What's new

Years later, the ‘Gilly’ effect is still being felt

giri26

ODI Debutant
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Runs
8,528
Post of the Week
1
I started watching cricket in the early 1990s, when the role of a wicketkeeper in a Test team was to be good with the gloves and contribute some useful runs with the bat.

Australia had Ian Healy, who was a brilliant keeper and also was a useful bat down the order, at a time when teams were happy with keepers contributing 20s and 30s, with the occasional 50.

All that changed on November 21, 1999.

Chasing 369 to win against a strong Pakistan at Bellerive Oval, Australia had lost half their side for just over a 100.

Justin Langer was holding up one end and Adam Gilchrist, in only his second Test having replaced Healy, came in to join him in the middle.

The Pakistan bowling attack was a strong one, comprising Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Shoaib Akhtar and Saqlain Mushtaq. Even though Gilchrist had made his ODI debut three years earlier, no one could have predicted what followed over the next 24 hours.

Gilchrist scored a brilliant, unbeaten 149, Australia chased down the total, and the legend was born. For the next nine years, Gilchrist tormented bowling attacks around the world.

Gilchrist was brilliant behind the stumps too, was excellent keeping wickets to the legendary Shane Warne, and he had an amazing ODI career as an opener.

This success made teams world over realise how important the role of a good wicketkeeper-batsman can be, and in an effort to find their own version ended up compromising the primary skills of many a keeper.

The only other player who did well as a keeper in the ’90s was Andy Flower, but again, he wasn’t as destructive as Gilchrist.

Mark Boucher was brilliant for South Africa and was decent with the bat. Alec Stewart was good for England, as were Adam Parore and Dave Richardson, but none came even close to the impact Gilly had for Australia.

In the 2000s we saw Kumar Sangakkara, AB de Villiers, Brendon McCullum and MS Dhoni – all brilliant for their teams – but again, none had the impact of Gilchrist.

Sangakkara and De Villiers found keeping and batting hard to combine, and gave up their gloves to concentrate on batting. Dhoni was a good keeper but was not effective with the bat overseas. McCullum played just 52 Tests as a keeper before becoming a frontline batter for his side.

From the current generation, possibly Quinton de Kock comes close, but he has a long way to go before he can be compared to the Aussie.

Gilchrist not only averaged 47.8 with the bat but also scored those runs at an enormous strike rate of 81.95 – a deadly combination that saw him turn Test matches multiple times during his career.

Adam Gilchrist set a trend that teams the world over are struggling to follow to this date.
 
Gilly was brilliant and was one of my favourite Aussie players. I still remember how he would just turn around and walk if he hit the ball. The most famous occurrence was the 2003 semi-finals against Sri Lanka, the Aussies were in trouble but he still walked. I am not sure if the umpire would have given him out.
 
That's why I rate Gilchrist as the greatest test cricketer of all time. The most astonishing fact is that he averaged 50+ for the majority of his career. I think only in last year or so, his batting declined and lowered his career average.
 
Gilly is an inspiration.

Sanath, Saeed and Gilly were golden left handers.
 
Gilchrist wasn't that much of a good keeper.

I like him but he was more of a batsman than a keeper.
 
Gilchrist wasn't that much of a good keeper.

I like him but he was more of a batsman than a keeper.

I think his batting overshadowed his keeping. He wasn't Ian Healy but he was brilliant keeping to Shane Warne and the fast bowlers. It is just that he was such a great batsman, his keeping never made the headlines.
 
I think his batting overshadowed his keeping. He wasn't Ian Healy but he was brilliant keeping to Shane Warne and the fast bowlers. It is just that he was such a great batsman, his keeping never made the headlines.

His keeping not making the headlines can be considered a good thing, just goes to show he wasn't bad enough either to be mentioned
 
Gilchrist's keeping is severely underrated only because everyone talks about his batting as that was his claim to fame. But his keeping was top notch.
 
Gilchrist makes most All Time Test XI , that shows how special he was. Gilchrist was pretty safe keeper. He kept well to Warne , Lee , Mcgrath. He was the prime reason why Australian team never missed a quality AR during his playing days.
 
Gilchrist rarely dropped a catch and when he did he called it quits right there and than ( 08' Border-Gavaskar ) . He practiced his keeping far more than his batting. What a player. Greatest #7 batsman of all time and his innings against India in the 1st Test of the 2001 Border-Gavaskar series when India were 99-5 was amazing. From 99' to 05' Ashes, he was unstoppable. Like Ponting, he could have averaged 60 if not for the last 3-4 years of his career. My brother-in-law met him a few weeks ago and he was kind enough to talk to him and take a photo. Great guy off and on the field.
 
Last edited:
Gilchrist is one of the most revolutionary cricketers in history who redefined his disciple. There have been many great players and many legends, but he transcends all statistics because his impact on the game has been greater than many ATGs.

Certainly among the top 5 greatest cricketers of all time, and he might be surpassed by a WK batsman in the future (I think de Kock might do it), but no one will be able to match his influence because he changed the role of WK batsmen forever.
 
Gilchrist is one of the most revolutionary cricketers in history who redefined his disciple. There have been many great players and many legends, but he transcends all statistics because his impact on the game has been greater than many ATGs.

Certainly among the top 5 greatest cricketers of all time, and he might be surpassed by a WK batsman in the future (I think de Kock might do it), but no one will be able to match his influence because he changed the role of WK batsmen forever.

QDK might if he averages 50 and wins his team a World Cup or two, still very hard.

Gilchrist played his career against ATG bowling and decent bowling, although he didn't get to face the best bowling as they were in his own team, still 3 great knocks in WC finals is insane. QDK will be facing average bowlers in a batting era, I expect south Africas bowling to regress so he would benefit from that in terms of ranking.
 
QDK might if he averages 50 and wins his team a World Cup or two, still very hard.

Gilchrist played his career against ATG bowling and decent bowling, although he didn't get to face the best bowling as they were in his own team, still 3 great knocks in WC finals is insane. QDK will be facing average bowlers in a batting era, I expect south Africas bowling to regress so he would benefit from that in terms of ranking.
Gilly won 3 WC's and had a 50 in all 3 Finals including a 100 in the 07' Final. Very, very hard to surpass that.
 
Gilly won 3 WC's and had a 50 in all 3 Finals including a 100 in the 07' Final. Very, very hard to surpass that.

Yeah I might be underselling him.

If 2 or more ATG bowlers pop out in the next 10 years for QDK to face and if he averages 50+ while winning 2 world cups on his own then only then I will place him above the Gilly
 
A man who revolutionised ODI cricket with his risk taking batting and also revolutionised test cricket by looking to be positive when batting with the tail.

An all time great.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">"The way he played the game was revolutionary.”<br><br>Looking back on the incredible work of three-time <a href="https://twitter.com/cricketworldcup?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@cricketworldcup</a> winner <a href="https://twitter.com/gilly381?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@gilly381</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ICCHallOfFame?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ICCHallOfFame</a> &#55356;&#57253; <a href="https://t.co/U6pTcRFgGO">pic.twitter.com/U6pTcRFgGO</a></p>— ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1399191652074463241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 31, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Andy Flower deserves an honourable mention too. He did not have the devastating impact that Gilly did with that strike rate but Andy did average 53.70 with the bat and scored 4400 odd runs while keeping and that was very impressive for that era (1992-2003) especially considering that he played for Zimbabwe.
 
Gilchrist is a revolutionary and he defined the role of wicket keeper bat. Undoubtedly, one of the greatest cricketers of all-time.

A wicket keeper batsman averaging 45 is equal to a specialist batsman averaging 50 in my opinion :inti
 
Gilly played against better teams and bowling attacks. Nowadays half of the teams are rebuilding, don't have quality players like before or struggling due to greed of some boards who do not want to play against these teams for their own benefit. :inti
 
The reason I rate Gilchrist higher than many other attacking batsmen of his era , is this guy actually made good balls from top bowlers disappear to the boundary too. Otherwise there’s always plenty of attacking batsmen around who can put away the bad balls, I mean if putting away loose balls was the only quality needed to be a top batsman then Akmal brothers would be ranked alongside the Chappels and Waugh twins today.
 
Back
Top