiz, a fitness challenge?
 
I like the idea, as it takes away huge home advantages on pitches seen in India and Bang for example.

Win the toss, win the match is a myth especially on Indian pitches. We have lost 10 tosses in last 5 years, lost the test only once. Won 12 tosses, won 10 tests.
 
Aren't they getting more results now than before, who is behind this stupid thinking.

It is quality of players and their techniques away from home that needs improvement.
 
The home, higher ranked team won the toss in this match and still got smashed. Shows as long as you play well, toss is irrelevant.
 
The proposal has been rejected by the ICC

"The Committee discussed whether the toss should be automatically awarded to the visiting team but felt that it was an integral part of Test cricket which forms part of the narrative of the game."
 
No. It adds to the uncertainty and captains have to think about decisions. It would be boring without the toss
 
Actually they should make it so touring team gets to choose. Now a days so many pitches are made to really give advantage to home team, even to the point that games can be decided/predicted based on analysis of pitch and who wins the toss.

The coin toss was a chance for touring team to obtain the advantage that was set out for home team.

Instead of removing the coin toss ICC should hire curators just like ICC umpires. These curators will work for ICC who work to ensure equal chance for both teams.
 
Not a fan of removing toss. The reason away wins are so cherished is because you beat all odds and emerged victorious. If you make away victories easier it will reduce their charm imo.


What I would like instead is that the points you gain from a home win should be lower than an away win. For example 3 home wins should equal 2 away wins or something along those lines. Right now all you have to do is win at home and then you rise through the rankings even if you get your behinds handed to you away as shown by India.
 
The name “Test Cricket” came, because it’s the ultimate test of your skills, endurance, resilience, temperament and adoptability.

I don’t see any reason why Toss should be removed in a 2 Innings game, where both teams have two bites. Also, toss comes with an unique challenge for the winning side as well - decision dilemma. I am sure, had he won the toss for a 2nd time on that Lord’s track, against PAK, Root will bat first again - Poms batted poor, then dropped crucial catches; it had very little of winning toss or batting first.

I do agree that in T20 they can introduce this - in baseball home team always bat 2nd; not a bad idea for T20. May be in ODI as well they can try this, but not in Test.

What it needs is a proper scrutiny on Test wicket without double standard.
 
The scrapping of the Toss in Tests is tossed says ICC

The committee, headed by former India spinner Anil Kumble, had debated giving visiting teams the option to bat or bowl first to nullify home teams producing pitches which could work in their favour.

A recommendation had been put to the committee to do away with tosses for matches in the inaugural Test championship, which begins in 2019.

But that has been rejected in favour of a push to create more balanced pitches.

"The Committee discussed whether the toss should be automatically awarded to the visiting team but felt that it was an integral part of Test cricket which forms part of the narrative of the game," an ICC statement read.

"However, in acknowledging that the preparation of Test pitches that could provide a risk to the competitiveness of the ICC World Test Championship, the Committee urged members to continue to focus on the delivery of pitches that provide a better balance between bat and ball in line with ICC regulations."

The committee has authorised the recommendation of increased sanctions for ball-tampering and a new offence relating to personal abuse after issues during Australia's tour of South Africa.
 
Not a fan of removing toss. The reason away wins are so cherished is because you beat all odds and emerged victorious. If you make away victories easier it will reduce their charm imo.


What I would like instead is that the points you gain from a home win should be lower than an away win. For example 3 home wins should equal 2 away wins or something along those lines. Right now all you have to do is win at home and then you rise through the rankings even if you get your behinds handed to you away as shown by India.

Our upsurge to rank 1 started post 2015 WC under skipper Kohli. In this period this is our away record:
Sri Lanka 2-1
WI 2-0
Sri Lanka 3-0
South Africa 1-2

We have won most of our home matches, but where have we got our behinds handed to us away?

When we had bad results overseas in the 2011-15 period we were mostly ranked in the mid table, never near the top. The last time we were number 1 was when we drew in SA and won in England and NZ.
 
Not such a good idea. Things will simply become too repititive. You prepare a green pitch and no one will bat on it and if you prepare a flat pitch the visiting team will always bat first to avoid having to bat in the 4th innings.

The ICC shouldn't be aiming to remove home advantage rather give more reward to visiting teams which manage to perform and win despite the home advantage of the other team. Away wins should be worth more points in rankings simple as that.
 
I don't think it makes too much of a difference to be honest.
 
Do you guys feel toss should be scraped and away team allowed to decide in Tests?

Looking at recent Eng Vs Sl series it may be a good idea to do away with the toss.Who knows what would happen if Eng batted last on those crumbling pitches.
Also it will discourage dust bowls or green mambas
What are your opinions guys:sarf2
 
Pathetic idea. Even worse than the free hit rule or that baseball style pinch hitter rule in ODI.

The game is as beautiful as it can be with current state - if only they could impose some sadist punishments for deliberate slow over rate.
 
The ICC has already made a joke of the ODI format that I so dearly loved. Make no mistake, I still love ODI cricket. But the ICC has done everything they can to spoil it. You want them to start screwing with the Test format as well?
 
Yes, I think the toss should be done away with as it operates today.

At the least, have the team who lost the toss in the first game have the choice to bat or bowl in the second game. Then have a toss again for the 3rd game (if there is one).

Or how about you vie for the opportunity to choose - eg. in darts, you each get a dart to throw at the bulls. The closest to the bulls starts.
 
Not sure if it is 100% true but if it is than this is excellent decision

Media Report:

NEW CHANGES IN PAKISTAN DOMESTIC CRICKET! PCB decided to use 'No Toss' option in upcoming First-Class season. Last Season, visiting teams usually complain home side for underprepared pitches.

The visiting team will have option to bowl first without spinning coin. Toss only if both teams want to bat first.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Faf du Plessis has suggested scrapping the toss in Test cricket in order to help away teams become more competitive.

Du Plessis' South Africa side were whitewashed 3-0 in India - losing the final two Tests by an innings - with the hosts electing to bat after winning the toss in every match.

India have won their last 11 Test series on home soil, with their previous defeat on their own patch coming when they lost 2-1 to England in 2012.

"Every Test match, they bat first, they score 500, they declare when it's dark," Du Plessis said of India, who sit top of the ICC Test rankings and the inaugural World Test Championship.

"They get three wickets when it's dark and when day three starts, you're under pressure. It was like copy and paste in every Test match.

"[If the toss is removed] then away teams have a better chance. In South Africa, I don't mind that. We bat on green tops anyway."

South Africa - who also lost their previous Test series at home, to Sri Lanka in February - welcome England for a four-Test series in December and January.

The first Test, at Centurion, begins in Boxing Day before further fixtures in Cape Town (January 3), Port Elizabeth (January 16) and Johannesburg (January 24).

https://www.skysports.com/cricket/n...ss-should-be-axed-in-tests-to-help-away-teams
 
I am fine with the decision of scraping the toss from test cricket. We have been watching so many home series being one-sided affair. The results have been ridiculously in home teams favour. This decision will help ensure that games are equally favourable to both teams and we will see results being more close affairs rather than 3-0 or 4-0 that we see most of the times.

However, what negative this will do is it will take away the shine from an away team when they go and beat top teams in their backyard. India beating Aus in Aus or SL beating SA in their backyard or non Asian teams coming to subcontinent and winning series will no longer be a great achievement.

However,the test championship will become far more worthy with this. If India goes to England or SA, they will have the option to decide to bat or bowl as per their liking and in case if they lose they can't complain anymore and the same applies to non Asian teams when they tour India.
 
If they are going to do away with toss, then they should spice the things, if visitors are allowed to whatever in first test ( bat or ball first) ,then they they should do opposite in second test and so on.
This method will give opposite teams a fair chance while also maintaining home advantage.
 
If they are going to do away with toss, then they should spice the things, if visitors are allowed to whatever in first test ( bat or ball first) ,then they they should do opposite in second test and so on.
This method will give opposite teams a fair chance while also maintaining home advantage.

This would be atrociously unfair.
 
Wouldn't this just encourage more flat pitches to be prepared?

Terrible idea, it takes away the charm of an away win.
 
Should the coin toss be removed as a way of reducing home ground advantage?

The stats prove the toss is having a huge impact on Test results! The top three spots in the ICC Test rankings are occupied by India, New Zealand and Australia, their captains being Virat Kohli, Kane Williamson and Tim Paine respectively. During the 46 Tests where either member of this trio have won the toss, there have only been four defeats. For these three Test skippers, there is statistically only an 8.7 per cent chance of losing when the coin falls in their favour.

Opposing teams are in dire straits if Kohli, Williamson or Paine wins the toss — there’s a 91.3 per cent chance they won’t emerge victors before a ball is even bowled.

In the 25 Tests where Kohli has won the toss, India have never lost. Not once. When the coin has fallen in Kohli’s favour, India have claimed 21 wins and four draws.

Paine has only lost one Test match after winning the toss — he controversially chose to bowl first at The Oval in August last year, arguably costing the Australians an Ashes series victory.

Only once have Williamson’s Black Caps lost a Test after winning the toss and electing to bat first — against Sri Lanka in Galle last year.

WHEN WINNING THE TOSS

Virat Kohli’s India — 84 per cent win, 16 per cent draw, 0 per cent loss

Tim Paine’s Australia — 78 per cent win, 11 per cent draw, 11 per cent loss

Kane Williamson’s New Zealand — 70 per cent win, 12 per cent draw, 18 per cent loss

Faf du Plessis’ South Africa — 69 per cent win, 19 per cent draw, 12 per cent loss

Former Australian Test captain Allan Border called for the toss to be scrapped, suggesting the away captain should be given the right to choose, which would also lessen the impact of pitch doctoring.

“I’m in the camp for no toss and letting the visiting side decide,” Border told foxsports.com.au.

“Traditionally it shouldn’t play such an important role in the game, but it has become that way.

“I don’t think we need to fiddle around with Test cricket too much, but it has become an issue because all visiting sides feel like they get stitched up by pitch preparation.
 
I liked it. Go ahead. India are just so strong at home that they will win even if they get to bat in 4th inning.

Also, I don't see their home dominance going to an end anytime sooner. We have a lot of players already ready for future as far as home tours are concerned.

With a W/L of 9.0 in 2010s, my point only gets strengthened further.
 
To make things fair and avoid the home team preparing pitches in their favour, the option whether to bat or bowl first should be given to the touring team. This way the home team will have to prepare a balanced pitch and cannot rely on luck of the toss. It will also allow the touring team to prepare better and create more competitive cricket.
 
Not sure about removal of toss making test cricket interesting but it will definitely stop fans from making silly excuses after losing. :inti
 
Coin toss is tradition. Shouldn't be tampered with. Would love to see how teams like India and New Zealand would do at home when they lose the toss though.
 
If home team is ranked lower/higher than visitor, give the home/away team the chance to pick bat/bowl in the first match. After that alternate the team to pick bat/bowl every successive match.

This way the lower ranked team can get the ball running initially, but the visiting team has a chance to come back in the next few games if they put on a poor show.

The whole idea of coin toss is that it’s supposed to be 50-50, but the idea is flawed because of tiny sample size in each series. There’s no basis for a coin toss.
 
Should ICC abolish toss rule in test cricket

In the last 15 or so years away tours have become extremely tricky for the teams to win. Because most of the teams prepare pitches that suit them & there is nothing wrong with it but to have some balance between both sides on away tours ICC should just abolish the toss rule & allow the visiting team to choose whether to bowl or bat first.

In this way, the host won't be able to prepare green mambas like SENA countries do & similarly Asian teams won't be able to produce rank turners because they will certainly lose the game batting 4th.
 
In the last 15 or so years away tours have become extremely tricky for the teams to win. Because most of the teams prepare pitches that suit them & there is nothing wrong with it but to have some balance between both sides on away tours ICC should just abolish the toss rule & allow the visiting team to choose whether to bowl or bat first.

In this way, the host won't be able to prepare green mambas like SENA countries do & similarly Asian teams won't be able to produce rank turners because they will certainly lose the game batting 4th.

Pakistan has done this sort of thing in QEA Trophy & I really enjoyed it.
 
I am fine with the decision of scraping the toss from test cricket. We have been watching so many home series being one-sided affair. The results have been ridiculously in home teams favour. This decision will help ensure that games are equally favourable to both teams and we will see results being more close affairs rather than 3-0 or 4-0 that we see most of the times.

However, what negative this will do is it will take away the shine from an away team when they go and beat top teams in their backyard. India beating Aus in Aus or SL beating SA in their backyard or non Asian teams coming to subcontinent and winning series will no longer be a great achievement.

However,the test championship will become far more worthy with this. If India goes to England or SA, they will have the option to decide to bat or bowl as per their liking and in case if they lose they can't complain anymore and the same applies to non Asian teams when they tour India.

I agree overall and I don’t even think away victories will lose their shine. You have to be damn good to win away, whether you win a toss or not.
 
The no coin toss or conceding the toss works in County Cricket and QeA but not in internationals. I would not be in favour of it.
 
I will like to see the home team getting the home advantage, but visiting team deciding to bat or bowl. It will make it interesting.

If Indian thinks that they can win on rank tuner or flat track or seaming track while batting last then they can prepare those tracks.

If NZ is fully comfortable with green mamba which becomes better to bat later then they can prepare green mamba.

....
....

I bet the pitch will be more balanced everywhere because you would have zero chance to exploit the best-tailored conditions. Right now the chance is 50%.
 

NZ is most dependent on winning the toss it seems. They drop to W/L of 1.6 from not losing a game.

Aus is also somewhat dependent on winning the toss. W/L drops from 7 to 2.8.

India seems to have very little impact with toss with W/L of 9 in both cases.

Interesting stats.

I still think games go closer even in India when visiting team wins toss. Sure, they are too strong to win with same frequency despite losing toss.
 
Last edited:
Most of the times visiting teams will choose to bat first as they will look to make the best use of the pitch. This will decidedly hand them the advantage.
The coin toss randomizes(supposedly!) this advantage and makes the game interesting.
So no.
 
Most of the times visiting teams will choose to bat first as they will look to make the best use of the pitch. This will decidedly hand them the advantage.
The coin toss randomizes(supposedly!) this advantage and makes the game interesting.
So no.
The idea is to force host to make better pitches with less home advantage. Though it probably fails to account that in SC conditions 5th day pitch will be a rank turner anyway regardless of flatness on day 1.

I agree that current scenario is best where coin toss at least randomises it and if visitors have someone like Root then they can capitalise on it. Or bank on their own spinners to save the day.
 
Yes. The visiting teams should be allowed to choose whether they want to bat or bowl first. Home teams will still prepare tracks that suit them but the visitors will be able to make use of the best conditions.
 
The idea is to force host to make better pitches with less home advantage. Though it probably fails to account that in SC conditions 5th day pitch will be a rank turner anyway regardless of flatness on day 1.

Exactly. Whoever bats in 4th innings will be at distinct disadvantage. So why not randomize it.
 
Who Gives A Toss

Hello PPers,

I've been a regular non-participating member for several years. I joined up recently and would like to hear your criticisms and opinions on the toss. I tried looking for previous discussions on this topic but found nothing.

The toss is the one aspect of a match which is completely left to chance and no amount of practice can improve or worsen your prospects of making the right call. Getting it wrong can often mean your team is on the back foot before the players have even taken to the field.

I've been following cricket for over 40 years and this issue has persistently bothered me. I'm in the UK and for a test match if the conditions are overcast and the pitch helpful, losing the toss can at times effectively render the match over in the first session for the side batting first - generally the toss loser. Similarly on the subcontinent, if it's hot and the pitch is dry and unrelenting for the bowler, the side batting first controls the game by virtue of winning the toss.

I've often wondered how to mitigate the advantage so it doesn't hamper the losing team so drastically. I think I have a workable solution and if I had the ear of the MCC I'd propose the following change; both captains name their respective teams prior to the toss but the losing captain is then allowed to make one change to their team after being told whether they're batting or bowling. This obviously balances the toss loss somwwhat just considering the two aforementioned examples of conditions, what are your thoughts?
 
One of the stupidest rules in cricket. The game needs to do away with the toss. Given how much home teams are dominating, allowing the visiting teams the advantage of deciding to bat or bowl first would really make sense.
 
Nah it’s fair. Visiting sides need to be tested properly, the home side will be tested as well, that’s what the toss promises, 50-50, no discrimination.

I do like the idea of being able to name XI AFTER the toss.
 
Nothing wrong with it.

Toss adds the luck factor to the game and it is part of the beauty of cricket.
 
I've never got the criticism and I never will. I think its part and parcel of the game and adds an interesting and unique element to the game.

Simply giving the choice to the home or away team would be unjust and would likely make the game more predictable. By having a 50/50 chance it comes down to the luck of the draw and is therefore not something you can control.
 
Last edited:
One of the stupidest rules in cricket. The game needs to do away with the toss. Given how much home teams are dominating, allowing the visiting teams the advantage of deciding to bat or bowl first would really make sense.


What about the games at neutral venues then? Like the world cups and Tri series' and the WTC finals?
 
I'd propose the following change; both captains name their respective teams prior to the toss but the losing captain is then allowed to make one change to their team after being told whether they're batting or bowling. This obviously balances the toss loss somwwhat just considering the two aforementioned examples of conditions, what are your thoughts?

Good one.
This will surely help bring in more balance.
 
Back
Top