Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Viv, Sachin, Ponting, Kohli, ABDV.
1) Viv
2) ABD
3) Sachin
4) Ponting
5) Amla
Viv is the GOAT, ABD is the modern-day Viv. Sachin is Sachin and Ponting's impactful innings at #3 are legendary. Amla is a controversial choice but 25 centuries, average of 50 and SR of 90 all as an opener from South Africa is pretty amazing.
Dhoni is a lock for the keeping position in my all-time XI and the best #6 in ODI cricket but he bats too low to be compared directly with top order bats like Amla and Ponting.
All-time ODI top six batting lineup:
1) Amla
2) Sachin
3) Ponting
4) Viv
5) ABD
6) Dhoni
This batting lineup is perfect. It has everything one would need.
Viv, Sachin, Kohli, Dhoni/Bevan and AB. I think AB has gone ahead of Ponting now.
Amla doesn't belong. Even Rohit Sharma has better numbers as ODI opener than him.
Viv
Kohli
Bevan
Tendulkar
AB
In what world? Rohit is a FTB and nowhere near Amla.
In what world? Rohit is a FTB and nowhere near Amla.
Richards and SRT are a given.
Dhoni, Ponting, ABDV for me. Bevan misses out by a whisker. Kohli has been superb but he hasnt dominated a WC tournament or even been half as good in tournament finals. I hope he rectifies that by the end of his career,
I believe Lara had the best peak for an ODI batsmen as he dominated the greatest ODI bowlers in history at their peak. I would've added him in my top 5 had he not regressed so badly in the second half of his ODI career.
Check their ODI numbers away from home before you stick to your confirmation biases. How are Amla's and Rohit's ODI numbers in Australia?
Rohit's ODI average is 52 at 90+ SR in Australia. Amla is at 47.5 at 84 SR. If you restrict Rohit's numbers to only games played as openers, his numbers in Australia are an astronomical 82.9 at 98 SR. Doesn't seem like a a "FTB" to me.
Both Rohit and Amla have a tendency to disappear when the going gets tough. But Rohit's way more effective as an ODI opener. Amla has the better beard though.
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...orderby=default;template=results;type=batting
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...orderby=default;template=results;type=batting
And Rohit has a combined average of 26 against England, South Africa, New Zealand and Pakistan away/neutral conditions. Make a more intelligent analysis next time.![]()
Are you suggesting that Australia does not curate the flattest pitches these next, alongside India? You need to watch more cricket.
SR of 68, zero centuries and let me tell you this, the numbers don't do justice to the crapfest Rohit puts on when he's batting against anyone not wearing yellow on anything not resembling a highway.
Are you suggesting that England and South Africa don't have some of the flattest pitches in the world?
I'm not claiming Rohit as a GOAT, but your numbers are wrong. He averages 53 in England as opener with an SR of 80.
And Amla's numbers have steadily gotten worse over the last couple of years. If you look at last 3 years of data, Sharma averages 64 at 100 SR while Amla averages 45 at 89 SR. Any unbiased cricket observer will pick Rohit ahead of Amla for ODIs as of right now. The only exception would be if if the games are played in South Africa. Which would make Amla the home bully.
Amla had a couple of really good years in ODIs but that was a couple of years ago already. He is nowhere near the top 5 ODI bats of all time.
And Rohit has a combined average of 26 against England, South Africa, New Zealand and Pakistan away/neutral conditions. Make a more intelligent analysis next time.![]()
Are you suggesting that Australia does not curate the flattest pitches these next, alongside India? You need to watch more cricket.
So why can't Amla score on these flat pitches? The 5th best ODI batter in your opinion shouldn't have a problem scoring on such flat pitches then.
As an opener, here are Rohit's statistics away from home. The only countries he has failed in are Bangladesh, New Zealand and South Africa.
View attachment 76659
Rohit averages 30 in England so I'm not sure where that 50 average was pulled out from.
Anyways, discussing Rohit in this thread is a disrespect for the true greats of the game. He's a joke of a cricketer and he himself knows he's rubbish outside his comfort zone (come to India).
I rate Amla as the second best opener of all time and if anyone disagrees, that is fine. You are welcome to make your list and put Rohit and Sehwag as the openers for all I care.
So in your opinion, Amla is ahead of Greenidge, Hayden, Gilchrist, Ganguly, Warner? Amla is about a Ganguly level player, if that. His numbers benefit massively from the runflation in ODI cricket post 2012.
I rate Amla as the second best opener of all time and if anyone disagrees, that is fine.
I respectfully disagree and I'll list the reasons why.
Amla is brilliant at piling up runs but he doesn't really have any impact innings, a knock where someone would look back and say 'Wow'. He doesn't have a great track record in World Cups, nor does he excel at chasing totals - these are all high-pressure situations.
In an all-time ODI XI, I would probably choose someone like Jayasuriya for his revolutionary style of play. He played some brilliant knocks in World Cups over the years and impacted matches regularly. Plus, he provides a bowling option as well so is arguably one of the greatest overall ODI cricketers ever.
I don't give that much importance to overseas stats in different countries unlike Test cricket. ODIs are a different games and these numbers are only an indicator. Overseas performance in ODIs isn't the ultimate test, that would be World Cups.
Don't want to get in the Amla vs Rohit comparison but I don't really see much that makes them stand out from the competition during the past few years. The likes of Dilshan, Guptill, Dhawan, Warner, Watson, de Kock and others have all put up similar performances since ODI scores rocketed upwards.
Anyways, discussing Rohit in this thread is a disrespect for the true greats of the game. He's a joke of a cricketer and he himself knows he's rubbish outside his comfort zone (come to India).
I rate Amla as the second best opener of all time and if anyone disagrees, that is fine. You are welcome to make your list and put Rohit and Sehwag as the openers for all I care.
Calling a player who hasn't done anything of note in WCs as the best ever since Viv in Odis is an overstatement.
Let's not overhype a player unnecessarily. The guy will get his due itself when he reaches that level.
You got to be an absolute teletubby to have The Motorway King aka Virat Chokeli anywhere near a top 5 in any formatcan't do anything the moment ball deviates and crumbles when his back is against the world, has flopped spectacularly in two ODI finals already so much for the self proclaimed ATG. He is a legend amongst gullible Indians that's about it.
Who says he doesn't? Just not as good as the FTBs because he isn't a FTB
Oh, so that's how you guys are making him look respectable. Bullying weaker teams in England is not an achievement. Against the good bowling attacks I mentioned, he's failed.
Anyways, discussing Rohit in this thread is a disrespect for the true greats of the game. He's a joke of a cricketer and he himself knows he's crap outside his comfort zone (come to India).
I rate Amla as the second best opener of all time and if anyone disagrees, that is fine. You are welcome to make your list and put Rohit and Sehwag as the openers for all I care.
That's just one aspect of the game. Kohli is the only batsman in history who is a top order batsman and a finisher. He has played half the number of games as Ponting yet he has the same number of hundreds.
Kohli is only 28, he still has another 6 years and 2 world cups left. I'm sure he will improve his WC knockouts record.
Mine would be:-
Viv
Tendulkar
Kohli
Ponting
AB